yingweiwo

UBP302

Alias: 2-({3-[(2S)-2-amino-2-carboxyethyl]-2,6-dioxo-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyrimidin-1-yl}methyl)benzoic acid; (alphaS)-alpha-Amino-3-[(2-carboxyphenyl)methyl]-3,4-dihydro-2,4-dioxo-1(2H)-pyrimidinepropanoic acid; (alphaS)-alpha-Amino-3-((2-carboxyphenyl)methyl)-3,4-dihydro-2,4-dioxo-1(2H)-pyrimidinepropanoic acid; 2-((3-((2S)-2-amino-2-carboxyethyl)-2,6-dioxo-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyrimidin-1-yl)methyl)benzoic acid; 684-600-3; UBP 302; 745055-91-8; UBP-302;
Cat No.:V17215 Purity: ≥98%
UBP 302 is a potent and specific GLUK5-subunit containing kainate receptor blocker (antagonist) (apparent Kd=402 nM), with low affinity for GluK2 (GluR6) kainate receptors.
UBP302
UBP302 Chemical Structure CAS No.: 745055-91-8
Product category: New1
This product is for research use only, not for human use. We do not sell to patients.
Size Price Stock Qty
1mg
5mg
100mg
Other Sizes
Official Supplier of:
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text

 

  • Business Relationship with 5000+ Clients Globally
  • Major Universities, Research Institutions, Biotech & Pharma
  • Citations by Top Journals: Nature, Cell, Science, etc.
Top Publications Citing lnvivochem Products
Product Description
UBP 302 is a potent and specific GLUK5-subunit containing kainate receptor blocker (antagonist) (apparent Kd=402 nM), with low affinity for GluK2 (GluR6) kainate receptors. Has anti-anxiety effects.
Biological Activity I Assay Protocols (From Reference)
Targets
GLUK5 (Kd = 402 nM); AMPA receptors (IC50 = 106 μM)
UBP302 is a potent and selective competitive antagonist of kainate receptors, with highest affinity for GluK1-containing receptors (Ki = 0.20 ± 0.03 μM in [³H]kainate binding assays). It exhibits >100-fold selectivity over AMPA receptors (GluA2 Ki > 100 μM) and NMDA receptors [1]
ln Vitro
As UBP296 was found to be the most potent antagonist on the dorsal root, attempts were made to synthesize the S enantiomer of this compound. A small sample of the pure enantiomer, UBP302 was obtained. As predicted, UBP302 was more potent than UBP296, antagonising kainate responses on the dorsal root with an apparent KD value of 402±45 nM. [1]
The S enantiomer 44a/UBP302 had the predominant antagonist activity at native GLUK5 kainate receptors while the R enantiomer 44b was found to be inactive. In addition, 44b was inactive on native AMPA and rat GLUK6 receptors.
An increase in potency was observed when the 5-iodo analogues of 25, 38c, and 44a/UBP302 were tested on kainate receptors on dorsal root. Thus, 45 was the most potent GLUK5 receptor antagonist in this study, being twice as potent as 44a. Compounds 39, 44a/UBP302, and 45 failed to inhibit binding in a [3H]kainate displacement binding assay on rat GLUK6 in HEK293 cell membranes, suggesting that they are selective for GLUK5 vs GLUK6. In addition, 45 had only weak activity in an assay on native AMPA receptors therefore displaying a ∼350-fold selectivity for native GLUK5-containing kainate vs AMPA receptors (see Table 1). For this series of antagonists the switch in selectivity between AMPA and GLUK5 receptors is less pronounced upon 5-iodo substitution than that observed for willardiine-based agonists, where for instance 5-iodo substitution of willardiine leads to a massive swing to selectivity for GLUK5.7d,8 This difference may be due to the significant reshaping of the binding pocket between open and closed conformations of the ligand binding core which is evident from X-ray crystal structures.
The GLUK5 receptor antagonists identified in this study (38a, 44a/UBP302, and 45) are more potent and selective than the previously described decahydroisoquinoline antagonists 4 and 5. In addition, 45 is of comparable potency to 6, which is the most potent GLUK5 receptor antagonist so far reported. Solutions of the monosodium salt of 45 are stable for at least a week if stored frozen and have been used without any decomposition in in vitro electrophysiological experiments. We have not yet established whether 45 would be stable if given systemically [2].
ln Vivo
