yingweiwo

Acesulfame

Cat No.:V66997 Purity: ≥98%
Acesulfame is an artificial sweetener.
Acesulfame
Acesulfame Chemical Structure CAS No.: 33665-90-6
Product category: Biochemical Assay Reagents
This product is for research use only, not for human use. We do not sell to patients.
Size Price
500mg
1g
Other Sizes

Other Forms of Acesulfame:

  • Acesulfame potassium
Official Supplier of:
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Top Publications Citing lnvivochem Products
Product Description
Acesulfame is an artificial sweetener. Chronic use of acesulfame affects cognitive function, possibly by altering neurometabolic function in mice.
Biological Activity I Assay Protocols (From Reference)
ADME/Pharmacokinetics
Absorption, Distribution and Excretion
/MILK/ Nonnutritive sweeteners (NNS), including saccharin, sucralose, aspartame, and acesulfame-potassium, are commonly consumed in the general population, and all except for saccharin are considered safe for use during pregnancy and lactation. Sucralose (Splenda) currently holds the majority of the NNS market share and is often combined with acesulfame-potassium in a wide variety of foods and beverages. To date, saccharin is the only NNS reported to be found in human breast milk after maternal consumption, while there is no apparent information on the other NNS. Breast milk samples were collected from 20 lactating volunteers, irrespective of their habitual NNS intake. Saccharin, sucralose, and acesulfame-potassium were present in 65% of participants' milk samples, whereas aspartame was not detected. These data indicate that NNS are frequently ingested by nursing infants, and thus prospective clinical studies are necessary to determine whether early NNS exposure via breast milk may have clinical implications. /Acesulfame potassium/
Single oral doses of 10 mg (14)C-Acesulfame K/kg bw given to rats and dogs were rapidly absorbed. Maximum blood levels reached were 0.75 plus or minus 0.2 g/mL in rats, 0.5 hr after dosing, and 6.56 plus or minus 2.08 g/mL in dogs, 1-1.5 hr after dosing. In rats, 82-100% of the dose, and in dogs, 85-100% of the dose was excreted in the urine; in both species, 97-100% of the total radioactivity was excreted in feces, and total recovery approximated 100%. Rats given 10 consecutive daily doses of 10 mg/kg orally did not show evidence of accumulation. Three days after dosing, the concn in the organs and plasma was 0.4 nMol/g in liver, and <0.2 nMol/g in other tissues. Seven days after dosing, the concn in dogs was <0.2 nMol/g in all tissues examined. /Acesulfame K/
After pretreatment for seven days with a diet containing 3% Acesulfame K, male rats were given a dose of 250 mg Acesulfame K containing (14)C-Acesulfame K (9.6 x 108 dpm) by oral gavage. After eight hours the animals were killed and liver and spleen excised; DNA and chromatin protein was isolated from these organs. No radioactivity could be detected on any DNA sample. A low level of activity (8-11 dpm/mg protein) was associated with chromatin protein and this was claimed to be due to non-covalent interactions of unchanged Acesulfame K. /Acesulfame K/
Single oral doses of approximately 15 mg (14)C-Acesulfame K/kg bw were administered to male and female rats which had been pretreated with unlabeled Acesulfame K at a level of 300 mg/kg diet for 60 days. Control animals without pretreatment were also similarly dosed with (14)C-Acesulfame K. In all animals 95.1-98.2% of the dose was recovered in urine and cage washings and 0.95-2.86% in feces. Total recoveries were 96.3-99.2%. Excretion of radioactivity was rapid and displayed biphasic kinetics; 92.6-96.8% of the dose was excreted in 24 hours. ... No significant differences in route or rate of excretion were observed between sexes nor between controls and animals pretreated with Acesulfame K for 60 days. /Acesulfame K/
For more Absorption, Distribution and Excretion (Complete) data for Acesulfame (8 total), please visit the HSDB record page.
Metabolism / Metabolites
