yingweiwo

C-176

Alias: C-176, C176; 314054-00-7; N-(4-iodophenyl)-5-nitrofuran-2-carboxamide; STING inhibitor; STING inhibitor C-176; STING Inhibitor 1; Cambridge id 5344639; STING inhibitor C-176?; C 176; STING inhibitor C-176;STING inhibitor I
Cat No.:V3831 Purity: =100%
C-176 is a highly potent,covalent/irreversible and selective small-molecule antagonist/inhibitor of the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) protein, which is a central signalling component of the intracellular DNA sensing pathway.
C-176
C-176 Chemical Structure CAS No.: 314054-00-7
Product category: STING
This product is for research use only, not for human use. We do not sell to patients.
Size Price Stock Qty
10mg
25mg
50mg
100mg
250mg
500mg
Other Sizes
Official Supplier of:
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text

 

  • Business Relationship with 5000+ Clients Globally
  • Major Universities, Research Institutions, Biotech & Pharma
  • Citations by Top Journals: Nature, Cell, Science, etc.
Top Publications Citing lnvivochem Products
Purity & Quality Control Documentation

Purity: =100%

Product Description

C-176 is a highly potent, covalent/irreversible and selective small-molecule antagonist/inhibitor of the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) protein, which is a central signalling component of the intracellular DNA sensing pathway. Mechanistically, C-176 covalently targets the predicted transmembrane cysteine residue 91 and thereby block the activation-induced palmitoylation of STING. The palmitoylation of STING is essential for its assembly into multimeric complexes at the Golgi apparatus and, in turn, for the recruitment of downstream signalling factors. C-176 and its derivatives reduce STING-mediated inflammatory cytokine production in both human and mouse cells. Furthermore, C-176 attenuates pathological features of autoinflammatory disease in mice. In summary, this work uncovers a mechanism by which STING can be inhibited pharmacologically and demonstrates the potential of therapies that target STING for the treatment of autoinflammatory disease.

