yingweiwo

Etonogestrel

Alias: ORG 3236; ORG3236; ORG-3236; Implanon; Etonogestrel; nexplanon; 3-keto-desogestrel, 3-ketodesogestrel, 3-oxo desogestrel, 3-oxodesogestrel
Cat No.:V20831 Purity: ≥98%
Etonogestrel (ORG3236; ORG-3236; Nexplanon; Implano; NuvaRing; Circlet) isan active metabolite of desogestrel and long-acting synthetic progestin derivative that has been used as a hormonal contraceptive drug in many devices.
Etonogestrel
Etonogestrel Chemical Structure CAS No.: 54048-10-1
Product category: ERR
This product is for research use only, not for human use. We do not sell to patients.
Size Price Stock Qty
25mg
50mg
100mg
250mg
Other Sizes
Official Supplier of:
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text

 

  • Business Relationship with 5000+ Clients Globally
  • Major Universities, Research Institutions, Biotech & Pharma
  • Citations by Top Journals: Nature, Cell, Science, etc.
Top Publications Citing lnvivochem Products
Product Description

Etonogestrel (ORG3236; ORG-3236; Nexplanon; Implano; NuvaRing; Circlet) is a synthetic progestin derivative with long half-life that is an active metabolite of desogestrel and has been used in numerous hormonal contraceptive devices. It is a birth control pill that women can use as an implant under their skin under their upper arm or as a vaginal ring combined with ethinylestradiol.