The metabolism of Acesulfame K was investigated in the urine and feces of rats and dogs which had received single oral doses of 10 mg/kg bw, and in the urine and bile of pigs dosed orally with 5 mg/kg bw. The analytical methods used (thin-layer chromatography, mass spectrometry and isotope dilution) detected only the original substance in these samples. Separation by TLC of urinary extracts from rats used in the above study revealed only one peak which was identical with Acesulfame K. No metabolites were detected in control or Acesulfame K-pretreated animals. Similarly, no metabolites were detected in animals which had been pretreated with 1% Acesulfame K for 7 days. /Acesulfame K/
The metabolism of Acesulfame K was studied in serum and urine from human volunteers following a single dose of 30 mg/individual. Only the original substance was detected in all samples. /Acesulfame K/
Biological Half-Life
/After/ single oral doses of approximately 15 mg (14)C-Acesulfame K/kg bw were administered to male and female rats which had been pretreated with unlabeled Acesulfame K at a level of 300 mg/kg diet for 60 days; ... the half-life of the rapid phase was 4-4.5 hours and of the slower phase (accounting for <0.5% of the dose) was 109-257 hours. /Acesulfame K/
After iv admin of a single dose of 10 mg (14C)-Acesulfame K/kg bw to rats, the radioactivity was excreted quantitatively in urine and the plasma half-life was 0.23 hr. /Acesulfame K/
In lactating rats given a single oral dose of (14)C-Acesulfame K of about 10.6 mg/kg bw, ...the biological half-lives were similar in milk (5.6 hr) and blood (4 hr). /Acesulfame K/
The purpose of this work was...the determination of acesulfame-K (AcK) in C57BL mouse plasma and urine. Male and female animals were dosed orally (gavage) and intravenously at 10 mg/kg and then plasma and urine collected at up to 24 hours post dose. Plasma samples were analyzed with an HPLC method... and urine was analyzed with a second HPLC method .... Both methods used saccharin as internal standard with detection by UV absorbance at 230 nm. Following IV administration, plasma AcK concentrations declined rapidly and linearly within 120 min and a second AcK peak was observed at 240 minutes. Half-life was estimated to be 11-15 minutes. Plasma concentrations of AcK reached maximal levels within 45 minutes and rapidly declined following oral doses. Plasma AcK were below limits of detection by 480 minutes post dose. A second peak was also observed following oral administration, suggesting enterohepatic recirculation. Following IV and PO administration, 45% (males) and 70% (females) of the dose was excreted in urine by 24 hr. Oral bioavailability was estimated to be 90-100% based on urinary data.
Toxicity/Toxicokinetics
Toxicity Summary
IDENTIFICATION AND USE: Acesulfame (AS) is a solid. It is used as artificial sweetener for food, also used in cosmetics. HUMAN STUDIES: A case study is reported whereby an individual with known sulfite and sulfonamide allergies develops hypersensitivity to taurine above a threshold level as well as to the non-nutritive sweetener acesulfame potassium, compounds that are not normally associated with allergic reactions. In vitro studies suggested that long-term consumption of AS might accelerate atherosclerosis and senescence via impairment of function and structure of apoA-I and HDL. ANIMAL STUDIES: Acesulfame K was non-irritant in a primary dermal irritation test in the rabbit. Acesulfame K showed no antigenic effect and only the guinea pigs sensitized with BSA showed anaphylactic reactions. Acesulfame K was not carcinogenic in mice or rats. A multigeneration study in rats was carried out, in which males and females received Acesulfame K at dietary levels of 0, 0.3, 1.0 and 3.0% for three successive generations, each comprising two consecutive litters. Growth rate was slightly decreased in the top dose group of the F0 and F1 generations, and the mid-dose group of the F0 generation. In the teratogenicity studies, no adverse effects were seen in appearance, food consumption, autopsy of the dams, organ weights, or litter data; no visceral or skeletal abnormalities attributable to the treatment were observed. Acesulfame K was negative in the genotoxicity studies in vivo and in vitro, including Ames tests in S. typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA15325, TA1537, TA1538 at 0-100 mg/plate, 4-5000 ug/plate and in E.Coli WP2uvrA at 4-5000 ug/plate. ECOTOXICITY STUDIES: AS is listed as an emerging contaminant due to its environmental persistence and wide occurrence in the environment. An increased toxicity of AS after UV irradiance was observed in the liver of Carassius auratus exposed to AS and its irradiation products. Embryotoxicity tests showed that AS transformation products at the low g/L level produced significant adverse effects in tail detachment, heart rate, hatching rate and survival rate during fish embryo development.
