| Size | Price | Stock | Qty |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5mg |
|
||
| 10mg |
|
||
| 50mg |
|
||
| Other Sizes |
| Targets |
GPR35 (Ki = 12.8 nM)
|
|---|---|
| ln Vitro |
The CID 2745687 (CID2745687) Ki for ERK1/2 phosphorylation using 1 μM Pamoic acid as the agonist is 18 nM[1]. In β-arrestin-2 interaction experiments, CID 2745687 (CID-2745687) is a strong antagonist limited to human GPR35 [2]. With an agonist concentration of 20 μM Zaprinast and the BRET-based GPR35-β-arrestin-2 interaction test, CID 2745687 exhibited moderate potency and concentration dependence at human GPR35, with a pIC50 of 6.70±0.09[2]. CID 2745687 (pIC50=6.27±0.08) completely counteracts Cromolyn disodium's agonistic effects [2].
Identification of CID2745687 as a GPR35 Antagonist with the Use of High Content Screening. [1] There are no recognized GPR35 antagonists, but if such compounds were available, they would probably be useful as antitumor agents or as tool compounds in delineating the physiological role of GPR35 in animal models. To identify GPR35 antagonists, we assessed compounds for their ability to block 10 μM zaprinast-induced βarr2-GFP translocation. In a screen performed at the Sanford-Burnham Institute Molecular Libraries Probe Production Center, we assessed 293,187 compounds in an image-based high-content primary screen (PubChem AID 2508), and approximately 150 demonstrated low micromolar or better activities. Two structurally related hits, CID2745684 and CID2745687, are shown in Fig. 6A with the results of a confirmatory dose response performed down to 0.5 μM. The compounds' chemical identities and purities were confirmed using high-pressure liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (the spectra are shown in Supplemental Fig. S3). Representative images from the high-throughput screen are shown in Supplemental Fig. S4. The more potent of the two, CID2745687, was obtained as a dry powder, and its ability to antagonize GPR35 response was further evaluated against 1 μM pamoic acid. In Fig. 6B are representative images of βarr2-GFP recruitment in the presence of antagonist alone, pamoic acid alone, and pamoic acid in the presence of the antagonist where the inhibition of recruitment by CID2745687 is evident. In the βarr2-GFP trafficking assay (Fig. 6C, left), CID2745687 demonstrates a Ki of 12.8 nM (7.5–21.8) from three independent experiments. For ERK1/2 phosphorylation with 1 μM pamoic acid as the agonist (Fig. 6D, left), the CID2745687 Ki is 18 nM (9.1–35.7; n = 3). The antagonism of CID2745687 is also reversible (Fig. 6C, right) and competitive (Fig. 6D, right). To confirm that pamoic acid also activates GPR35 from other species, HEK293 cells were transiently cotransfected with plasmids for untagged mouse GPR35 and βarr2-GFP. Application of either pamoic acid (1 μM) or zaprinast (5 μM) induced trafficking of βarr2-GFP (Supplemental Fig. S5) was prevented by coincubation with CID2745687. Antagonists of GPR35 Also Display Marked Species Ortholog Selectivity. [2] Based on the marked species selectivity of certain agonist ligands, we next considered whether species selectivity might also be true of reported antagonists. CID2745687 (Fig. 1) is the only GPR35 antagonist detailed so far in the primary scientific literature (Zhao et al., 2010). Using the BRET-based GPR35-β-arrestin-2 interaction assay and an EC80 concentration of zaprinast (2 × 10−5 M) as agonist, CID-2745687 behaved as a moderately potent, concentration-dependent antagonist at human GPR35 with pIC50 = 6.70 ± 0.09 (mean ± S.E.M.; n = 9) (Fig. 5A). By contrast, even at 1 × 10−4 M CID-2745687 did not substantially block the agonist action of an EC80 concentration of zaprinast (4 × 10−6 M) at mouse GPR35 (Fig. 5A), and