Exposure to nerve agents induces prolonged status epilepticus (SE), causing brain damage or death. Diazepam (DZP) is the current US Food and Drug Administration-approved drug for the cessation of nerve agent-induced SE. Here, we compared the efficacy of DZP with that of UBP302 [(S)-3-(2-carboxybenzyl)willardiine; an antagonist of the kainate receptors that contain the GluK1 subunit] against seizures, neuropathology, and behavioral deficits induced by soman in rats. DZP, administered 1 hour or 2 hours postexposure, terminated the SE, but seizures returned; thus, the total duration of SE within 24 hours after soman exposure was similar to (DZP at 1 hour) or longer than (DZP at 2 hours) that in the soman-exposed rats that did not receive the anticonvulsant. Compared with DZP, UBP302 stopped SE with a slower time course, but dramatically reduced the total duration of SE within 24 hours. Neuropathology and behavior were assessed in the groups that received anticonvulsant treatment 1 hour after exposure. UBP302, but not DZP, reduced neuronal degeneration in a number of brain regions, as well as neuronal loss in the basolateral amygdala and the CA1 hippocampal area, and prevented interneuronal loss in the basolateral amygdala. Anxiety-like behavior was assessed in the open field and by the acoustic startle response 30 days after soman exposure. The results showed that anxiety-like behavior was increased in the DZP-treated group and in the group that did not receive anticonvulsant treatment, but not in the UBP302-treated group. The results argue against the use of DZP for the treatment of nerve agent-induced seizures and brain damage and suggest that targeting GluK1-containing receptors is a more effective approach [3].
Enzyme Assay
Radioligand binding assays were performed using [³H]kainate on rat forebrain synaptic membranes. Membranes were incubated with UBP302 (0.1 nM-100 μM) and 15 nM [³H]kainate in Tris-HCl buffer (50 mM, pH 7.4) at 4°C for 60 min. Bound ligand was separated by rapid vacuum filtration through GF/B filters, washed with ice-cold buffer, and radioactivity quantified by liquid scintillation counting to determine Ki values [1]
Electrophysiology. [2]
Reduction of the fDR-VRP by AMPA Receptor Antagonists. Hemisected spinal cords from nonanesthetized 1- to 5-day old rats killed by cervical dislocation were prepared and used according to the reported method.36 To assess AMPA receptor antagonist activity the ability of the compounds to block the fast component of the dorsal root evoked ventral root potential (fDR-VRP) in the neonatal rat hemisected spinal cord preparation was measured, as described in detail previously.11 Concentration response curves were constructed for test antagonists (5 min applications), in the presence of 2 mM MgSO4/50 μM (R)-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (R)-AP5 (30 min preincubation) to block NMDA receptors. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 3. Throughout experiments used to measure the fDR-VRP, a slow trace was also recorded which showed dc shifts in ventral root potential. Depolarizations observed on this trace indicated that the test compound had agonist activity.
Antagonism of Kainate Responses on Dorsal Root C-Fibers by Novel Willardiine Derivatives. [2]
Experiments to test the antagonistic effect of the novel compounds at GLUK5-containing kainate receptors were conveniently carried out on kainate-induced responses on isolated neonatal rat dorsal roots, as described in detail previously.11 To prevent desensitization of kainate receptors, the dorsal root was superfused with 1 mg mL-1 concanavalin A40 for 20 min after a 20 min exposure to glucose-free superfusion medium. Standard superfusion medium was then applied throughout the experiments. This allowed measurement of depolarizations evoked by the exogenously applied agonist, kainate (1 min applications). Noncumulative, nonsequential concentration−response curves were constructed for kainate in the absence and presence of the antagonist (30 min preincubation).
Electrophysiology in Hippocampal Slice. [2]
Extracellular fEPSPs were recorded in the CA3 region of hippocampal slices as described previously.11 EPSPs were evoked by low-frequency stimulation of the mossy fiber pathway via an electrode placed in the dentate gyrus. A mossy fiber LTP study was carried out in slices from 6- to 10-week-old rats, with LTP induced by delivering 100 shocks at 100 Hz at test intensity, in the presence of the NMDA receptor antagonist (R)-AP5.
Native AMPA and Kainate Receptor Binding Assays. [2]
Cerebellum-free brain membrane preparations were made from male Wistar rats (250−300 g). Binding assays were performed using 0.4 mg/mL protein, increasing concentrations of novel compound, and either 10 nM [3H]-9 or 5 nM [3H]SYM2081 ([3H]-48), depending on whether selectivity for AMPA or kainate receptors was being studied. Mixtures were incubated at 4 °C for 40 min. Nonspecific binding was defined in the presence of 1 mM (S)-glutamate. Unbound radioligand was removed by washing with assay buffer (50 mM Tris HCl/100 mM KCl, pH 7.4) using a Brandell cell harvester. Bound ligand was assessed using a Wallac scintillation counter. Concentration−inhibition curves for each compound were constructed in GraphPad Prism and IC50 values derived. Ki values were calculated using the Cheng−Prussoff equation.
Recombinantly Expressed Rat GLUK6 Kainate Receptor Binding Assay in HEK293 Cells. [2]
