| Size | Price | Stock | Qty |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5mg |
|
||
| 10mg |
|
||
| 50mg |
|
||
| 100mg |
|
||
| Other Sizes |
| Targets |
TLR4
|
|---|---|
| ln Vitro |
Lipopolysaccharides (10–80 μg/mL) selectively reduce the production of nitric oxide (NO) in THir (tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactive) cells and increase the levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) as well as nitrite (nitrate index) in the culture medium [5].
Bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS) are unique and complex glycolipids that provide characteristic components of the outer membranes of Gram-negative bacteria. In LPS of the Enterobacteriaceae, the core oligosaccharide links a highly conserved lipid A to the antigenic O-polysaccharide. Structural diversity in the core oligosaccharide is limited by the constraints imposed by its essential role in outer membrane stability and provides a contrast to the hypervariable O-antigen. The genetics of core oligosaccharide biosynthesis in Salmonella and Escherichia coli K-12 have served as prototypes for studies on the LPS and lipo-oligosaccharides from a growing range of bacteria. However, despite the wealth of knowledge, there remains a number of unanswered questions, and direct experimental data are not yet available to define the precise mechanism of action of many gene products. Here we present a comparative analysis of the recently completed sequences of the major core oligosaccharide biosynthesis gene clusters from the five known core types in E. coli and the Ra core type of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and discuss advances in the understanding of the related biosynthetic pathways. Differences in these clusters reflect important structural variations in the outer core oligosaccharides and provide a basis for ascribing functions to the genes in these model clusters, whereas highly conserved regions within these clusters suggest a critical and unalterable function for the inner region of the core[3]. |
| ln Vivo |
Induction of cardiac dysfunction [8] Pathogenic principle Cardiac dysfunction (cardiac inflammation) is a common complication of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced sepsis and is caused by a severe inflammatory response. LPS can also cause deterioration of cardiac systolic function and increase cardiac lipid peroxidation, leading to cardiac dysfunction. Specific modeling method Rat[8]: male • Wistar male rats • 6-week-old Administration: 10 mg/kg • ip for single dose • collected cardiac tissues and serums 24 hr after LPS-injection. Note / Modeling success indicators Phenotypic changes: left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV, %) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV, %) of cardiac function were significantly increased. Molecular level: CK-MB, LDH, and AST levels in serum are ↑, and the TLR4/NF-κB pathway is inhibited. Antagonist product Ferrostatin-1[7].
Puberty is an important developmental event that is marked by the reorganizing and remodeling of the brain. Exposure to stress during this critical period of development can have enduring effects on both reproductive and non-reproductive behaviors. The purpose of this study was to investigate age and sex differences in immune response by examining sickness behavior, body temperature changes, and serum cytokine levels following an immune challenge. The effects of circulating gonadal hormones on age and sex differences in immune response were also examined. Results showed that male mice display more sickness behavior and greater fluctuations in body temperature following LPS treatment than female mice. Moreover, adult male mice display more sickness behavior and a greater drop in body temperature following LPS treatment compared to pubertal male mice. Following gonadectomy, pubertal and adult males displayed steeper and prolonged drops in body temperature compared to sham-operated counterparts. Gonadectomy did not eliminate sex differences in LPS-induced body temperature changes, suggesting that additional factors contribute to the observed differences. LPS treatment increased cytokine levels in all mice. However, the increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines was higher in adult compared to pubertal mice, while the increase in anti-inflammatory cytokines was greater in pubertal than in adult mice. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of age and sex differences in acute immune response following LPS treatment and possible mechanisms involved in the enduring alterations in behavior and brain function following pubertal exposure to LPS[2]. |
| Cell Assay |
Human podocyte cell line (HPC) was used. HPCs were seeded onto culture plates and cultured in RPMI 1640 medium enriched with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin, and ITS. HPCs were cultured at 33°C and 5% CO2 for proliferation and were then shifted to 37°C and 5% CO2 for differentiation for 10–12 days. HPCs were incubated with or without different dose LPS, PAN, and HG for different time. HPCs were cultured with or without 50 μg/mL LPS, 75 μg/mL PAN, 60 mM HG, and different dose Rac-1 inhibitor (EHT 1864) for different time. In addition, HPCs were cultured with dynamin Inhibitor Dynasore or blebbistatin for 12 h[3].