Effects During Pregnancy and Lactation
◉ Summary of Use during Lactation
Acesulfame has been found in variable concentrations in the breastmilk of nursing mothers who report consuming artificially sweetened beverages and sweetener packets in the past 24 hours. Even some mothers who reported not consuming artificial sweeteners have small amounts of acesulfame in their breastmilk. However, it is not likely to reach an intake greater than the acceptable daily intake for infants. Ingestion of diet drinks containing low-calorie sweeteners might increase the risk of vomiting in breastfed infants. Some authors suggest that women may wish to limit the consumption of nonnutritive sweeteners while breastfeeding because their effect on the nursing infants are unknown.
◉ Effects in Breastfed Infants
A cross-sectional survey assessed the dietary history of US mothers nursing infants between 11 and 15 weeks of age. The survey was used to estimate the amount of diet soda and fruit drinks consumed by the women. There were no statistically significant differences in infants’ weight or z-scores based on low calorie sweetener exposure. However, infants exposed to low calorie sweetener in milk once or less per week had a statistically significantly higher risk of vomiting than those who were not exposed. Greater exposure was not associated with vomiting. It was not possible to assess the effects of specific sweeteners.
◉ Effects on Lactation and Breastmilk
Relevant published information was not found as of the revision date.
Interactions
The ecotoxicity of heavy metals depends much on their speciation, which is influenced by other co-existing substances having chelating capacity. In the present study, the toxic effects of Cd(2+) and Cu(2+) on a green algae Scenedesmus obliquus were examined in the presence of two artificial sweeteners (ASs), acesulfame (ACE) and sucralose (SUC) by comparing the cell specific growth rate mu and pulse-amplitude-modulated (PAM) parameters (maximal photosystem II photochemical efficiency Fv/Fm, actual photochemical efficiency Yield, and non-photochemical quenching NPQ) of the algae over a 96-hr period. Simultaneously, the bioconcentration of the metals by the algal cells in the presence of the ASs was measured. The presence of ACE enhanced the growth of S. obliquus and promoted the bioconcentration of Cd(2+) in S. obliquus, while the impacts of SUC were not significant. Meanwhile, EC50 values of Cd(2+) on the growth of S. obliquus increased from 0.42 mg/L to 0.54 mg/L and 0.48 mg/L with the addition of 1.0 mg/L ACE and SUC, respectively. As for Cu(2+), EC50 values increased from 0.13 mg/L to 0.17 mg/L and 0.15 mg/L with the addition of 1.0 mg/L ACE and SUC, respectively. In summary, the two ASs reduced the toxicity of the metals on the algae, with ACE showing greater effect than SUC. Although not as sensitive as the cell specific growth rate, PAM parameters could disclose the mechanisms involved in metal toxicity at subcellular levels. This study provides the first evidence for the possible impact of ASs on the ecotoxicity of heavy metals.
Swiss Albino male mice were exposed to blends of aspartame (3.5, 35, 350 mg/kg bw) and acesulfame-K (1.5, 15 and 150mg/kg bw) by gavage. Bone marrow cells isolated from femora were analyzed for chromosome aberrations. Statistical analysis of the results show that aspartame in combination with acesulfame-K is not significantly genotoxic. /Acesulfame K/
/The authors/ ... investigated the ability of zinc sulfate (5, 25, 50 mM) to inhibit the sweetness of 12 chemically diverse sweeteners, which were all intensity matched to 300 mM sucrose [800 mM glucose, 475 mM fructose, 3.25 mM aspartame, 3.5 mM saccharin, 12 mM sodium cyclamate, 14 mM acesulfame-K, 1.04 M sorbitol, 0.629 mM sucralose, 0.375 mM neohesperidin dihydrochalcone (NHDC), 1.5 mM stevioside and 0.0163 mM thaumatin]. Zinc sulfate inhibited the sweetness of most compounds in a concentration dependent manner, peaking with 80% inhibition by 50 mM. Curiously, zinc sulfate never inhibited the sweetness of Na-cyclamate. This suggests that Na-cyclamate may access a sweet taste mechanism that is different from the other sweeteners, which were inhibited uniformly (except thaumatin) at every concentration of zinc sulfate. We hypothesize that this set of compounds either accesses a single receptor or multiple receptors that are inhibited equally by zinc sulfate at each concentration.