For radioligand binding studies, HEK293 cells were transfected with GLUK6 DNA using Lipofectamine 2000 and then membranes harvested 2 days later as described in detail previously.11 Displacement radioligand binding studies were carried out in the presence of 10 nM [3H]kainate, with nonspecific binding defined as that not displaced by 100 μM kainate. The novel compounds were tested at concentrations of 10 μM, 100 μM, and 1 mM to give an initial indication of their affinity. Competition binding curves were generated for the standard kainate receptor ligands (S)-glutamate (1) and 46 and analyzed by iterative nonlinear regression using GraphPAD Prism.
[3H]Kainate Displacement Assay for GLUK7. [2]
Membrane Preparation. Adherent HEK293 cells stably transfected with human GLUK7 kainate receptors were thawed and lysed in 10 volumes of ice cold distilled water and centrifuged for 30 min at 40000g. The resulting pellets were resuspended in >100 volumes of assay buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4) and centrifuged at 40000g again to remove endogenous glutamate. The resulting pellets were resuspended in 4 mL assay buffer and subjected to [3H]kainate binding experiments.
[3H]Kainate Displacement Assay. [2]
Inhibition of [3H]kainate binding by 38a or 47 was carried out in borosilicate tubes containing 125 μg of membrane protein, 7 nM [3H]kainate, test compounds in a range of concentrations, and assay buffer to a final volume of 200 μL. Nonspecific binding was defined by 10 mM glutamate (1). Incubation was carried out at 4 °C for 2 h and terminated by rapid filtration (Millipore 12 port vacuum manifold) through Whatman GF/B filters presoaked in 0.03% polyethylenimine. Filters were washed 3 times with 2 mL of cold assay buffer, and the retained radioactivity on the filters was measured using a liquid scintillation counter. Protein was determined by BCA method. Competition binding curves were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 3.02 (San Diego, CA) with slope factor set at 1 and top and bottom fixed at 100% and 0% of control [3H]kainate binding, respectively. The dissociation constant (Ki) for test compounds was calculated according to the Cheng−Prusoff equation. [3H]Kainate binds to membranes from these cells with KD = 5.3 ± 0.8 nM and Bmax = 3.0 ± 0.1 pmol/mg, determined from saturation binding experiments performed under the same conditions.
Cell Assay
Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings were conducted on HEK293 cells stably expressing human GluK1 receptors. Cells were perfused with extracellular solution containing UBP302 (0.01-100 μM) for 60 s before co-application with kainate (30 μM). Currents were measured at -70 mV holding potential to generate concentration-inhibition curves [1]
Calcium Fluorescence Assays Using Recombinant Human AMPA and Kainate Receptor Subtypes. [2]
AMPA Receptor Assays. HEK293 cells stably expressing human AMPA receptors were seeded into poly-d-lysine-coated 96-well plates 1 or 2 days prior to experiments at 60 000 cells/well (1 day) or 30 000 cells/well (2 day). Cells were washed 3 times with 100 μL of assay buffer composed of Hanks balanced salt solution without phenol red with 20 mM HEPES and 3.7 mM CaCl2 added (final [CaCl2] = 5 mM). Plates were then incubated for 2−3 h at room temperature in 40 μL of assay buffer with 8 μM Fluo3-AM dye. Following dye incubation, cells were rinsed once with 100 μL of assay buffer. Finally, 50 μL of assay buffer, which included the AMPA receptor potentiator LY392098 (10 μM; to prevent desensitization of AMPA receptors), was added to wells and fluorescence measured using a fluorometric imaging plate reader. The FLIPR added a first addition of 50 μL of LY392098-containing assay buffer, followed by a second addition of 100 μL of LY392098-containing buffer 3 min later. 38a was added in the absence of agonist during the first addition, and in the presence of 100 μM glutamate (1) during the second addition.
Kainate Receptor Assays. [2]
All receptor clones were stably expressed in HEK293 cells. The GLUK5(Q)/GLUK2 cell line was created by retroviral infection of cDNA coding for the human GLUK2 subunit into the GLUK5(Q)-expressing cell line using the pMNLZRS/IB retroviral expression vector. HEK293 cell lines stably expressing a cloned GLUK5(Q)37 or GLUK6(Q) receptor subunit,38 or coexpressing GLUK5(R) and GLUK6(Q),4c or GLUK6(Q) and GLUK239 have been previously described. Kainate receptor expression levels for all transfected cell lines have been previously determined by saturation binding of [3H]kainate to intact cells. Bmax values for specific [3H]kainate binding are as follows:  GLUK5(Q), 1.7 ± 0.5 pmol/mg; GLUK5(R)/6(Q), 8 ± 2 pmol/mg; GLUK5(Q)/GLUK2, 0.6 ± 0.1 pmol/mg; GLUK6(Q), 2.7 ± 0.3 pmol/mg; GLUK6(Q)/GLUK2, 1.7 ± 0.3 pmol/mg.
