yingweiwo

PLX-5622

Alias: PLX5622 free base; PLX-5622 free base; PLX5622; 1303420-67-8; 6-Fluoro-N-((5-fluoro-2-methoxypyridin-3-yl)methyl)-5-((5-methyl-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridin-3-yl)methyl)pyridin-2-amine; PLX-5622; 6-fluoro-N-[(5-fluoro-2-methoxypyridin-3-yl)methyl]-5-[(5-methyl-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridin-3-yl)methyl]pyridin-2-amine; 16A8IGR8L7; 5-fluoro-N-[6-fluoro-5-[(5-methyl-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridin-3-yl)methyl]-2-pyridinyl]-2-methoxy-3-pyridinemethanamine; UNII-16A8IGR8L7; PLX 5622 free base;PLX5622; PLX-5622; PLX 5622
Cat No.:V5140 Purity: ≥98%
PLX5622 is a novel and highly selective CNS-penetrant CSF1R inhibitor, that has the potential to be used for extended and specific microglial elimination, preceding and during pathology development.
PLX-5622
PLX-5622 Chemical Structure CAS No.: 1303420-67-8
Product category: CSF-1R
This product is for research use only, not for human use. We do not sell to patients.
Size Price Stock Qty
5mg
10mg
25mg
50mg
100mg
250mg
500mg
Other Sizes

Other Forms of PLX-5622:

  • PLX5622 fumarate
Official Supplier of:
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Top Publications Citing lnvivochem Products
Purity & Quality Control Documentation

Purity: =98.19%

Product Description

PLX5622 is a novel and highly selective CNS-penetrant CSF1R inhibitor, that has the potential to be used for extended and specific microglial elimination, preceding and during pathology development. Myeloid cells express a large number of risk genes for the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD) either exclusively or highly. The survival of microglia is reliant on the signalling mediated by the colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R).

Biological Activity I Assay Protocols (From Reference)
Targets
CSF-1R (IC50 = 0.016 μM); FLT3 (IC50 = 0.39 μM); KIT (IC50 = 0.86 μM); AURKC (IC50 = 1 μM); KDR (IC50 = 1.1 μM)
ln Vitro
PLX5622 (1–20 μM; 3 days) efficiently reduces microglia in cerebellar slices while having no effect on oligodendrocytes or astrocytes. After three days at 4 μM, NG2+ or PDGFRα+ cell counts are reduced by 30–40%, and at 20 μM, this number rises to 90–95%. Despite a robust (~95%) depletion of the microglial cells, slices exposed to 1 μM or 2 μM PLX5622 show no reduction of NG2+ or PDGFRα+ OPCs[3].
Cell free kinase inhibitor profiling revealed that PLX5622 is highly specific for the CSF1R, showing > 20-fold selectivity over KIT and FLT3, the two most homologous receptors (Supplementary Table 2, 3). Two key structural differences between PLX5622 and PLX3397 contribute to the improved selectivity based on crystallographic analysis (Fig. 2b; Supplementary Table 4). First, the 2-fluoro substitution on the middle pyridine ring of PLX5622 is designed to access the CSF1R-unique space next to Gly-795 (a gate-keeper to the interior allosteric pocket); both KIT and FLT3 have a bulkier cysteine at the equivalent position. While the difference between a hydrogen atom and a fluorine atom may seem small (with slightly longer bond length and slightly larger radius, a fluorine atom extends the van der Waals edge by ~ 0.5 Å compared to a hydrogen atom), the effect is significant. Anchored on both ends by hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic packing (Fig. 2b), PLX5622 has the fluorine atom at a fixed position. As van der Waals repulsion increases in proportion to the 6th power of the distance between two atoms, a larger gate keeper residue (as seen in KIT and FLT3) will likely incur an energetic penalty for the steric hindrance. In support of this mechanism, a close analog of PLX3397 containing the same 2-fluoro substitution as PLX5622 has the same potency as PLX3397 in inhibiting CSF1R but is 10-fold more selective over KIT than PLX3397. Second, the terminal pyridine group of PLX5622 is optimized to stabilize the allosteric pocket of CSF1R vacated by the displaced juxtamembrane domain. When PLX5622 binds to KIT or FLT3, the position and orientation of the middle pyridine ring causes steric clash with the gate-keeper cysteine, compromising the optimal fit of the terminal pyridine moiety. [1]