a similar inability to antagonize the effect of an EC80 concentration of zaprinast (4 × 10−7 M) was observed with rat GPR35 (Fig. 5A). This again was unexpected because Zhao et al. (2010) have reported CID-2745687 blocks the effects of zaprinast in a mouse pain model. Equivalent results were obtained with cromolyn disodium as agonist. Once again, a concentration-dependent inhibitory activity of CID-2745687 (pIC50 = 6.27 ± 0.08, mean ± S.E.M.; n = 9) to fully reverse the agonist action of an EC80 concentration of cromolyn disodium was observed only at the human ortholog (Fig. 5B). Although we were only able to explore the ability to inhibit the agonist action of pamoate at human GPR35, CID2745687 did so fully and in a concentration-dependent manner with pIC50 = 7.16 ± 0.12 (mean ± S.E.M.; n = 9) (Fig. 5C). Both CID2745687 and ML-145 Can Also Prevent Agonist-Induced Internalization of Human GPR35. [2] It is noteworthy that both CID-2745687 and ML-145 (1 × 10−5 M) also fully blocked internalization of human FLAG-GPR35-eYFP in response to varying concentrations of zaprinast, cromolyn disodium, and pamoate (Fig. 7, A–C). This was not the case for either CID2745687 or ML-145 when tested against zaprinast at rat FLAG-GPR35-eYFP (Fig. 7D). At mouse FLAG-GPR35-eYFP, although ML-145 was without effect on the potency or effect of zaprinast (Fig. 7E), at 1 × 10−5 M CID-2745687 consistently produced a modest, but not statistically significant, decrease in potency but not a maximal effect of zaprinast (Fig. 7E). To explore this more fully, the ability of varying concentrations of ML-145 or CID-2745687 to prevent internalization of the human or mouse orthologs of GPR35 in response to an EC80 concentration of zaprinast was assessed. Here, both ML-145 (Fig. 8A) and CID-2745687 (Fig. 8B) were effective inhibitors of zaprinast at the human ortholog but neither produced a substantial effect at the mouse ortholog (Fig. 8, C and D). Equivalent results for both ML-145 (Fig. 8, A, and C) and CID-2745687 (Fig. 8, B and D) were produced when EC80 concentrations of cromolyn disodium (at both human and mouse GPR35) or pamoate (at the human ortholog) were used. CID2745687 Inhibits the Action of Agonists at Human GPR35 by Distinct Mechanisms. [2] To assess whether CID-2745687 also acted as a competitive antagonist, the ability of a range of concentrations of this ligand to alter the concentration-response curves of zaprinast, cromolyn disodium, and pamoate was also examined at human GPR35. For both zaprinast (Fig. 11D) and cromolyn disodium (Fig. 11E) such studies produced surmountable shifts in the potency of the agonist to higher concentrations. Global-fit analyses of such curves were also consistent with a competitive mode of antagonism with pA2 affinity values for CID-2745687 of 7.7 to 7.8 (1.6–1.9 × 10−8 M) and slope factor close to 1.0. By contrast, equivalent studies with pamoate produced very different results (Fig. 11F). Increasing concentrations of CID-2745687 had little effect on the EC50 of pamoate but rather decreased the maximal effect of the agonist, which is indicative of a noncompetitive mode of action. Consistent with the observations that both zaprinast and cromolyn disodium were antagonized competitively by CID2745687 and ML-145 and are full agonists in the β-arrestin-2 interaction assay, the addition of a series of submaximally effective concentrations of cromolyn disodium did not alter the observed EC50 of zaprinast at human GPR35 (Fig. 12), suggesting the two agonists share a common or overlapping binding site (Jenkins et al., 2011). |
| ln Vivo |
A particular GPR35 antagonist, CID-2745687 (CID2745687; 1 mg/kg; taken orally daily for the last 4 weeks), counteracts the anti-fibrotic effects of lodoxamide[3].