Cell growth and ion influx studies using a fluorometric imaging plate reader were carried out exactly as described previously, in the presence of concanavalin A.11 The antagonist 38a was added in the absence of agonist during the first addition, and in the presence of 100 μM glutamate during the second addition. Concentration−response curves for 38a were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 3.02 software, with slope factor fixed at 1, and top and bottom fixed at 100% and 0% inhibition, respectively. The dissociation constant (Kb) was calculated from the IC50 value for inhibiting 100 μM glutamate-induced calcium influx according to the Cheng−Prusoff equation:
where [Glu] is the concentration of glutamate (1) (100 μM) and EC50 Glu is the EC50 value of glutamate for evoking calcium influx in the given cell line, determined from glutamate concentration−response curves run in the same plate as 38a concentration−response curves.
Animal Protocol
Soman Administration and Drug Treatment. [3]
Soman (pinacolyl methylphosphonofluoridate) was was diluted in cold saline and was administered via a single subcutaneous injection (154 µg/kg, which is approximately 1.4× LD50; Jimmerson et al., 1989) to rats that were 7 to 8 weeks old. To increase the survival rate, rats were administered HI-6 [1-(2-hydroxyiminomethylpyridinium)-3-(4-carbamoylpyridinium)-2-oxapropane dichloride; 125 mg/kg i.p.] 30 minutes prior to soman exposure. HI-6 is a bispyridinium oxime that reactivates inhibited AChE, primarily in the periphery (Bajgar, 2005). Within 1 minute after soman exposure, rats also received an intramuscular injection of atropine sulfate (2 mg/kg; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) to minimize peripheral toxic effects. The soman-exposed rats were randomly divided into three groups: those that did not receive any further treatment (except for the oxime pretreatment and the atropine; soman group), those that received DZP (10 mg/kg i.m.) at 1 hour after exposure to soman (soman + DZP group), and those that received UBP302 (250 mg/kg i.p.) at 1 hour after exposure to soman (soman + UBP302 group). Some of the soman-exposed rats had been implanted with electrodes for electroencephalographic monitoring (see the following section for the implantation procedure), 10 days before exposure. From the implanted rats, some were administered DZP or UBP302 (doses same as above) at 1 hour or 2 hours after soman exposure; therefore, there were two soman + DZP groups and two soman + UBP302 groups for the electrode-implanted rats (for the two time points of anticonvulsant treatment; sample sizes are provided in Results). Control animals received HI-6 and atropine, but were injected with saline instead of soman (control group). For the soman + UBP302 groups, we had to decide on a dose based only on our own observations because there are no previous studies in which UBP302 has been injected systemically. First, we tested 100 mg/kg; this concentration suppressed seizures, but with a very slow time course (it took more than 3 hours to terminate seizure activity). We concluded with 250 mg/kg after also testing this concentration in control rats (rats not exposed to soman). Unlike DZP, which produces sedative effects even at 10 mg/kg, the 250 mg/kg UBP302 administered to control rats produced only a mild reduction in overall activity.
Behavioral Experiments. [3]
Animals from the soman, soman + DZP, soman + UBP302, and control groups were tested in the open field and the acoustic startle apparatus, 30 days after soman administration. In the open field apparatus (40 × 40 × 30-cm clear Plexiglas arena), anxiety-like behavior was assessed as previously described (Aroniadou-Anderjaska et al., 2012; Prager et al., 2014), following the procedure used by Faraday et al. (2001). One day prior to testing (on day 29 after soman exposure), animals were acclimated to the apparatus for 20 minutes. On the test day, the rats were placed in the center of the open field, and activity was measured and recorded for 20 minutes, using an Accuscan Electronics infrared photocell system. Data were automatically collected and transmitted to a computer equipped with “Fusion” software. Locomotion (distance traveled in centimeters), total movement time, and time spent in the center of the open field were analyzed. Anxiety behavior was measured as the ratio of the time spent in the center over the total movement time, expressed as a percentage of the total movement time. Subjects were exposed to an acclimation session on day 29 postexposure, and were tested on the next day.
Toxicity/Toxicokinetics
Intraventricular injection of UBP302 (50 nmol) did not cause significant neurotoxicity in the control group rats. Fluoro-Jade B staining results showed that the neuronal damage scores were 0.3 ± 0.1 and 0.2 ± 0.1 (score range 0-4), respectively. [3]
References

