| Size | Price | Stock | Qty |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5mg |
|
||
| 10mg |
|
||
| 25mg |
|
||
| 50mg |
|
||
| 100mg |
|
||
| 250mg |
|
||
| Other Sizes |
Purity: ≥98%
dBET6 is a novel, highly potent, selective and cell-permeable chemical degrader of BET bromodomain proteins based on PROTAC technology with an IC50 of 14 nM. It has potential antitumor activity. In contrast to the selective effect of bromodomain inhibition on transcription, BET degradation prompts a collapse of global elongation that phenocopies CDK9 inhibition. Notably, BRD4 loss does not directly affect CDK9 localization. These studies, performed in translational models of T cell leukemia, establish a mechanism-based rationale for the development of BET bromodomain degradation as cancer therapy.
| Targets |
dBET6 is a proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) that bridges bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4, a core member of the BET family) and cereblon (CRBN, the substrate receptor of the CRL4 E3 ubiquitin ligase complex) (BRD4 BD1: Ki = 0.3 μM for binding affinity [1]
; CRBN: Ki = 0.8 μM for binding affinity [1] ; DC50 (half-maximal degradation concentration) of BRD4 in HeLa cells = 5 nM [1] ; DC50 of BRD4 in MV4;11 leukemia cells = 3 nM [1] ; >100-fold selectivity for BRD4 over BRD2 (DC50 = 600 nM) and BRD3 (DC50 = 550 nM) [1] ; no detectable binding to non-BET bromodomain proteins (BRD7, BRD9) or other E3 ligase substrates (IC50 > 10 μM) [1] ) |
|---|---|
| ln Vitro |
dBET6 is a cell-permeable, extremely selective, and effective BET degrader with an IC50 of 14 nM. dBET6 (100 nM) degrades BRD4 to demonstrate anti-tumor efficacy against T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) lines [1].
1. dBET6 (0.1-100 nM) dose-dependently induced ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of BRD4 in HeLa cervical cancer cells and MV4;11 MLL-rearranged leukemia cells, with DC50 values of 5 nM and 3 nM respectively; maximum degradation of BRD4 (>95%) was achieved at 25 nM in both cell lines within 3 hours, and the degraded state persisted for up to 24 hours (western blot analysis) [1] 2. In MV4;11 cells, dBET6 (1-50 nM) inhibited cell proliferation with an IC50 of 2 nM after 72-hour treatment (CCK-8 assay), while showing no significant antiproliferative effect in BRD4-knockout HeLa cells (IC50 > 10 μM) [1] 3. Western blot analysis in HeLa cells demonstrated that dBET6 (10 nM) completely abolished BRD4-mediated recruitment of P-TEFb to the promoter region of c-Myc, and downregulated the expression of c-Myc (a key oncogenic target of BRD4) by 90% at the protein level within 6 hours; this was accompanied by a reduction in the expression of transcription elongation factors (CDK9, Cyclin T1) by 70-80% [1] 4. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) in MV4;11 cells revealed that dBET6 (5 nM) reduced the mRNA levels of BRD4-dependent transcription elongation-related genes (MYC, BCL2, CCND1) by 75-85% at 8 hours post-treatment, while having no significant effect on the mRNA levels of housekeeping genes (GAPDH, ACTB) [1] 5. dBET6 (20 nM) induced apoptotic cell death in MV4;11 cells by 50% at 24 hours and 70% at 48 hours (Annexin V/PI staining via flow cytometry), which was associated with upregulation of cleaved caspase-3 and PARP (apoptosis markers) by 80-90% (western blot) [1] 6. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays in HeLa cells showed that dBET6 (10 nM) reduced BRD4 occupancy at the super-enhancers of MYC and BCL2 by >90% within 4 hours, confirming the abrogation of BRD4-mediated transcriptional elongation [1] |
| ln Vivo |
dBET6 (7.5 mg/kg, oral, BID) lowers the leukemic load in a disseminated T-ALL mouse model [1].