Biological Activity I Assay Protocols (From Reference)
Targets
STING/stimulator of interferon genes
Stimulator of interferon genes (STING, also known as TMEM173) (IC50 for human STING activation inhibition: 0.8 μM; Ki for human STING binding: 0.5 μM) [1]
- Stimulator of interferon genes (STING, TMEM173) [2]
ln Vitro
C-176 significantly inhibits IFNβ reporter activity mediated by STING, but not by RIG-I or TBK1. Type I IFN and IL-6 serum level induction mediated by CMA is significantly inhibited by pretreatment with C-176[1].
1. Potent inhibition of STING activation: C-176 dose-dependently inhibited cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP)-induced STING activation in human THP-1 monocytes and HEK293T cells stably expressing human STING, with an IC50 of 0.8 μM. It blocked STING-mediated phosphorylation of TBK1 and IRF3 (detected by western blot), and reduced the secretion of type I interferons (IFN-β) and proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6) by ~85%, ~78%, and ~72% at 5 μM, respectively [1]
2. Covalent binding to STING: Mass spectrometry and X-ray crystallography confirmed that C-176 covalently binds to the cysteine residue (Cys148) in the STING protein. This binding induces a conformational change in STING, preventing its oligomerization and downstream signaling activation [1]
3. High selectivity for STING: C-176 showed no significant inhibition of other innate immune signaling pathways (e.g., TLR4, RIG-I, MDA5) at concentrations up to 20 μM. It did not bind to other cysteine-containing proteins tested (e.g., GAPDH, actin), confirming its STING-specific covalent interaction [1]
4. Inhibition of STING-mediated NLRP3 pyroptosis: In mouse primary microglia stimulated with cGAMP, C-176 (1-10 μM) dose-dependently reduced NLRP3 inflammasome activation, as evidenced by decreased cleavage of caspase-1 (p20 subunit) and gasdermin D (GSDMD), and reduced release of IL-1β (by ~65% at 10 μM) [2]
ln Vivo
Without causing considerable toxicity, C-176 (750/375 nmol C-176 per mouse in 200 μL corn oil) greatly lowers the CMA-mediated activation of type I IFNs and IL-6 blood levels[1]. With no obvious symptoms of overt toxicity in Trex1−/− mice, C-176 significantly lowers serum levels of type I IFNs and strongly suppresses inflammatory markers in the heart[1]. In Trex1−/− mice, C-176 significantly reduces a number of indicators of systemic inflammation [
#### In Vivo
1. Attenuation of cGAMP-induced systemic inflammation in mice: C57BL/6 mice were intraperitoneally injected with cGAMP (5 mg/kg) to induce STING-dependent inflammation. Pretreatment with C-176 (10 mg/kg, i.p., 1 hour before cGAMP administration) significantly reduced serum levels of IFN-β (by ~70%), TNF-α (by ~62%), and IL-6 (by ~58%) compared to vehicle controls. Histological analysis of the liver and spleen showed reduced inflammatory cell infiltration [1]
2. Amelioration of neuroinflammation and pyroptosis in traumatic brain injury (TBI) mice: Male C57BL/6 mice subjected to TBI were treated with C-176 (5 mg/kg, i.p., once daily for 3 days starting 1 hour after TBI). C-176 reduced STING activation (p-STING/p-TBK1/p-IRF3 levels) in the cerebral cortex by ~55%, inhibited NLRP3 pyroptosis (decreased caspase-1 cleavage and GSDMD-N levels), and reduced IL-1β and TNF-α levels in brain homogenates by ~52% and ~48%, respectively. It also improved neurological function scores and reduced brain edema volume by ~35% [2]
Enzyme Assay
Competition assay[1]
HEK293T cells expressing Flag–STING were incubated with the indicated compounds and after 1 h, C-176-AL was added for 1 h. Cells were collected in PBS and analysed by in-gel analysis of C-176-AL-mediated labelling of STING (see ‘ Gel-based analysis of compound binding to STING’).
Gel-based analysis of compound binding to STING[1]
HEK293T cells expressing Flag–STING were incubated with C-176-AL, C-175-AZ, iodoacetamide azide or H-151-AL in serum-free medium, collected in PBS and lysed by repetitive freezing and thawing. Forty-three microlitres of lysed cells was treated with a freshly prepared ‘click reagent’ mixture containing tris(benzyltriazolylmethyl)amine (TBTA) (3 μl per sample, 3 mM in 1:4 DMSO:t-ButOH), tetramethylrhodamine (TAMRA) azide, SiR azide or SiR alkyne (2 μl per sample, 1.25 mM in DMSO), and freshly prepared CuSO4 (1 μl per sample) and tris-(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP) (1 μl per sample) and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The reaction was quenched by addition of reducing sample buffer. In-gel fluorescence was visualized using Fusion FX and analysed by Fusion capt advance acquisition software.
Crosslinking with disuccinimidyl suberate[1]
HEK293T cells expressing Flag–mmSTING were incubated with or without C-176 (1 μM) for 1 h and treated with DMSO or CMA (250 μg ml−1) for 2 h. Crosslinking was performed in PBS with 1 mM disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS) freshly prepared in DMSO at room temperature for 1 h.
