yingweiwo

CGP37849

Alias: CGP-37849; CGP 37849; 127910-31-0; Cgp 37,849; Cgp-37,849; (E)-2-amino-4-methyl-5-phosphonopent-3-enoic acid; CGP37,849; 3-Pentenoic acid, 2-amino-4-methyl-5-phosphono-, (3E)-; 76IND1BS43; DTXSID40873634; CGP37849
Cat No.:V18056 Purity: ≥98%
CGP 37849 is a potent, competitive, orally bioactive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor blocker (antagonist).
CGP37849
CGP37849 Chemical Structure CAS No.: 127910-31-0
Product category: New1
This product is for research use only, not for human use. We do not sell to patients.
Size Price Stock Qty
1mg
5mg
Other Sizes
Official Supplier of:
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text

 

  • Business Relationship with 5000+ Clients Globally
  • Major Universities, Research Institutions, Biotech & Pharma
  • Citations by Top Journals: Nature, Cell, Science, etc.
Top Publications Citing lnvivochem Products
Product Description
CGP 37849 is a potent, competitive, orally bioactive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor blocker (antagonist). CGP 37849 is a rodent anticonvulsant (antiepileptic/antiseizure) with antidepressant and anxiolytic (anti-anxiety) effects.
Biological Activity I Assay Protocols (From Reference)
Targets
NMDA/N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor
ln Vitro
In vitro, CGP 37849specifically and reversibly inhibited the rise in CA1 pyramidal cell firing rate that NMDA induced in hippocampal slices. CGP 37849, at concentrations up to 10 μM, inhibited burst discharges evoked by CA1 neurons via Schaffer collateral commissure fiber stimulation in slices soaked in low-Mg2+ medium [2]. This effect was observed without altering the amplitude of the initial population spike.
Receptor binding profiles of CGP 37849 and CGP 39551 [2]
The high affinity of CGP 37849 for the NMDA receptor was identified on the basis of its activity at NMDA-sensitive L-[3H]-glutamate binding sites in crude PSDs (Foster & Fagg, 1987a; Fagg & Baud, 1988) and subsequently was confirmed using the selective radioligand, [3H]-CPP (Olverman et al., 1986; Murphy et al., 1987). Systematic analyses of a series of co-phosphono amino acid analogues revealed that CGP 37849 was a highly potent inhibitor of L-[3H]-glutamate binding, with a K, similar to that of Lglutamate itself Inhibitory activity was found to be associated with the trans configuration of the APPA molecule (not with the naturally-occurring cis-isomer) and, as in the case of AP5 (Table 1; Evans et al., 1982) and other NMDA receptor antagonists (Watkins et al., 1990), with the D-stereoisomer (CGP 40116). Saturation analyses indicated that the interaction of CGP 37849 with the L-[3H]-glutamate binding site was of a competitive nature; increasing concentrations of the blocker did not alter the maximum number of binding sites labelled by the radioligand, but progressively decreased the apparent affinity of L-[3H]-glutamate for the receptor (Figure 2). CGP 37849 inhibited the binding of the selective NMDA receptor antagonist, [3H]-CPP, to rat brain PSDs with a Ki of 35 nM (Figure 3 and Table 1), and was thus some 4, 5 and 7 fold more potent than the antagonists CGS 19755, CPP and D-AP5, respectively. As observed when using L-[3H]-glutamate as radioligand, activity was found to reside essentially exclusively in the D-isomer (CGP 40116, Ki 19 nM; Table 1), which showed an affinity roughly 150 fold greater than that of the L-enantiomer (CGP 40117). The ethylester, CGP 39551, showed measurable inhibitory activity at both L-[3H]-glutamate (K; 8.4 pM) and [3H]-CPP binding sites (Ki 0.31 pM), but was weaker than the free acid, CGP 37849 (Table 1). Both CGP 37849 and CGP 39551 were weak or inactive in receptor binding assays for 18 other neurotransmitters or modulators. At a concentration of 50 pM, CGP 37849 inhibited strychnine-insensitive [3H]-glycine binding by 26 + 2% and CGP 39551 by 22 + 2% (means + s.e.mean, n = 3). In the remaining 17 receptor assays used (see Methods), both compounds showed 20% inhibition of binding or less at the test concentration of 10pM. CGP 37849 thus is minimally 300 fold more selective for the NMDA receptor recognition site than for any of the other sites examined [2].
Neuropharmacological actions of CGP 37849 and CGP 39551 in vitro [2]
Agonist-antagonist interaction Electrophysiological studies using the hippocampal slice preparation indicated that CGP 37849 showed no excitatory activity, but at concentrations as low as 0.3 JM antagonized the increases in CA1 pyramidal cell firing rate induced by sub-maximal concentrations of NMDA (Figure 4a). This effect was rapid in onset and in offset, and was agonist-selective, in that responses evoked by quisqualate and kainate were unaffected. Thus, the potency and selectivity of CGP 37849 as an antagonist of NMDA receptor responses is in good agreement with its mechanism of action as determined from radioligand binding studies.
Effects of CGP 37849 and CGP 39551 on the uptake and release ofL-glutamate [2]