Protective effect of lodoxamide on CCl4-induced liver fibrosis [3] Intraperitoneal injection of CCl4 twice a week for eight weeks was performed to induce liver fibrosis. Lodoxamide and/or CID2745687 were administrated orally every day for the last 4 weeks. Body and liver weights were unchanged after administration of CCl4, lodoxamide, and CID2745687 (Supplementary Fig. 1A, 1B). The ratio of liver to body weight was also unchanged (Supplementary Fig. 1C). Serum AST and ALT levels were elevated by CCl4 treatment, implying liver injury, although these levels were unchanged after lodoxamide and CID2745687 treatment (Fig. 1). In order to measure histological changes induced by chronic liver fibrosis, the liver tissues were stained with H&E (Fig. 2). Compared to normal tissue (control), CCl4 induced severe injury, which appears as injured areas in the slide. Lodoxamide protected from the CCl4-induced injury and co-administration of CID2745687 inhibited lodoxamide-mediated protective effects (Fig. 2). Liver injury was semi-quantitatively evaluated using a subjective scale of 0–5, as previously described (Lim et al., 2016). Quantitative evaluation of liver injury confirmed the protective effect of lodoxamide and inhibition by CID2745687 (Fig. 2E). In order to confirm liver fibrosis, Masson’s trichrome staining was also performed. As shown in Fig. 3, CCl4 induced fibrosis, as shown by blue-stained areas, while liver tissues from lodoxamide-treated mice exhibited less fibrosis. CID2745687 inhibited lodoxamide’s protective effects (Fig. 3). Degree of liver fibrosis was semi-quantitatively evaluated using a subjective scale of 0–5 in Ishak stage (Lim et al., 2016; Nallagangula et al., 2017). The result clearly showed the protective effect of lodoxamide and inhibition by CID2745687 (Fig. 3). Next, changes in the mRNA levels of pro-fibrotic markers were measured in liver tissues. mRNA expression of the profibrotic markers, collagen Iα1, collagen Iα2, collagen IIIα1, αSMA, TIMP1, TGF-β1, and fibronectin in CCl4-treated liver tissues was measured by RT-PCR (Fig. 4A). mRNA levels of collagen Iα1, collagen Iα2, TIMP1, TGF-β1, and fibronectin were significantly elevated in livers of CCl4-treated mice, and CCl4-induced increase of collagen Iα1, collagen Iα2, and TGF-β1 was suppressed in lodoxamide-treated mice (Fig. 4B). CID2745687 co-treatment reversed the effects of lodoxamide treatment on TGF-β1 significantly, but not on others. Collagen IIIα1 and αSMA were unchanged by CCl4 treatment (Fig. 4A). |
| Cell Assay |
β-Arrestin Assay for Determining Receptor Responsiveness. [1]
U2OS cells transiently expressing human GPR35b and βarr2-GFP or HEK 293 cells transiently expressing mouse GPR35 and βarr2-GFP were used 48 h after transfection. U2OS cells permanently expressing HA-GPR35a and βarr2-GFP (UGPR35β) were used for most experiments. Cells were plated onto coverslips, placed in 24-well plates, and pretreated for 1 h with 0.02 mg/ml poly-d-lysine. Cells were maintained at 37°C in 5% CO2 until ready for experiments (80–85% confluent) and washed once with HBSS before drug application and experiments were performed in HBSS. Agonist-stimulated redistribution of βarr2-GFP was assessed after drug treatment for 40 min. Experiments involving antagonist were done with 15 min preincubation of antagonist for both the stable UGPR35β cells and the transiently transfected mouse GPR35 HEK293 cells. To examine reversibility of the antagonist, cells were preincubated with 100 nM CID2745687 for 10 min, then washed with HBSS five times for 5 min each before adding 1 μM pamoic acid. Cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature followed by three washes with HBSS. Glass coverslips were mounted on slides and were imaged on a fluorescence microscope using a 40× oil objective and 488 nm excitation for GFP. In-Cell Western Assay for ERK activity. [1] Cells were grown to confluence in 96-well plates and serum-starved overnight before assay. After drug treatment, the medium was removed, and 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS was added to fix cells for 20 min at room temperature. PTX, 200 ng/ml, was incubated with the cells for 3 h before drug treatment. The CID2745687 antagonist was coapplied with agonist. In the competitive antagonist assay, 300 