Biological Activity I Assay Protocols (From Reference)
Targets
Human Endogenous Metabolite
ln Vitro
Etonogestrel reduces fertility through preventing the release of luteinizing hormone (LH), a reproductive hormone crucial to ovulation.
Etonogestrel also makes cervical mucus more viscous, which prevents spermatozoa from passing through and modifies the uterine lining to stop a fertilized egg from implanting into the endometrium.
Etonogestrel, a progestin, is an oxidative substrate of CYP 3A4.
Etonogestrel induces the expression of FKBP51 mRNA and protein in cultured human endometrial stromal cells (HESCs)[1].
ln Vivo
Etonogestrel (Implanon, Nexplanon, 3-Oxodesogestrel, 3-keto-Desogestrel) is a synthetic version of progesterone, a hormone that is naturally present in female sex.
Cell Assay
In basal medium (BM), which is a 1:1 v/v mixture of Dulbecco's MEM and Ham's F-12 without phenol red, thawed HESCs are grown to confluence with 100U/ml penicillin, 100μg/ml streptomycin, and 0.25μg/ml fungizone complex supplemented with 10% charcoal-stripped calf serum. Confluent HESCs are cultured in parallel in BM with 0.1% ethanol (vehicle control), 10 nM ethradiol or E2+100 nM progesterone, or 100 nM of either MPA (medroxyprogesterone acetate) or ETO (etonogestrel). The cultures are kept in a serum-free defined media (DM) that contains BM plus ITS+ (insulin, transferrin, selenium, and linoleic acid) premix, 5 μM of FeSO4, 50 μM of ZnSO4, 1 nM of CuSO4, 20 nM of Na2SeO3 trace elements, 50 μg/ml of ascorbic acid, and 50 ng/ml of recombinant epidermal growth factor. The cultures are kept in this medium for seven days after the serum is removed twice using 1X phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove any remaining serum. After twice washing the cultures in 1X PBS to get rid of any remaining steroids, DM containing the appropriate vehicle control or steroids is added to the cultures for either six or twenty-four hours. Following their incubation periods, HESCs are stored at −70°C after being rinsed with ice-cold 1X PBS and prepared for total RNA and protein extraction.
ADME/Pharmacokinetics
Absorption, Distribution and Excretion
Etonogestrel administered vaginally is known to be significantly absorbed through the vaginal epithelium without increasing its concentration in urine. Orally administered Etonogestrel, on the other hand, is absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract and undergoes first-pass metabolism. Subcutaneous injection of Etonogestrel results in rapid absorption into the bloodstream with a bioavailability of 82%. It has been reported that implants release approximately 60 micrograms daily during the first 3 months, gradually decreasing thereafter to 30 micrograms by the end of the second year. Elimination of Etonogestrel and its metabolites primarily occurs via the kidneys. The apparent volume of distribution of Etonogestrel is approximately 201 liters. The clearance rate of Etonogestrel has been reported to be 7.5 liters/hour. Metabolism/Metabolites Etonogestrel is primarily metabolized in the liver by cytochrome 3A4 via hydroxylation, sulfate conjugation, and glucuronide conjugation.
Biological Half-Life
According to reports, the elimination half-life of etoposide is 25 hours, indicating that its contraceptive effect is reversible.
Toxicity/Toxicokinetics
Effects During Pregnancy and Lactation
◉ Overview of Medication Use During Lactation
Etonogestrel is available in various formulations in the United States, including the NuvaRing, a combined vaginal ring that releases 120 micrograms of Etonogestrel and 15 micrograms of ethinylestradiol daily, and subdermal implants (Implanon, Nexplanon) that release Etonogestrel at a decreasing rate over 3 years.
Based on current evidence, US experts recommend that postpartum breastfeeding women should not use combined hormonal contraceptives (such as NuvaRing) during the first 3 weeks postpartum due to concerns about increased risk of venous thromboembolism; and generally should not use combined hormonal contraceptives during the 4th week postpartum due to concerns about potential impact on breastfeeding outcomes. Postpartum breastfeeding women with other venous thromboembolism risk factors should generally not use combined hormonal contraceptives within 6 weeks postpartum. The World Health Organization guidelines are more stringent, stating that breastfeeding women should not use combined oral contraceptives within 42 days postpartum, and that the disadvantages of using this method generally outweigh the benefits during the 6 weeks to 6 months postpartum. Estrogen exposure in the initial days may lead to reduced milk production. Expert opinion suggests that the risks of progestin-only contraceptive products are generally acceptable for breastfeeding women at any postpartum time. A review of published data concluded that etamenogestrene implants appear to have a risk of approximately 0.9% lactation suppression. Low-quality evidence suggests that there may be no difference in breastfeeding rates at 6 months between immediate and delayed placement of progestin-releasing intrauterine devices. Some preliminary evidence suggests that etamenogestrene implants may delay lactation activation (stage II lactation). However, other studies have found no difference between immediate and delayed placement of etamenogestrene implants. ◉ Effects on breastfed infants: 42 women received an etamenogestrene subcutaneous implant (Implanon) between 28 and 56 days postpartum. Compared with 38 infants from similar mothers using non-hormonal intrauterine devices (IUDs), there were no statistically significant differences in disease incidence or growth rate between the two groups, except for a slightly higher but not statistically significant increase in weight gain in male infants and a higher incidence of respiratory and skin diseases in the implant group. Infants were followed up at 3 years of age; no differences were found in growth or psychomotor development.
A non-blinded randomized study of exclusively breastfeeding women compared those who received an etoposide implant within 24–48 hours postpartum (n=20) and those who received a 150 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate extended-release injection 6 weeks postpartum (n=20). There was no difference in weight gain between the two groups.
