yingweiwo

Nigericin

Alias: Azalomycin M; Antibiotic K178; nigericin; Azalomycin M; 28380-24-7; Helixin C; Antibiotic X-464; Antibiotic K-178; UNII-RRU6GY95IS; RRU6GY95IS; Helexin C; Antibiotic X464; Polyetherin A
Cat No.:V6744 Purity: ≥98%
Nigericin, a natural antibiotic extracted fromStreptomyces hygroscopicus,is a novel and potent cationic ionophore that inhibits Golgi function and suppresses growth of gram positive bacteria.
Nigericin
Nigericin Chemical Structure CAS No.: 28380-24-7
Product category: New1
This product is for research use only, not for human use. We do not sell to patients.
Size Price Stock Qty
10mg
25mg
50mg
100mg

Other Forms of Nigericin:

  • Nigericin sodium
Official Supplier of:
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Top Publications Citing lnvivochem Products
Purity & Quality Control Documentation

Purity: ≥98%

Product Description

Nigericin, a natural antibiotic extracted from Streptomyces hygroscopicus, is a novel and potent cationic ionophore that inhibits Golgi function and suppresses growth of gram positive bacteria. It also prevents viral activation and triggers activation of the NALP3 inflammasome. Nigericin sodium works by acting as an H+, K+, and Pb2+ ionophore.

Biological Activity I Assay Protocols (From Reference)
Targets
K+/H+ ionophore; NLRP3
ln Vitro
Through caspase 1/GSDMD, nigericin (0–4 μg/ml; 24 hours) effectively causes pyroptosis in TNBC cells [6]. With its focused action, nigericin (0-0.25 μg/ml; 24 hours) suppresses the upregulation of Wnt/β-catenin in H460 cells and exhibits anti-cancer properties [7]. Gram-positive bacteria are resistant to antibiotics[4].
ln Vivo
Mice with Staphylococcus aureus USA300 infection can be lessened by administering 1 mg/kg of nigericin intraperitoneally every 12 hours for three days [4]. Nigericin (subcutaneous injection, once every two days; 0.025 mg/kg).

Volumetric data showed that ngericin (4 mg/kg, ip) exhibited a significant reduction in tumor growth and exhibited good interaction with the chemotherapeutic agent DDP. In vivo, nigericin dramatically lowers Bmi-1. Under nigericin treatment, the CSC content and metastatic potential of NPC cells were partially impacted by overexpression of Bmi-1. The inhibition of nigericin on nasopharyngeal cancer stem cells may be connected to the decline in Bmi-1 [3].
Nigericin exhibits selective toxicity to CSCs in vivo [3]
To evaluate the in vivo effects of nigericin on NPC cells, nude mice subcutaneously inoculated with S18 and S26 cells, respectively, were randomly divided into four subgroups with treatments of vehicle, DDP, nigericin or the combination of DPP and nigericin, respectively. In the S18 group, nigericin significantly reduced tumor growth and acted synergistically with the chemotherapeutic agent DDP, as shown by the tumor volumes (P < 0.05 or <0.01, Fig. 6A). However, in the S26 group, nigericin only slightly suppressed the growth of S26 xenografts, whereas DDP either alone or in combination with nigericin significantly inhibited the tumor growth (P < 0.05 or <0.01, Fig. 6B). Importantly, each treatment of drugs had effects on the loss of body weights of mice as compared to the control group, with increasing severity ranging from nigericin, DDP to the combination of the two drugs (Fig. 6C).
Immunohistochemistry analysis in S18 xenografts showed the expression of Bmi-1 was lower in the nigericin treated group, suggesting that nigericin could downregulate Bmi-1 in vivo.
Moreover, we assessed the change of PTEN and Snail, two molecules involved in Bmi-1 pathway, after nigericin treatment. As expected, PTEN protein level increased and Snail expression decreased after using nigericin in vivo, as compared to the control groups. These results suggest that downregulation of Bmi-1 might contribute to the inhibited effect of nigericin on NPC CSCs.
Next, we evaluated the synergistic anti-tumor effect of Nigericin with anti-PD-1 antibody in the 4T1 xenograft model, which included relatively cold tumors and was resistant to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment due to a lack of T cell infiltration and activation [43,44]. The 4T1 cells were orthotopically transplanted into the mammary fat pad of BALB/c mice. Mice were randomly divided into four groups and treated with the control, nigericin (subcutaneous) or anti-PD-1 antibody (intraperitoneal) alone and together. As expected, PD-1 antibody alone did not show significant anti-tumor effect, whereas nigericin showed moderate anti-tumor effect. The combination of nigericin and anti-PD-1 antibody almost completely suppressed tumor growth (Figure 6B–D). Consistently, the tumor infiltrated CD4+ or CD8+ T cells were increased in the nigericin-treated and combination therapy groups (Figure 6E), suggesting that nigericin-mediated pyroptosis modulated the tumor microenvironment to facilitate the T cell infiltration, thus turning cold tumors into hot tumors. The levels of TNF-α and IFN-γ secreted by CD4+ or CD8+ cells were higher in the nigericin and anti-PD-1 combination therapy groups (Figure 6F and Figure S4C). In accordance with above results, cleaved Caspase-1 and cleaved Caspase-3 also increased in the nigericin-treated group (Figure 6F). In addition, we did not observe that nigericin impacted the expressions of PD-1 or PD-L1 in immune cells and cancer cells (Figure S4D). These data confirmed the synergistic anti-tumor effect of nigericin with anti-PD-1 antibody.
Meanwhile, the systematic side effects of these treatments were assessed in vivo. No noticeable histological toxicity was observed in the tissues from heart, liver, spleen, lung and kidney (Figure S5A). Hematological parameters, including white blood cells, hemoglobin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, albumin and creatinine, were in the normal range when treatment was completed (Figure S5B). In conclusion, these results suggested that applying nigericin was an effective strategy for sensitizing TNBCs to immune checkpoint blockage therapy with acceptable systematic side effects. [5]
nigericin is efficacious in mouse models of USA300 infection [6]
Since the outstanding antibacterial properties of NIG and its efficacy has not been evaluated in animal models of infection, we further tested the in vivo efficacy of NIG using mouse models of S. aureus USA300 infection. We first used deep-seated mouse biofilm infection model with the S. aureus USA300 strain to mimic human deep-seated chronic infections. 5 × 107 CFU of S. aureus USA300 was injected to the thigh of each mouse. Twenty-four hours after bacterial infection, mice were administrated intraperitoneally with 50 mg/kg VAN or 1 mg/kg NIG every 12 hours for 3 days. VAN treatment did not significantly reduce S. aureus USA300 abundance, which suggests the presence of a VAN-tolerant bacterial population in this model ( Figure 3A ). Remarkably, treatment with NIG led to an approximately 103-fold reduction of USA300 load in the infected thigh ( Figure 3A ). The potency of NIG reducing the stationary cells and biofilm populations in vivo was encouraging.