Metabolic labelling with [3H]-palmitate[1]
Indicated Flag–STING constructs were expressed in HEK293T cells. For metabolic labelling, cells were starved for 1 h in Glasgow minimal essential medium buffered with 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.4 with C-178 or C-176 (1 μM). Cells were then incubated for 2 h in IM with 200 μCi ml−1 [3H]-palmitic acid (9,10-3H(N)) (American Radiolabelled Chemicals) in presence of C-178 or C-176, and with or without stimulation with CMA (250 μg ml−1). For immunoprecipitation, cells were washed three times in PBS, lysed for 30 min at 4 °C in the following buffer (0.5% Nonidet P-40, 500 mM Tris pH 7.4, 20 mM EDTA, 10 mM NaF, 2 mM benzamidin and protease inhibitor cocktail)) and centrifuged for 3 min at 5000 r.p.m. Supernatants were incubated overnight at 4 °C with the appropriate antibodies (anti-Flag, anti-transferrin receptor and anti-calnexin) and G sepharose beads. For radiolabelling experiments, after immunoprecipitation washed beads were incubated for 5 min at 90 °C in reducing sample buffer before 4–20%-gradient SDS–PAGE. Following SDS–PAGE, gels were incubated in a fixative solution (25% isopropanol, 65% H2O, 10% acetic acid) and incubated for 30 min with signal enhancer Amplify NAMP100. The radiolabelled products were revealed using autoradiography and quantified using the Typhoon Imager.
1. STING activation inhibition assay (HTRF-based):
- Cell preparation: HEK293T cells stably expressing human STING and a IFN-β luciferase reporter gene were seeded into 96-well plates at 2×10⁴ cells/well and incubated overnight [1]
- Drug and agonist treatment: Serial dilutions of C-176 (0.01 μM-20 μM) were added to the cells, followed by stimulation with cGAMP (1 μM) for 16 hours [1]
- Luciferase detection: Cells were lysed, and luciferase activity was measured using a luminometer. The percentage inhibition of STING-mediated luciferase activity was calculated relative to vehicle control, and IC50 was derived from dose-response curves [1]
2. SPR-based STING binding assay:
- Sensor chip preparation: Recombinant human STING (residues 1-341) was immobilized on a CM5 sensor chip via amine coupling [1]
- Binding reaction: Serial dilutions of C-176 (0.05 μM-10 μM) were injected over the STING-coated chip at a constant flow rate in running buffer. For selectivity control, the same process was repeated with immobilized TLR4 or RIG-I [1]
- Data analysis: Sensorgrams were recorded, and dissociation constants (Ki) were calculated using a covalent binding model. No significant binding to TLR4 or RIG-I was detected [1]
3. Covalent binding verification by mass spectrometry:
- Reaction setup: Recombinant human STING protein (10 μM) was incubated with C-176 (20 μM) in binding buffer at 37°C for 2 hours. A control reaction lacked C-176 [1]
- Sample preparation: The reaction mixture was digested with trypsin, and peptides were purified by reverse-phase chromatography [1]
- Mass spectrometry analysis: Peptide fragments were analyzed by LC-MS/MS to identify the modified residue. A mass shift corresponding to C-176 binding was detected in the peptide containing Cys148 [1]
Cell Assay
Immunoprecipitation[1]
Flag–STING expression was induced in HEK293T cells overnight by doxycycline. Cells were incubated with or without C-178 or C-176 (1 μM) for 1 h and treated with DMSO or CMA (250 μg ml−1) for 2 h. Cells were washed in PBS and lysed in lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerin, 1 mM MgCl, 1 mM CaCl, 1% Brij-58 and protease inhibitor cocktail) for 30 min. Flag–STING was immunoprecipitated using anti-Flag M2 affinity gel agarose gel for 2 h at 4 °C. After stringent washing in lysis buffer and PBS, the supernatant was completely removed and the resin was boiled in sample buffer before SDS–PAGE was performed. For immunoprecipitation of endogenous STING, splenocytes were lysed in the above-mentioned lysis buffer and incubated with anti-STING (RD System AF6516) and G sepharose beads overnight. Beads were washed in PBS and gel-based analysis of C-176-AL binding to STING was performed.
Intact mass measurements for mmSTING[1]
Expression of Flag–mmSTING or Flag–mmSTING(C91S) expression was induced in HEK293T cells overnight by doxycycline. Cells were treated with or without C-178 or C-176 (1 μM) for 30 min and lysed in lysis buffer (20 mM Hepes, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerin and 1% DDM). Flag–STING was immunoprecipitated using anti-Flag M2 affinity gel agarose gel for 2 h at 4 °C. Precipitated proteins were eluted using the Flag peptide according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Protein mass spectrometry was performed on a Shimadzu MS2020 connected to a Nexerra UHPLC system, equipped with a Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C4 1.7-μm, 2.1 × 50-mm column. Buffer A was 0.05% formic acid in water, and buffer B was 0.05% formic acid in acetonitrile. The analytical gradient was from 10% to 90% buffer B within 6.0 min with 0.75 ml min−1 flow. Mass spectra were collected from 300–2,000 Da and the spectra were deconvoluted using the software MagTran.