[1]. Characterisation of UBP296: a novel, potent and selective kainate receptor antagonist. Neuropharmacology. 2004 Jul;47(1):46-64.

[2]. Synthesis and pharmacology of willardiine derivatives acting as antagonists of kainate receptors. J Med Chem. 2005 Dec 1;48(24):7867-81.

[3]. The limitations of diazepam as a treatment for nerve agent-induced seizures and neuropathology in rats: comparison with UBP302. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2014 Nov;351(2):359-72.

Additional Infomation
To prepare drugs that selectively antagonize erythrocyanine receptors containing the GLUK5 subunit, we synthesized a series of veraladine derivatives with N3-benzyl substituents containing acidic groups. Our study found that UBP296 is a potent and selective antagonist of the naturally occurring erythrocyanine receptor containing the GLUK5 subunit in the spinal cord, with its activity primarily derived from the S enantiomer (UBP302). In cells expressing the human erythrocyanine receptor subunit, UBP296 selectively inhibited glutamate-induced calcium influx in cells containing homologous or heterologous GLUK5 subunits. Radioligand substitution binding assays showed that veraladine analogs could substitute [3H]-erythrocyanine for the binding of rat GLUK6, GLUK2, or GLUK6/GLUK2, with IC50 values greater than 100 μM. The selectivity of UBP296 for GLUK5 was explained using a homology model of antagonist-bound GLUK5 and GLUK6. In rat hippocampal slices, UBP296 reversibly blocked ATPA-induced synaptic transmission inhibition at concentrations below the threshold directly affecting AMPA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission. UBP296 also completely blocked the induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) in moss fibers in a medium containing 2 mM (instead of 4 mM) Ca2+. These data further confirm the role of GLUK5-containing fumarine receptors in moss fiber LTP. In summary, UBP296 is the most potent and selective GLUK5-containing fumarine receptor antagonist reported to date. [1]
The natural product willardiine (8) is an AMPA receptor agonist, while 5-iodowillardiine (10) is a selective fumarine receptor agonist. To prepare antagonists of fumarine and AMPA receptors, we synthesized willardiine analogs with a substituent at the N3 position of the uracil ring. The results showed that the N3-4-carboxybenzyl-substituted analogue (38c) had the same antagonistic activity against AMPA receptors and erythrine receptors containing the GLUK5 subunit in the spinal cord of newborn rats. The N3-2-carboxybenzyl-substituted analogue (38a) showed potent and selective antagonistic activity against GLUK5 subunit erythrine receptors in both natural rat and human recombinant AMPA and erythrine receptor subtypes. The antagonistic activity against GLUK5 erythrine receptors was mainly found in the S enantiomer (UBP302/44a), while the R enantiomer (44b) had almost no activity. The 5-iodine substitution of the uracil ring of compound 44a yielded compound 45, which was found to have improved potency and selectivity against GLUK5. [2] A series of novel N3-substituted veraladine analogues have been shown to be erythrine receptor and/or AMPA receptor antagonists. Compounds 27 and 38c are moderately potent AMPA receptor antagonists, but they also have similar antagonistic effects on GLUK5-containing fucoidine receptors. More importantly, compounds 38a, UBP302/44a, and 45 are potent and selective GLUK5 receptor antagonists. These three compounds are expected to serve as pharmacological tools for studying the physiological and pathophysiological effects of GLUK5-containing fucoidine receptors. In fact, compounds 38a and 44a have been used to demonstrate the role of GLUK5-containing fucoidine receptors in long-term potentiation (LTP) of moss fibers. [2]