CSF1R kinase inhibitors PLX5622 and PLX3397 depleted microglia in cerebellar slices [3]
PLX5622 or PLX3397 were applied to cerebellar slices at increasing concentrations from 1 to 20 μM. After three days of treatment, bothPLX5622 and PLX3397 at concentrations greater than 2 μM eliminated more than 95% of microglia (Fig. 1A,B). At 1 μM, PLX5622 caused 15% more depletion than PLX 3397 (94.6±1.1% vs 79.9±2.4% Iba1+ cell loss) (Fig. 1A,B). With greater than 95% loss of microglia at 2 μM, no changes were observed in the viability or morphology of oligodendrocytes or astrocytes, as assessed by PLP-eGFP expression or GFAP staining with either PLX preparation (Fig. 1C). High concentrations of PLX5622 and PLX3397 were cytotoxic to OPCs ex vivo and in vitro [3]
Because CSF1R inhibitors may bind to multiple tyrosine kinases, we examined the effects of PLX5622 and PLX3397 on OPCs, which depend on the tyrosine kinase PDGFRα for survival. OPC cell numbers were assessed by NG2 or PDGFRα immunostaining following exposure of cerebellar explants to increasing PLX concentrations for 3 days. At 4 μM, PLX5622 caused a 30-40% reduction in NG2+ or PDGFRα+ cells; this increased to 90-95% at 20 μM. No reduction of NG2+ or PDGFRα+ OPCs was observed in slices exposed to 1 μM or 2 μM PLX5622 despite robust (~95%) depletion of the microglial cells (Fig. 2A,C). In contrast, treatment with PLX3397 significantly reduced OPC numbers at all concentrations tested. We observed a 30-35% loss of NG2+ or PDGFRα+ cells at 0.5 μM, despite incomplete (~70%) depletion of microglia. OPC loss with PLX3397 was concentration dependent with a 75-85% reduction at 1 μM and > 90% loss at 2 μM and 20 μM (Fig. 2B,D).

A similar effect on OPCs was observed in purified primary murine OPC cultures. Cell type specific marker staining showed that the cultures consisted of >92% OPCs (PDGFRα), <1% astrocytes (GFAP), and 3.7±2.1% microglia (Iba1) (Supplemental Fig. S1A). Most oligodendroglial cells were OPCs but, occasionally (<0.5%) maturing OLs (04+ with a highly complex network of processes) were noted (data not shown). Low concentration (0.5 μM) of PLX5622 had no effect on viability after 24 h; however, 20 μM PLX5622 resulted in increased OPC death. In contrast, PLX3397 treatment caused significant cytotoxicity at 0.5 μM and 20μM (Supplemental Fig. S1B,C). These results indicate that the PLX CSF1R inhibitors can directly impair OPC viability in a concentration-dependent manner.

To examine the effect of long-term microglia depletion on OPC survival, 2 μM PLX5622 was applied to cerebellar slices for 8 days. Although microglia were completely eliminated, we observed no difference in NG2+ cell numbers when compared to DMSO-treated controls. In addition, long-term exposure to PLX5622 had no effect on the morphology or number of oligodendrocytes (assessed by PLP-eGFP) and astrocytes (assessed by GFAP and S100b) (Fig. 3A,B and data not shown). Myelin protein expression (measured by PLP immunofluorescence) was unchanged (Fig. 3A).

