yingweiwo

Molidustat

Alias: Molidustat; BAY 85-3934; BAY-85-3934; BAY85-3934; BAY 853934; BAY-853934; BAY853934
Cat No.:V2958 Purity: ≥98%
Molidustat (formerly known as BAY 85-3934) is a novel potent inhibitor of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase (HIF-PH) which stimulates erythropoietin (EPO) production and the formation of red blood cells.
Molidustat
Molidustat Chemical Structure CAS No.: 1154028-82-6
Product category: HIF HIF Prolyl-Hydroxylase
This product is for research use only, not for human use. We do not sell to patients.
Size Price Stock Qty
5mg
10mg
25mg
50mg
100mg
250mg
500mg
Other Sizes

Other Forms of Molidustat:

  • Molidustat sodium
Official Supplier of:
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Top Publications Citing lnvivochem Products
Purity & Quality Control Documentation

Purity: ≥98%

Product Description

Molidustat (formerly known as BAY 85-3934) is a novel potent inhibitor of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase (HIF-PH) which stimulates erythropoietin (EPO) production and the formation of red blood cells. The mean IC50 values of BAY 85-3934 for PHD1, PHD2, and PHD3 are 480 nM, 280 nM, and 450 nM, respectively. HIF stabilization by oral administration of the HIF-PH inhibitor BAY 85-3934 (molidustat) resulted in dose-dependent production of EPO in healthy Wistar rats and cynomolgus monkeys. In repeat oral dosing of BAY 85-3934, hemoglobin levels were increased compared with animals that received vehicle, while endogenous EPO remained within the normal physiological range. BAY 85-3934 therapy was also effective in the treatment of renal anemia in rats with impaired kidney function and, unlike treatment with rhEPO, resulted in normalization of hypertensive blood pressure in a rat model of CKD. Notably, unlike treatment with the antihypertensive enalapril, the blood pressure normalization was achieved without a compensatory activation of the renin-angiotensin system. Thus, BAY 85-3934 may provide an approach to the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD, without the increased risk of adverse cardiovascular effects seen for patients treated with rhEPO. Clinical studies are ongoing to investigate the effects of BAY 85-3934 therapy in patients with renal anemia.

