LDH-A/lactate dehydrogenase-A

In NPCs, oxalic acid (10 μM; 24-72 h) suppresses cell growth in ways that are dose- and time-dependent [2]. In CNE-1 and CNE-2 cells, sodium oxalate (0–100 mM; 24 hours) promotes the G2/M phase of the cell life cycle [2]. By using caspase-3, sodium oxalate (0-100 mM; 48 hours) raises the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in NPC cells [2].

When paired with radiation therapy, sodium oxalate (750 mg/kg; once daily; 3 weeks) tumor treatment can enhance the inhibitory impact in vivo [2].

Cell Proliferation Analysis[2]
Cell Types: CNE-1 and CNE activation and pathway-induced ROS levels in NPC cells[2]. -2 Cell
Tested Concentrations: 10 μM
Incubation Duration: 24-72 hrs (hours)
Experimental Results: In CNE-1 and CNE-2 cancer cells, the IC50 at 24, 48 and 72 hrs (hours) were 74.6, 32.4 and 17.8 mM and 62.3, 44.5, respectively. 31.6 mM, respectively.

---

Apoptosis analysis [2]
Cell Types: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells
Tested Concentrations: 0, 20, 50, 100 mM
Incubation Duration: 48 hrs (hours)
Experimental Results: There was a dose-dependent increase in early and late apoptotic cells. Increases the expression of pro-apoptotic Bax and cleaved-caspase-3, while reducing the anti-apoptotic signals of Bcl-2 and pro-caspase-3.

---

Cell cycle analysis [2]
Cell Types: CNE-1 and CNE-2 Cell
Tested Concentrations: 0, 20, 50 and 100 mM
Incubation Duration: 24 hrs (hours)
Experimental Results: Dose-dependent increase in CNE-1 and CNE- numbers 2 cells in G2/M stage.

Animal/Disease Models: Female Balb/c nude mice were injected with CNE-1 cells [2].
Doses: 750 mg/kg
Route of Administration: intraperitoneal (ip) injection; 750 mg/kg; one time/day; 3 weeks
Experimental Results: Inhibition of tumor growth compared with oxalate alone or irradiation alone.

[1]. LDH-A inhibitors as remedies to enhance the anticancer effects of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer cells. Aging (Albany NY). 2021 Dec 16;13(24):25920-25930.

[2]. Inhibition of LDH-A by oxamate induces G2/M arrest, apoptosis and increases radiosensitivity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Oncol Rep. 2013 Dec;30(6):2983-91.

[3]. Targeting lactate dehydrogenase‑A promotes docetaxel‑induced cytotoxicity predominantly in castration‑resistant prostate cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2019 Jul;42(1):224-230.

Ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal gynecologic malignancies. It has been shown that PARP inhibitors can selectively target BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer and exert some effects on ovarian cancer without BRCA mutations. However, the mechanism is still unclear. In this study, wild-type BRCA ovarian cancer cells (A2780 and SKOV3) were used. Our results showed that using a PARP inhibitor (olaparib or AG14361) alone significantly inhibited the proliferation of A2780 cells but negligibly inhibited the proliferation of SKOV3 cells. We used RNA sequencing to explore differentially expressed genes and found that PARP inhibitors increased LDH-A in SKOV3 cells, which was confirmed by RT-PCR. Oxamate (a specific inhibitor of LDH-A) was used to investigate whether LDH-A inhibition enhances the suppressive effects of PARP inhibitors on ovarian cancer without BRCA mutations. CCK-8 assays, scratch assays and Transwell assays were used to determine cell proliferation, cell migration ability and invasion ability, respectively. Both olaparib and AG14361 significantly inhibited the proliferation/invasion ability of A2780 cells but not SKOV3 cells. Inhibition of LDH-A can remarkably promote the inhibitory effects of PARP inhibitors on both A2780 and SKOV3 cells. Thus, high expression level of LDH-A influenced the suppressive effects of PARP inhibitors on ovarian cancer with wild-type BRCA, and LDH-A inhibition notably enhanced this effect.[1]

---

An elevated rate of glucose consumption and the dependency on aerobic glycolysis for ATP generation have long been observed in cancer cells, a phenomenon known as the Warburg effect. the altered energy metabolism in cancer cells provides an attractive opportunity for developing novel cancer therapeutic strategies. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), which catalyzes the transformation of pyruvate to lactate, plays a vital role in the process of glycolysis. It has been reported that the level of LDH-A expression is increased both in head and neck cancer cells and in the blood serum of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients, and is associated with poor prognosis. However, the effect of LDH-A inhibition on NPC cells remains unknown. Here, in the present study, we found that oxamate, a classical inhibitor of LDH-A, suppressed cell proliferation in a dose- and time-dependent manner both in CNE-1 and CNE-2 cells, two NPC cancer cell lines. LDH inhibition by oxamate induced G2/M cell cycle arrest via downregulation of the CDK1/cyclin B1 pathway and promoted apoptosis through enhancement of mitochondrial ROS generation. N-acetylcysteine, a specific scavenger of ROS, significantly blocked the growth inhibition effect induced by oxamate. We also identified that oxamate increased sensitivity to ionizing radiation in the two NPC cancer cell lines. Furthermore, we verified similar results in tumor xenograft models. collectively, these results suggest that LDH-A may serve as a promising therapeutic target for NPC treatment.[2]