A randomized prospective study compared the growth of infants born to mothers who received an etoposide implant within 48 hours postpartum (n=50) or 6 weeks postpartum (n=50). There were no significant differences in breastfeeding rates or infant growth between the two groups in the first year of life.
A prospective non-randomized trial compared the effects of four contraceptive methods on 10 women. On day 42 postpartum, mothers began using one of the following contraceptive methods: combined ethinyl estradiol 30 mcg and levonorgestrel 150 mcg (Microvlar), an etonogestrel implant (Implanon), a levonorgestrel intrauterine system (Myrena), or a copper-containing intrauterine device (Optima). Breast milk intake was measured by administering deuterated water to the mother and by measuring the deuterium content in the infant's saliva and the number of diaper wetting sessions per day. The infant's weight and height were also measured to assess growth and development. From day 42 to day 63 postpartum, no differences were observed in breast milk intake or infant growth and development among the different contraceptive methods. A small study randomly assigned postpartum women to two groups: one group received an etonogestrel implant (Implanon) within 48 hours postpartum (n = 12), and the other group did not use any contraception for the first 6 weeks postpartum (n = 12). Breast milk intake was measured at 48 hours postpartum and on day 29 postpartum. There was no difference in breast milk intake between the two groups, nor in neonatal weight gain during the follow-up period.
◉ Effects on Lactation and Breast Milk
42 women received an etoposide subcutaneous implant (Implanon) between 28 and 56 days postpartum. There were no differences in breast milk volume, lactose, protein, or fat content compared to 38 similar mothers using non-hormonal intrauterine devices. There was no significant difference in the duration of lactation between the two groups, with a mean of 421 days in the implant group and 423 days in the IUD group.
A non-blinded randomized study compared exclusive breastfeeding women who received an etoposide implant 24 to 48 hours postpartum (n = 20) with those who received a 150 mg extended-release medroxyprogesterone acetate injection at 6 weeks postpartum (n = 20). Exclusive breastfeeding rates were similar in both groups at 6 and 12 weeks postpartum. A randomized controlled trial compared the effects of etoposide implantation 1-3 days postpartum (n = 35) versus etoposide implantation 4-8 weeks postpartum (n = 34). The study measured several outcome measures: time to lactation stage II, lactation failure rate, formula supplementation, and milk composition at 6 weeks postpartum. There were no differences in any outcome measures between the two groups. One mother successfully breastfed her newborn, and the infant grew well. On day 39 postpartum, an etoposide implant (Nexplanon) was implanted. By day 70 postpartum, the mother reported reduced breast milk production, infant weight loss, and a drop in growth percentile from the 44th percentile to the 6th percentile. Five weeks later, the mother switched entirely to formula feeding. The authors requested a report from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding etoposide and found a similar case of reduced breast milk production. Based on a review of four published studies, the authors estimated that the probability of etoposide implants suppressing lactation is approximately 0.9% (range 0.2% to 5.4%). A randomized, non-blinded trial compared the effects of etoposide implants (brand unspecified) in postpartum women aged 14 to 24 years before discharge or 6 weeks postpartum. At 3 and 6 months postpartum, women who received immediate implants had slightly higher breastfeeding rates, but the difference was not statistically significant. A randomized prospective study compared the growth of infants born to mothers who received etoposide implants within 48 hours postpartum (n=50) or 6 weeks postpartum (n=50). There was no significant difference in breastfeeding rates between the two groups in the first year of life. A study in Malawi compared breastfeeding rates in women who received immediate postpartum implants of etoposide (n=28) or levonorgestrel (n=112). Mothers chose their implantation method and underwent a 2-year postpartum follow-up. Most women continued breastfeeding for 2 years. There were no differences between the two groups in the rate of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months and the proportion of women continuing to breastfeed until 2 years of age. A study of women intending to breastfeed randomly assigned them to two groups: one received a progestin implant (presumably etoposide) in the delivery room, and the other received it within 24 to 48 hours postpartum. There was no significant difference in the time to reach stage II lactation between the two groups. A small, non-randomized, prospective pilot study compared the time to lactation activation in women who received an etoposide implant (Nexplanon; n = 8) and women who did not use contraception (n = 24). Women who received etoposide implants experienced a delayed time to lactation activation, as determined by biochemical assays. A non-inferiority study randomly assigned postpartum women to two groups, receiving etoposide implants 0 to 2 hours postpartum (n = 35) or 24 to 48 hours postpartum (n = 34). There was no significant difference in the time required to reach stage II lactation between the two groups. Another study randomly assigned postpartum women to three groups, with etoposide implanted within 30 minutes of placental delivery, 24 to 72 hours postpartum, or 6 weeks and beyond postpartum. There was no significant difference in the time required to reach lactation stage II among the groups, with a mean time of 62 hours. The duration of breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding, implant satisfaction, and reports of excessive or irregular bleeding were similar across groups. One woman who received Nexplanon implantation 2 months postpartum and began breastfeeding reported persistent galactorrhea. The galactorrhea persisted for 2 years until the Nexplanon implant was removed. Her galactorrhea symptoms improved at 1 month and 7 months postpartum. Protein Binding: Etoposide is highly bound to plasma proteins, primarily albumin, followed by sex hormone-binding globulin. Approximately 96-99% of the administered dose of etoposide is protein-bound.
References