In concert, both ex vivo and in vitro data demonstrate that low concentrations (≤ 2 μM) of PLX5622 completely deplete microglia in the absence of direct effects on OPCs, oligodendrocytes or astrocytes. PLX3397 causes a significant reduction in viable OPCs even at low concentrations. At higher concentrations, both PLX compounds diminish OPC cell numbers in primary cell culture and cerebellar slices.
ln Vivo
PLX5622 (1200 ppm; chow; for 3 weeks or 3 days; adult C57/Bl6 wild type mice) causes approximately 80% and 99% of microglia to be lost after 3 days and 3 weeks of treatment, respectively. The microglia in the cortex, striatum, cerebellum, and hippocampus are reduced in PLX5622 (adult C57/Bl6 wild type mice, 3 months old; fed for 3 weeks)[4].
In a total of 14 days, PLX5622 (50 mg/kg; intraperitoneal injection; once daily for neonatal rats, or twice daily for adult rats) reduces microglia by 80–90% in 3 days and by more than 90% in 7 days. Both adults and neonates experience a > 96% reduction in microglia after 14 days of PLX5622 treatment, while baseline astrocyte quantity is maintained. (Depleting microglia in neonates only requires a single daily injection of 0.65% PLX5622 suspended in 5% dimethyl sulfoxide and 20% Kolliphor RH40 in 0.01 M PBS; twice-daily injections are needed for adult depletion.)[5].
PLX5622 (formulated in AIN-76A standard chow at 1200 mg/kg; for 28 days) reduces microglia throughout the CNS in 14-month-old 5xfAD mice[6].
Many risk genes for the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are exclusively or highly expressed in myeloid cells. Microglia are dependent on colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) signaling for their survival. We designed and synthesized a highly selective brain-penetrant CSF1R inhibitor (PLX5622) allowing for extended and specific microglial elimination, preceding and during pathology development. We find that in the 5xFAD mouse model of AD, plaques fail to form in the parenchymal space following microglial depletion, except in areas containing surviving microglia. Instead, Aβ deposits in cortical blood vessels reminiscent of cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Altered gene expression in the 5xFAD hippocampus is also reversed by the absence of microglia. Transcriptional analyses of the residual plaque-forming microglia show they exhibit a disease-associated microglia profile. Collectively, we describe the structure, formulation, and efficacy of PLX5622, which allows for sustained microglial depletion and identify roles of microglia in initiating plaque pathogenesis.[1]
Introduction Neuropathic pain is a debilitating condition. The importance of neuroimmune interactions in neuropathic pain has been evidenced by the involvement of different immune cells in peripheral and central sensitization of pathological pain. Macrophages and microglia are the most abundant immune cells activated in injured nerves and spinal cord, respectively. Several lines of evidence showed that macrophage/microglia survival, activation, proliferation, and differentiation require the involvement of macrophage-colony stimulating factor. In this study, we investigated whether blocking macrophage-colony stimulating factor/colony stimulating factor 1 receptor signaling can be effective in relieving neuropathic pain. Materials and methods Partial sciatic nerve ligation was performed in mice to induce neuropathic pain behavior. Mice were orally treated with a selective colony stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibitor, PLX5622, daily in both preventive (two days prior to surgery until D14 post-partial sciatic nerve ligation) and reversal paradigms (D28-D33 post-partial sciatic nerve ligation). Animal neuropathic pain behavior was monitored using von Frey hairs and acetone application. Phenotype of macrophages in injured nerves was analyzed at D3 and D33 post-injury using flow cytometry analysis. The effect of PLX5622 on microglia activation in lumbar spinal cord was further examined by immunohistochemistry using Iba-1 antibody. Results Significant alleviation of both mechanical and cold allodynia was observed in PLX5622-treated animals, both in preventive and reversal paradigms. PLX5622 treatment reduced the total number of macrophages in injured nerves, it appears colony stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibition affected more specifically