nM CID2745687 was coapplied together with a serial dilution of pamoic acid. Cells were then permeabilized by 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for five washes, 5 min per wash. LI-COR blocking buffer was added, and samples were shaken on a rotator for 1 h. Primary antibodies against phospho-ERK1/2 (1:100) were applied overnight in a cold room, and then secondary antibodies goat anti-rabbit 800CW (1:800) were applied for 2 h at room temperature. Sapphire700 (1:1000; LI-COR) and DRAQ5 (1:2000) were added together with the secondary antibodies for normalization. The plate was dried and then scanned using a LI-COR Odyssey IR Imager set at 169 μM resolution, 3 focus offset, and 4.5 to 6 intensity. |
| Animal Protocol |
Animal/Disease Models: Sixweeks old male C57BL/6 mice[3]
Doses: 1 mg/kg Route of Administration: Oral administration, every day for 4 weeks Experimental Results: Inhibited Lodoxamide-mediated protective effects. Induction of hepatic fibrosis in C57BL/6 mice [3] Six-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were housed under standard laboratory conditions (22°C ± 2°C, 12-h light/dark cycles) with free access to food and water in the laboratory animal facility at PNU. In this study, seven-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into 4 groups : control (n=5), in which mice were intraperitoneal (i.p.) injected a vehicle for 8 weeks; CCl4 (n=5), in which mice were i.p. injected a CCl4 (5 ml/kg, CCl4:con oil=2:8) twice a week for 8 weeks; CCl4 plus lodoxamide (n=5), in which mice were i.p. injected a CCl4 two times a week for 8 weeks and oral administration with lodoxamide (1 mg/kg) every day of the last 4 weeks; and CCl4 plus lodoxamide and CID2745687 (n=5), in which mice were i.p. injected a CCl4 two times a week for 8 weeks, and oral administration of lodoxamide (1 mg/kg) and CID2745687 (1 mg/kg) every day of the last 4 weeks. |
| References |
|
| Additional Infomation |
5-[[[(tert-butylamino)-thionylmethyl]hydrazinomethyl]methyl]-1-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-4-pyrazolecarboxylic acid methyl ester is a cyclic compound belonging to the pyrazole class. Known orphan receptor GPR35 agonists include kynurenic acid, zaprost, 5-nitro-2-(3-phenylpropylamino)benzoic acid, and lysophosphatidic acid. However, their relatively low affinity for GPR35 and significant off-target effects in other pathways limit their application in understanding the GPR35 signaling pathway and identifying potential therapeutic uses for GPR35. In screening the Prestwick drug and drug-like compound library, we found pamoate to be a potent GPR35 agonist. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classifies pamoate as an inactive compound that can be used in long-acting formulations of various drugs, such as the anthelmintics oxtaral pamoate and praziquantel pamoate; the psychoactive compounds hydroxyzine pamoate (Vistaril) and imipramine pamoate (Tofranil-PM); and the peptide hormones triptorelin pamoate (Trelstar) and octreotide pamoate (OncoLar). We found that pamoate induces increased phosphorylation of G(i/o) protein-coupled GPR35-mediated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2, recruitment of β-arrestin2 to GPR35, and GPR35 internalization. In mice, pamoate reduces visceral pain perception, suggesting an analgesic effect that may act through the GPR35 receptor. We also collaborated with the Sanford-Burnam Institute’s Molecular Library Probe Production Centre to identify novel GPR35 antagonist compounds, including the nanomolar potent antagonist methyl-5-[(tert-butylaminomethylthiohydrazine)methyl]-1-(2,4-difluorophenyl)pyrazole-4-carboxylic acid ester (CID2745687). Potent antagonists such as pamoic acid and CID2745687 offer new opportunities to expand the chemical space of GPR35, elucidate the pharmacology of GPR35, and promote the development of GPR35-related drugs. Our results suggest that the unexpected biological function of pamoic acid may lead to potential new uses for this common drug ingredient. [1] The ligand pharmacology and functional differences of species-homogeneous receptors may interfere with our understanding of the biological characteristics and functions of uncharacterized receptors. It has been previously demonstrated that there are significant