Then, we used a trauma infection model with the S. aureus USA300 strain. Wounds were punched on the back skin of mice, followed by infection with S. aureus USA300. One day after infection, NIG ointment was applied once daily for 9 days. The results showed that NIG reduced USA300 loads approximately 104-fold in the wound ( Figure 3B ). Meanwhile, NIG treatment reduced the wound size by 80% after 10 days, as did mupirocin, an established anti-staphylococcal agent ( Figures 3C, D ), indicating that NIG, as well as mupirocin, may promote wound healing by drastically reducing bacterial load at the site of infection. Through hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of the infected skin, disruption of the skin epidermis layer and infiltration of numerous lymphocytes in the interstitium were observed in the USA300-infected mice, while the mice treated with mupirocin or NIG showed more healed skin structures and decreased lymphocyte levels in the interstitium ( Figure 3E ). Notably, the efficacy of NIG was comparable to that of mupirocin but at an 8,000-fold lower concentration.

A murine model of bloodstream infection was further used. One hour after injection with a lethal dose of USA300 through the tail vein, mice were treated with drugs (via ip) every 12 h for 3 days. Treatment with 1 mg/kg NIG significantly prolonged the survival of USA300-infected mice, which was comparable to that of mice treated with 5 mg/kg VAN ( Figure 3F ). The bacterial loads of USA300 in the heart, liver, spleen, lung and kidney were also detected at 72 h post-infection. NIG treatment led to a 1,000- to 10,000-fold reduction in the bacterial burden in the major organs. The effect of 1 mg/kg NIG was slightly better than that of 2.5 mg/kg VAN ( Figures 3G–K ). These results demonstrate the in vivo efficacy of NIG in the treatment of S. aureus infection.
Enzyme Assay
The K(+),H(+) ionophore and antibiotic nigericin has been shown to trigger apoptosis and is thus considered for the treatment of malignancy. Cellular mechanisms involved include induction of oxidative stress, which is known to activate erythrocytic Ca(2+)-permeable unselective cation channels leading to Ca(2+) entry, increase in cytosolic Ca(2+) activity ([Ca(2+)]i) and subsequent stimulation of eryptosis, the suicidal erythrocyte death characterized by cell shrinkage and cell membrane scrambling with phosphatidylserine translocation to the erythrocyte surface. This study explored whether and how nigericin induces eryptosis. Phosphatidylserine exposure at the cell surface was estimated from annexin V binding, cell volume from forward scatter, [Ca(2+)]i from Fluo3 fluorescence, pHi from BCECF fluorescence, ceramide abundance utilizing antibodies and reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation from DCFDA-dependent fluorescence. A 48-hr exposure of human erythrocytes to nigericin significantly increased the percentage of annexin-V-binding cells (0.1-10 nM), significantly decreased forward scatter (0.1-1 nM), significantly decreased cytosolic pH (0.1-1 nM) and significantly increased Fluo3 fluorescence (0.1-10 nM). Nigericin (1 nM) slightly, but significantly, increased ROS, but did not significantly modify ceramide abundance. The effect of nigericin on annexin V binding was significantly blunted, but not abolished by removal of extracellular Ca(2+). The nigericin-induced increase in [Ca(2+)]i and annexin V binding was again significantly blunted but not abolished by the Na(+)/H(+) exchanger inhibitor cariporide (10 μM). Nigericin triggers eryptosis, an effect paralleled by ROS formation, in part dependent on stimulation of Ca(2+) entry, and involving the cariporide-sensitive Na(+)/H(+) exchanger[3].
Cell Assay
Cell viability assay [4]
Cell Types: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Streptococcus pneumoniae) and Streptococcus agalactiae
Tested Concentrations: 0 μg/ml, 0.05 μg/ml, 0.125 μg/ ml, 0.25 μg/ml
Incubation Duration: 24 hrs (hours)
Experimental Results: demonstrated potent activity against these clinical MDR strains with MIC values ranging from 0.004-0.25 mg/ml.