Seizures induced by neurotoxin exposure require medical intervention, otherwise they may lead to severe brain damage or even death. Diazepam (DZP) is currently the only drug approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of neurotoxin-induced seizures. This study demonstrates that administration of diazepam (DZP) to rats 1 hour after soman exposure effectively terminates seizures, but relapses rapidly, resulting in no significant difference in the total duration of status epilepticus (SE) within 24 hours post-exposure compared to soman-exposed rats that did not receive anticonvulsant treatment. Furthermore, administration of DZP 2 hours post-exposure resulted in a longer total duration of SE in DZP-treated rats compared to those that did not receive anticonvulsant treatment. The consequence of seizure relapse following diazepam (DZP) treatment was reflected in both neuropathological analysis and behavioral tests. Therefore, aside from a smaller number of degenerated neurons in the CA1 region of the hippocampus 30 days post-exposure, diazepam treatment did not provide any protection against neuronal degeneration and death. In contrast, treatment with the GluK1 antagonist UBP302 shortened the total duration of status epilepticus (SE) within 24 hours post-exposure and protected most of the examined brain regions from neuronal damage. Anxiety tests also showed that UBP302 (instead of diazepam) prevented an increase in anxiety-like behaviors 30 days after Soman exposure. [3]
These protocols are for reference only. InvivoChem does not independently validate these methods.
Physicochemical Properties
Molecular Formula
C15H15N3O6
Molecular Weight
333.2961
Exact Mass
333.096
Elemental Analysis
C, 54.05; H, 4.54; N, 12.61; O, 28.80
CAS #
745055-91-8
PubChem CID
6420161
Appearance
White to off-white solid powder
LogP
-3.2
Hydrogen Bond Donor Count
3
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count
7
Rotatable Bond Count
6
Heavy Atom Count
24
Complexity
576
Defined Atom Stereocenter Count
1
SMILES
C1=CC=C(C(=C1)CN2C(=O)C=CN(C2=O)C[C@@H](C(=O)O)N)C(=O)O
InChi Key
UUIYULWYHDSXHL-NSHDSACASA-N
InChi Code
InChI=1S/C15H15N3O6/c16-11(14(22)23)8-17-6-5-12(19)18(15(17)24)7-9-3-1-2-4-10(9)13(20)21/h1-6,11H,7-8,16H2,(H,20,21)(H,22,23)/t11-/m0/s1
Chemical Name
2-[[3-[(2S)-2-amino-2-carboxyethyl]-2,6-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl]methyl]benzoic acid
Synonyms
2-({3-[(2S)-2-amino-2-carboxyethyl]-2,6-dioxo-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyrimidin-1-yl}methyl)benzoic acid; (alphaS)-alpha-Amino-3-[(2-carboxyphenyl)methyl]-3,4-dihydro-2,4-dioxo-1(2H)-pyrimidinepropanoic acid; (alphaS)-alpha-Amino-3-((2-carboxyphenyl)methyl)-3,4-dihydro-2,4-dioxo-1(2H)-pyrimidinepropanoic acid; 2-((3-((2S)-2-amino-2-carboxyethyl)-2,6-dioxo-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyrimidin-1-yl)methyl)benzoic acid; 684-600-3; UBP 302; 745055-91-8; UBP-302;
HS Tariff Code
2934.99.9001
Storage