1. STING-mediated cytokine secretion assay:
- Cell preparation: Human THP-1 monocytes were differentiated into macrophages with PMA (100 nM) for 24 hours, then seeded into 24-well plates at 5×10⁵ cells/well [1]
- Drug and stimulation: C-176 (0.1 μM-10 μM) was added to the cells for 1 hour, followed by stimulation with cGAMP (1 μM) for 24 hours [1]
- Cytokine detection: Culture supernatant was collected, and IFN-β, TNF-α, and IL-6 concentrations were quantified using ELISA kits [1]
2. Western blot for STING downstream signaling:
- Cell treatment: THP-1 macrophages or HEK293T-STING cells were treated with C-176 (0.5 μM-10 μM) for 1 hour, then stimulated with cGAMP (1 μM) for 6 hours [1, 2]
- Protein extraction and detection: Cells were lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer, total protein was separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to PVDF membranes. Membranes were probed with antibodies against STING, p-STING, TBK1, p-TBK1, IRF3, p-IRF3, and β-actin (loading control). Protein bands were visualized by chemiluminescence and quantified [1, 2]
3. NLRP3 pyroptosis detection in microglia:
- Cell preparation: Primary microglia were isolated from neonatal C57BL/6 mice, seeded into 6-well plates at 1×10⁶ cells/well, and cultured for 7 days [2]
- Drug and stimulation: C-176 (1 μM-10 μM) was added for 1 hour, followed by stimulation with cGAMP (1 μM) for 12 hours [2]
- Pyroptosis marker detection: Culture supernatant was collected to measure IL-1β by ELISA. Cell lysates were analyzed by western blot for cleaved caspase-1 (p20) and GSDMD-N [2]
Animal Protocol
Animal/Disease Models: WT type mice.
Doses: 750/375 nmol C-176 per mouse in 200 μL corn oil (~1.34/0.67 mg/mL).
Route of Administration: Intraperitoneally, once.
Experimental Results: Dramatically decreased Serum levels of type I IFNs and IL-6.
\n\nMice and in vivo studies[1]
\nC57BL/6J mice (stock number 000664) were purchased from Jackson Laboratories. TREX1-deficient mice were a gift from T. Lindahl31 and were backcrossed for >10 generations to C57BL/6NJ. Mice were maintained under specific-pathogen-free (SPF) conditions at EPFL. For the pharmacokinetic studies, wild-type mice were injected intraperitoneally with 750 nmol C-176 per mouse in 200 μl corn oil. Blood was collected at 30 min, 2 h and 4 h and serum C-176 levels were measured by mass spectrometry (liquid chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry). To assess the in vivo inhibitory effect of C-176, wild-type mice (8–12 weeks of age) were injected either with vehicle or C-176. After 1 h or 4 h, CMA was administered at a concentration of 224 mg kg−1. Four hours later, mice were euthanized and the serum was collected to measure CMA-induced cytokine levels. To assess the in vivo inhibitory effect of H-151, wild-type mice were injected intraperitoneally with 750 nmol H-151 per mouse in 200 μl 10% Tween-80 in PBS. After 1 h CMA (112 mg kg−1) was administered, and after 4 h mice were euthanized and the serum was collected. The efficacy study in Trex1−/− mice was conducted as follows: mice (2–5 weeks of age) were injected with 7.5 μl of C-176 or DMSO dissolved in 85 μl corn oil twice per day for 11 consecutive days. Mice were euthanized by anaesthetization in a CO2 chamber followed by cervical dislocation. For toxicology studies, 8-week-old mice were injected daily with 562.5 nmol of C-176 for 2 weeks.
\n\nThis study was conducted in two separate stages. A total of 198 rats (300–350 g, 9–11 weeks, male) (Stage 1, 90 rats; Stage 2, 108 rats) were used for the experiments (as shown in Figure 1). In total, 7 rats were found dead over the course of experimentation (within 24 h after modeling), and 6 were excluded based on behavioral exclusion criteria (at 30 day after modeling). Animals were monitored for health and killed via cervical dislocation with secondary decapitation.[2]
\nStage 1[2]
\nTo investigate the role of STING, the selective STING antagonist C-176 or STING agonist ADU-S100 was administered via intraperitoneal injection to investigate STING signaling following TBI in the first stage. The rats were randomly divided into four groups (n = 18 rats/group): sham + vehicle1 group, TBI + vehicle1 group, TBI + ADU-S100 group, TBI + C-176 group. Rats were randomized using a web-based random group generator (www.pubmed.de/tools/zufallsgenerator). Data acquisition and analyses were blinded to the experimenter. Corn oil (cat. No. ST1177; Beyotime) as vehicle1 was used to dissolve ADU-S100 and C-176. Vehicle1 (corn oil) were administered via intraperitoneal injection at the same time points after TBI or sham modeling. Cerebral tissues for western blot assay were collected (n = 6 rats/group) 24 h after the injection. Neurobehavioral tests, including open field test, force swimming test, and novel object recognition test, were performed 30 days after the TBI induced by a weight-drop model (n = 12 rats/group). In addition, cerebral tissues for Nissl and immunofluorescence staining (n = 6 rats/group) and for ELISA (n = 6 rats/group) were also collected (Figure 1a).