The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of repeated presentation of the same sweet stimulus on sweetness intensity ratings. The sweet stimuli tested in this study were binary and ternary blends of 14 sweeteners that varied widely in chemical structure. A trained panel evaluated the sweetness intensity over four sips of a given mixture presented at 30 s intervals. The individual components in the binary sweetener combinations were intensity-anchored with 5% sucrose, while the individual sweeteners in the ternary mixtures were intensity-anchored with 3% sucrose .... Each self-mixture was also evaluated (e.g. acesulfame-K-acesulfame-K). The main finding of this study was that mixtures consisting of two or three different sweeteners exhibited less reduction in sweetness intensity over four repeated sips than a single sweetener at an equivalent sweetness level. Furthermore, ternary combinations tended to be slightly more effective than binary combinations at lessening the effect of repeated exposure to a given sweet stimulus. These findings suggest that the decline in sweetness intensity experienced over repeated exposure to a sweet stimulus could be reduced by the blending of sweeteners.
Human bitter taste is mediated by the hTAS2R family of G protein-coupled receptors. ... /This study/ employed a high-throughput screening approach to discover a novel bitter receptor antagonist (GIV3727) that inhibits activation of hTAS2R31 (formerly hTAS2R44) by saccharin and acesulfame K, two common artificial sweeteners. Pharmacological analyses revealed that GIV3727 likely act/ed/ as an orthosteric, insurmountable antagonist of hTAS2R31. Surprisingly, ... /it was/ also found that this compound could inhibit five additional hTAS2Rs, including the closely related receptor hTAS2R43. Molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis studies suggest/ed/ that two residues in helix 7 are important for antagonist activity in hTAS2R31 and hTAS2R43. In human sensory trials, GIV3727 significantly reduced the bitterness associated with the two sulfonamide sweeteners, indicating that hTAS2R antagonists ... /were/ active in vivo.
Non-Human Toxicity Values
LD50 Rat oral 7431 mg/kg /Acesulfame K/
LD50 Rat ip 2243 mg/kg /Acesulfame K/
References
[1]. BioCong WN, et al. Long-term artificial sweetener acesulfame potassium treatment alters neurometabolic functions in C57BL/6J mice. PLoS One. 2013 Aug 7;8(8):e70257.chemical Assay Reagents
Additional Infomation
Acesulfame is a sulfamate ester that is 1,2,3-oxathiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide substituted by a methyl group at position 6. It has a role as a xenobiotic, an environmental contaminant and a sweetening agent. It is a sulfamate ester, an organonitrogen heterocyclic compound, an oxacycle and an organic heteromonocyclic compound.
These protocols are for reference only. InvivoChem does not independently validate these methods.
Physicochemical Properties
Molecular Formula
C4H5NO4S
Molecular Weight
163.15
Exact Mass
162.993
CAS #
33665-90-6
Related CAS #
Acesulfame potassium;55589-62-3
PubChem CID
36573
Appearance
Needles from benzene or chloroform
Density
1.7±0.1 g/cm3
Boiling Point
332.7±25.0 °C at 760 mmHg
Melting Point
123.2 °C
MP: 225 °C /Acesulfame potatssium/
123 - 123.5 °C
Flash Point
155.0±23.2 °C
Vapour Pressure
0.0±1.6 mmHg at 25°C
Index of Refraction
1.609
LogP
-0.31
Hydrogen Bond Donor Count
1
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count
4
Rotatable Bond Count
0
Heavy Atom Count
10
Complexity
283
Defined Atom Stereocenter Count
0
SMILES
[K+].CC1=CC(=O)N=S(=O)([O-])O1
InChi Key
YGCFIWIQZPHFLU-UHFFFAOYSA-N
InChi Code
InChI=1S/C4H5NO4S/c1-3-2-4(6)5-10(7,8)9-3/h2H,1H3,(H,5,6)
Chemical Name
6-methyl-2,2-dioxooxathiazin-4-one
HS Tariff Code
2934.99.9001
Storage