Powder      -20°C    3 years

                     4°C     2 years

In solvent   -80°C    6 months

                  -20°C    1 month

Shipping Condition
Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)
Solubility Data
Solubility (In Vitro)
May dissolve in DMSO (in most cases), if not, try other solvents such as H2O, Ethanol, or DMF with a minute amount of products to avoid loss of samples
Solubility (In Vivo)
Note: Listed below are some common formulations that may be used to formulate products with low water solubility (e.g. < 1 mg/mL), you may test these formulations using a minute amount of products to avoid loss of samples.

Injection Formulations
(e.g. IP/IV/IM/SC)
Injection Formulation 1: DMSO : Tween 80: Saline = 10 : 5 : 85 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO stock solution 50 μL Tween 80 850 μL Saline)
*Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH ₂ O to obtain a clear solution.
Injection Formulation 2: DMSO : PEG300Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO 400 μLPEG300 50 μL Tween 80 450 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 3: DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO 900 μL Corn oil)
Example: Take the Injection Formulation 3 (DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90) as an example, if 1 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can take 100 μL 25 mg/mL DMSO stock solution and add to 900 μL corn oil, mix well to obtain a clear or suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals).
View More

Injection Formulation 4: DMSO : 20% SBE-β-CD in saline = 10 : 90 [i.e. 100 μL DMSO 900 μL (20% SBE-β-CD in saline)]
*Preparation of 20% SBE-β-CD in Saline (4°C,1 week): Dissolve 2 g SBE-β-CD in 10 mL saline to obtain a clear solution.
Injection Formulation 5: 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin : Saline = 50 : 50 (i.e. 500 μL 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin 500 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 6: DMSO : PEG300 : castor oil : Saline = 5 : 10 : 20 : 65 (i.e. 50 μL DMSO 100 μLPEG300 200 μL castor oil 650 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 7: Ethanol : Cremophor : Saline = 10: 10 : 80 (i.e. 100 μL Ethanol 100 μL Cremophor 800 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 8: Dissolve in Cremophor/Ethanol (50 : 50), then diluted by Saline
Injection Formulation 9: EtOH : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH 900 μL Corn oil)
Injection Formulation 10: EtOH : PEG300Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH 400 μLPEG300 50 μL Tween 80 450 μL Saline)


Oral Formulations
Oral Formulation 1: Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na (carboxymethylcellulose sodium)
Oral Formulation 2: Suspend in 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Example: Take the Oral Formulation 1 (Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na) as an example, if 100 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can first prepare 0.5% CMC Na solution by measuring 0.5 g CMC Na and dissolve it in 100 mL ddH2O to obtain a clear solution; then add 250 mg of the product to 100 mL 0.5% CMC Na solution, to make the suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals).
View More

Oral Formulation 3: Dissolved in PEG400
Oral Formulation 4: Suspend in 0.2% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Oral Formulation 5: Dissolve in 0.25% Tween 80 and 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Oral Formulation 6: Mixing with food powders


Note: Please be aware that the above formulations are for reference only. InvivoChem strongly recommends customers to read literature methods/protocols carefully before determining which formulation you should use for in vivo studies, as different compounds have different solubility properties and have to be formulated differently.