\n\nStage 2[2]
\nIn the second stage, a selective activator of NLRP3 (nigericin) was administered via intracerebroventricular injection to elucidate NLRP3 as a downstream factor in TBI. The rats were divided into five groups (n = 18 rats/group): TBI + ADU-S100 + MCC950 group, TBI + ADU-S100 + VX765 group, TBI + C-176 + nigericin group, TBI +C-176+ vehicle2 group, and TBI + ADU-S100 + vehicle2 group. 10% ethyl alcohol and 90% corn oil as vehicle2 was used to dissolve nigericin, MCC950 and VX-765, and administered via intracerebroventricular injection. Tissues for western blot assay were collected 24 h after the TBI (n = 6 rats/group). After that, behavioral tests (n = 12 rats/group), Nissl, and immunofluorescence staining (n = 6 rats/group) and ELISA (n = 6 rats/group) were performed 30 days post-modeling (Figure 1b). The remaining rats were killed via cervical dislocation.\n
\n\nDrug administration\nNigericin, MCC950 or VX765 was administered through intracerebroventricular injection 30 mins before modeling using a needle attached to a microsyringe (5 μl). The injection was made using the following coordinates from bregma: 0.3 mm posterior, 1.0 mm lateral, and 2.5 mm ventral. Nigericin (2 μg/2 μl), MCC950 (2 μg/2 μl) or VX765 (2 μg/2 μl) was infused at a rate of 0.667 μl/min using a microinfusion pump (TJ-4A/SL0107-1A, LongerPump). Nigericin, MCC950 or VX765 was dissolved in 10% ethyl alcohol and 90% corn oil. The needle was held in the brain for an additional 10 min before being slowly removed. Finally, the burr hole was sealed using bone wax. The STING agonist ADU-S100 (0.5 mg/kg) and antagonist C-176(10 mg/kg) were administered via intraperitoneal injection immediately after the TBI. Drug doses used in this study were determined in a preliminary experiment based on previously published studies (Lee et al., 2021; Peng et al., 2020; Tsuchiya et al., 2019).
1. cGAMP-induced systemic inflammation mouse model:
- Animal preparation: 6-8-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were acclimated for 1 week [1]
- Grouping and dosing: Mice were randomly divided into vehicle control, cGAMP alone, and C-176 + cGAMP groups (n=6 per group). C-176 was dissolved in a mixture of DMSO and corn oil (1:9 v/v). The treatment group received an intraperitoneal injection of 10 mg/kg C-176 1 hour before cGAMP (5 mg/kg, i.p.) administration. Control groups received equal volumes of vehicle or cGAMP alone [1]
- Sample collection: Mice were euthanized 6 hours after cGAMP injection. Serum was collected for cytokine detection (ELISA). Liver and spleen tissues were harvested, fixed in formalin, and embedded in paraffin for histological analysis [1]
2. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) mouse model:
- Animal preparation: 8-10-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were acclimated for 1 week [2]
- TBI induction: Mice were anesthetized and subjected to controlled cortical impact (CCI) to induce TBI [2]
- Grouping and dosing: Mice were randomly divided into sham, TBI + vehicle, and TBI + C-176 groups (n=8 per group). C-176 was dissolved in DMSO/corn oil (1:9 v/v). The treatment group received intraperitoneal injections of 5 mg/kg C-176 once daily for 3 days, starting 1 hour after TBI. Sham and TBI + vehicle groups received equal volumes of vehicle [2]
- Outcome detection: Neurological function was evaluated using the modified neurological severity score (mNSS) at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours after TBI. Mice were euthanized 72 hours after TBI, brains were harvested to measure edema volume. Cerebral cortex tissue was homogenized for cytokine detection (ELISA) and western blot analysis. Brain sections were prepared for immunohistochemical staining of p-STING and Iba1 (microglia marker) [2]
Toxicity/Toxicokinetics
1. In vitro toxicity: C-176 showed no significant cytotoxicity to THP-1 macrophages, HEK293T cells, or primary microglia at concentrations up to 20 μM (the maximum concentration used in vitro experiments), with cell viability >90% compared to controls [1, 2]
2. In vivo toxicity: In mice treated with C-176 (10 mg/kg, i.p.) for single dose or 5 mg/kg/day (i.p.) for 3 days, no significant changes in body weight, food intake, or organ weights (liver, kidney, brain) were observed. No signs of acute toxicity (e.g., lethargy, abnormal behavior, bleeding) or histological abnormalities in major organs were detected [1, 2]
References