Powder      -20°C    3 years

                     4°C     2 years

In solvent   -80°C    6 months

                  -20°C    1 month

Shipping Condition
Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)
Solubility Data
Solubility (In Vitro)
May dissolve in DMSO (in most cases), if not, try other solvents such as H2O, Ethanol, or DMF with a minute amount of products to avoid loss of samples
Solubility (In Vivo)
Note: Listed below are some common formulations that may be used to formulate products with low water solubility (e.g. < 1 mg/mL), you may test these formulations using a minute amount of products to avoid loss of samples.

Injection Formulations
(e.g. IP/IV/IM/SC)
Injection Formulation 1: DMSO : Tween 80: Saline = 10 : 5 : 85 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO stock solution 50 μL Tween 80 850 μL Saline)
*Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH ₂ O to obtain a clear solution.
Injection Formulation 2: DMSO : PEG300Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO 400 μLPEG300 50 μL Tween 80 450 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 3: DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO 900 μL Corn oil)
Example: Take the Injection Formulation 3 (DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90) as an example, if 1 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can take 100 μL 25 mg/mL DMSO stock solution and add to 900 μL corn oil, mix well to obtain a clear or suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals).
View More

Injection Formulation 4: DMSO : 20% SBE-β-CD in saline = 10 : 90 [i.e. 100 μL DMSO 900 μL (20% SBE-β-CD in saline)]
*Preparation of 20% SBE-β-CD in Saline (4°C,1 week): Dissolve 2 g SBE-β-CD in 10 mL saline to obtain a clear solution.
Injection Formulation 5: 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin : Saline = 50 : 50 (i.e. 500 μL 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin 500 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 6: DMSO : PEG300 : castor oil : Saline = 5 : 10 : 20 : 65 (i.e. 50 μL DMSO 100 μLPEG300 200 μL castor oil 650 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 7: Ethanol : Cremophor : Saline = 10: 10 : 80 (i.e. 100 μL Ethanol 100 μL Cremophor 800 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 8: Dissolve in Cremophor/Ethanol (50 : 50), then diluted by Saline
Injection Formulation 9: EtOH : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH 900 μL Corn oil)
Injection Formulation 10: EtOH : PEG300Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH 400 μLPEG300 50 μL Tween 80 450 μL Saline)


Oral Formulations
Oral Formulation 1: Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na (carboxymethylcellulose sodium)
Oral Formulation 2: Suspend in 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Example: Take the Oral Formulation 1 (Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na) as an example, if 100 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can first prepare 0.5% CMC Na solution by measuring 0.5 g CMC Na and dissolve it in 100 mL ddH2O to obtain a clear solution; then add 250 mg of the product to 100 mL 0.5% CMC Na solution, to make the suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals).
View More

Oral Formulation 3: Dissolved in PEG400
Oral Formulation 4: Suspend in 0.2% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Oral Formulation 5: Dissolve in 0.25% Tween 80 and 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Oral Formulation 6: Mixing with food powders


Note: Please be aware that the above formulations are for reference only. InvivoChem strongly recommends customers to read literature methods/protocols carefully before determining which formulation you should use for in vivo studies, as different compounds have different solubility properties and have to be formulated differently.