Biological Activity I Assay Protocols (From Reference)
Targets
PHD1 (IC50 = 480 nM); PHD2 (IC50 = 280 nM); PHD3 (IC50 =450 nM)[1]
ln Vitro
For PHD1, PHD2, and PHD3, the average IC50 values of BAY 85-3934 are 480 nM, 280 nM, and 450 nM, respectively. It only takes 20 minutes of exposure to 5 μM BAY 85-3934 for HeLa cells to produce detectable levels of HIF-1α. Using the hypoxia response element promoter as the control, BAY 85-3934 induced the expression of the firefly luciferase reporter gene in a cell reporter assay, with a mean (± SD) EC50 of 8.4±0.7 μM (n=4) [1].
ln Vivo
When healthy Wistar rats and cynomolgus monkeys were given the HIF-PH inhibitor BAY 85-3934 (Molidustat) orally, it stabilized HIF and caused dose-dependent production of EPO. In addition to normalizing hypertensive blood pressure in a CKD rat model, molidustat therapy, in contrast to rhEPO therapy, is effective in managing renal anemia in rats with impaired renal function [1].
Enzyme Assay
Prolyl hydroxylase assay[1]
The prolyl hydroxylase assay was performed as described previously with minor modifications. Biotinylated HIF-1α 556–574 (biotinyl-DLDLEMLAPYIPMDDDFQL) was bound to white 96-well NeutrAvidin high binding capacity plates, which were pre-blocked with Blocker Casein and subsequently blocked with 1 mM biotin. The immobilized peptide substrate was incubated with the appropriate amount of HIF-PH in buffer containing 20 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 5 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 20 µM 2-oxoglutarate, 10 µM FeSO4, 2 mM ascorbate, 4% protease inhibitors without EDTA in a final volume of 100 µl, with or without test compound added at appropriate concentrations. The reaction time was 60 min. To stop the reaction, plates were washed three times with wash buffer.[1]
Hydroxylated biotinyl-HIF-1α 556–574 was incubated with Eu-VBC in 100 µl binding buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 120 mM NaCl) for 60 min at room temperature. After washing six times with DELFIA wash buffer and adding 100 µl enhancer solution, the amount of bound VBC was determined by measuring time-resolved fluorescence with a Tecan infinite M200 plate reader. Measurements were taken in triplicate or more, and results were expressed as means ± SEM. IC50 values were determined after curve fitting using GraphPad Prism software applying the four-parameter logistic equation to the data sets. When adjustment of the concentration of free Fe2+ was necessary, the reaction buffer was supplemented with appropriate amounts of ammonium iron(II) sulfate ((NH4)2Fe(SO4)2.6H2O, Mohr’s salt).
Cell Assay
Cell lines, cell culture media, and luciferase reporter assay[1]
A549 and HeLa carcinoma cell lines (American Type Culture Collection) were cultured in DMEM/F-12, and Hep3B cells in RPMI medium, both supplemented with antibiotics, L-glutamine and 10% fetal calf serum. A549 cells stably transfected with the HIF-RE2-luc HIF reporter construct (constructed in pGL3) were seeded on 384-well plates at a density of 2500 cells/well in a volume of 25 µl complete cell culture medium, and re-incubated for 16–24 h before the test. Test compounds were added at appropriate dilutions in a volume of 10 µl, and cells were re-incubated for 6 h before measurement. Luciferase activity was determined in a luminometer after addition of cell lysis/luciferase buffer. Cell line identities were verified by STR DNA typing.
Western blot analysis[1]
For western blot analysis, cell lysates were separated on 4–12% SDS polyacrylamide gradient gels. Proteins were blotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. HIF-1α protein was detected using a HIF-1α specific monoclonal antibody at a dilution of 1∶250. HIF-2α protein was detected using a HIF-2α specific polyclonal antibody at a dilution of 1∶1000. Anti-β-actin antibody served as a loading control. Binding of the antibodies was visualized by binding of a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody, and subsequently enhanced using chemiluminescence, according to the manufactureŕs instructions. Novex Sharp Pre-stained Protein Standard was used as molecular weight marker.
Animal Protocol
Studies in rats[1]
Male Wistar rats (240–340 g in body weight) were housed with five animals per cage for at least 1 week before experimentation. Blood samples from rats were collected under anesthesia (2% isoflurane in air) by puncturing the retro-orbital vein plexus with a glass capillary. In a repeat-dose, 26-day experiment, animals were administered vehicle or Molidustat (BAY 85-3934) at doses of 0.5 mg/kg, 1.25 mg/kg, 2.5 mg/kg, and 5 mg/kg. PCV was determined at baseline and at weekly intervals after centrifugation in a hematocrit capillary tube (Brand) for 10 min at full speed in a Haemofuge centrifuge (Heraeus). The number of reticulocytes in 5 µl blood was counted after staining with thiazol orange (Becton Dickinson) according to the manufacturer’s instructions by FACS analysis on a BD FACSCalibur system (Becton Dickinson). The efficacy of BAY 85-3934 (2.5 mg/kg, once-daily, oral) was also compared with that of rhEPO (25 IU/kg, 50 IU/kg, and 100 IU/kg, twice-weekly, s.c. injection). The time-course of induction of EPO mRNA expression and plasma EPO was determined at baseline and 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, and 8 h after oral administration of a single dose of BAY 85-3934 (5 mg/kg).
Studies in cynomolgus monkeys[1]
Male and female cynomolgus monkeys (2.8–5.6 kg in body weight) were used, which were housed two per cage. Blood samples from conscious cynomolgus monkeys were taken by puncturing a superficial vein. In a 5-day, repeat-dose study of plasma EPO response, Molidustat (BAY 85-3934) was administered at doses of 0.5 mg/kg and 1.5 mg/kg at 0 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 96 h. Blood samples were taken at 7 h, 31 h, 55 h, 79 h, 103 h, and 168 h. Erythropoietic parameters were also evaluated after a 2-week treatment period with s.c. administration of rhEPO (100 IU/kg twice weekly at days 1, 4, 8, and 11) and BAY 85-3934 (1.5 mg/kg) once daily.
