Size | Price | Stock | Qty |
---|---|---|---|
5mg |
|
||
10mg |
|
||
25mg |
|
||
50mg |
|
||
100mg |
|
||
250mg |
|
||
500mg |
|
||
Other Sizes |
|
Purity: ≥98%
Molidustat (formerly known as BAY 85-3934) is a novel potent inhibitor of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase (HIF-PH) which stimulates erythropoietin (EPO) production and the formation of red blood cells. The mean IC50 values of BAY 85-3934 for PHD1, PHD2, and PHD3 are 480 nM, 280 nM, and 450 nM, respectively. HIF stabilization by oral administration of the HIF-PH inhibitor BAY 85-3934 (molidustat) resulted in dose-dependent production of EPO in healthy Wistar rats and cynomolgus monkeys. In repeat oral dosing of BAY 85-3934, hemoglobin levels were increased compared with animals that received vehicle, while endogenous EPO remained within the normal physiological range. BAY 85-3934 therapy was also effective in the treatment of renal anemia in rats with impaired kidney function and, unlike treatment with rhEPO, resulted in normalization of hypertensive blood pressure in a rat model of CKD. Notably, unlike treatment with the antihypertensive enalapril, the blood pressure normalization was achieved without a compensatory activation of the renin-angiotensin system. Thus, BAY 85-3934 may provide an approach to the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD, without the increased risk of adverse cardiovascular effects seen for patients treated with rhEPO. Clinical studies are ongoing to investigate the effects of BAY 85-3934 therapy in patients with renal anemia.
Targets |
PHD1 (IC50 = 480 nM); PHD2 (IC50 = 280 nM); PHD3 (IC50 =450 nM)[1]
|
||
---|---|---|---|
ln Vitro |
For PHD1, PHD2, and PHD3, the average IC50 values of BAY 85-3934 are 480 nM, 280 nM, and 450 nM, respectively. It only takes 20 minutes of exposure to 5 μM BAY 85-3934 for HeLa cells to produce detectable levels of HIF-1α. Using the hypoxia response element promoter as the control, BAY 85-3934 induced the expression of the firefly luciferase reporter gene in a cell reporter assay, with a mean (± SD) EC50 of 8.4±0.7 μM (n=4) [1].
|
||
ln Vivo |
When healthy Wistar rats and cynomolgus monkeys were given the HIF-PH inhibitor BAY 85-3934 (Molidustat) orally, it stabilized HIF and caused dose-dependent production of EPO. In addition to normalizing hypertensive blood pressure in a CKD rat model, molidustat therapy, in contrast to rhEPO therapy, is effective in managing renal anemia in rats with impaired renal function [1].
|
||
Enzyme Assay |
Prolyl hydroxylase assay[1]
The prolyl hydroxylase assay was performed as described previously with minor modifications. Biotinylated HIF-1α 556–574 (biotinyl-DLDLEMLAPYIPMDDDFQL) was bound to white 96-well NeutrAvidin high binding capacity plates, which were pre-blocked with Blocker Casein and subsequently blocked with 1 mM biotin. The immobilized peptide substrate was incubated with the appropriate amount of HIF-PH in buffer containing 20 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 5 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 20 µM 2-oxoglutarate, 10 µM FeSO4, 2 mM ascorbate, 4% protease inhibitors without EDTA in a final volume of 100 µl, with or without test compound added at appropriate concentrations. The reaction time was 60 min. To stop the reaction, plates were washed three times with wash buffer.[1] Hydroxylated biotinyl-HIF-1α 556–574 was incubated with Eu-VBC in 100 µl binding buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 120 mM NaCl) for 60 min at room temperature. After washing six times with DELFIA wash buffer and adding 100 µl enhancer solution, the amount of bound VBC was determined by measuring time-resolved fluorescence with a Tecan infinite M200 plate reader. Measurements were taken in triplicate or more, and results were expressed as means ± SEM. IC50 values were determined after curve fitting using GraphPad Prism software applying the four-parameter logistic equation to the data sets. When adjustment of the concentration of free Fe2+ was necessary, the reaction buffer was supplemented with appropriate amounts of ammonium iron(II) sulfate ((NH4)2Fe(SO4)2.6H2O, Mohr’s salt). |