Alterations of synaptic function elicited by CGP 37849 and CGP 39551 (see below) potentially might result not simply from their interaction with postsynaptic NMDA receptors, but also from modifications of glutamate uptake or release. In experiments to evaluate these possibilities, no effects of the compounds were observed. As shown by other investigators (Davies & Johnston, 1976; Johnston et al., 1979), L-[3H]-glutamate was accumulated with high affinity (Km 11 pIM) by rat brain synaptosomes and its uptake was inhibited by the reference compounds, D-aspartate and dihydrokainate (IC50 s 7 pM and 315 pM, respectively; mean values, 2 separate experiments). However, neither CGP 37849 nor CGP 39551, at concentrations of 1-10001pm, impaired L-[3H]-glutamate uptake. For example, in the presence of 10 pM CGP 37849 or CGP 39551, L-[3H]-glutamate uptake was respectively 104% and 100% of control values, and in the presence of 1 mm drug, 102% and 106%, respectively (means, 2 separate experiments, each in duplicate). Similarly, neither CGP 37849 nor CGP 39551 modified the electrically-evoked release of endogenous glutamate from rat hippocampal slices. In these experiments, basal glutamate release routinely was in the range 0.2-0.4% of the tissue content per fraction, and this was increased 2.5 + 0.2 times by 10Hz electrical field stimulation. Under control conditions, the ratio S2/S1 (release evoked by the second stimulation/ release evoked by the first stimulation) was close to unity (1.2), and this ratio was not altered by inclusion of 10pM CGP 37849 (1.1) or CGP 39551 (1.0) in the superfusion medium (mean values, 2 separate experiments, each in triplicate) [2].
Epileptiform activity [2]
Stimulation of Schaffer collateralcommissural fibres in hippocampal slices bathed in low Mg2 I_ containing medium previously has been shown to evoke multiple population spikes in CAI pyramidal neurones that are reminiscent of an epileptiform burst (Coan & Collingridge, 1985; Lester et al., 1988; see Figure 4b,i). Bath application of CGP 37849 at concentrations up to 10pM markedly suppressed this type of repetitive firing, while having no effect on the first population spike of the burst (Figure 4bii). This effect was rapidly reversible, with the control pattern of bursting being restored within 10min following drug wash-out (Figure 4b,iii). CGP 39551 also suppressed stimulus-induced burst firing in this experimental paradigm, but was weaker than CGP 37849 (not shown).
ln Vivo
In the rat brain, CGP 37849 exhibits a strong (Ki of 220 nM) and competitive inhibition of NMDA-sensitive l-[3H]-glutamate binding to postsynaptic density (PSD) components. The selective NMDA receptor antagonist [3H]-(±)-3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)propyl-1-phosphonate (CPP) is inhibited by CGP 37849, with a Ki of 35 nM[2]. Oral CGP 37849 given to rats in vivo can specifically inhibit hippocampus cell firing triggered by iontophoretic NMDA, while leaving the response to quilarate and kainic acid unchanged [2]. With an ED50 of 21 mg/kg, oral treatment of CGP 37849 to mice can prevent the maximal epileptic seizure caused by electric shock in mice[2].
Anticonvulsant properties of CGP 37849 and CGP 39551, two novel phosphono-amino acids which are competitive NMDA receptor antagonists, were examined in rodents. At optimal pretreatment times CGP 37849 suppressed electroshock-induced seizures in mice and rats with ED50s ranging from 8 to 22 mg/kg after oral administration, and 0.4 to 2.4 mg/kg after i.v. and i.p. injection. Relative to CGP 37849, CGP 39551 was more potent after p.o. (ED50 3.7-8.1 mg/kg), and less potent after i.v. or i.p. treatment (ED50 2.7-8.7 mg/kg). Following oral treatment, the duration of action of CGP 37849 was about 8 h, while CGP 39551 still showed good activity after 24 h (ED50 8.7 mg/kg, mouse; 21 mg/kg, rat). Both compounds were anticonvulsant at doses below those at which overt behavioural side effects were apparent. CGP 39551 delayed the development of kindling in rats at doses of 10 mg/kg p.o. and above, and showed weak anticonvulsant activity against pentylenetetrazol-evoked seizures. CGP 37849 and CGP 39551 are the first competitive NMDA antagonists to show oral anti-convulsant properties in a therapeutically-useful dose-range, and hence are interesting candidates for novel antiepileptic therapy in man. [1]
1. The pharmacological properties of CGP 37849 (DL-(E)-2-amino-4-methyl-5-phosphono-3-pentenoic acid; 4-methyl-APPA) and its carboxyethylester, CGP 39551, novel unsaturated analogues of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, 2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoate (AP5), were evaluated in rodent brain in vitro and in vivo. 2. Radioligand binding experiments demonstrated that CGP 37849 potently (Ki 220 nM) and competitively inhibited NMDA-sensitive L-[3H]-glutamate binding to postsynaptic density (PSD) fractions from rat brain. It inhibited the binding of the selective NMDA receptor antagonist, [3H]-((+/-)-3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)propyl-1-phosphonate (CPP), with a Ki of 35 nM, and was 4, 5 and 7 fold more potent than the antagonists [+/-)-cis-4-phosphonomethylpiperidine-2-carboxylic acid) (CGS 19755), CPP and D-AP5, respectively. Inhibitory activity was associated exclusively with the trans configuration of the APPA molecule and with the D-stereoisomer. CGP 39551 showed weaker activity at NMDA receptor recognition sites and both compounds were weak or inactive at 18 other receptor binding sites. 