Western Blot Analysis[6]
Cell Types: MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 Cell
Tested Concentrations: 0 μg/ml, 2 μg/ml, 4 μg/ml
Incubation Duration: 24 hrs (hours)
Experimental Results: Shows increased caspase 1 protein levels and N-GSDMD .

Cell viability assay [7]
Cell Types: H460 Cell
Tested Concentrations: 0.5 μM, 1 μM, 2.5 μM
Incubation Duration: 24 hrs (hours)
Experimental Results: Down-regulation of expression of classic Wnt proteins (LRP6, Wnt5a/b and β-catenin) signaling pathway.
The human colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines HT29 and SW480 were treated with nigericin or oxaliplatin under the conditions specified. Cell viability assay and invasion and metastasis assay were performed to evaluate the effect of nigericin on CRC cells. Sphere-forming assay and soft agar colony-forming assay were implemented to assess the action of nigericin on the cancer stem cell properties of CRC cells undergone epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT).
Results: Compared with oxaliplatin, nigericin showed more toxicity for the HT29 cell line (IC50, 12.92 ± 0.25 μmol vs 37.68 ± 0.34 μmol). A similar result was also obtained with the SW116 cell line (IC50, 15.86 ± 0.18 μmol vs 41.02 ± 0.23 μmol). A Boyden chamber assay indicated that a significant decrease in the number of HT29 cells migrating through polyvinylidene fluoride membrane was observed in the nigericin-treated group, relative to the vehicle-treated group [11 ± 2 cells per high-power field (HPF) vs 19.33 ± 1.52 cells per HPF, P < 0.05]. Compared to the control group, the numbers of HT29 cells invading through the Matrigel-coated membrane also decreased in the nigericin-treated group (6.66 ± 1.52 cells per HPF vs 14.66 ± 1.52 cells per HPF, P < 0.05). Nigericin also reduced the proportion of CD133+ cells from 83.57% to 63.93%, relative to the control group (P < 0.05). Nigericin decreased the number of spheres relative to the control group (0.14 ± 0.01 vs 0.35 ± 0.01, P < 0.05), while oxaliplatin increased the number of spheres relative to the control group (0.75 ± 0.02 vs 0.35 ± 0.01; P < 0.05). Nigericin also showed a decreased ability to form colonies under anchorage-independent conditions in a standard soft agar assay after 14 d in culture, relative to the control group (1.66 ± 0.57 vs 7 ± 1.15, P < 0.05), whereas the colony numbers were higher in the oxaliplatin group relative to the vehicle-treated controls (14.33 ± 0.57 vs 7 ± 1.15, P < 0.05). We further detected the expression of E-cadherin and vimentin in cells treated with nigericin and oxaliplatin. The results showed that HT29 cells treated with nigericin induced an increase in E-cadherin expression and a decrease in the vimentin expression relative to vehicle controls. In contrast, oxaliplatin downregulated the expression of E-cadherin and upregulated the expression of vimentin in HT29 cells relative to vehicle controls.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that nigericin could partly reverse the EMT process during cell invasion and metastasis[4].
Animal Protocol
Animal/Disease Models: balb/c (Bagg ALBino) mouse orthotopically injected with 4T1 cells [6]
Doses: 0.025 mg/kg
Route of Administration: subcutaneous injection
Experimental Results: Shown almost complete inhibition of tumor growth with anti-PD-1 antibody.