potency selectivity among human and murine G protein-coupled receptor homologs for various GPR35 agonists. By inducing the interaction between GPR35 and β-arrestin-2 based on bioluminescent resonance energy transfer (BRET), mouse homologs were incorporated into the study. The results showed that, similar to the mouse homologs, mouse GPR35 exhibited extremely low potency to pamoate, while its potency to the reference GPR35 agonist zapustol was intermediate between that of the mouse and human homologs. This pattern was also confirmed by receptor internalization and G protein activation experiments. This study investigated the efficacy and mechanism of action of two recently reported GPR35 antagonists: methyl 5-[(tert-butylcarbamoylhydrazylmethylene)methyl]-1-(2,4-difluorophenyl)pyrazole-4-carboxylic acid (CID2745687) and 2-hydroxy-4-[4-(5Z)-5-[(E)-2-methyl-3-phenylprop-2-enyl]-4-oxo-2-thiomethylene-1,3-thiazolidin-3-yl]butyrylamino)benzoic acid (ML-145). The results showed that both CID-2745687 and ML-145 competitively inhibited the effects of sodium cromoglycate and zaprost (two GPR35 agonists with overlapping binding sites) on human GPR35. In contrast, while ML-145 also competitively antagonized the effects of pamoate, CID-2745687 acted in a non-competitive manner. Neither ML-145 nor CID-2745687 effectively antagonized the agonist effects of zaprost or sodium cromoglycate on rodent GPR35 homologs. These studies suggest that the significant species selectivity of GPR35 ligands is not limited to agonists, and therefore, careful selection of appropriate ligands is necessary when studying the function of GPR35 in non-human cells and tissues. [2]
Although non-receptor accessory proteins may also alter the pharmacological properties of GPR35 in a species-dependent manner, the current study reiterates the need for standard but in-depth pharmacological analysis to fully understand the potential and limitations of novel ligands identified through various screening methods, as well as their detailed mechanisms of action. The current study suggests that although CID2745687 and ML-145 have high affinity for human GPR35, neither are effective pharmacological antagonists for studying GPR35 function in mouse or rat physiological and disease models, and pamoate is not a highly effective agonist of rodent homologous receptors. [2] Previous pharmacogenomics analyses have revealed that the anti-allergic drug sodium cromoglycate is an effective anti-fibrotic agent that acts on hepatocytes and stellate cells. Furthermore, sodium cromoglycate has been confirmed as a G protein-coupled receptor 35 (GPR35) agonist. However, whether its anti-fibrotic effect is mediated by GPR35 remains unknown. Therefore, this study investigated the role of GPR35 in liver fibrosis using another anti-allergic drug and the potent GPR35 agonist lodoxamide. Long-term carbon tetrachloride treatment can induce liver fibrosis, while lodoxamide treatment can inhibit this fibrosis. In addition, the specific GPR35 antagonist CID2745687 can reverse the lodoxamide-mediated anti-fibrotic effect. Furthermore, lodoxamide treatment significantly affects the mRNA expression of type I collagen α1 chains, type I collagen α2 chains, and TGF-β1 in the extracellular matrix. However, the transforming growth factor α (TGF-α) shedding assay showed that lodoxamide was not a potent agonist of mouse GPR35 in vitro. Therefore, these results suggest that lodoxamide has an anti-fibrotic effect in mice and raise concerns about how lodoxamide protects the liver from fibrosis in vivo and whether GPR35 is involved. [3] CID2745687 has been reported to be a potent antagonist of human GPR35, but ineffective against rodent GPR35 homologs (Jenkins et al., 2012). However, other reports indicate that CID274568 can inhibit agonist-induced mouse GPR35 activation in HEK293 cells, mouse astrocytes and mouse colonic epithelial cells (Zhao et al., 2010; Berlinguer-Palmini et al., 2013; Tsukahara et al., 2017). Although an inhibitory effect of CID2745687 on the effects of loduxamide was observed in mice, we cannot rule out the possibility of off-target effects of CID2745687. This may suggest that loduxamide and CID2745687 act as agonists and antagonists, respectively, for the same unknown target in mice. In our previous