 (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.)
Preparing Stock Solutions 1 mg 5 mg 10 mg
1 mM 6.1293 mL 30.6466 mL 61.2933 mL
5 mM 1.2259 mL 6.1293 mL 12.2587 mL
10 mM 0.6129 mL 3.0647 mL 6.1293 mL

*Note: Please select an appropriate solvent for the preparation of stock solution based on your experiment needs. For most products, DMSO can be used for preparing stock solutions (e.g. 5 mM, 10 mM, or 20 mM concentration); some products with high aqueous solubility may be dissolved in water directly. Solubility information is available at the above Solubility Data section. Once the stock solution is prepared, aliquot it to routine usage volumes and store at -20°C or -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze and thaw cycles.

Calculator

Molarity Calculator allows you to calculate the mass, volume, and/or concentration required for a solution, as detailed below:

  • Calculate the Mass of a compound required to prepare a solution of known volume and concentration
  • Calculate the Volume of solution required to dissolve a compound of known mass to a desired concentration
  • Calculate the Concentration of a solution resulting from a known mass of compound in a specific volume
An example of molarity calculation using the molarity calculator is shown below:
What is the mass of compound required to make a 10 mM stock solution in 5 ml of DMSO given that the molecular weight of the compound is 350.26 g/mol?
  • Enter 350.26 in the Molecular Weight (MW) box
  • Enter 10 in the Concentration box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 5 in the Volume box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 17.513 mg appears in the Mass box. In a similar way, you may calculate the volume and concentration.

Dilution Calculator allows you to calculate how to dilute a stock solution of known concentrations. For example, you may Enter C1, C2 & V2 to calculate V1, as detailed below:

What volume of a given 10 mM stock solution is required to make 25 ml of a 25 μM solution?
Using the equation C1V1 = C2V2, where C1=10 mM, C2=25 μM, V2=25 ml and V1 is the unknown:
  • Enter 10 into the Concentration (Start) box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Concentration (End) box and select the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Volume (End) box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 62.5 μL (0.1 ml) appears in the Volume (Start) box
g/mol

Molecular Weight Calculator allows you to calculate the molar mass and elemental composition of a compound, as detailed below:

Note: Chemical formula is case sensitive: C12H18N3O4  c12h18n3o4
Instructions to calculate molar mass (molecular weight) of a chemical compound:
  • To calculate molar mass of a chemical compound, please enter the chemical/molecular formula and click the “Calculate’ button.
Definitions of molecular mass, molecular weight, molar mass and molar weight:
  • Molecular mass (or molecular weight) is the mass of one molecule of a substance and is expressed in the unified atomic mass units (u). (1 u is equal to 1/12 the mass of one atom of carbon-12)
  • Molar mass (molar weight) is the mass of one mole of a substance and is expressed in g/mol.
/

Reconstitution Calculator allows you to calculate the volume of solvent required to reconstitute your vial.

  • Enter the mass of the reagent and the desired reconstitution concentration as well as the correct units
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer appears in the Volume (to add to vial) box
In vivo Formulation Calculator (Clear solution)
Step 1: Enter information below (Recommended: An additional animal to make allowance for loss during the experiment)
Step 2: Enter in vivo formulation (This is only a calculator, not the exact formulation for a specific product. Please contact us first if there is no in vivo formulation in the solubility section.)
+
+
+

Calculation results

Working concentration mg/mL;

Method for preparing DMSO stock solution mg drug pre-dissolved in μL DMSO (stock solution concentration mg/mL). Please contact us first if the concentration exceeds the DMSO solubility of the batch of drug.

Method for preparing in vivo formulation:Take μL DMSO stock solution, next add μL PEG300, mix and clarify, next addμL Tween 80, mix and clarify, next add μL ddH2O,mix and clarify.

(1) Please be sure that the solution is clear before the addition of next solvent. Dissolution methods like vortex, ultrasound or warming and heat may be used to aid dissolving.
             (2) Be sure to add the solvent(s) in order.

Contact Us