Animal/Disease Models: Staphylococcus aureus-infected mice USA300[4]
Doses: 1 mg/kg
Route of Administration: intraperitoneal (ip) injection
Experimental Results: Major The bacterial load in the organs is diminished to 1,000-10,000 times.
Deep-seated mouse biofilm infection model [6]
A previously reported deep-seated mouse biofilm infection model (Conlon et al., 2013) was used with modifications. 100 μL of stationary-phase S. aureus USA300 (5 × 107 CFU) was injected to the thigh of each mouse. Starting at 24 h post-infection, mice were administrated with 200 µL of nigericin (1 mg/kg, dissolved in 20% (w/v) Kolliphor® HS 15), vancomycin (50 mg/kg), or vehicle intraperitoneally every 12 h for 3 days. Mice were sacrificed 4 days post-infection, and their infected thighs were homogenized, diluted, and plated on MH agar for determination of CFU.
Murine wound infection [6]
Murine wounds were generated as round lesions having a diameter of 1 cm on the back of each mouse. Each wound was then infected with 10 μL of 3 × 107 CFU/mL S. aureus USA300. Staring at 24 h post-infection, nigericin (0.025 μg per wound) or mupirocin (200 μg per wound), diluted in 0.1% EtOH, was applied to the wounds once daily for 9 days. The wounds were monitored at 1, 5- and 10-days post-infection. The wound tissues were excised and grounded, and aliquots of the grounded tissue were diluted in normal saline and plated on drug-free agar to determine CFU. A portion of the wound tissue was also subjected to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining for histopathological analysis.
Murine bloodstream infection model [6]
Mice were infected by intravenous injection of 100 μL 1 × 108 CFU/mL S. aureus USA300. Starting at 4 h post-infection, nigericin (0.5, 1 mg/kg, dissolved in 20% (w/v) Kolliphor® HS 15), vancomycin (5 mg/kg), or vehicle (20% (w/v) Kolliphor® HS 15) in a volume of 200 µL was administrated via the intraperitoneal route every 12 h for 3 d. Survival curves were recorded during 3 days of treatment. For determining the bacterial loads of USA300, the mice were sacrificed 3 days post-infection, and their hearts, livers, spleens, lungs, and kidneys were homogenized, diluted, and plated on MH agar for determination of CFU.
Six-to-eight-week old female immunocompetent BALB/c mice were used. Next, 5 × 105 4T1 cells were injected orthotopically into the left inguinal mammary fat pad of BALB/c mice. Mice were randomly divided into four groups and treated at the same time with indicated drugs. Nigericin (2 mg/kg) was injected subcutaneously every two days, and anti-PD-1 (250 μg/mouse) was injected intraperitoneally every week. Tumor volumes were monitored every three-to-four days. At the end of the experiment (after about 4 weeks), the mice were sacrificed via carbon dioxide euthanasia, and tumors were harvested for further analysis.[5]
The S18 cells were injected near the scapula of the nude mice. Nine days after injection, the mice were randomly divided into four groups with six animals each (control, DDP, nigericin and DDP combined with nigericin). DDP (2.5 mg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally for five continuous days and nigericin (4 mg/kg) was administrated intraperitoneally every two days. Tumor length and width were measured with a vernier caliper every other day. Tumor volume was calculated using the formula V = 0.5 × (length × width2). The body weights of the mice were recorded every two days. Mice were humanely euthanized when the tumor volume reached 2000 mm3.[3]
Toxicity/Toxicokinetics
mouse LD50 oral 190 mg/kg CRC Handbook of Antibiotic Compounds, Vols.1- , Berdy, J., Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 1980, 5(477), 1981
mouse LD50 intraperitoneal 2500 ug/kg Antibiotics and Chemotherapy, 1(594), 1951
References

[1]. Novel components of an active mitochondrial K(+)/H(+) exchange. J Biol Chem. 2010 May 7;285(19):14399-414.

[2]. Cryopyrin activates the inflammasome in response to toxins and ATP.Nature. 2006 Mar 9;440(7081):228-32.

[3]. Triggering of Suicidal Erythrocyte Death by the Antibiotic Ionophore Nigericin. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2016 May;118(5):381-9.

[4]. Nigericin is effective against multidrug resistant gram-positive bacteria, persisters, and biofilms. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Dec 20:12:1055929.

[5]. Evidence of nigericin as a potential therapeutic candidate for cancers: A review. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021 May:137:111262.

[6]. Nigericin Boosts Anti-Tumor Immune Response via Inducing Pyroptosis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 16;15(12):3221.

[7]. Nigericin decreases the viability of multidrug-resistant cancer cells and lung tumorspheres and potentiates the effects of cardiac glycosides. Tumour Biol.2017 Mar;39(3):1010428317694310.