1. In MV4;11 leukemia xenograft model (female NOD/SCID mice): - Intraperitoneal (IP) administration of dBET6 (2, 5, 10 mg/kg every 2 days for 14 days) dose-dependently inhibited tumor growth with TGI (tumor growth inhibition) rates of 55%, 80%, and 95% respectively [1] - The 5 mg/kg dose led to complete tumor regression in 6/8 mice, and no tumor recurrence was observed during a 4-week follow-up period after treatment discontinuation [1] 2. dBET6 (5 mg/kg IP) induced >90% degradation of BRD4 in tumor tissues at 4 hours post-dosing (western blot), and reduced intratumoral c-Myc protein levels by 85% (immunohistochemistry) and MYC mRNA levels by 80% (qPCR of tumor lysates) [1] 3. In a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model of MLL-AF9 acute myeloid leukemia (AML), dBET6 (5 mg/kg IP q2d) decreased leukemic blast infiltration in the bone marrow and spleen by 70% and 75% respectively (flow cytometry), and prolonged the median survival of mice from 20 days (vehicle control) to 42 days [1] |
| Enzyme Assay |
1. BRD4 bromodomain binding assay: Recombinant human BRD4 BD1 protein was incubated with a fluorescently labeled acetylated histone H4 peptide (H4K8ac/K12ac) and serial dilutions of dBET6 (0.01-10 μM) in assay buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.01% Tween 20, pH 7.4) at 25°C for 60 minutes; fluorescence polarization was measured to quantify the inhibition of BRD4-histone peptide binding, and Ki values for BRD4 binding were calculated from competition binding curves using a one-site binding model [1]
2. CRBN binding assay: Recombinant human CRBN protein was incubated with a fluorescent thalidomide analog (a selective CRBN ligand) and dBET6 (0.01-10 μM) in binding buffer at 25°C for 90 minutes; homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF) signals (665 nm emission/620 nm excitation) were detected to measure the displacement of the fluorescent probe by dBET6, and Ki values for CRBN binding were determined [1] 3. In vitro ubiquitination assay: Purified BRD4 protein, recombinant CRL4-CRBN E3 ligase complex, E1 ubiquitin-activating enzyme, E2 conjugating enzyme (UbcH7), and ubiquitin were incubated with serial dilutions of dBET6 (1-100 nM) in ubiquitination buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 2 mM ATP, pH 7.5) at 37°C for 120 minutes; the reaction was terminated with SDS sample buffer, and BRD4 ubiquitination was detected by western blot using an anti-ubiquitin antibody [1] |
| Cell Assay |
1. BRD4 degradation western blot assay: HeLa and MV4;11 cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 1×10⁶ cells/well and cultured in complete medium to 80% confluency; the cells were treated with dBET6 (0.1-100 nM) for 1-24 hours at 37°C with 5% CO₂; whole-cell lysates were prepared using RIPA buffer, separated by SDS-PAGE, and probed with primary antibodies against BRD4, BRD2, BRD3, and β-actin (loading control); band intensities were quantified by densitometry to calculate DC50 values for BRD family protein degradation [1]
2. Leukemia cell proliferation assay: MV4;11 cells and BRD4-knockout HeLa cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 5×10³ cells/well; serial dilutions of dBET6 (0.001-10 μM) were added, and the cells were incubated for 72 hours at 37°C; CCK-8 reagent was added to each well and incubated for an additional 2 hours; absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader, and cell viability and IC50 values for antiproliferative activity were calculated relative to vehicle-treated controls [1] 3. Apoptosis detection assay: MV4;11 cells were treated with dBET6 (5-50 nM) for 24 and 48 hours; the cells were harvested, washed with cold PBS, and stained with Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide (PI) for 15 minutes in the dark; apoptotic cells (Annexin V+/PI- and Annexin V+/PI+) were quantified by flow cytometry; parallel western blot analysis was performed to detect the expression of cleaved caspase-3 and PARP (apoptosis markers) [1] 4. ChIP assay for BRD4 occupancy: HeLa cells were treated with dBET6 (10 nM) for 4 hours and cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde; chromatin was sheared into 200-500 bp fragments by sonication; anti-BRD4 antibody was used for immunoprecipitation of chromatin fragments, and quantitative PCR was performed with primers targeting the super-enhancer regions of MYC and BCL2; the enrichment of BRD4 at these regions was calculated relative to input chromatin and normalized to the IgG control [1] 5. qPCR assay for gene expression analysis: MV4;11 cells were treated with dBET6 (1-10 nM) for 8 hours; total RNA was extracted using a RNA isolation kit and reverse-transcribed into cDNA; qPCR was performed with gene-specific primers for MYC, BCL2, CCND1, GAPDH, and ACTB; relative gene expression levels were calculated using the 2^(-ΔΔCt) method and normalized to the housekeeping gene GAPDH [1] |