Gentamicin-induced kidney failure model[1]
Male Wistar rats were treated once daily with gentamicin (Gibco/Invitrogen) at a dose of 100 mg/kg body weight via i.p. injection on 14 consecutive days. Control animals received injections of an equal volume of 0.9% saline. After gentamicin treatment, PCV was determined and animals were distributed to the vehicle or treatment groups with respect to equal mean PCV. On day 15, Molidustat (BAY 85-3934) was given orally once daily at doses of 1 mg/kg, 2.5 mg/kg, 5.0 mg/kg, and 10.0 mg/kg, five times weekly.
PG-PS-induced inflammatory anemia model[1]
Female Lewis rats, with a body weight of 155–181 g were used. Body weight, ankle diameter, hematocrit, and blood cell count were determined at baseline and thereafter at regular intervals. PG-PS from Streptococcus pyogenes was dissolved in sterile saline and administered via i.p. injection at 15 mg/kg. Animals that did not show an inflammatory response were not studied further. Two weeks after injection, animals were distributed into treatment groups in equal proportions based on their hematocrit levels. On day 15, Molidustat (BAY 85-3934) was given orally once daily at doses of 2.5 mg/kg and 5.0 mg/kg. At the end of the study, animals were sacrificed and kidney and liver samples were processed for qRT-PCR analysis.
Subtotal nephrectomy model[1]
Subtotal nephrectomy was conducted in adult male Wistar rats. Body weight, blood pressure, hematocrit, and blood cell counts were determined at baseline and thereafter at weekly intervals. At baseline, rats were randomly distributed into two groups: those that underwent subtotal nephrectomy and those that underwent a sham procedure without reduction of renal mass. Surgery was performed in deeply anesthetized (2% isoflurane in air) animals. Kidneys were accessed via a dorsolateral incision of the body wall of about 2 cm in length. The right kidney was removed after ligature of the renal peduncle, and subsequently the upper and lower pole of the left kidney were removed, followed by careful hemostasis. Approximately one third of the initial kidney mass remained (removed tissue was weighed to check this was achieved). In the sham-treated animals, both kidneys were exposed before closure of the wound. Three weeks after surgery, animals were allocated to each group in equal proportions with respect to systolic blood pressure and hematocrit values. For 5 weeks, animals were treated twice weekly with rhEPO (100 IU/kg), or once daily with BAY 85–3936 sodium (2.5 mg/kg or 5.0 mg/kg) or vehicle. In experiments using enalapril or a combination of Molidustat (BAY 85-3934) sodium and enalapril, study drugs were administered with drinking water. BAY 85-3934 sodium and enalapril were administered in drinking water at concentrations of 80 ppm and 30 ppm, respectively. This was equivalent to approximately 2 mg/kg/day for enalapril and 5 mg/kg/day for BAY 85-3934. Systolic blood pressure and heart rate were determined using the tail-cuff method (a semi-automatic, non-invasive blood pressure monitor; TSE Systems), with three repeated measurements per animal.
Rats: 0.5 mg/kg, 1.25 mg/kg, 2.5 mg/kg, and 5 mg/kg; oral
Rats: BAY 85-3934 is prepared as a solution in ethanol:Solutol HS 15:water (10:20:70). In a repeat-dose, 26-day experiment, male Wistar rats (240–340 g in body weight) are administered vehicle or BAY 85-3934 at doses of 0.5 mg/kg, 1.25 mg/kg, 2.5 mg/kg, and 5 mg/kg. The efficacy of BAY 85-3934 (2.5 mg/kg, once-daily, oral) is also compared with that of rhEPO (25 IU/kg, 50 IU/kg, and 100 IU/kg, twice-weekly, s.c. injection). The time-course of induction of EPO mRNA expression and plasma EPO is determined at baseline and 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, and 8 h after oral administration of a single dose of BAY 85-3934 (5 mg/kg); Monkey: BAY 85-3934 is prepared as a solution in 0.5% tylose. Male and female cynomolgus monkeys (2.8–5.6 kg in body weight) are administered at doses of 0.5 mg/kg and 1.5 mg/kg at 0 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 96 h. Blood samples are taken at 7 h, 31 h, 55 h, 79 h, 103 h, and 168 h. Erythropoietic parameters are also evaluated after a 2-week treatment period with s.c. administration of rhEPO (100 IU/kg twice weekly at days 1, 4, 8, and 11) and BAY 85-3934 (1.5 mg/kg) once daily
Toxicity/Toxicokinetics
Overall, 94.5% of patients experienced at least 1 TEAE during the study: 92.7% of patients in the molidustat group and 96.3% in the darbepoetin group (Table 2). The most commonly reported TEAEs were nasopharyngitis (34.1% and 40.2% in the molidustat and darbepoetin groups, respectively), worsening of CKD (18.3% and 9.8%, respectively), and diarrhea (8.5% and 12.2%, respectively) (Table 2). TEAEs leading to death were reported in 2 patients (2.4%) in the molidustat group and none in the darbepoetin group, and serious TEAEs were reported in 32.9% and 26.8% of patients, respectively. MACEs that occurred after the start of the study drug were reported in 3.7% of patients treated with molidustat and 1.2% of patients receiving darbepoetin (online suppl. Table 3). Additionally, 3.7% of patients in the molidustat group and 1.2% in the darbepoetin group developed diabetic retinopathy, and 3.7% in the molidustat group and 4.9% in the darbepoetin group developed neoplasms (benign, malignant, or unspecified) (online suppl. Table 4). The mean serum eGFR appeared to remain stable in the molidustat group (online suppl. Fig. 7). Subgroup analyses of TEAEs by age group (<65 and ≥65 years old) and by sex are presented in online supplementary Table 5. The proportion of serious TEAEs was similar between the 2 groups in female patients but higher for males in the molidustat group than in the darbepoetin group.[2]
References