3. CGP 37849 and CGP 39551 were inactive as inhibitors of L-[3H]-glutamate uptake into rat brain synaptosomes and had no effect on the release of endogenous glutamate from rat hippocampal slices evoked by electrical field stimulation. 4. In the hippocampal slice in vitro, CGP 37849 selectively and reversibly antagonized NMDA-evoked increases in CA1 pyramidal cell firing rate. In slices bathed in medium containing low Mg2+ levels, concentrations of CGP 37849 up to 10 microM suppressed burst firing evoked in CAl neurones by stimulation of Schaffer collateral-commissural fibres without affecting the magnitude of the initial population spike; CGP 39551 exerted the same effect but was weaker. In vivo, oral administration to rats of either CGP 37849 or CGP 39551 selectively blocked firing in hippocampal neurones induced by ionophoreticallyapplied NMDA, without affecting the responses to quisqualate or kainate. 5. CGP 37849 and CGP 39551 suppressed maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice with ED50 s of 21 and 4 mg kg'- p.o., respectively. 6. CGP 37849 and CGP 39551 are potent and competitive NMDA receptor antagonists which show significant central effects following oral administration to animals. As such, they may find value as tools to elucidate the roles of NMDA receptors in brain function, and potentially as therapeutic agents for the treatment of neurological disorders such as epilepsy and ischaemic brain damage in man.[2]
Anticonvulsant properties of CGP 37849 and CGP 39551 [2]
In contrast to AP5, AP7, CPP and CGS 19755, which were ineffective anticonvulsants when given orally, CGP 37849 suppressed maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice following oral administration with an ED50 of 21 mgkg-1 (Table 1). In agreement with radioligand binding studies at the NMDA receptor (see above), anticonvulsant activity was found to reside in the D-stereoisomer (CGP 40116; ED50 7mgkg-1). Unlike the investigations in vitro, however, the ethylester of CGP 37849 (CGP 39551; ED50 4mgkg-1) was more potent than the free acid. Details of the anticonvulsant properties of CGP 37849 and CGP 39551 will be published elsewhere.
Antagonism of NMDA-evoked responses by CGP 37849 and CGP 39551 in vivo [2]
Since CGP 37849 and CGP 39551 exhibited anticonvulsant activity following oral administration, it was of interest, in terms of understanding their mechanism of action in vivo, to determine whether they antagonized NMDA-evoked responses after such treatments. Figure 5 shows that this is 7. 6 5- CD a) 'EL 3.- 1n 2 a indeed the case. At doses some 5-7 times greater than their oral ED50 s as anticonvulsants, both drugs selectively blocked the responses of hippocampal neurones to ionophoreticallyapplied NMDA, without affecting responses to quisqualate or kainate (or acetylcholine, not shown). For CGP 37849, the onset of this effect was 30-40min after administration, with almost complete blockade of NMDA-evoked responses after 75-85 min. CGP 39551 showed a longer latency to onset; clear antagonism of NMDA responses was first observed 80- 90min after oral dosage, and responses were essentially abolished after 110- 120 min.
The antidepressant properties of the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, MK-801 (dizocilpine), and the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, CGP 37849 (DL-(E)-2-amino-4-methyl-5-phosphono-3-pentonoic acid) and its (R)-enantiomer CGP 40116, were studied in a chronic mild stress model of depression. In this model, animals subjected to a variety of mild stressors for a prolonged period of time show a substantial decrease in the consumption of palatable sucrose solution (anhedonia). It was previously demonstrated that the chronic mild stress-induced anhedonia can be reversed by chronic treatment with various antidepressant drugs. In this study we found that the stress-induced deficit in sucrose intake was gradually reversed by chronic (4-5 weeks) treatment with MK-801 (0.3 mg/kg i.p.), CGP 37849 (5 mg/kg i.p.) and CGP (25 mg/kg p.o.). The magnitude of this effect and its time course were comparable to those observed following similar administration of imipramine (10 mg/kg i.p. or p.o.). The increase in sucrose intake following chronic administration of imipramine and NMDA receptor antagonists was specific to stressed animals; the behaviour of non-stressed controls was unchanged by any of the drugs tested. These results confirm those of previous studies, carried out on 'normal' animals, suggesting that antagonists of NMDA receptors may have antidepressant properties.[3]
In this paper we examined the effect of flumazenil (Ro 15-1788, 10 mg/kg), a benzodiazepine receptor antagonist, on the anticonflict activity of DL-(E)-2-amino-4-methyl-5-phosphono-3-pentenoic acid (CGP 37849), a competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, and 1-aminocyclopropanecarboxylic acid (ACPC), a partial agonist at glycine(B) receptors, in the Vogel conflict drinking test in rats. The effect of flumazenil on the anxiolytic-like (in the plus-maze test) and the anticonvulsant (in the maximal electroshock-induced seizures) activities of CGP 37849 in rats was also studied. Diazepam was used as a reference drug. CGP 37849 (2. 