---

Docetaxel (DOC) is one of the most effective chemotherapeutic agents against castration‑resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Despite an impressive initial clinical response, the majority of patients eventually develop resistance to DOC. In tumor metabolism, where tumors preferentially utilize anaerobic metabolism, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) serves an important role. LDH controls the conversion of pyruvate to lactate, with LDH‑A, one of the predominant isoforms of LDH, controlling this metabolic process. In the present study, the role of LDH‑A in drug resistance of human prostate cancer (PC) was examined by analyzing 4 PC cell lines, including castration‑providing strains PC3, DU145, LNCaP and LN‑CSS (which is a hormone refractory cell line established from LNCaP). Sodium oxamate (SO) was used as a specific LDH‑A inhibitor. Changes in the expression level of LDH‑A were analyzed by western blotting. Cell growth and survival were evaluated with a WST‑1 assay. Cell cycle progression and apoptotic inducibility were evaluated by flow cytometry using propidium iodide and Annexin V staining. LDH expression was strongly associated with DOC sensitivity in PC cells. SO inhibited growth of PC cells, which was considered to be caused by the inhibition of LDH‑A expression. Synergistic cytotoxicity was observed by combining DOC and SO in LN‑CSS cells, but not in LNCaP cells. This combination treatment induced additive cytotoxic effects in PC‑3 and DU145 cells, caused cell cycle arrest in G2‑M phase and increased the number of cells in the sub‑G1 phase of cell cycle in LN‑CSS cells. SO promoted DOC induced apoptosis in LN‑CSS cells, which was partially caused by the inhibition of DOC‑induced increase in LDH‑A expression. The results strongly indicated that LDH‑A serves an important role in DOC resistance in advanced PC cells and inhibition of LDH‑A expression promotes susceptibility to DOC, particularly in CRPC cells. The present study may provide valuable information for developing targeted therapies for CRPC in the future.[3]

C2H2NNAO3

111.0320

110.993

C, 21.64; H, 1.82; N, 12.62; Na, 20.71; O, 43.23

565-73-1

5242

Typically exists as White to off-white solids at room temperature

306.3ºC at 760 mmHg

300 °C

139ºC

1

3

1

7

90.9

0

[Na+].[O-]C(C(N([H])[H])=O)=O

RQVZIJIQDCGIKI-UHFFFAOYSA-M

InChI=1S/C2H3NO3.Na/c3-1(4)2(5)6;/h(H2,3,4)(H,5,6);/q;+1/p-1

sodium;oxamate

Oxamic acid sodium salt; Sodium 2-amino-2-oxoacetate; Oxamic acid, sodium salt; Aminooxoacetic acid sodium salt; Acetic acid, aminooxo-, monosodium salt; Oxamate (sodium);

2934.99.9001

Powder      -20°C    3 years

                     4°C     2 years

In solvent   -80°C    6 months

                  -20°C    1 month

Note: Please store this product in a sealed and protected environment, avoid exposure to moisture.

Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)

H2O : ~12.5 mg/mL (~112.58 mM)
DMSO : ~3.23 mg/mL (~29.09 mM)

Note: Listed below are some common formulations that may be used to formulate products with low water solubility (e.g. < 1 mg/mL), you may test these formulations using a minute amount of products to avoid loss of samples.

---

Injection Formulation 1: DMSO : Tween 80： Saline = 10 : 5 : 85 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO stock solution → 50 μL Tween 80 → 850 μL Saline)
*Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH ₂ O to obtain a clear solution.
Injection Formulation 2: DMSO : PEG300 ：Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 400 μLPEG300 → 50 μL Tween 80 → 450 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 3: DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 900 μL Corn oil)
Example: Take the Injection Formulation 3 (DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90) as an example, if 1 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can take 100 μL 25 mg/mL DMSO stock solution and add to 900 μL corn oil, mix well to obtain a clear or suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals).

View More

Injection Formulation 4: DMSO : 20% SBE-β-CD in saline = 10 : 90 [i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 900 μL (20% SBE-β-CD in saline)]
*Preparation of 20% SBE-β-CD in Saline (4°C，1 week): Dissolve 2 g SBE-β-CD in 10 mL saline to obtain a clear solution.
Injection Formulation 5: 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin : Saline = 50 : 50 (i.e. 500 μL 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin → 500 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 6: DMSO : PEG300 : castor oil : Saline = 5 : 10 : 20 : 65 (i.e. 50 μL DMSO → 100 μLPEG300 → 200 μL castor oil → 650 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 7: Ethanol : Cremophor : Saline = 10： 10 : 80 (i.e. 100 μL Ethanol → 100 μL Cremophor → 800 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 8: Dissolve in Cremophor/Ethanol (50 : 50), then diluted by Saline
Injection Formulation 9: EtOH : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH → 900 μL Corn oil)
Injection Formulation 10: EtOH : PEG300：Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH → 400 μLPEG300 → 50 μL Tween 80 → 450 μL Saline)

---

Oral Formulation 1: Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na (carboxymethylcellulose sodium)
Oral Formulation 2: Suspend in 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Example: Take the Oral Formulation 1 (Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na) as an example, if 100 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can first prepare 0.5% CMC Na solution by measuring 0.5 g CMC Na and dissolve it in 100 mL ddH2O to obtain a clear solution; then add 250 mg of the product to 100 mL 0.5% CMC Na solution, to make the suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals).

View More

Oral Formulation 3: Dissolved in PEG400
Oral Formulation 4: Suspend in 0.2% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Oral Formulation 5: Dissolve in 0.25% Tween 80 and 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Oral Formulation 6: Mixing with food powders

---

Note: Please be aware that the above formulations are for reference only. InvivoChem strongly recommends customers to read literature methods/protocols carefully before determining which formulation you should use for in vivo studies, as different compounds have different solubility properties and have to be formulated differently.

---

 (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.)