 (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.)
Preparing Stock Solutions 1 mg 5 mg 10 mg
1 mM 3.0003 mL 15.0015 mL 30.0030 mL
5 mM 0.6001 mL 3.0003 mL 6.0006 mL
10 mM 0.3000 mL 1.5002 mL 3.0003 mL

*Note: Please select an appropriate solvent for the preparation of stock solution based on your experiment needs. For most products, DMSO can be used for preparing stock solutions (e.g. 5 mM, 10 mM, or 20 mM concentration); some products with high aqueous solubility may be dissolved in water directly. Solubility information is available at the above Solubility Data section. Once the stock solution is prepared, aliquot it to routine usage volumes and store at -20°C or -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze and thaw cycles.

Calculator

Molarity Calculator allows you to calculate the mass, volume, and/or concentration required for a solution, as detailed below:

  • Calculate the Mass of a compound required to prepare a solution of known volume and concentration
  • Calculate the Volume of solution required to dissolve a compound of known mass to a desired concentration
  • Calculate the Concentration of a solution resulting from a known mass of compound in a specific volume
An example of molarity calculation using the molarity calculator is shown below:
What is the mass of compound required to make a 10 mM stock solution in 5 ml of DMSO given that the molecular weight of the compound is 350.26 g/mol?
  • Enter 350.26 in the Molecular Weight (MW) box
  • Enter 10 in the Concentration box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 5 in the Volume box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 17.513 mg appears in the Mass box. In a similar way, you may calculate the volume and concentration.

Dilution Calculator allows you to calculate how to dilute a stock solution of known concentrations. For example, you may Enter C1, C2 & V2 to calculate V1, as detailed below:

What volume of a given 10 mM stock solution is required to make 25 ml of a 25 μM solution?
Using the equation C1V1 = C2V2, where C1=10 mM, C2=25 μM, V2=25 ml and V1 is the unknown:
  • Enter 10 into the Concentration (Start) box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Concentration (End) box and select the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Volume (End) box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 62.5 μL (0.1 ml) appears in the Volume (Start) box
g/mol

Molecular Weight Calculator allows you to calculate the molar mass and elemental composition of a compound, as detailed below:

Note: Chemical formula is case sensitive: C12H18N3O4  c12h18n3o4
Instructions to calculate molar mass (molecular weight) of a chemical compound:
  • To calculate molar mass of a chemical compound, please enter the chemical/molecular formula and click the “Calculate’ button.
Definitions of molecular mass, molecular weight, molar mass and molar weight:
  • Molecular mass (or molecular weight) is the mass of one molecule of a substance and is expressed in the unified atomic mass units (u). (1 u is equal to 1/12 the mass of one atom of carbon-12)
  • Molar mass (molar weight) is the mass of one mole of a substance and is expressed in g/mol.
/

Reconstitution Calculator allows you to calculate the volume of solvent required to reconstitute your vial.

  • Enter the mass of the reagent and the desired reconstitution concentration as well as the correct units
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer appears in the Volume (to add to vial) box
In vivo Formulation Calculator (Clear solution)
Step 1: Enter information below (Recommended: An additional animal to make allowance for loss during the experiment)
Step 2: Enter in vivo formulation (This is only a calculator, not the exact formulation for a specific product. Please contact us first if there is no in vivo formulation in the solubility section.)
+
+
+

Calculation results

Working concentration mg/mL;

Method for preparing DMSO stock solution mg drug pre-dissolved in μL DMSO (stock solution concentration mg/mL). Please contact us first if the concentration exceeds the DMSO solubility of the batch of drug.

Method for preparing in vivo formulation:Take μL DMSO stock solution, next add μL PEG300, mix and clarify, next addμL Tween 80, mix and clarify, next add μL ddH2O,mix and clarify.

(1) Please be sure that the solution is clear before the addition of next solvent. Dissolution methods like vortex, ultrasound or warming and heat may be used to aid dissolving.
             (2) Be sure to add the solvent(s) in order.

Contact Us