5-5 mg/kg), ACPC (50-200 mg/kg) and diazepam (2.5-5 mg/kg) significantly and dose-dependently increased the number of shocks accepted during experimental sessions in the conflict drinking test. Flumazenil partly but significantly reduced the anticonflict effect of CGP 37849, and it fully blocked the anticonflict effect of ACPC and diazepam. CGP 37849 (2.5-5 mg/kg) and diazepam (2.5-5 mg/kg) were also active in the plus-maze test, as they significantly increased the percentage of the time spent in and entries into the open arms of the plus-maze, both those effects having been antagonized by flumazenil. Flumazenil alone was inactive in both the conflict drinking and the plus-maze tests. In the maximal electroshock-induced seizures, both CGP 37849 (2.5-5 mg/kg) and diazepam (5-10 mg/kg) produced anticonvulsant effects, of which only that of diazepam was antagonized by flumazenil. The results of the present study showing antagonism of flumazenil towards the anxiolytic-like effects of CGP 37849 and ACPC suggest involvement of benzodiazepine receptors in such an activity of the NMDA and glycine(B) receptor ligands, respectively, which may be due to a possible interaction between NMDA and GABA/benzodiazepine systems. The lack of effect of the benzodiazepine antagonist on the anticonvulsant activity of CGP 37849 indicates that involvement of benzodiazepine receptors in the pharmacological action of the NMDA antagonist is not a general phenomenon [4].
Enzyme Assay
NMDA receptor assays [2]
Subcellular fractions enriched in postsynaptic densities (PSDs) were isolated from the brains of adult male Tif:RAIf(SPF) rats (180-250g) as previously described (Foster & Fagg, 1987a). In brief, synaptic plasma membranes were isolated by sucrose density gradient centrifugation, treated with 0.4% Triton X-100, subjected to one freeze-thaw cycle, and washed 4 times by resuspension and centrifugation in 0.5 mm HEPES-KOH buffer (pH 7.0). The resultant crude PSDs were stored as a suspension at -800C until assay, at which time they were thawed, washed once more and resuspended in assay buffer. The binding of L-[3,4-3H]-glutamic acid (44.1Cimmol-'), [1,2-3H]-CPP (20 Ci mmol- 1) (Olverman et al., 1986; Murphy et al., 1987) and [2-3H]-glycine (43.5Cimmol-t) (Bristow et al., 1986; Kessler et al., 1989) was determined essentially according to previously published procedures. Aliquots (40- 50pg protein) of crude PSDs were incubated in triplicate with radioligand (50 nM L-[3H]-glutamate; 25 nm [3H]-CPP; 20nm [3H]-glycine) in a final volume of 0.5ml 50mM Tris-acetate buffer (pH 6.9 for L-[3H]-glutamate; pH 7.8 for [3H]-CPP; pH 7.5 for [3H]-glycine), and membrane-bound radioactivity was measured after centrifugation and aspiration of the supernatant. Incubations were 30min at 32°C for L-[3H]-glutamate and [3H]-CPP, and 20 min at 4°C for [3H]-glycine. Non-specific binding was determined in the presence of 0.5 mM L-glutamate, 0.1 mM CPP or 0.5 mm glycine, and was routinely about 15%, 30% and 25% of total binding, respectively. Potential inhibitors were added to the incubation tubes prior to the addition of radioligand. IC50 values were determined by fitting data to the logistic equation using an iterative curve fitting procedure operated on a VAX 8600 computer, and Ki values were calculated from the relationship: Ki = IC54/(l + F/Kd), where F is the free concentration of radioligand and Kd its equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd values were determined by saturation analyses of the type illustrated in Figure 2; mean values used here were 250nM for L-[3H]- glutamate, and 130 nM for [3H]-CPP).
Other receptors [2]
Radioreceptor assays were conducted by use of procedures which have been established and documented previously (Foster et alt, 1981; Honore & Nielsen, 1985; Lehmann et al., 1988). Assays (and radioligands) used were as follows: quisqualate (AMPA), kainate (kainate), GABAA (muscimol), benzodiazepine (flunitrazepam), GABAB (CGP 27492), adenosine (cyclohexyladenosine), muscarinic cholinoceptor (diozalane and QNB), xl-adrenoceptor (prazosin), a2-adrenoceptor (clonidine), f0-adrenoceptor (dihydroalprenolol), 5-HT1 (5-HT), 5-HT2 (ketanserin), histamine H1 (doxepine), histamine H2 (thiotidine), substance P (substance P) and neurotensin (neurotensin). All assays were validated using standard reference compounds. Transport studies The Na+-dependent uptake of L-[3,4-3H]-glutamate (52.6 Ci mmol'-) into crude synaptosomal (P2) fractions isolated from rat brain was investigated by the method described by Yunger et al., (1984) for [3H]-GABA uptake with minor modifications. In brief, the P2 fraction (recovered as a pellet in 0.32M sucrose) was suspended in 0.32 M glucose and diluted with Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer (composition in mM: NaCl 118, KCI 4.8, CaCl2 2.7, MgSO4 1.2, KH2PO4 1.2, NaHCO3 25, final glucose concentration 8, equilibrated with 5% CO2 in 02) containing 0.1 mM isoniazid and L-methionine sulphoximine to inhibit the metabolism of L-[3H]-glutamate. Aliquots of this P2 suspension were preincubated in duplicate (with test compounds as appropriate) at 37°C for 15min before addition of L-[3H]- glutamate (final concentration 1 pM, except for Km determinations). 'Blank' tubes were incubated on ice. Incubations were continued for a further 3 min, and were terminated by rapid filtration (0.45 pm pore size) and washing twice with ice-cold buffer. Radioactivity retained on the filter was determined by liquid scintillation counting.