Additional Infomation
Nigericin is a polyether antibiotic which affects ion transport and ATPase activity in mitochondria. It is produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus. It has a role as an antimicrobial agent, an antibacterial agent, a potassium ionophore and a bacterial metabolite.
A polyether antibiotic which affects ion transport and ATPase activity in mitochondria. It is produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus. (From Merck Index, 11th ed)
Nigericin has been reported in Streptomyces, Streptomyces violaceusniger, and Streptomyces hygroscopicus with data available.
A polyether antibiotic which affects ion transport and ATPase activity in mitochondria. It is produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus. (From Merck Index, 11th ed)
Multiple factors including tumor heterogeneity and intrinsic or acquired resistance have been associated with drug resistance in lung cancer. Increased stemness and the plasticity of cancer cells have been identified as important mechanisms of resistance; therefore, treatments targeting cancer cells independent of stemness phenotype would be much more effective in treating lung cancer. In this article, we have characterized the anticancer effects of the antibiotic Nigericin in cells displaying varying degrees of stemness and resistance to anticancer drugs, arising from (1) routine culture conditions, (2) prolonged periods of serum starvation. These cells are highly resistant to conventional anticancer drugs such as Paclitaxel, Hydroxyurea, Colchicine, Obatoclax, Wortmannin, and LY294002, and the multidrug-resistant phenotype of cells growing under prolonged periods of serum starvation is likely the result of extensive rewiring of signaling pathways, and (3) lung tumorspheres that are enriched for cancer stem-like cells. We found that Nigericin potently inhibited the viability of cells growing under routine culture conditions, prolonged periods of serum starvation, and lung tumorspheres. In addition, we found that Nigericin downregulated the expression of key proteins in the Wnt canonical signaling pathway such as LRP6, Wnt5a/b, and β-catenin, but promotes β-catenin translocation into the nucleus. The antitumor effects of Nigericin were potentiated by the Wnt activator HLY78 and by therapeutic levels of the US Food and Drug Administration-approved drug Digitoxin and its novel synthetic analog MonoD. We believe that Nigericin may be used in a co-therapy model in combination with other novel chemotherapeutic agents in order to achieve potent inhibition of cancers that display varying degrees of stemness, potentially leading to sustained anticancer effects. [1]
The K(+),H(+) ionophore and antibiotic nigericin has been shown to trigger apoptosis and is thus considered for the treatment of malignancy. Cellular mechanisms involved include induction of oxidative stress, which is known to activate erythrocytic Ca(2+)-permeable unselective cation channels leading to Ca(2+) entry, increase in cytosolic Ca(2+) activity ([Ca(2+)]i) and subsequent stimulation of eryptosis, the suicidal erythrocyte death characterized by cell shrinkage and cell membrane scrambling with phosphatidylserine translocation to the erythrocyte surface. This study explored whether and how nigericin induces eryptosis. Phosphatidylserine exposure at the cell surface was estimated from annexin V binding, cell volume from forward scatter, [Ca(2+)]i from Fluo3 fluorescence, pHi from BCECF fluorescence, ceramide abundance utilizing antibodies and reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation from DCFDA-dependent fluorescence. A 48-hr exposure of human erythrocytes to nigericin significantly increased the percentage of annexin-V-binding cells (0.1-10 nM), significantly decreased forward scatter (0.1-1 nM), significantly decreased cytosolic pH (0.1-1 nM) and significantly increased Fluo3 fluorescence (0.1-10 nM). Nigericin (1 nM) slightly, but significantly, increased ROS, but did not significantly modify ceramide abundance. The effect of nigericin on annexin V binding was significantly blunted, but not abolished by removal of extracellular Ca(2+). The nigericin-induced increase in [Ca(2+)]i and annexin V binding was again significantly blunted but not abolished by the Na(+)/H(+) exchanger inhibitor cariporide (10 μM). Nigericin triggers eryptosis, an effect paralleled by ROS formation, in part dependent on stimulation of Ca(2+) entry, and involving the cariporide-sensitive Na(+)/H(+) exchanger.[2]
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is prevalent in southern China, northern Africa, and Alaska. The prognosis for NPC patients at early stage is good, while it is poor for patients at late stages. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been proposed to be associated with tumor initiation, relapse and metastasis, and the poor prognosis of NPC likely results from residual CSCs after therapy. Study on the therapy targeting CSCs in NPC remains poor, though it received intensive attentions in other cancers. Here, we used NPC cell lines with high and low proportion of CSCs as models to explore the effect of nigericin, an antibiotic, on CSCs. We found that nigericin could selectively target CSCs and sensitize CSCs in NPC to the widely used clinical drug cisplatin both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, downregulation of the polycomb group protein Bmi-1 may contribute to the inhibitory effect of nigericin on CSCs. Furthermore, by using the in vitro NPC cell models, we found that nigericin could significantly decrease the migration and invasion abilities, which are known to be associated with CSCs. Taken together, our results suggest that nigericin can selectively target CSCs in NPC, which could be a candidate CSCs targeting drug for clinical evaluation.[3]