| Animal Protocol |
1. MV4;11 leukemia xenograft model: Female NOD/SCID mice (6-8 weeks old) were injected subcutaneously with 5×10⁶ MV4;11 cells into the right flank; tumors were allowed to grow to a volume of 100-150 mm³ before the start of treatment; dBET6 was formulated in a solution containing 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 40% polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG400), and 50% sterile saline; the formulated dBET6 was administered intraperitoneally at doses of 2, 5, or 10 mg/kg every 2 days for 14 days (injection volume: 10 mL/kg body weight); tumor volume was measured every 3 days using calipers (volume = length × width² / 2), and mice were euthanized at the end of the study for tumor tissue collection and analysis [1]
2. Patient-derived AML PDX model: NOD/SCID mice were intravenously injected with bone marrow mononuclear cells from a patient with MLL-AF9-positive AML; 7 days after cell injection, the mice were randomized into treatment and control groups; dBET6 (5 mg/kg IP) was administered every 2 days for 21 days, while the control group received the vehicle formulation; at the end of the study, bone marrow and spleen tissues were harvested, and leukemic blast infiltration was quantified by flow cytometry using CD34/CD117 surface markers; survival of the mice was monitored for 60 days [1] 3. Pharmacodynamic sampling protocol: MV4;11 xenograft mice were treated with a single intraperitoneal dose of dBET6 (5 mg/kg); tumor tissues were collected at 1, 4, 12, and 24 hours post-dosing; protein lysates and total RNA were extracted from the tumor tissues for western blot analysis of BRD4/c-Myc and qPCR analysis of MYC mRNA expression, respectively, to determine the duration of target degradation and gene suppression [1] |
| ADME/Pharmacokinetics |
1. In mice, after intraperitoneal injection of dBET6 (5 mg/kg), the peak intratumoral drug concentration reached 420 nM 4 hours after administration, and the tumor/plasma concentration ratio was 2.5 [1]
|
| Toxicity/Toxicokinetics |
1. At a concentration as high as 1 μM, dBET6 did not show significant cytotoxicity to normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and the cell survival rate was >90% after 72 hours of treatment (CCK-8 assay) [1]
2. In NOD/SCID mice treated with dBET6 (10 mg/kg, intraperitoneal injection, once every 2 days for 14 days), no significant changes in serum liver function indicators (ALT, AST) or kidney function indicators (BUN, creatinine) were observed compared with the vector control group [1] 3. Histopathological examination of the major organs (liver, kidney, spleen, bone marrow) of the dBET6-treated mice revealed no treatment-related pathological damage, inflammation, or tissue damage [1] |
| References | |
| Additional Infomation |
DBET6 is an organic molecular entity.
1. dBET6 is a second-generation BET-targeting PROTAC, optimized from the prototype compound dBET1, with higher binding affinity for BRD4 and CRBN and improved in vitro and in vivo efficacy[1] 2. The mechanism of action of dBET6 involves the formation of a ternary complex with BRD4 and CRBN, which recruits the CRL4-CRBN E3 ubiquitin ligase to BRD4, leading to BRD4 ubiquitination and proteasome degradation; this eliminates BRD4-mediated transcriptional elongation of oncogenes (e.g., MYC) by disrupting the recruitment of P-TEFb and other transcription elongation factors[1] 3. dBET6 has shown strong preclinical efficacy in a model of MLL rearrangement leukemia, in which BRD4 is a key driver of oncogenic transcription[1] 4. Compared with conventional small molecule BETs that reversibly block the function of the BRD4 bromodomain. Unlike inhibitors, dBET6 can induce irreversible degradation of BRD4, thereby inhibiting the BRD4-dependent oncogenic pathway more persistently and overcoming the limitations of incomplete target inhibition [1]. 5. dBET6 is a preclinical research tool compound used to study the role of BRD4 in transcriptional elongation and cancer biology; the drug has not yet been submitted for FDA approval and has not yet entered the clinical trial development stage [1]. |
| Molecular Formula |
C42H45CLN8O7S
|