Transmitter release experiments [2]
The electrically-evoked release of endogenous glutamate from rat hippocampal slices was determined by a slight modification of the method described by Waldmeier et al. (1988) for the release of endogenous GABA. Cross-chopped slices (about 0.36 x 0.36 x 1 mm) were suspended in a Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer (composition as for Transport studies above, except that the final concentrations of CaCl2 and D-glucose were 1.8mm and 10mm, respectively) equilibrated with 5% CO2 in °2, and aliquots were transferred to superfusion chambers with platinum ring electrodes above and below the tissue slices. Slices were superfused with buffer (0.25 ml min-1, 37°C) containing 0.5mm dihydrokainate (to inhibit reuptake) for 1 h before collecting 1.25 ml fractions for amino acid analysis. The glutamate content of the superfusate and of the slices (collected at the end of each experiment) were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (h.p.l.c.) after pre-column derivatization with o-phthalaldehyde, and the glutamate released in each fraction was expressed as a percentage of the tissue content at the time of collection (% fractional release). Previous studies have shown that, in this system, the evoked release of endogenous glutamate is frequency-dependent over the range 2-40 Hz and is entirely Ca2 f-dependent (Thedinga et al., 1989). For the experiments described here, two trains of monophasic pulses (1O Hz, 20 mA, 2 ms, 2 min duration) were delivered during fractions 3 (Sj and 9 (S2); the first stimulation was always in superfusion buffer alone, and the second was either in the absence or the presence of test compounds (added to the buffer 20 min previously). Drug effects on evoked release were determined by comparing the ratio S2/ S1 in drug-treated and control slices (Waldmeier et al., 1988). All experiments were conducted in triplicate.
Electrophysiological investigations [2]
In vitro Experiments were performed on transverse hippocampal slices (450pm) prepared from male Tif:RAIf(SPF) rats (150-200g weight) as previously described (Olpe & Lynch, 1982). Slices were allowed to stabilize in a humidified interface chamber, and were subsequently perfused (6 ml min- ; equivalent to 2 chamber volumes per min) with a physiological salt solution (composition in mM: NaCl 124, KCl 2.5, CaCl2 2.5, MgSO4 2, KH2PO4 1.25, NaHCO3 26, D-glucose 10; gassed with 5% CO2 in 02) at 320C. Extracellular recordings were made from the stratum pyramidale region of area CAI by use of glass microelectrodes filled with 4M NaCl. Two series of experiments were performed: (1) Agonistantagonist interactions were investigated by applying submaximal concentrations (10pM) of NMDA, quisqualate or kainate at intervals of 5-10 min in the presence and absence of test blockers, and by plotting the firing rate of single neurones (action potentials in 5-10 s bins) on a chart recorder. All substances were applied via the perfusion system to submerged hippocampal slices. (2) The ability of test drugs to block synaptically-evoked epileptiform activity was evaluated using an approach employed by Coan & Collingridge (1985). Stable single population spikes were first elicited in CA1 neurones by stimulation of Schaffer collateral-commissural fibres (submerged slices), and the Mg2+ concentration of the perfusion medium was then decreased from 2 mm to nominally 0.1 mm (conditions which reduce the voltage-dependent blockade of the NMDA receptor ion channel). Subsequent sub-maximal stimulation (at a frequency of 0.125 Hz) evoked bursts of population spikes, which previously have been shown to be sensitive to blockade by NMDA receptor antagonists (Coan & Collingridge, 1985; Lester et al., 1988).
Animal Protocol
In vivo [2]
Male rats (Tif:RAII(SPF), 280-320g weight) were anaesthetized with chloral hydrate (400mg kg- 1, i.p.) and the tips of four-barrelled micropipettes were stereotaxically positioned in the region of the hippocampal CAI pyramidal neurones. Three barrels of the pipette contained NMDA, quisqualate and kainate (0.01 M, pH 10) and the fourth recording barrel 4 M NaCl. Excitatory amino acids were applied ionophoretically (currents 20-3OnA; adjusted to yield similar response amplitudes) for periods of 20-60s at constant intervals of 2-3min (retaining currents of 20nA were employed between drug applications). The number of action potentials in 5-lOs bins was plotted on a chart recorder, and responses to ionophoretically-applied agonists were monitored for up to 8h. Antagonists were dissolved in physiological saline and were administered cumulatively (3 h intervals) via a canula in the oesophagus.
Anticonvulsant evaluation [2]
Convulsions in mice were elicited by maximal electroshock (Bernasconi et al., 1986). Brief current pulses (16mA, 50 Hz, 0.2s) were applied via corneal electrodes and the number of animals displaying tonic hind limb extension seizures after saline or drug administration (5 animals per dose group) was determined. Test anticonvulsants were administered orally (via an oesophageal cannula) 2-4h before electroshock. ED50 values (dose which prevented seizures in 50% of animals) were determined by the method of Spearman-Kaerber.
CGP 37849 wasdissolved in distilled water [4]