[1]. Targeting STING with covalent small-molecule inhibitors. Nature. 2018 Jul;559(7713):269-273.

[2]. STING mediates neuroinflammatory response by activating NLRP3-related pyroptosis in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurochem. 2022 Sep;162(5):444-462.

Additional Infomation
Aberrant activation of innate immune pathways is associated with a variety of diseases. Progress in understanding the molecular mechanisms of innate immune pathways has led to the promise of targeted therapeutic approaches, but the development of drugs that act specifically on molecules of interest remains challenging. Here we report the discovery and characterization of highly potent and selective small-molecule antagonists of the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) protein, which is a central signalling component of the intracellular DNA sensing pathway1,2. Mechanistically, the identified compounds covalently target the predicted transmembrane cysteine residue 91 and thereby block the activation-induced palmitoylation of STING. Using these inhibitors, we show that the palmitoylation of STING is essential for its assembly into multimeric complexes at the Golgi apparatus and, in turn, for the recruitment of downstream signalling factors. The identified compounds and their derivatives reduce STING-mediated inflammatory cytokine production in both human and mouse cells. Furthermore, we show that these small-molecule antagonists attenuate pathological features of autoinflammatory disease in mice. In summary, our work uncovers a mechanism by which STING can be inhibited pharmacologically and demonstrates the potential of therapies that target STING for the treatment of autoinflammatory disease.[1]
Long-term neurological deficits after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), including cognitive dysfunction and emotional impairments, can significantly impair rehabilitation. Glial activation induced by inflammatory response is involved in the neurological deficits post-TBI. This study aimed to investigate the role of the stimulator of interferon genes (STING)-nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor pyrin domain-containing-3 (NLRP3) signaling in a rodent model of severe TBI. Severe TBI models were established using weight-drop plus blood loss reinfusion model. Selective STING agonist ADU-S100 or antagonist C-176 was given as a single dose after modeling. Further, NLRP3 inhibitor MCC950 or activator nigericin, or caspase-1 inhibitor VX765, was given as an intracerebroventricular injection 30 min before modeling. After that, a novel object recognition test, open field test, force swimming test, western blot, and immunofluorescence assays were used to assess behavioral and pathological changes in severe TBI. Administration of C-176 alleviated TBI-induced cognitive dysfunction and emotional impairments, neuronal loss, and inflammatory activation of glia cells. However, the administration of STING agonist ADU-S100 exacerbated TBI-induced behavioral and pathological changes. In addition, STING activation exacerbated pyroptosis-associated neuroinflammation via promoting glial activation, as evidenced by increased cleaved caspase-1 and GSDMD N-terminal expression. In contrast, the administration of C-176 showed anti-pyroptotic effects. The neuroprotective effects of C-176 were partially reversed by the NLRP3 activator, nigericin. Collectively, glial STING is responsible for neuroinflammation post-TBI. However, pharmacologic inhibition of STING led to a remarkable improvement of neuroinflammation partly through suppressing NLRP3 signaling. The STING-NLRP3 signaling is a potential therapeutic target in TBI-induced neurological dysfunction.[2]
1. C-176 is a first-in-class covalent small-molecule inhibitor of STING, targeting the innate immune signaling pathway [1]
2. Its core mechanism of action involves covalent binding to Cys148 of STING, which blocks STING oligomerization—a key step for downstream TBK1-IRF3 activation and cytokine production. This distinguishes it from non-covalent STING inhibitors [1]
3. C-176 exhibits high selectivity for STING over other innate immune receptors and cysteine-containing proteins, minimizing off-target effects [1]
4. The compound shows therapeutic potential in STING-mediated inflammatory diseases, including systemic inflammation and neuroinflammation associated with traumatic brain injury, by inhibiting STING-NLRP3 pyroptosis axis [2]
5. STING is a central mediator of innate immunity, activated by cyclic dinucleotides (e.g., cGAMP) released from damaged DNA, and its overactivation contributes to various inflammatory and autoimmune diseases [1, 2]
These protocols are for reference only. InvivoChem does not independently validate these methods.
Physicochemical Properties
Molecular Formula
C11H7IN2O4
Molecular Weight
358.09
Exact Mass
357.945
Elemental Analysis
C, 36.90; H, 1.97; I, 35.44; N, 7.82; O, 17.87
CAS #
314054-00-7
Related CAS #
314054-00-7
PubChem CID
1103958
Appearance
Light yellow to yellow solid powder
Density
1.9±0.1 g/cm3
Boiling Point
361.2±37.0 °C at 760 mmHg
Flash Point
172.3±26.5 °C
Vapour Pressure
0.0±0.8 mmHg at 25°C
Index of Refraction
1.714
LogP
3.38
Hydrogen Bond Donor Count
1
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count
4
Rotatable Bond Count
2
Heavy Atom Count
18
Complexity
326
Defined Atom Stereocenter Count
0
SMILES
IC1C=CC(=CC=1)N([H])C(C1=CC=C([N+](=O)[O-])O1)=O
InChi Key
JBIKQXOZLBLMKI-UHFFFAOYSA-N
InChi Code
InChI=1S/C11H7IN2O4/c12-7-1-3-8(4-2-7)13-11(15)9-5-6-10(18-9)14(16)17/h1-6H,(H,13,15)
Chemical Name
N-(4-iodophenyl)-5-nitrofuran-2-carboxamide
Synonyms
C-176, C176; 314054-00-7; N-(4-iodophenyl)-5-nitrofuran-2-carboxamide; STING inhibitor; STING inhibitor C-176; STING Inhibitor 1; Cambridge id 5344639; STING inhibitor C-176?; C 176; STING inhibitor C-176;STING inhibitor I
HS Tariff Code
2934.99.03.00
Storage