[1]. Mimicking hypoxia to treat anemia: HIF-stabilizer BAY 85-3934 (Molidustat) stimulates erythropoietin production without hypertensive effects. PLoS One. 2014 Nov 13;9(11):e111838.

[2]. Molidustat for Renal Anemia in Nondialysis Patients Previously Treated with Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study. Am J Nephrol. 2021;52(10-11):884-893.

Additional Infomation
Molidustat is under investigation in clinical trial NCT03350321 (A Study of Molidustat for Correction of Renal Anemia in Non-dialysis Subjects).
See also: Molidustat Sodium (active moiety of).
These protocols are for reference only. InvivoChem does not independently validate these methods.
Physicochemical Properties
Molecular Formula
C13H14N8O2
Molecular Weight
314.3
Exact Mass
314.123
Elemental Analysis
C, 49.68; H, 4.49; N, 35.65; O, 10.18
CAS #
1154028-82-6
Related CAS #
1375799-59-9 (Sodium);1154028-82-6;
PubChem CID
59603622
Appearance
White to off-white solid powder
Density
1.7±0.1 g/cm3
Boiling Point
589.2±60.0 °C at 760 mmHg
Flash Point
310.2±32.9 °C
Vapour Pressure
0.0±1.7 mmHg at 25°C
Index of Refraction
1.820
LogP
-1.77
Hydrogen Bond Donor Count
1
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count
8
Rotatable Bond Count
3
Heavy Atom Count
23
Complexity
481
Defined Atom Stereocenter Count
0
InChi Key
IJMBOKOTALXLKS-UHFFFAOYSA-N
InChi Code
InChI=1S/C13H14N8O2/c22-13-10(20-2-1-16-18-20)8-17-21(13)12-7-11(14-9-15-12)19-3-5-23-6-4-19/h1-2,7-9,17H,3-6H2
Chemical Name
2-(6-morpholin-4-ylpyrimidin-4-yl)-4-(triazol-1-yl)-1H-pyrazol-3-one
Synonyms
Molidustat; BAY 85-3934; BAY-85-3934; BAY85-3934; BAY 853934; BAY-853934; BAY853934
HS Tariff Code
2934.99.9001
Storage