Aim: To evaluate the effect of nigericin on colorectal cancer and to explore its possible mechanism. Methods: The human colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines HT29 and SW480 were treated with nigericin or oxaliplatin under the conditions specified. Cell viability assay and invasion and metastasis assay were performed to evaluate the effect of nigericin on CRC cells. Sphere-forming assay and soft agar colony-forming assay were implemented to assess the action of nigericin on the cancer stem cell properties of CRC cells undergone epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Results: Compared with oxaliplatin, nigericin showed more toxicity for the HT29 cell line (IC50, 12.92 ± 0.25 μmol vs 37.68 ± 0.34 μmol). A similar result was also obtained with the SW116 cell line (IC50, 15.86 ± 0.18 μmol vs 41.02 ± 0.23 μmol). A Boyden chamber assay indicated that a significant decrease in the number of HT29 cells migrating through polyvinylidene fluoride membrane was observed in the nigericin-treated group, relative to the vehicle-treated group [11 ± 2 cells per high-power field (HPF) vs 19.33 ± 1.52 cells per HPF, P < 0.05]. Compared to the control group, the numbers of HT29 cells invading through the Matrigel-coated membrane also decreased in the nigericin-treated group (6.66 ± 1.52 cells per HPF vs 14.66 ± 1.52 cells per HPF, P < 0.05). Nigericin also reduced the proportion of CD133+ cells from 83.57% to 63.93%, relative to the control group (P < 0.05). Nigericin decreased the number of spheres relative to the control group (0.14 ± 0.01 vs 0.35 ± 0.01, P < 0.05), while oxaliplatin increased the number of spheres relative to the control group (0.75 ± 0.02 vs 0.35 ± 0.01; P < 0.05). Nigericin also showed a decreased ability to form colonies under anchorage-independent conditions in a standard soft agar assay after 14 d in culture, relative to the control group (1.66 ± 0.57 vs 7 ± 1.15, P < 0.05), whereas the colony numbers were higher in the oxaliplatin group relative to the vehicle-treated controls (14.33 ± 0.57 vs 7 ± 1.15, P < 0.05). We further detected the expression of E-cadherin and vimentin in cells treated with nigericin and oxaliplatin. The results showed that HT29 cells treated with nigericin induced an increase in E-cadherin expression and a decrease in the vimentin expression relative to vehicle controls. In contrast, oxaliplatin downregulated the expression of E-cadherin and upregulated the expression of vimentin in HT29 cells relative to vehicle controls. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that nigericin could partly reverse the EMT process during cell invasion and metastasis. [4]
Although immune checkpoint inhibitors improved the clinical outcomes of advanced triple negative breast cancer (TBNC) patients, the response rate remains relatively low. Nigericin is an antibiotic derived from Streptomyces hydrophobicus. We found that nigericin caused cell death in TNBC cell lines MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 by inducing concurrent pyroptosis and apoptosis. As nigericin facilitated cellular potassium efflux, we discovered that it caused mitochondrial dysfunction, leading to mitochondrial ROS production, as well as activation of Caspase-1/GSDMD-mediated pyroptosis and Caspase-3-mediated apoptosis in TNBC cells. Notably, nigericin-induced pyroptosis could amplify the anti-tumor immune response by enhancing the infiltration and anti-tumor effect of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Moreover, nigericin showed a synergistic therapeutic effect when combined with anti-PD-1 antibody in TNBC treatment. Our study reveals that nigericin may be a promising anti-tumor agent, especially in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced TNBC treatment. [5]
Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria pose a significant clinical threat to human health, but the development of antibiotics cannot meet the urgent need for effective agents, especially those that can kill persisters and biofilms. Here, we reported that nigericin showed potent bactericidal activity against various clinical MDR Gram-positive bacteria, persisters and biofilms, with low frequencies of resistance development. Moreover, nigericin exhibited favorable in vivo efficacy in deep-seated mouse biofilm, murine skin and bloodstream infection models. With Staphylococcus aureus, nigericin disrupted ATP production and electron transport chain; cell death was associated with altered membrane structure and permeability. Obtaining nigericin-resistant/tolerant mutants required multiple rounds of challenge, and, cross-resistance to members of several antimicrobial classes was absent, probably due to distinct nigericin action with the GraSR two-component regulatory system. Thus, our work reveals that nigericin is a promising antibiotic candidate for the treatment of chronic or recurrent infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria.[6]
These protocols are for reference only. InvivoChem does not independently validate these methods.
Physicochemical Properties
Molecular Formula
C40H68O11
Molecular Weight
746.94318
Exact Mass
746.458
Elemental Analysis
C, 66.27; H, 9.45; O, 24.28
CAS #
28380-24-7
Related CAS #
Nigericin sodium salt;28643-80-3
PubChem CID
34230
Appearance
White to off-white solid powder
Density
1.19g/cm3
Boiling Point
779.9ºC at 760mmHg
Melting Point
245-255ºC
Flash Point
226.9ºC
Index of Refraction
1.543
LogP
4.37
Hydrogen Bond Donor Count
3
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count
11
Rotatable Bond Count
9
Heavy Atom Count
51
Complexity
1230
Defined Atom Stereocenter Count
19
SMILES
C[C@H]1CC[C@@H](O[C@H]1[C@@H](C)C(=O)O)C[C@@H]2C[C@H]([C@H]([C@@]3(O2)[C@@H](C[C@@](O3)(C)[C@H]4CC[C@@](O4)(C)[C@H]5[C@H](C[C@@H](O5)[C@@H]6[C@H](C[C@H]([C@@](O6)(CO)O)C)C)C)C)C)OC
InChi Key
MOYOTUKECQMGHE-PDEFJWSRSA-M
InChi Code
InChI=1S/C40H68O11.Na/c1-21-11-12-28(46-33(21)26(6)36(42)43)17-29-18-30(45-10)27(7)40(48-29)25(5)19-38(9,51-40)32-13-14-37(8,49-32)35-23(3)16-31(47-35)34-22(2)15-24(4)39(44,20-41)50-34/h21-35,41,44H,11-20H2,1-10H3,(H,42,43)/q+1/p-1/t21-,22-,23-,24+,25+,26+,27+,28+,29+,30+,31+,32+,33+,34-,35+,37-,38-,39-,40+/m0./s1
Chemical Name
sodium (R)-2-((2R,3S,6R)-6-(((2S,4R,5R,7R,9R,10R)-2-((2S,2'R,3'S,5R,5'R)-5'-((2S,3S,5R,6R)-6-hydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)-3,5-dimethyltetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-yl)-2,3'-dimethyloctahydro-[2,2'-bifuran]-5-yl)-9-methoxy-2,4,10-trimethyl-1,6-dioxaspiro[4.5]decan-7-yl)methyl)-3-methyltetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-yl)propanoate
Synonyms
Azalomycin M; Antibiotic K178; nigericin; Azalomycin M; 28380-24-7; Helixin C; Antibiotic X-464; Antibiotic K-178; UNII-RRU6GY95IS; RRU6GY95IS; Helexin C; Antibiotic X464; Polyetherin A
HS Tariff Code
2934.99.9001
Storage