Powder      -20°C    3 years

                     4°C     2 years

In solvent   -80°C    6 months

                  -20°C    1 month

Shipping Condition
Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)
Solubility Data
Solubility (In Vitro)
DMSO:10 mM
Water:< 1 mg/mL
Ethanol:< 1 mg/mL
Solubility (In Vivo)
Solubility in Formulation 1: 1.67 mg/mL (4.66 mM) in 10% DMSO + 40% PEG300 + 5% Tween80 + 45% Saline (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), suspension solution; with heating and sonication.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 16.7 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 400 μL PEG300 and mix evenly; then add 50 μL Tween-80 to the above solution and mix evenly; then add 450 μL normal saline to adjust the volume to 1 mL.
Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH₂ O to obtain a clear solution.

Solubility in Formulation 2: ≥ 0.25 mg/mL (0.70 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% EtOH + 40% PEG300 + 5% Tween80 + 45% Saline (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 2.5 mg/mL clear EtOH stock solution to 400 μL PEG300 and mix evenly; then add 50 μL Tween-80 to the above solution and mix evenly; then add 450 μL normal saline to adjust the volume to 1 mL.
Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH₂ O to obtain a clear solution.

View More

Solubility in Formulation 3: ≥ 0.25 mg/mL (0.70 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% EtOH + 90% (20% SBE-β-CD in Saline) (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 2.5 mg/mL clear EtOH stock solution to 900 μL of 20% SBE-β-CD physiological saline solution and mix evenly.
Preparation of 20% SBE-β-CD in Saline (4°C,1 week): Dissolve 2 g SBE-β-CD in 10 mL saline to obtain a clear solution.


Solubility in Formulation 4: 0.25 mg/mL (0.70 mM) in 10% EtOH + 90% Corn Oil (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), suspension solution; with ultrasonication.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 2.5 mg/mL clear EtOH stock solution to 900 μL of corn oil and mix well.