Powder      -20°C    3 years

                     4°C     2 years

In solvent   -80°C    6 months

                  -20°C    1 month

Shipping Condition
Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)
Solubility Data
Solubility (In Vitro)
DMSO:< 3.3 mg/mL
Water:<1 mg/mL
Ethanol:<1 mg/mL
Solubility (In Vivo)
Solubility in Formulation 1: ≥ 0.5 mg/mL (1.59 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO + 40% PEG300 + 5% Tween80 + 45% Saline (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 5.0 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 400 μL PEG300 and mix evenly; then add 50 μL Tween-80 to the above solution and mix evenly; then add 450 μL normal saline to adjust the volume to 1 mL.
Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH₂ O to obtain a clear solution.

Solubility in Formulation 2: ≥ 0.5 mg/mL (1.59 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO + 90% (20% SBE-β-CD in Saline) (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 5.0 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 900 μL of 20% SBE-β-CD physiological saline solution and mix evenly.
Preparation of 20% SBE-β-CD in Saline (4°C,1 week): Dissolve 2 g SBE-β-CD in 10 mL saline to obtain a clear solution.

View More

Solubility in Formulation 3: ≥ 0.5 mg/mL (1.59 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO + 90% Corn Oil (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 5.0 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 900 μL of corn oil and mix evenly.


Solubility in Formulation 4: 10 mg/mL (31.82 mM) in 0.5% CMC-Na/saline water (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), suspension solution; with ultrasonication.
Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH₂ O to obtain a clear solution.

 (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.)
Preparing Stock Solutions 1 mg 5 mg 10 mg
1 mM 3.1817 mL 15.9084 mL 31.8167 mL
5 mM 0.6363 mL 3.1817 mL 6.3633 mL
10 mM 0.3182 mL 1.5908 mL 3.1817 mL

*Note: Please select an appropriate solvent for the preparation of stock solution based on your experiment needs. For most products, DMSO can be used for preparing stock solutions (e.g. 5 mM, 10 mM, or 20 mM concentration); some products with high aqueous solubility may be dissolved in water directly. Solubility information is available at the above Solubility Data section. Once the stock solution is prepared, aliquot it to routine usage volumes and store at -20°C or -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze and thaw cycles.

Calculator

Molarity Calculator allows you to calculate the mass, volume, and/or concentration required for a solution, as detailed below:

  • Calculate the Mass of a compound required to prepare a solution of known volume and concentration
  • Calculate the Volume of solution required to dissolve a compound of known mass to a desired concentration
  • Calculate the Concentration of a solution resulting from a known mass of compound in a specific volume
An example of molarity calculation using the molarity calculator is shown below:
What is the mass of compound required to make a 10 mM stock solution in 5 ml of DMSO given that the molecular weight of the compound is 350.26 g/mol?
  • Enter 350.26 in the Molecular Weight (MW) box
  • Enter 10 in the Concentration box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 5 in the Volume box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 17.513 mg appears in the Mass box. In a similar way, you may calculate the volume and concentration.