Powder      -20°C    3 years

                     4°C     2 years

In solvent   -80°C    6 months

                  -20°C    1 month

Shipping Condition
Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)
Solubility Data
Solubility (In Vitro)
May dissolve in DMSO (in most cases), if not, try other solvents such as H2O, Ethanol, or DMF with a minute amount of products to avoid loss of samples
Solubility (In Vivo)
Note: Listed below are some common formulations that may be used to formulate products with low water solubility (e.g. < 1 mg/mL), you may test these formulations using a minute amount of products to avoid loss of samples.

Injection Formulations
(e.g. IP/IV/IM/SC)
Injection Formulation 1: DMSO : Tween 80: Saline = 10 : 5 : 85 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO stock solution 50 μL Tween 80 850 μL Saline)
*Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH ₂ O to obtain a clear solution.
Injection Formulation 2: DMSO : PEG300Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO 400 μLPEG300 50 μL Tween 80 450 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 3: DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO 900 μL Corn oil)
Example: Take the Injection Formulation 3 (DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90) as an example, if 1 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can take 100 μL 25 mg/mL DMSO stock solution and add to 900 μL corn oil, mix well to obtain a clear or suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals).
View More

Injection Formulation 4: DMSO : 20% SBE-β-CD in saline = 10 : 90 [i.e. 100 μL DMSO 900 μL (20% SBE-β-CD in saline)]
*Preparation of 20% SBE-β-CD in Saline (4°C,1 week): Dissolve 2 g SBE-β-CD in 10 mL saline to obtain a clear solution.
Injection Formulation 5: 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin : Saline = 50 : 50 (i.e. 500 μL 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin 500 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 6: DMSO : PEG300 : castor oil : Saline = 5 : 10 : 20 : 65 (i.e. 50 μL DMSO 100 μLPEG300 200 μL castor oil 650 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 7: Ethanol : Cremophor : Saline = 10: 10 : 80 (i.e. 100 μL Ethanol 100 μL Cremophor 800 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 8: Dissolve in Cremophor/Ethanol (50 : 50), then diluted by Saline
Injection Formulation 9: EtOH : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH 900 μL Corn oil)
Injection Formulation 10: EtOH : PEG300Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH 400 μLPEG300 50 μL Tween 80 450 μL Saline)