[1]. Dionne D. Maddox, et al. Etonogestrel (Implanon), Another Treatment Option for Contraception. P T. 2008 Jun; 33(6): 337–347.

[2]. Ozlem Guzeloglu Kayisli, et al. Progestins Upregulate FKBP51 Expression in Human Endometrial Stromal Cells to Induce Functional Progesterone and Glucocorticoid Withdrawal: Implications for Contraceptive- Associated Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. PLoS One. 201 .

Additional Infomation
Etonogestrel is a 17β-hydroxysteroid, 3-oxo-Δ⁴ steroid, and terminal alkyne compound. It is a contraceptive, progestin, and female contraceptive. The Etonogestrel molecule is 3-ketodisogestene or 19-nortestosterone, a synthetic bioactive metabolite of the progestin disogestene. The first product containing Etonogestrel was developed by Organon, a subsidiary of Merck, and approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2001. Etonogestrel is a progestin. Etonogestrel is the synthetic form of the natural female sex hormone progesterone. Etonogestrel binds to cytoplasmic progesterone receptors in the reproductive system, subsequently activating progesterone receptor-mediated gene expression. Due to a negative feedback mechanism, the release of luteinizing hormone (LH) is inhibited, leading to ovulation suppression and changes in cervical mucus and the endometrium. See also: ethinylestradiol; Etonogestrel (ingredient).
Drug Indications
Etonogestrel is a long-acting reversible contraceptive administered as a subdermal implant. It is known to be effective in postpartum implantation (including in breastfeeding women). Etonogestrel is a component of long-acting contraceptive implants and prevents pregnancy. The contraceptive effect of the implant lasts for up to 5 years.
FDA Label
Mechanism of Action
Etonogestrel binds with high affinity to progesterone and estrogen receptors in target organs. Target organs include the female reproductive tract, mammary glands, hypothalamus, and pituitary gland. Once bound to cells, the drug alters the synthesis of various proteins, thereby reducing levels of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and luteinizing hormone.
These protocols are for reference only. InvivoChem does not independently validate these methods.
Physicochemical Properties
Molecular Formula
C22H28O2
Molecular Weight
324.4565
Exact Mass
324.208
Elemental Analysis
C, 81.44; H, 8.70; O, 9.86
CAS #
54048-10-1
Related CAS #
54048-10-1
PubChem CID
6917715
Appearance
White to off-white solid powder
Density
1.1±0.1 g/cm3
Boiling Point
473.1±45.0 °C at 760 mmHg
Melting Point
182-184ºC
Flash Point
201.1±21.3 °C
Vapour Pressure
0.0±2.7 mmHg at 25°C
Index of Refraction
1.575
LogP
4.22
Hydrogen Bond Donor Count
1
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count
2
Rotatable Bond Count
2
Heavy Atom Count
24
Complexity
677
Defined Atom Stereocenter Count
6
SMILES
O([H])[C@@]1(C#C[H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])[C@@]2([H])[C@]3([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C4=C([H])C(C([H])([H])C([H])([H])[C@]4([H])[C@@]3([H])C(=C([H])[H])C([H])([H])[C@@]21C([H])([H])C([H])([H])[H])=O
InChi Key
GCKFUYQCUCGESZ-BPIQYHPVSA-N
InChi Code
InChI=1S/C22H28O2/c1-4-21-13-14(3)20-17-9-7-16(23)12-15(17)6-8-18(20)19(21)10-11-22(21,24)5-2/h2,12,17-20,24H,3-4,6-11,13H2,1H3/t17-,18-,19-,20+,21-,22-/m0/s1
Chemical Name
(8S,9S,10R,13S,14S,17R)-13-ethyl-17-ethynyl-17-hydroxy-11-methylidene-2,6,7,8,9,10,12,14,15,16-decahydro-1H-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-one
Synonyms
ORG 3236; ORG3236; ORG-3236; Implanon; Etonogestrel; nexplanon; 3-keto-desogestrel, 3-ketodesogestrel, 3-oxo desogestrel, 3-oxodesogestrel
HS Tariff Code
2934.99.9001
Storage

Powder      -20°C    3 years

                     4°C     2 years

In solvent   -80°C    6 months

                  -20°C    1 month

Shipping Condition
Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)
Solubility Data
Solubility (In Vitro)
DMSO: 50~65 mg/mL (154.1~200.3 mM)
Ethanol: 65 mg/mL (~200.3 mM)
Solubility (In Vivo)
Solubility in Formulation 1: ≥ 2.5 mg/mL (7.71 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO + 90% Corn Oil (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 25.0 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 900 μL of corn oil and mix evenly.

 (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.)
Preparing Stock Solutions 1 mg 5 mg 10 mg
1 mM 3.0820 mL 15.4102 mL 30.8204 mL
5 mM 0.6164 mL 3.0820 mL 6.1641 mL
10 mM 0.3082 mL 1.5410 mL 3.0820 mL

*Note: Please select an appropriate solvent for the preparation of stock solution based on your experiment needs. For most products, DMSO can be used for preparing stock solutions (e.g. 5 mM, 10 mM, or 20 mM concentration); some products with high aqueous solubility may be dissolved in water directly. Solubility information is available at the above Solubility Data section. Once the stock solution is prepared, aliquot it to routine usage volumes and store at -20°C or -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze and thaw cycles.