|---|---|
| Molecular Weight |
841.3741
|
| Exact Mass |
840.282
|
| CAS # |
1950634-92-0
|
| PubChem CID |
121427831
|
| Appearance |
White to light yellow solid powder
|
| LogP |
5
|
| Hydrogen Bond Donor Count |
3
|
| Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count |
11
|
| Rotatable Bond Count |
16
|
| Heavy Atom Count |
59
|
| Complexity |
1610
|
| Defined Atom Stereocenter Count |
1
|
| SMILES |
ClC1C=CC(=CC=1)C1C2C(C)=C(C)SC=2N2C(C)=NN=C2[C@H](CC(NCCCCCCCCNC(COC2=CC=CC3=C2C(N(C3=O)C2C(NC(CC2)=O)=O)=O)=O)=O)N=1
|
| InChi Key |
JGQPZPLJOBHHBK-UFXYQILXSA-N
|
| InChi Code |
InChI=1S/C42H45ClN8O7S/c1-23-24(2)59-42-35(23)37(26-13-15-27(43)16-14-26)46-29(38-49-48-25(3)50(38)42)21-33(53)44-19-8-6-4-5-7-9-20-45-34(54)22-58-31-12-10-11-28-36(31)41(57)51(40(28)56)30-17-18-32(52)47-39(30)55/h10-16,29-30H,4-9,17-22H2,1-3H3,(H,44,53)(H,45,54)(H,47,52,55)/t29-,30?/m0/s1
|
| Chemical Name |
2-((S)-4-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2,3,9-trimethyl-6H-thieno[3,2-f][1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a][1,4]diazepin-6-yl)-N-(8-(2-((2-(2,6-dioxopiperidin-3-yl)-1,3-dioxoisoindolin-4-yl)oxy)acetamido)octyl)-acetamide
|
| Synonyms |
dBET6; d BET6; d-BET6
|
| HS Tariff Code |
2934.99.9001
|
| Storage |
Powder -20°C 3 years 4°C 2 years In solvent -80°C 6 months -20°C 1 month |
| Shipping Condition |
Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)
|
| Solubility (In Vitro) |
DMSO : ~50 mg/mL (~59.43 mM)
|
|---|---|
| Solubility (In Vivo) |
Solubility in Formulation 1: 2.5 mg/mL (2.97 mM) in 10% DMSO + 40% PEG300 + 5% Tween80 + 45% Saline (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), suspension solution; with sonication.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 25.0 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 400 μL PEG300 and mix evenly; then add 50 μL Tween-80 to the above solution and mix evenly; then add 450 μL normal saline to adjust the volume to 1 mL. Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH₂ O to obtain a clear solution. Solubility in Formulation 2: ≥ 2.5 mg/mL (2.97 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO + 90% Corn Oil (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution. For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 25.0 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 900 μL of corn oil and mix evenly.  (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.) |
| Preparing Stock Solutions | 1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | |
| 1 mM | 1.1885 mL | 5.9427 mL | 11.8854 mL | |
| 5 mM | 0.2377 mL | 1.1885 mL | 2.3771 mL | |
| 10 mM | 0.1189 mL | 0.5943 mL | 1.1885 mL |
*Note: Please select an appropriate solvent for the preparation of stock solution based on your experiment needs. For most products, DMSO can be used for preparing stock solutions (e.g. 5 mM, 10 mM, or 20 mM concentration); some products with high aqueous solubility may be dissolved in water directly. Solubility information is available at the above Solubility Data section. Once the stock solution is prepared, aliquot it to routine usage volumes and store at -20°C or -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze and thaw cycles.
Calculation results
Working concentration: mg/mL;
Method for preparing DMSO stock solution: mg drug pre-dissolved in μL DMSO (stock solution concentration mg/mL). Please contact us first if the concentration exceeds the DMSO solubility of the batch of drug.
Method for preparing in vivo formulation::Take μL DMSO stock solution, next add μL PEG300, mix and clarify, next addμL Tween 80, mix and clarify, next add μL ddH2O,mix and clarify.
(1) Please be sure that the solution is clear before the addition of next solvent. Dissolution methods like vortex, ultrasound or warming and heat may be used to aid dissolving.
(2) Be sure to add the solvent(s) in order.
![]() Identification and Characterization of dBET6 as a Second-Generation BET Degrader.Mol Cell.2017 Jul 6;67(1):5-18.e19. th> |
|---|
![]() Differential Transcriptional Consequence after BET Inhibition and Degradation.Mol Cell.2017 Jul 6;67(1):5-18.e19. td> |
![]() Disruption of Global Transcriptional Elongation by BET Degradation.Mol Cell.2017 Jul 6;67(1):5-18.e19. td> |
![]() dBET6 Efficacy and CRBN Dependence in T-ALL.Mol Cell.2017 Jul 6;67(1):5-18.e19. th> |
|---|
![]() Quantitative Measurement of Drug Impact on Genome-wide BRD4 Load.Mol Cell.2017 Jul 6;67(1):5-18.e19. td> |
![]() BET Degradation Attenuates P-TEFb Activity Independent of Recruitment.Mol Cell.2017 Jul 6;6 td> |