hepatocyte studies, the effects of loduxamide were reversed when the dose of CID2745687 was 10 times the in vivo dose of loduxamide (1 mg/kg) (Nam et al., 2019). However, in this study, the same dose of CID2745687 also effectively reversed the effects of loduxamide, indicating a different affinity between the two experimental models of hepatic steatosis and liver fibrosis. Further research is needed to elucidate the different therapeutic effects of CID2745687. In summary, loduxamide alleviates carbon tetrachloride-induced liver fibrosis in mice, while CID2745687 reverses the effects of loduxamide. However, it remains questionable whether mouse GPR35 is involved in these effects in the AP-TGF-α shedding experiment. Therefore, we report these results to accelerate the development of drugs for liver fibrosis and to raise awareness of how loduxamide protects against liver fibrosis in vivo and whether GPR35 is involved in its effects. [3] |
| Molecular Formula |
C17H19F2N5O2S
|
|---|---|
| Molecular Weight |
395.43
|
| Exact Mass |
395.122
|
| Elemental Analysis |
C, 51.64; H, 4.84; F, 9.61; N, 17.71; O, 8.09; S, 8.11
|
| CAS # |
264233-05-8
|
| PubChem CID |
9581011
|
| Appearance |
Off-white to light yellow solid powder
|
| Density |
1.3±0.1 g/cm3
|
| Boiling Point |
493.6±55.0 °C at 760 mmHg
|
| Flash Point |
252.3±31.5 °C
|
| Vapour Pressure |
0.0±1.3 mmHg at 25°C
|
| Index of Refraction |
1.591
|
| LogP |
3.05
|
| Hydrogen Bond Donor Count |
2
|
| Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count |
7
|
| Rotatable Bond Count |
6
|
| Heavy Atom Count |
27
|
| Complexity |
572
|
| Defined Atom Stereocenter Count |
0
|
| SMILES |
CC(C)(C)NC(=S)N/N=C/C1=C(C=NN1C2=C(C=C(C=C2)F)F)C(=O)OC
|
| InChi Key |
CYNLZIBKERMMOA-AWQFTUOYSA-N
|
| InChi Code |
InChI=1S/C17H19F2N5O2S/c1-17(2,3)22-16(27)23-20-9-14-11(15(25)26-4)8-21-24(14)13-6-5-10(18)7-12(13)19/h5-9H,1-4H3,(H2,22,23,27)/b20-9+
|
| Chemical Name |
methyl 5-[(E)-(tert-butylcarbamothioylhydrazinylidene)methyl]-1-(2,4-difluorophenyl)pyrazole-4-carboxylate
|
| Synonyms |
264233-05-8; CID 2745687; ML194; MLS000834953; methyl 5-[(E)-(tert-butylcarbamothioylhydrazinylidene)methyl]-1-(2,4-difluorophenyl)pyrazole-4-carboxylate; CHEMBL1708510; CID 27456; SMR000461569;
|
| HS Tariff Code |
2934.99.9001
|
| Storage |
Powder -20°C 3 years 4°C 2 years In solvent -80°C 6 months -20°C 1 month |
| Shipping Condition |
Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)
|
| Solubility (In Vitro) |
DMSO: 125 mg/mL (316.11 mM)
|
|---|---|
| Solubility (In Vivo) |
Solubility in Formulation 1: ≥ 2.08 mg/mL (5.26 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO + 90% Corn Oil (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 20.8 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 900 μL of corn oil and mix evenly.  (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.) |
| Preparing Stock Solutions | 1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | |
| 1 mM | 2.5289 mL | 12.6445 mL | 25.2889 mL | |
| 5 mM | 0.5058 mL | 2.5289 mL | 5.0578 mL | |
| 10 mM | 0.2529 mL | 1.2644 mL | 2.5289 mL |
*Note: Please select an appropriate solvent for the preparation of stock solution based on your experiment needs. For most products, DMSO can be used for preparing stock solutions (e.g. 5 mM, 10 mM, or 20 mM concentration); some products with high aqueous solubility may be dissolved in water directly. Solubility information is available at the above Solubility Data section. Once the stock solution is prepared, aliquot it to routine usage volumes and store at -20°C or -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze and thaw cycles.
Calculation results
Working concentration: mg/mL;
Method for preparing DMSO stock solution: mg drug pre-dissolved in μL DMSO (stock solution concentration mg/mL). Please contact us first if the concentration exceeds the DMSO solubility of the batch of drug.
Method for preparing in vivo formulation::Take μL DMSO stock solution, next add μL PEG300, mix and clarify, next addμL Tween 80, mix and clarify, next add μL ddH2O,mix and clarify.
(1) Please be sure that the solution is clear before the addition of next solvent. Dissolution methods like vortex, ultrasound or warming and heat may be used to aid dissolving.
(2) Be sure to add the solvent(s) in order.