Calculator

Molarity Calculator allows you to calculate the mass, volume, and/or concentration required for a solution, as detailed below:

  • Calculate the Mass of a compound required to prepare a solution of known volume and concentration
  • Calculate the Volume of solution required to dissolve a compound of known mass to a desired concentration
  • Calculate the Concentration of a solution resulting from a known mass of compound in a specific volume
An example of molarity calculation using the molarity calculator is shown below:
What is the mass of compound required to make a 10 mM stock solution in 5 ml of DMSO given that the molecular weight of the compound is 350.26 g/mol?
  • Enter 350.26 in the Molecular Weight (MW) box
  • Enter 10 in the Concentration box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 5 in the Volume box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 17.513 mg appears in the Mass box. In a similar way, you may calculate the volume and concentration.

Dilution Calculator allows you to calculate how to dilute a stock solution of known concentrations. For example, you may Enter C1, C2 & V2 to calculate V1, as detailed below:

What volume of a given 10 mM stock solution is required to make 25 ml of a 25 μM solution?
Using the equation C1V1 = C2V2, where C1=10 mM, C2=25 μM, V2=25 ml and V1 is the unknown:
  • Enter 10 into the Concentration (Start) box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Concentration (End) box and select the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Volume (End) box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 62.5 μL (0.1 ml) appears in the Volume (Start) box
g/mol

Molecular Weight Calculator allows you to calculate the molar mass and elemental composition of a compound, as detailed below:

Note: Chemical formula is case sensitive: C12H18N3O4  c12h18n3o4
Instructions to calculate molar mass (molecular weight) of a chemical compound:
  • To calculate molar mass of a chemical compound, please enter the chemical/molecular formula and click the “Calculate’ button.
Definitions of molecular mass, molecular weight, molar mass and molar weight:
  • Molecular mass (or molecular weight) is the mass of one molecule of a substance and is expressed in the unified atomic mass units (u). (1 u is equal to 1/12 the mass of one atom of carbon-12)
  • Molar mass (molar weight) is the mass of one mole of a substance and is expressed in g/mol.
/

Reconstitution Calculator allows you to calculate the volume of solvent required to reconstitute your vial.

  • Enter the mass of the reagent and the desired reconstitution concentration as well as the correct units
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer appears in the Volume (to add to vial) box
In vivo Formulation Calculator (Clear solution)
Step 1: Enter information below (Recommended: An additional animal to make allowance for loss during the experiment)
Step 2: Enter in vivo formulation (This is only a calculator, not the exact formulation for a specific product. Please contact us first if there is no in vivo formulation in the solubility section.)
+
+
+

Calculation results

Working concentration mg/mL;

Method for preparing DMSO stock solution mg drug pre-dissolved in μL DMSO (stock solution concentration mg/mL). Please contact us first if the concentration exceeds the DMSO solubility of the batch of drug.

Method for preparing in vivo formulation:Take μL DMSO stock solution, next add μL PEG300, mix and clarify, next addμL Tween 80, mix and clarify, next add μL ddH2O,mix and clarify.

(1) Please be sure that the solution is clear before the addition of next solvent. Dissolution methods like vortex, ultrasound or warming and heat may be used to aid dissolving.
             (2) Be sure to add the solvent(s) in order.

Clinical Trial Information
NCT Number Recruitment interventions Conditions Sponsor/Collaborators Start Date Phases
NCT05237141 Recruiting Drug: Etonogestrel implant Contraception University of Colorado, Denver April 1, 2022 Phase 4
NCT05760144 Recruiting Drug: DMPA
Drug: Etonogestrel implant
Contraception Oregon Health and Science
University
July 1, 2023 Early Phase 1
NCT04047875 Recruiting Drug: Placebo
Drug: Norethisterone 10mg/day
Breakthrough Bleeding University of Sao Paulo September 15, 2020 Phase 4
NCT04423055 Recruiting Drug: Etonogestrel
contraceptive implant
Contraception University of California, Davis August 13, 2020 Phase 4
NCT05791799 Not yet recruiting Drug: Etonogestrel Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Sixth Affiliated Hospital,
Sun Yat-sen University
April 1, 2023 Phase 2
Phase 3
Biological Data
  • Chemical structure of etonogestrel. (Data from Implanon package insert, 2006.4). P T. 2008 Jun; 33(6): 337–347.
Contact Us