|
| Animal Protocol |
Animal/Disease Models:Female and male CD1 mice[3]
Doses: 1.5mg/kg Route of Administration: Intraperitoneal injection, once Experimental Results: Induced sickness behavior in all mice, but adult mice displayed more sickness than pubertal mice and adult males remained sick for a longer period of time than adult females. Caused a decrease in body temperature for all mice, but this decrease was greatest in adult males. Increased pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines at various levels in pubertal and adult male and female mice, resulted in age and sex differences in cytokine concentrations following immune challenge. Only adult males and females treated with LPS displayed significantly more IL-6 than their saline controls, and pubertal males and females and adult females displayed significantly more IL-10 than their saline controls. All the mice displayed significantly more IL-12 and TNF-α than their saline controls. |
| References |
|
| Additional Infomation |
Background: Elevated levels of urinary microvesicles, which increase in various kidney injuries, hold diagnostic potential for kidney diseases. However, the significance of urinary microvesicles as a marker of kidney disease is limited due to the difficulty in determining their cellular origin. Objective: This study aimed to demonstrate that podocytes can release migrasomes, unique microvesicles ranging in size from 400 to 2000 nm, and that the level of migrasomes in urine may serve as a novel, non-invasive biomarker for the diagnosis of early podocyte injury. Methods: Migrasomes were purified and analyzed using immunofluorescence labeling, electron microscopy, nanotargeting, and continuous centrifugation. Results: Migrasomes released by podocytes differ from exosomes in both content and release mechanism. Renal tubular cells secreted significantly fewer migrasomes compared to podocytes. Furthermore, migrasome secretion from human or mouse podocytes significantly increased during lipopolysaccharide (LPS), puromycin aminonucleotide (PAN), or high-glucose (HG)-induced podocyte injury. However, Rac-1 inhibitors can block the release of podocyte migratory bodies induced by LPS, PAN, or HG. Notably, the level of podocyte migratory bodies in the urine of PAN nephropathy mice was higher than that in control mice. In fact, in PAN nephropathy, the increase in the number of urinary migratory bodies preceded the increase in proteinuria, suggesting that urinary migratory bodies are a more sensitive indicator of podocyte damage than proteinuria. An increase in the number of urinary migratory bodies was also detected in diabetic nephropathy patients with proteinuria levels <5.5 g/day. Conclusion: Our results suggest that podocytes release “damage-associated” migratory bodies during migration and suggest that urinary podocyte migratory bodies could serve as a potential diagnostic marker for early podocyte damage. [4] Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by the loss of dopamine (DA) neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc). Although the exact mechanism leading to this cell loss is unclear, there is growing evidence that inflammatory responses are involved. In this study, we analyzed the effect of the pro-inflammatory bacterial toxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on the number of tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactive (THir) cells (used as an indicator of DA neurons) in primary midbrain cultures. LPS (10–80 μg/ml) selectively reduced the number of THir cells and increased the levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and nitrite (an indicator of nitric oxide (NO) production) in the culture medium. Cultures simultaneously exposed to LPS and IL-1β or TNF-α neutralizing antibodies showed that LPS-induced THir cell loss was reduced by at least 50% in both cases. Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) by L-NIL did not affect the toxicity of LPS but increased the levels of LPS-induced TNF-α and IL-1β. These findings suggest that neuroinflammatory stimuli leading to elevated cytokines may induce DA neuron cell loss in a NO-independent manner and may be involved in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease. [5]
|
| Appearance |
White to off-white solid powder
|
|---|---|
| Synonyms |
Lipopolysaccharide; LPS
|
| HS Tariff Code |
2934.99.9001
|
| Storage |
Powder -20°C 3 years 4°C 2 years In solvent -80°C 6 months -20°C 1 month |
| Shipping Condition |
Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)
|
| Solubility (In Vitro) |
DMSO : 14.29 mg/mL (with sonication (<60°C))
H2O : 5 mg/mL |
|---|---|
| Solubility (In Vivo) |
Solubility in Formulation 1: ≥ 1.43 mg/mL 1 (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO 90% (20% SBE-β-CD in Saline) (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one). For example, to prepare 1 mL of working solution, add 100 μL of 14.3 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 900 μL of 20% SBE-β-CD in saline and mix. For the following dissolution protocols, prepare the working solution directly. It is recommended to prepare it as needed and use it up as soon as possible. The percentages shown in front of the following solvents refer to the volume percentage of the solvent in your final solution; if precipitation or precipitation occurs during the preparation process, heating and/or ultrasound can be used to assist dissolution.
* Preparation of 20% SBE-β-CD saline solution (4°C, 1 week): Dissolve 2 g SBE-β-CD in 10 mL saline to obtain a clear solution.  (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.) |
Calculation results
Working concentration: mg/mL;
Method for preparing DMSO stock solution: mg drug pre-dissolved in μL DMSO (stock solution concentration mg/mL). Please contact us first if the concentration exceeds the DMSO solubility of the batch of drug.
Method for preparing in vivo formulation::Take μL DMSO stock solution, next add μL PEG300, mix and clarify, next addμL Tween 80, mix and clarify, next add μL ddH2O,mix and clarify.
(1) Please be sure that the solution is clear before the addition of next solvent. Dissolution methods like vortex, ultrasound or warming and heat may be used to aid dissolving.
(2) Be sure to add the solvent(s) in order.