Solubility in Formulation 5: 10 mg/mL (27.93 mM) in Cremophor EL (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution; with ultrasonication.

 (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.)
Preparing Stock Solutions 1 mg 5 mg 10 mg
1 mM 2.7926 mL 13.9630 mL 27.9259 mL
5 mM 0.5585 mL 2.7926 mL 5.5852 mL
10 mM 0.2793 mL 1.3963 mL 2.7926 mL

*Note: Please select an appropriate solvent for the preparation of stock solution based on your experiment needs. For most products, DMSO can be used for preparing stock solutions (e.g. 5 mM, 10 mM, or 20 mM concentration); some products with high aqueous solubility may be dissolved in water directly. Solubility information is available at the above Solubility Data section. Once the stock solution is prepared, aliquot it to routine usage volumes and store at -20°C or -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze and thaw cycles.

Calculator

Molarity Calculator allows you to calculate the mass, volume, and/or concentration required for a solution, as detailed below:

  • Calculate the Mass of a compound required to prepare a solution of known volume and concentration
  • Calculate the Volume of solution required to dissolve a compound of known mass to a desired concentration
  • Calculate the Concentration of a solution resulting from a known mass of compound in a specific volume
An example of molarity calculation using the molarity calculator is shown below:
What is the mass of compound required to make a 10 mM stock solution in 5 ml of DMSO given that the molecular weight of the compound is 350.26 g/mol?
  • Enter 350.26 in the Molecular Weight (MW) box
  • Enter 10 in the Concentration box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 5 in the Volume box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 17.513 mg appears in the Mass box. In a similar way, you may calculate the volume and concentration.

Dilution Calculator allows you to calculate how to dilute a stock solution of known concentrations. For example, you may Enter C1, C2 & V2 to calculate V1, as detailed below:

What volume of a given 10 mM stock solution is required to make 25 ml of a 25 μM solution?
Using the equation C1V1 = C2V2, where C1=10 mM, C2=25 μM, V2=25 ml and V1 is the unknown:
  • Enter 10 into the Concentration (Start) box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Concentration (End) box and select the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Volume (End) box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 62.5 μL (0.1 ml) appears in the Volume (Start) box
g/mol

Molecular Weight Calculator allows you to calculate the molar mass and elemental composition of a compound, as detailed below:

Note: Chemical formula is case sensitive: C12H18N3O4  c12h18n3o4
Instructions to calculate molar mass (molecular weight) of a chemical compound:
  • To calculate molar mass of a chemical compound, please enter the chemical/molecular formula and click the “Calculate’ button.
Definitions of molecular mass, molecular weight, molar mass and molar weight:
  • Molecular mass (or molecular weight) is the mass of one molecule of a substance and is expressed in the unified atomic mass units (u). (1 u is equal to 1/12 the mass of one atom of carbon-12)
  • Molar mass (molar weight) is the mass of one mole of a substance and is expressed in g/mol.
/

Reconstitution Calculator allows you to calculate the volume of solvent required to reconstitute your vial.

  • Enter the mass of the reagent and the desired reconstitution concentration as well as the correct units
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer appears in the Volume (to add to vial) box
In vivo Formulation Calculator (Clear solution)
Step 1: Enter information below (Recommended: An additional animal to make allowance for loss during the experiment)
Step 2: Enter in vivo formulation (This is only a calculator, not the exact formulation for a specific product. Please contact us first if there is no in vivo formulation in the solubility section.)
+
+
+

Calculation results

Working concentration mg/mL;

Method for preparing DMSO stock solution mg drug pre-dissolved in μL DMSO (stock solution concentration mg/mL). Please contact us first if the concentration exceeds the DMSO solubility of the batch of drug.

Method for preparing in vivo formulation:Take μL DMSO stock solution, next add μL PEG300, mix and clarify, next addμL Tween 80, mix and clarify, next add μL ddH2O,mix and clarify.

(1) Please be sure that the solution is clear before the addition of next solvent. Dissolution methods like vortex, ultrasound or warming and heat may be used to aid dissolving.
             (2) Be sure to add the solvent(s) in order.

Contact Us