CD86+ (M1 like) macrophages. Consequently, the expression of various pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β) was reduced. Microglia activation in dorsal horn of lumbar spinal cord following partial sciatic nerve ligation was significantly inhibited with PLX5622 treatment in both preventive and reversal paradigms. Conclusion Macrophages in peripheral nerve and microglia in the spinal cord are required in the generation and maintenance of injury-associated neuropathic pain. Blocking macrophage-colony stimulating factor/colony stimulating factor 1 receptor signaling on these myeloid cells along the pain transmission pathway is an effective strategy to alleviate neuropathic pain.[2]
Introduction Neuropathic pain is a debilitating condition. The importance of neuroimmune interactions in neuropathic pain has been evidenced by the involvement of different immune cells in peripheral and central sensitization of pathological pain. Macrophages and microglia are the most abundant immune cells activated in injured nerves and spinal cord, respectively. Several lines of evidence showed that macrophage/microglia survival, activation, proliferation, and differentiation require the involvement of macrophage-colony stimulating factor. In this study, we investigated whether blocking macrophage-colony stimulating factor/colony stimulating factor 1 receptor signaling can be effective in relieving neuropathic pain. Materials and methods Partial sciatic nerve ligation was performed in mice to induce neuropathic pain behavior. Mice were orally treated with a selective colony stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibitor, PLX5622, daily in both preventive (two days prior to surgery until D14 post-partial sciatic nerve ligation) and reversal paradigms (D28-D33 post-partial sciatic nerve ligation). Animal neuropathic pain behavior was monitored using von Frey hairs and acetone application. Phenotype of macrophages in injured nerves was analyzed at D3 and D33 post-injury using flow cytometry analysis. The effect of PLX5622 on microglia activation in lumbar spinal cord was further examined by immunohistochemistry using Iba-1 antibody. Results Significant alleviation of both mechanical and cold allodynia was observed in PLX5622-treated animals, both in preventive and reversal paradigms. PLX5622 treatment reduced the total number of macrophages in injured nerves, it appears colony stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibition affected more specifically CD86+ (M1 like) macrophages. Consequently, the expression of various pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β) was reduced. Microglia activation in dorsal horn of lumbar spinal cord following partial sciatic nerve ligation was significantly inhibited with PLX5622 treatment in both preventive and reversal paradigms. Conclusion Macrophages in peripheral nerve and microglia in the spinal cord are required in the generation and maintenance of injury-associated neuropathic pain. Blocking macrophage-colony stimulating factor/colony stimulating factor 1 receptor signaling on these myeloid cells along the pain transmission pathway is an effective strategy to alleviate neuropathic pain.[3]
Elimination of microglia in aged 5xfAD mice with the specific CSF1R inhibitor PLX5622 PLX5622 is a brain-penetrant inhibitor of CSF1R that quickly eliminates microglia, but does not inhibit c-kit (Valdearcos et al., 2014; Dagher et al., 2015). To confirm the effects of PLX3397 and to rule out other off-target effects, we treated a second cohort of 5xfAD mice for 28 days with 1200 mg/kg PLX5622 in chow. We again stained tissue for dense core plaques using Thioflavin-S and immunolabelled microglia with IBA1 (Fig. 5A). Microglia were dramatically depleted with treatment, with most of the remaining cells being associated with dense core plaques, as with PLX3397 treatment (Fig. 5B and E). Quantification revealed on average about one cell per plaque remaining (Fig. 5C); however, many plaques had no IBA1+ cells associated with them (Fig. 5D). Further analyses revealed that all remaining IBA1+ cells had cell bodies containing amyloid-β (Fig. 5K); in contrast, most IBA1+ cells around plaques in untreated 5xfAD brains did not contain any amyloid-β (Fig. 5J). Indeed, some of these IBA1+ cells in the treated mice were Thioflavin-S positive (Fig. 5E). However, as with the PLX3397-treated mice, we observed no change in the plaque area or total number (Fig. 5F and G), nor any significant changes in amyloid-β protein levels (Fig. 5H and I), with this cohort of microglia-eliminated 5xfAD mice.[6]