||
Cell Assay |
Cell lines, cell culture media, and luciferase reporter assay[1]
A549 and HeLa carcinoma cell lines (American Type Culture Collection) were cultured in DMEM/F-12, and Hep3B cells in RPMI medium, both supplemented with antibiotics, L-glutamine and 10% fetal calf serum. A549 cells stably transfected with the HIF-RE2-luc HIF reporter construct (constructed in pGL3) were seeded on 384-well plates at a density of 2500 cells/well in a volume of 25 µl complete cell culture medium, and re-incubated for 16–24 h before the test. Test compounds were added at appropriate dilutions in a volume of 10 µl, and cells were re-incubated for 6 h before measurement. Luciferase activity was determined in a luminometer after addition of cell lysis/luciferase buffer. Cell line identities were verified by STR DNA typing. Western blot analysis[1] For western blot analysis, cell lysates were separated on 4–12% SDS polyacrylamide gradient gels. Proteins were blotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. HIF-1α protein was detected using a HIF-1α specific monoclonal antibody at a dilution of 1∶250. HIF-2α protein was detected using a HIF-2α specific polyclonal antibody at a dilution of 1∶1000. Anti-β-actin antibody served as a loading control. Binding of the antibodies was visualized by binding of a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody, and subsequently enhanced using chemiluminescence, according to the manufactureŕs instructions. Novex Sharp Pre-stained Protein Standard was used as molecular weight marker. |
||
Animal Protocol |
|
||
Toxicity/Toxicokinetics |
Overall, 94.5% of patients experienced at least 1 TEAE during the study: 92.7% of patients in the molidustat group and 96.3% in the darbepoetin group (Table 2). The most commonly reported TEAEs were nasopharyngitis (34.1% and 40.2% in the molidustat and darbepoetin groups, respectively), worsening of CKD (18.3% and 9.8%, respectively), and diarrhea (8.5% and 12.2%, respectively) (Table 2). TEAEs leading to death were reported in 2 patients (2.4%) in the molidustat group and none in the darbepoetin group, and serious TEAEs were reported in 32.9% and 26.8% of patients, respectively. MACEs that occurred after the start of the study drug were reported in 3.7% of patients treated with molidustat and 1.2% of patients receiving darbepoetin (online suppl. Table 3). Additionally, 3.7% of patients in the molidustat group and 1.2% in the darbepoetin group developed diabetic retinopathy, and 3.7% in the molidustat group and 4.9% in the darbepoetin group developed neoplasms (benign, malignant, or unspecified) (online suppl. Table 4). The mean serum eGFR appeared to remain stable in the molidustat group (online suppl. Fig. 7). Subgroup analyses of TEAEs by age group (<65 and ≥65 years old) and by sex are presented in online supplementary Table 5. The proportion of serious TEAEs was similar between the 2 groups in female patients but higher for males in the molidustat group than in the darbepoetin group.[2]
|
||
References |
|
||
Additional Infomation |
Molidustat is under investigation in clinical trial NCT03350321 (A Study of Molidustat for Correction of Renal Anemia in Non-dialysis Subjects).