Animals [4]
The experiments were carried out on male Wistar rats weighing 180–190 g (electroshock-induced seizures test) or 220–250 g (conflict drinking test and elevated plus-maze test). The animals were kept in groups of eight in a cage (60×38×20 cm), at a room temperature of 20±1°C, and had free access to food (standard laboratory pellets) and water before the experiments
Conflict drinking test (Vogel test) [4]
A modification of the method of Vogel et al. (1971) was used. On the first day of the experiment the rats were adapted to the test chamber for 10 min. It was a plexiglass box (27×27×50 cm), equipped with a grid floor of stainless steel bars and with a drinking bottle containing tapwater. After the initial adaptation period, the animals were deprived of water for 24 h and were then placed in the test chamber for a further 10-min adaptation period during which they had free access to the drinking bottle. Afterwards, they were allowed a 30-min free-drinking session in their home cage. After another 24-h water deprivation period, the rats were placed again in the test chamber and were allowed to drink for 30 sec. Immediately afterwards, drinking attempts were punished with an electric shock (0.5 mA). The impulses were released every 2 sec (timed from the moment when a preceding shock was delivered) between the grid floor and the spout of the drinking bottle. Each shock lasted for 1 sec, and if a rat was drinking when an impulse was released, it received a shock. The number of shocks accepted throughout a 5-min experimental session were recorded. Behavioural responses were recorded by one experimenter unaware of the treatment the rats had received.
Elevated plus-maze test [4]
The construction and the testing procedure of an elevated plus-maze were based on a method described by Pellow and File (1986). Each rat was placed in the centre of the plus-maze, facing one of the enclosed arms immediately after a 5-min adaptation in a wooden box (60×60×35 cm). During a 5-min test period, two experimenters who were sitting in the same room approximately 1 m from the end of one of the open arms recorded the number of entries into the closed or the open arms, as well as the time spent in each type of arm. An entry with all four feet put into one arm was defined as an arm entry. At the end of each trial the maze was wiped clean.
Electroshock-induced seizures [4]
Seizures were induced according to the method of Swinyard et al. (1952). Electroshocks were delivered through ear-clip electrodes and were generated by a stimulator which produced an alternating current of 50 Hz and 150 mA for 0.5 sec. Each rat received a single electroshock only. The criterion for the occurrence of seizure activity was tonic extension of the hind limbs.
References