Cell Assay
Cerebellar Slice Culture [3]
Sagittal cerebellar slices (300μm) were prepared from PLP-eGFP mice (Mallon et al., 2002) at P10-12 and cultured on MilliCell 0.4μm membrane inserts in slice media: 25% Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS), 25% heat-inactivated horse serum, 50% minimum essential media (MEM), 125mM HEPES, 28mM D-Glucose, 2mM L-Glutamine, 10U/ml penicillin/streptomycin) at 37°C (Sheridan and Dev, 2012). Media was changed within the first 24 h of plating, and then every 2-3 days. Slices were cultured for 7-10 days prior to treatment. DMSO, PLX5622 and PLX3397 were applied at indicated concentrations in slice media for 3 or 8 days. Media was changed every 2-3 days. Following treatment, slices were rinsed once in PBS, fixed in 4% PFA in PBS for 30 minutes, and subjected to immunostaining.
Purified Primary OPC Cell Culture [3]
Primary murine OPC culture was prepared from PLP-eGFP pups as described (Liu et al., 2016). Briefly, mixed glial cultures were prepared from P0-1 dissociated cortices and plated on poly-D-lysine coated T75 flask. Purified OPC monocultures were prepared by shaking flasks of confluent mixed glial cultures overnight at 200 rpm to detach the OPCs. OPCs were plated on poly-D-lysine/laminin coated dishes and maintained in media containing 10 ng/ml PDGF (platelet-derived growth factor)/FGF (fibroblast growth factor) for 24-48 h prior to experiments.
IncuCyte Live Cell Imaging [3]
Live cell imaging was performed as described (Liu et al., 2016). Cells were grown and scanned on 24-well plates in the cell culture incubator. Each well was scanned with a 10× objective lens in 9 randomly selected positions at 15 min intervals with high definition phase contrast and epifluorescence microscopy using the 585/635 nm filter (red fluorescence, to detect the DRAQ7 dead cell nuclei). Image processing and cell counting were performed using IncuCyte and ImageJ software.
Animal Protocol
Drug preparation and treatment [2]
\nPLX5622 is a potent inhibitor of CSF1R tyrosine kinase activity (KI = 5.9 nM) with at least 50-fold selectivity over four related kinases and over 100-fold selectivity against a panel of 230 kinases. The molecule has been used to investigate the critical role of microglia/macrophages in many different circumstances. The dose in the current study was suggested by the company and in accordance with these previous reports where 1200 ppm in chow daily is sufficient to eliminate microglia fully or 300 ppm in chow daily can reduce partially microglia. Our 65 mg/kg dose nominally is close to the 300 ppm chow daily dose which allows us to lower macrophages in nerves. The drug was prepared following manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, PLX5622 stock was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at a concentration of 130 mg/ml; 2% hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose and 25% polysorbate 80 were prepared to make a diluent. On each dosing day, PLX5622 stock was diluted 20-fold by adding 1 volume of drug stock (130 mg/ml) in 19 volumes of diluent, making a working solution at 6.5 mg/ml. Vehicle solution was prepared with a mix of diluent and DMSO. Mice were treated daily by oral gavage with 100 μl solution (6.5 mg/ml) per 10g body weight (final dose at 65 mg/kg body weight).\n
\nTo study preventive effect of PLX5622, mice were treated with either a drug or vehicle two days prior to surgery, then daily until D14 post-PSNL. For the reversal effect of PLX5622, treatment started at D28, daily until D33 post-PSNL.\n
\n\nBehavioral analysis [2]
\nMice were habituated to the testing environment 1 to 2 h daily for at least two days before baseline testing. Mice were treated with either vehicle or PLX5622 daily in the morning. The investigator was blinded to the treatment conditions.\n
\n\nAnimal Chow Treatment [3]
\nMale and female PLP-eGFP animals (4-5 per group) aged 8-12 weeks were placed on formulated PLX Chow (1200 mg/kg for PLX5622 and 275 mg/kg for PLX3397) or standard diet for 7 or 21 days. Following treatment, animals were perfused with ice cold PBS followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Brains and spinal cords were dissected, post-fixed overnight and then cryoprotected. Tissues were sectioned at 30um on a cryostat and collected in PBS for free-floating immunostaining.\n