See also: Molidustat Sodium (active moiety of). |
Molecular Formula |
C13H14N8O2
|
|
---|---|---|
Molecular Weight |
314.3
|
|
Exact Mass |
314.123
|
|
Elemental Analysis |
C, 49.68; H, 4.49; N, 35.65; O, 10.18
|
|
CAS # |
1154028-82-6
|
|
Related CAS # |
1375799-59-9 (Sodium);1154028-82-6;
|
|
PubChem CID |
59603622
|
|
Appearance |
White to off-white solid powder
|
|
Density |
1.7±0.1 g/cm3
|
|
Boiling Point |
589.2±60.0 °C at 760 mmHg
|
|
Flash Point |
310.2±32.9 °C
|
|
Vapour Pressure |
0.0±1.7 mmHg at 25°C
|
|
Index of Refraction |
1.820
|
|
LogP |
-1.77
|
|
Hydrogen Bond Donor Count |
1
|
|
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count |
8
|
|
Rotatable Bond Count |
3
|
|
Heavy Atom Count |
23
|
|
Complexity |
481
|
|
Defined Atom Stereocenter Count |
0
|
|
InChi Key |
IJMBOKOTALXLKS-UHFFFAOYSA-N
|
|
InChi Code |
InChI=1S/C13H14N8O2/c22-13-10(20-2-1-16-18-20)8-17-21(13)12-7-11(14-9-15-12)19-3-5-23-6-4-19/h1-2,7-9,17H,3-6H2
|
|
Chemical Name |
2-(6-morpholin-4-ylpyrimidin-4-yl)-4-(triazol-1-yl)-1H-pyrazol-3-one
|
|
Synonyms |
|
|
HS Tariff Code |
2934.99.9001
|
|
Storage |
Powder -20°C 3 years 4°C 2 years In solvent -80°C 6 months -20°C 1 month |
|
Shipping Condition |
Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)
|
Solubility (In Vitro) |
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Solubility (In Vivo) |
Solubility in Formulation 1: ≥ 0.5 mg/mL (1.59 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO + 40% PEG300 + 5% Tween80 + 45% Saline (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 5.0 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 400 μL PEG300 and mix evenly; then add 50 μL Tween-80 to the above solution and mix evenly; then add 450 μL normal saline to adjust the volume to 1 mL. Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH₂ O to obtain a clear solution. Solubility in Formulation 2: ≥ 0.5 mg/mL (1.59 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO + 90% (20% SBE-β-CD in Saline) (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution. For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 5.0 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 900 μL of 20% SBE-β-CD physiological saline solution and mix evenly. Preparation of 20% SBE-β-CD in Saline (4°C,1 week): Dissolve 2 g SBE-β-CD in 10 mL saline to obtain a clear solution. View More
Solubility in Formulation 3: ≥ 0.5 mg/mL (1.59 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO + 90% Corn Oil (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution. Solubility in Formulation 4: 10 mg/mL (31.82 mM) in 0.5% CMC-Na/saline water (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), suspension solution; with ultrasonication. Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH₂ O to obtain a clear solution. |
Preparing Stock Solutions | 1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | |
1 mM | 3.1817 mL | 15.9084 mL | 31.8167 mL | |
5 mM | 0.6363 mL | 3.1817 mL | 6.3633 mL | |
10 mM | 0.3182 mL | 1.5908 mL | 3.1817 mL |
*Note: Please select an appropriate solvent for the preparation of stock solution based on your experiment needs. For most products, DMSO can be used for preparing stock solutions (e.g. 5 mM, 10 mM, or 20 mM concentration); some products with high aqueous solubility may be dissolved in water directly. Solubility information is available at the above Solubility Data section. Once the stock solution is prepared, aliquot it to routine usage volumes and store at -20°C or -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze and thaw cycles.
Calculation results
Working concentration: mg/mL;
Method for preparing DMSO stock solution: mg drug pre-dissolved in μL DMSO (stock solution concentration mg/mL). Please contact us first if the concentration exceeds the DMSO solubility of the batch of drug.
Method for preparing in vivo formulation::Take μL DMSO stock solution, next add μL PEG300, mix and clarify, next addμL Tween 80, mix and clarify, next add μL ddH2O,mix and clarify.
(1) Please be sure that the solution is clear before the addition of next solvent. Dissolution methods like vortex, ultrasound or warming and heat may be used to aid dissolving.
(2) Be sure to add the solvent(s) in order.