[1]. The competitive NMDA receptor antagonists CGP 37849 and CGP 39551 are potent, orally-active anticonvulsants in rodents. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1990 Jul;342(1):61-6.

[2]. CGP 37849 and CGP 39551: novel and potent competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists with oral activity. Br J Pharmacol. 1990 Apr;99(4):791-7.

[3]. Antidepressant activity of non-competitive and competitive NMDA receptor antagonists in a chronic mild stress model of depression. Eur J Pharmacol. 1994 Sep 22;263(1-2):1-7.

[4]. The influence of the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist flumazenil on the anxiolytic-like effects of CGP 37849 and ACPC in rats. Neuropharmacology. 2000 Jul 24;39(10):1858-64.

Additional Infomation
CGP 37849 (or 4-methyl-APPA) is a novel competitive antagonist at the NMDA-preferring sub-type of excitatory amino acid receptor and, together with its carboxyethylester (CGP 39551), is the first agent of this pharmacological class reported to show significant central effects following oral administration in animals. The NMDA receptor-active properties of CGP 37849 were identified on the basis of its high affinity for L-[3H]-glutamate binding sites in rat brain PSDs (predominantly NMDA-sensitive sites, see Foster & Fagg, 1987a; Fagg & Baud, 1988) and were confirmed using the selective NMDA receptor radioligand, [3H]-CPP (Olverman et al., 1986; Murphy et al., 1987). In the hippocampal slice preparation, it showed no agonist activity, but antagonized NMDA-evoked increases in neuronal firing at concentrations within the range shown to inhibit radioligand binding to the NMDA receptor recognition site; in addition, its ability to suppress burst firing in CAI pyramidal neurones without affecting the fast excitatory postsynaptic potential (e.p.s.p.) or population spike is in accordance with the properties of NMDA receptor antagonists as established by other investigators (Collingridge et al., 1983; Coan & Collingridge, 1985; Lester et al., 1988). The selectivity of CGP 37849 was indicated by its negligible interactions with binding sites for a range of other neurotransmitter receptors, including those for the quisqualate and kainate excitatory receptor sub-types, while its weak activity at strychnine-insensitive glycine binding sites provided further evidence that its primary locus of action on the NMDA rncoptor was indeed the transmitter recognition site. Additional demonstrations of its selectivity were obtained from electrophysiological studies in the hippocampus in vitro and in vivo, in which it failed to affect neuronal responses to applied quisqualate or kainate at doses which reduced or abolished responses to NMDA. With a Ki of 35 nm at [3H]-CPP binding sites, CGP 37849 thus shows a higher affinity and selectivity for the NMDA receptor recognition site than any compound described to date. NMDA receptor antagonists have been shown to exhibit anticonvulsant activity following central or systemic (i.p. or i.v.) administration to a variety of animal species (see Meldrum, 1985; Lehmann et al., 1987; 1988; Patel et al., 1988), and the oral efficacy of CGP 37849 was initially discerned from its ability to prevent maximal electroshockinduced seizures in mice; Its potency in this respect (ED50 21 mg kg-, p.o.) is within a therapeutically-useful dose-range as compared with established anticonvulsant drugs (see Meldrum & Porter, 1986), and was further augmented by esterification of the carboxyl moiety (yielding CGP 39551, ED50 4mgkg- 1, p.o.) (detailed anticonvulsant profiles for CGP 37849 and CGP 39551 will be published elsewhere). That these compounds are indeed acting centrally as NMDA receptor antagonists following oral administration was suggested by their observed enantiomeric selectivity (D-isomer active, as for all known NMDA receptor antagonists; see Watkins et al., 1990), and was more directly demonstrated by microionophoretic experiments in the rat hippocampus in vivo. At doses some 5-7 fold higher than their oral ED50s as anticonvulsants, both compounds were shown to abolish neuronal responses to NMDA, without affecting those to quisqualate, kainate or acetylcholine. The onset of action of CGP 39551 in this regard was somewhat slower than that of CGP 37489. This observation, coupled with the weaker action of CGP 39551 in vitro and current understanding of structureactivity relationships at the NMDA receptor (Fagg & Baud, 1988; Watkins et al., 1990), may indicate that the esterified compound functions as a more-readily absorbed pro-drug of CGP 37849 in vivo. However, definitive proof of the precursor-product relationship of these two substances in vivo is required to verify this hypothesis. CGP 37849 and CGP 39551 are the first competitive NMDA receptor antagonists reported to show significant central effects following oral administration in animals, and hence are candidates for the treatment of neurological disorders in man which require either acute or chronic drug administration. Whilst extensive discussion is outside the realms of this paper, it is appropriate to consider some of the issues which must be resolved before this goal can be realized. Major questions have centred on the therapeutic window of NMDA receptor antagonists (loss of muscle tone occurs at sufficient dosage; see Turski et al., 1988), their possible psychotomimetic effects (based on experience in man with noncompetitive blockers such as PCP and ketamine; see Domino & Luby, 1981; Lodge et al., 1988), and their potentially detrimental effects on learning (Morris et al., 1986; Collingridge & Bliss, 1987). In this respect, recent evidence indicates that competitive NMDA receptor antagonists may have significant advantages over non-competitive blockers (Meldrum, 1985; Ferkany et al., 1988; Leander et al., 1988; France et al., 1989; Tricklebank et al., 1989). Studies on the novel competitive NMDA receptor antagonists described here indicate, especially in the case of CGP 39551, a therapeutic window at least as great as clinically-used anticonvulsant agents (Fagg et al., 1989a; Schmutz et al., unpublished observations), no direct impairments of learning performance in the anticonvulsant dose-range (Mondadori, Buerki & Petschke, unpublished), and no generalization to the discriminative stimulus effects of ketamine or MK801 in rhesus monkeys (France & Woods, personal communication). Pending favourable toxicological profiles, they are thus leading candidates for clinical testing in man.[2]
The competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist DL-2-amino-4-methyl-5-phosphono-3-pentenoic acid (CAS 127910-31-0, 4-methyl-APPA, CGP 37849) and its ethyl ester (CAS 127910-32-1, CGP 39551) potently block NMDA-evoked whole-cell current on mouse spinal neurones in primary dissociated cell cultures with IC50 (+/- SE) values of 189 +/- 9 nmol/l (CGP 37849) and 2100 +/- 220 nmol/l (CGP 39551), respectively. The compounds dose-dependently blocked vestibular stimulation-induced convulsions in EL mice, 2 h after oral administration, with ED50 (95% CI) values of 135 (78-236) mumol/kg (CGP 37849) and 65 (45-94) mumol/kg (CGP 39551). In male Swiss albino mice, performance in the step-through passive avoidance procedure was dose-dependently impaired with ED50 (95% CI) values of 85 (56-157) mumol/kg (CGP 37849) and 27 (18-42) mumol/kg (CGP 39551). In addition performance of these animals in the rotarod test of motor coordination was impaired, 2 h after oral administration of CGP 39551, with an ED50 (95% CI) of 142 (100-201) mumol/kg. These findings demonstrate anticonvulsant activity in these potent NMDA antagonists after oral administration with CGP 39551 possessing greater relative potency. However, the unfavourable ratio of therapeutic dose versus dose inducing memory or motor impairment supports the prevailing notion that such adverse effects of the presently available compounds preclude the use of NMDA antagonists as long-term therapies.[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9893924/]
These protocols are for reference only. InvivoChem does not independently validate these methods.
Physicochemical Properties
Molecular Formula
C6H12NO5P
Molecular Weight
209.14
Exact Mass
209.045
Elemental Analysis
C, 34.46; H, 5.78; N, 6.70; O, 38.25; P, 14.81
CAS #
127910-31-0
PubChem CID
5950212
Appearance
White to off-white solid powder
Density
1.506 g/cm3
Boiling Point
523.1ºC at 760 mmHg
Flash Point
270.2ºC
LogP
0.222
Hydrogen Bond Donor Count
4
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count
6
Rotatable Bond Count
4
Heavy Atom Count
13
Complexity
268
Defined Atom Stereocenter Count
0
SMILES
C/C(=C\C(C(=O)O)N)/CP(=O)(O)O
InChi Key
BDYHNCZIGYIOGJ-DUXPYHPUSA-N
InChi Code
InChI=1S/C6H12NO5P/c1-4(3-13(10,11)12)2-5(7)6(8)9/h2,5H,3,7H2,1H3,(H,8,9)(H2,10,11,12)/b4-2+
Chemical Name
(E)-2-amino-4-methyl-5-phosphonopent-3-enoic acid
Synonyms
CGP-37849; CGP 37849; 127910-31-0; Cgp 37,849; Cgp-37,849; (E)-2-amino-4-methyl-5-phosphonopent-3-enoic acid; CGP37,849; 3-Pentenoic acid, 2-amino-4-methyl-5-phosphono-, (3E)-; 76IND1BS43; DTXSID40873634; CGP37849
HS Tariff Code
2934.99.9001
Storage