Oral Formulations
Oral Formulation 1: Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na (carboxymethylcellulose sodium)
Oral Formulation 2: Suspend in 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Example: Take the Oral Formulation 1 (Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na) as an example, if 100 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can first prepare 0.5% CMC Na solution by measuring 0.5 g CMC Na and dissolve it in 100 mL ddH2O to obtain a clear solution; then add 250 mg of the product to 100 mL 0.5% CMC Na solution, to make the suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals).
View More

Oral Formulation 3: Dissolved in PEG400
Oral Formulation 4: Suspend in 0.2% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Oral Formulation 5: Dissolve in 0.25% Tween 80 and 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Oral Formulation 6: Mixing with food powders


Note: Please be aware that the above formulations are for reference only. InvivoChem strongly recommends customers to read literature methods/protocols carefully before determining which formulation you should use for in vivo studies, as different compounds have different solubility properties and have to be formulated differently.

 (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.)
Preparing Stock Solutions 1 mg 5 mg 10 mg
1 mM 1.3388 mL 6.6940 mL 13.3880 mL
5 mM 0.2678 mL 1.3388 mL 2.6776 mL
10 mM 0.1339 mL 0.6694 mL 1.3388 mL

*Note: Please select an appropriate solvent for the preparation of stock solution based on your experiment needs. For most products, DMSO can be used for preparing stock solutions (e.g. 5 mM, 10 mM, or 20 mM concentration); some products with high aqueous solubility may be dissolved in water directly. Solubility information is available at the above Solubility Data section. Once the stock solution is prepared, aliquot it to routine usage volumes and store at -20°C or -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze and thaw cycles.

Calculator

Molarity Calculator allows you to calculate the mass, volume, and/or concentration required for a solution, as detailed below:

  • Calculate the Mass of a compound required to prepare a solution of known volume and concentration
  • Calculate the Volume of solution required to dissolve a compound of known mass to a desired concentration
  • Calculate the Concentration of a solution resulting from a known mass of compound in a specific volume
An example of molarity calculation using the molarity calculator is shown below:
What is the mass of compound required to make a 10 mM stock solution in 5 ml of DMSO given that the molecular weight of the compound is 350.26 g/mol?
  • Enter 350.26 in the Molecular Weight (MW) box
  • Enter 10 in the Concentration box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 5 in the Volume box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 17.513 mg appears in the Mass box. In a similar way, you may calculate the volume and concentration.

Dilution Calculator allows you to calculate how to dilute a stock solution of known concentrations. For example, you may Enter C1, C2 & V2 to calculate V1, as detailed below:

What volume of a given 10 mM stock solution is required to make 25 ml of a 25 μM solution?
Using the equation C1V1 = C2V2, where C1=10 mM, C2=25 μM, V2=25 ml and V1 is the unknown:
  • Enter 10 into the Concentration (Start) box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Concentration (End) box and select the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Volume (End) box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 62.5 μL (0.1 ml) appears in the Volume (Start) box
g/mol

Molecular Weight Calculator allows you to calculate the molar mass and elemental composition of a compound, as detailed below:

Note: Chemical formula is case sensitive: C12H18N3O4  c12h18n3o4
Instructions to calculate molar mass (molecular weight) of a chemical compound:
  • To calculate molar mass of a chemical compound, please enter the chemical/molecular formula and click the “Calculate’ button.
Definitions of molecular mass, molecular weight, molar mass and molar weight:
  • Molecular mass (or molecular weight) is the mass of one molecule of a substance and is expressed in the unified atomic mass units (u). (1 u is equal to 1/12 the mass of one atom of carbon-12)
  • Molar mass (molar weight) is the mass of one mole of a substance and is expressed in g/mol.
/

Reconstitution Calculator allows you to calculate the volume of solvent required to reconstitute your vial.

  • Enter the mass of the reagent and the desired reconstitution concentration as well as the correct units
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer appears in the Volume (to add to vial) box
In vivo Formulation Calculator (Clear solution)
Step 1: Enter information below (Recommended: An additional animal to make allowance for loss during the experiment)
Step 2: Enter in vivo formulation (This is only a calculator, not the exact formulation for a specific product. Please contact us first if there is no in vivo formulation in the solubility section.)
+
+
+

Calculation results

Working concentration mg/mL;

Method for preparing DMSO stock solution mg drug pre-dissolved in μL DMSO (stock solution concentration mg/mL). Please contact us first if the concentration exceeds the DMSO solubility of the batch of drug.

Method for preparing in vivo formulation:Take μL DMSO stock solution, next add μL PEG300, mix and clarify, next addμL Tween 80, mix and clarify, next add μL ddH2O,mix and clarify.

(1) Please be sure that the solution is clear before the addition of next solvent. Dissolution methods like vortex, ultrasound or warming and heat may be used to aid dissolving.
             (2) Be sure to add the solvent(s) in order.

Contact Us