\n\nFor brain-wide microglia ablation, adult C57/Bl6 wild type mice between 8-16 weeks of age were treated with CSF1R inhibitor, PLX5622, or control chow (same formula lacking only the inhibitor) for 3 weeks or 3 days as indicated. While a 3-week long PLX5622 treatment leads to a 99% microglia loss, around 80% of microglia are already lost after 3 days [4].
\n
\n\nHabituation to head-fixation and intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection. [4]
\nAfter a 1-2 week recovery from the surgery, the mice were randomly divided into 2 groups, one group received PLX5622 and one group received control chow (lacking inhibitor).\n
\nThe mice were later put under water restriction (1.5 ml/day) and were handled and habituated daily to head-fixation and immobilization for ~2 weeks. They were immobilized in a polyethylene tube and head-fixed in the future recording environment under 2-photon microscope. During this habituation period, we increased the head-fixation period from 3 minutes to 40 minutes gradually. After they showed no signs of stress and drank water provided randomly during the 40-minute session, we switched to no-water-provided head fixation habituation for future recording.\n
\nAfter habituation to head-fixation, we also performed daily habituation to i.p. injection before the head-fixation session. Mice were injected i.p. with a microlitre volume equivalent to 10× the body weight in grams (10 × BW μl) of saline, matching the volume to be injected in future imaging sessions, and then performed head-fixation. This habituation was performed for ~1 week until the mice showed a reduction in clear signs of stress upon handling and i.p. injection.\n
\nMicrodialysis [4]
\nC57/Bl6 male mice were put on PLX5622 or control chow (n=5 PLX5622 diet, n=5 control diet). for one week. Dialysis probes were implanted and mice recovered for one week before commencing microdialysis collection. Microdialysis guide cannulae were stereotaxically implanted in the striatum (A/P: +1.4 mm; M/L: −1.0 mm; D/V: −3.8 mm from skull). Microdialysis experiments were conducted following a one-week recovery period following guide cannula implantation. Dialysis tubing was flushed prior to initial use with 70% EtOH for 5 minutes, followed by dH2O syringe pump at a flow rate of 1 μL/min. The tubing was then attached to the microdialysis probe (Cuprophane (6kD), membrane length 1mm), which was primed by placing the probe in artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF; pH 7.4: 148 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 1.2 mM CaCl2, 0.85 mM MgCl2) and running aCSF through the microdialysis tubing and probe at a 0.8 μL/min rate. Microdialysis experiments were done in anesthetized animals. Briefly, mice were placed into a stereotaxic frame under isoflurane anesthesia (4% induction,1.75% sustained). The probe was inserted via the guide cannula and allowed to equilibrate. Dialysate was collected after 20 minutes. All collections were frozen at −80 degrees Celsius immediately following collection completion.\n
\nMicroglia inhibition via intraperitoneal injection of PLX5622 [5]
\nPrior CSF1R inhibitor studies using PLX3397/5622-integrated chow treated animals for at least 1 week prior to their experimental manipulation (e.g. Elmore et al., 2014; Okunukia et al., 2019). To ensure adequate microglia depletion for neonatal surgeries, we began our treatments at P1, with an equivalent pre-surgery treatment duration (9 days) for adults. Pilot testing indicated that while a single daily injection of 0.65% PLX5622 suspended in 5% dimethyl sulfoxide and 20% Kolliphor RH40 in 0.01 M PBS was sufficient for neonatal microglia depletion, adult depletion required injections twice daily (10–12 h apart). Starting at P1 (for P10 CTX) or P41 (for P50 CTX), additional rats were injected with either PLX5622 (50 mg/kg; n = 4–5/condition) or a vehicle solution (n = 3–4/condition) once (neonates) or twice (adult) a day until being sacrificed 4 days after surgery.\n
\n\nCompounds [6]
\nPLX3397 was formulated in AIN-76A standard chow by Research Diets Inc. at 290 mg/kg or 600 mg/kg, as previously described (Elmore et al., 2014). PLX5622 was provided by Plexxikon Inc. and formulated in AIN-76A standard chow at 1200 mg/kg.\n