Powder      -20°C    3 years

                     4°C     2 years

In solvent   -80°C    6 months

                  -20°C    1 month

Note: Please store this product in a sealed and protected environment, avoid exposure to moisture.
Shipping Condition
Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)
Solubility Data
Solubility (In Vitro)
May dissolve in DMSO (in most cases), if not, try other solvents such as H2O, Ethanol, or DMF with a minute amount of products to avoid loss of samples
Solubility (In Vivo)
Note: Listed below are some common formulations that may be used to formulate products with low water solubility (e.g. < 1 mg/mL), you may test these formulations using a minute amount of products to avoid loss of samples.

Injection Formulations
(e.g. IP/IV/IM/SC)
Injection Formulation 1: DMSO : Tween 80: Saline = 10 : 5 : 85 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO stock solution 50 μL Tween 80 850 μL Saline)
*Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH ₂ O to obtain a clear solution.
Injection Formulation 2: DMSO : PEG300Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO 400 μLPEG300 50 μL Tween 80 450 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 3: DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO 900 μL Corn oil)
Example: Take the Injection Formulation 3 (DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90) as an example, if 1 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can take 100 μL 25 mg/mL DMSO stock solution and add to 900 μL corn oil, mix well to obtain a clear or suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals).
View More

Injection Formulation 4: DMSO : 20% SBE-β-CD in saline = 10 : 90 [i.e. 100 μL DMSO 900 μL (20% SBE-β-CD in saline)]
*Preparation of 20% SBE-β-CD in Saline (4°C,1 week): Dissolve 2 g SBE-β-CD in 10 mL saline to obtain a clear solution.
Injection Formulation 5: 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin : Saline = 50 : 50 (i.e. 500 μL 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin 500 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 6: DMSO : PEG300 : castor oil : Saline = 5 : 10 : 20 : 65 (i.e. 50 μL DMSO 100 μLPEG300 200 μL castor oil 650 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 7: Ethanol : Cremophor : Saline = 10: 10 : 80 (i.e. 100 μL Ethanol 100 μL Cremophor 800 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 8: Dissolve in Cremophor/Ethanol (50 : 50), then diluted by Saline
Injection Formulation 9: EtOH : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH 900 μL Corn oil)
Injection Formulation 10: EtOH : PEG300Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH 400 μLPEG300 50 μL Tween 80 450 μL Saline)


Oral Formulations
Oral Formulation 1: Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na (carboxymethylcellulose sodium)
Oral Formulation 2: Suspend in 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Example: Take the Oral Formulation 1 (Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na) as an example, if 100 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can first prepare 0.5% CMC Na solution by measuring 0.5 g CMC Na and dissolve it in 100 mL ddH2O to obtain a clear solution; then add 250 mg of the product to 100 mL 0.5% CMC Na solution, to make the suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals).
View More

Oral Formulation 3: Dissolved in PEG400
Oral Formulation 4: Suspend in 0.2% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Oral Formulation 5: Dissolve in 0.25% Tween 80 and 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Oral Formulation 6: Mixing with food powders


Note: Please be aware that the above formulations are for reference only. InvivoChem strongly recommends customers to read literature methods/protocols carefully before determining which formulation you should use for in vivo studies, as different compounds have different solubility properties and have to be formulated differently.

 (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.)
Preparing Stock Solutions 1 mg 5 mg 10 mg
1 mM 4.7815 mL 23.9074 mL 47.8149 mL
5 mM 0.9563 mL 4.7815 mL 9.5630 mL
10 mM 0.4781 mL 2.3907 mL 4.7815 mL

*Note: Please select an appropriate solvent for the preparation of stock solution based on your experiment needs. For most products, DMSO can be used for preparing stock solutions (e.g. 5 mM, 10 mM, or 20 mM concentration); some products with high aqueous solubility may be dissolved in water directly. Solubility information is available at the above Solubility Data section. Once the stock solution is prepared, aliquot it to routine usage volumes and store at -20°C or -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze and thaw cycles.

Calculator

Molarity Calculator allows you to calculate the mass, volume, and/or concentration required for a solution, as detailed below:

  • Calculate the Mass of a compound required to prepare a solution of known volume and concentration
  • Calculate the Volume of solution required to dissolve a compound of known mass to a desired concentration
  • Calculate the Concentration of a solution resulting from a known mass of compound in a specific volume
An example of molarity calculation using the molarity calculator is shown below:
What is the mass of compound required to make a 10 mM stock solution in 5 ml of DMSO given that the molecular weight of the compound is 350.26 g/mol?
  • Enter 350.26 in the Molecular Weight (MW) box
  • Enter 10 in the Concentration box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 5 in the Volume box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 17.513 mg appears in the Mass box. In a similar way, you may calculate the volume and concentration.

Dilution Calculator allows you to calculate how to dilute a stock solution of known concentrations. For example, you may Enter C1, C2 & V2 to calculate V1, as detailed below:

What volume of a given 10 mM stock solution is required to make 25 ml of a 25 μM solution?
Using the equation C1V1 = C2V2, where C1=10 mM, C2=25 μM, V2=25 ml and V1 is the unknown:
  • Enter 10 into the Concentration (Start) box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Concentration (End) box and select the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Volume (End) box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 62.5 μL (0.1 ml) appears in the Volume (Start) box
g/mol

Molecular Weight Calculator allows you to calculate the molar mass and elemental composition of a compound, as detailed below:

Note: Chemical formula is case sensitive: C12H18N3O4  c12h18n3o4
Instructions to calculate molar mass (molecular weight) of a chemical compound:
  • To calculate molar mass of a chemical compound, please enter the chemical/molecular formula and click the “Calculate’ button.
Definitions of molecular mass, molecular weight, molar mass and molar weight:
  • Molecular mass (or molecular weight) is the mass of one molecule of a substance and is expressed in the unified atomic mass units (u). (1 u is equal to 1/12 the mass of one atom of carbon-12)
  • Molar mass (molar weight) is the mass of one mole of a substance and is expressed in g/mol.
/

Reconstitution Calculator allows you to calculate the volume of solvent required to reconstitute your vial.

  • Enter the mass of the reagent and the desired reconstitution concentration as well as the correct units
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer appears in the Volume (to add to vial) box
In vivo Formulation Calculator (Clear solution)
Step 1: Enter information below (Recommended: An additional animal to make allowance for loss during the experiment)
Step 2: Enter in vivo formulation (This is only a calculator, not the exact formulation for a specific product. Please contact us first if there is no in vivo formulation in the solubility section.)
+
+
+

Calculation results

Working concentration mg/mL;

Method for preparing DMSO stock solution mg drug pre-dissolved in μL DMSO (stock solution concentration mg/mL). Please contact us first if the concentration exceeds the DMSO solubility of the batch of drug.

Method for preparing in vivo formulation:Take μL DMSO stock solution, next add μL PEG300, mix and clarify, next addμL Tween 80, mix and clarify, next add μL ddH2O,mix and clarify.

(1) Please be sure that the solution is clear before the addition of next solvent. Dissolution methods like vortex, ultrasound or warming and heat may be used to aid dissolving.
             (2) Be sure to add the solvent(s) in order.

Contact Us