Dilution Calculator allows you to calculate how to dilute a stock solution of known concentrations. For example, you may Enter C1, C2 & V2 to calculate V1, as detailed below:

What volume of a given 10 mM stock solution is required to make 25 ml of a 25 μM solution?
Using the equation C1V1 = C2V2, where C1=10 mM, C2=25 μM, V2=25 ml and V1 is the unknown:
  • Enter 10 into the Concentration (Start) box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Concentration (End) box and select the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Volume (End) box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 62.5 μL (0.1 ml) appears in the Volume (Start) box
g/mol

Molecular Weight Calculator allows you to calculate the molar mass and elemental composition of a compound, as detailed below:

Note: Chemical formula is case sensitive: C12H18N3O4  c12h18n3o4
Instructions to calculate molar mass (molecular weight) of a chemical compound:
  • To calculate molar mass of a chemical compound, please enter the chemical/molecular formula and click the “Calculate’ button.
Definitions of molecular mass, molecular weight, molar mass and molar weight:
  • Molecular mass (or molecular weight) is the mass of one molecule of a substance and is expressed in the unified atomic mass units (u). (1 u is equal to 1/12 the mass of one atom of carbon-12)
  • Molar mass (molar weight) is the mass of one mole of a substance and is expressed in g/mol.
/

Reconstitution Calculator allows you to calculate the volume of solvent required to reconstitute your vial.

  • Enter the mass of the reagent and the desired reconstitution concentration as well as the correct units
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer appears in the Volume (to add to vial) box
In vivo Formulation Calculator (Clear solution)
Step 1: Enter information below (Recommended: An additional animal to make allowance for loss during the experiment)
Step 2: Enter in vivo formulation (This is only a calculator, not the exact formulation for a specific product. Please contact us first if there is no in vivo formulation in the solubility section.)
+
+
+

Calculation results

Working concentration mg/mL;

Method for preparing DMSO stock solution mg drug pre-dissolved in μL DMSO (stock solution concentration mg/mL). Please contact us first if the concentration exceeds the DMSO solubility of the batch of drug.

Method for preparing in vivo formulation:Take μL DMSO stock solution, next add μL PEG300, mix and clarify, next addμL Tween 80, mix and clarify, next add μL ddH2O,mix and clarify.

(1) Please be sure that the solution is clear before the addition of next solvent. Dissolution methods like vortex, ultrasound or warming and heat may be used to aid dissolving.
             (2) Be sure to add the solvent(s) in order.

Clinical Trial Information
A Study to Learn More About the Long-term Safety and Effectiveness of Molidustat as a Treatment for Japanese Men and Women With Renal Anemia
CTID: NCT04899661
Status: Active, not recruiting
Date: 2024-09-19
Maintenance Treatment of Renal Anemia in Dialysis Subjects
CTID: NCT03543657
Phase: Phase 3
Status: Completed
Date: 2021-01-29
A Study of Molidustat for Maintenance Treatment of Renal Anemia in Non-dialysis Subjects
CTID: NCT03350347
Phase: Phase 3
Status: Completed
Date: 2021-01-29
A Study of Molidustat for Correction of Renal Anemia in Non-dialysis Subjects
CTID: NCT03350321
Phase: Phase 3
Status: Completed
Date: 2021-01-29
A Study of Molidustat for Treatment of Renal Anemia in Peritoneal Dialysis Subjects
CTID: NCT03418168
Phase: Phase 3
Status: Completed
Date: 2021-01-29
Biological Data
  • Molidustat

    Characterization of the in vitro activity of BAY 85-3934.2014 Nov 13;9(11):e111838.

  • Molidustat

    Effects of BAY 85-3934 administration in male Wistar rats treated with gentamicin to induce renal anemia.2014 Nov 13;9(11):e111838.

  • Molidustat

    Effects of BAY 85-3934 or recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) on erythropoietic parameters in cynomolgus monkeys.2014 Nov 13;9(11):e111838.
Contact Us