\nAnimal treatments [6]
\nCrossing these mice yielded CSF1R-iCRE/Rosa26YFP progeny that express yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) in all cells that either transiently or constitutively express CSF1R, which in the brain predominantly labels microglia. Two-month-old mice were treated for 7 days with PLX3397 (600 mg/kg in chow) to eliminate microglia. The 5xfAD mouse model has been previously described in detail (Oakley et al., 2006). Using a 2 × 2 factorial design, forty male and female 10-month-old wild-type (C57BL/6 background) or 5xfAD mice were treated with either PLX3397 for 28 days to eliminate microglia or control chow, creating four treatment groups (n = 10/group): Control (six males and four females), PLX3397 (six males and four females), 5xfAD (four males and six females), and 5xfAD + PLX3397 (four males and six females). At this age, 5xfAD mice display extensive pathology, synaptic loss, and neuronal loss (Oakley et al., 2006; Buskila et al., 2013; Eimer and Vassar, 2013). After 28 days of treatment, behavioural testing commenced while animals remained on their respective diets. A second cohort of 14-month-old 5xfAD mice (n = 4/group; 5xfAD = four males, and 5xfAD + PLX5622 = three males and one female) was treated with either PLX5622 for 28 days to deplete microglia or control chow (5xfAD versus 5xfAD + PLX5622). A third cohort of 1.5-month-old 5xfAD mice (n = 4/group; two males and two females) was treated with PLX3397 or control for 28 days (5xfAD versus 5xfAD + PLX3397). Following behavioural testing in the 10-month-old cohort, and following inhibitor treatment in the 14-month-old and 1.5-month-old cohorts, mice were euthanized via CO2 inhalation and transcardially perfused with phosphate-buffered saline. For both studies, brains were removed and hemispheres separated along the midline. Brain halves were either flash frozen for subsequent biochemical analysis, drop-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for subsequent immunohistochemical analysis, or placed in Golgi impregnation solution for subsequent dendritic spine analysis. Fixed half brains were sliced at 40 µm using a Leica SM2000 R freezing microtome. The flash-frozen hemispheres were ground with a mortar and pestle to yield a fine powder. One-half of the powder was homogenized in Tissue Protein Extraction Reagent, T-PER with protease and phosphatase inhibitors. The second half was processed with an RNA Plus Universal Mini Kit for RNA analysis.
ADME/Pharmacokinetics
PLX5622 exhibited desirable pharmacokinetic properties in mice, rats, dogs, and monkeys (Supplementary Table 5), with a brain penetration of approximately 20% (compared to approximately 5% for PLX339717; Supplementary Table 6). PLX5622 had a higher blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration than PLX3397, consistent with the physicochemical properties of the two compounds (Supplementary Table 7). PLX5622 had a lower molecular weight, higher lipophilicity, and better cell permeability, all of which are known to affect the ability of compounds to cross the blood-brain barrier. PLX5622 was formulated into rodent feed and administered to mice, showing significant efficacy, reducing platelet count by 90% within 5 days at a feed concentration of 1200 ppm (Fig. 2d, e). The synthesis and formulation of PLX5622 are detailed in the Supplementary Methods. [1]
References

[1]. Sustained microglial depletion with CSF1R inhibitor impairs parenchymal plaque development in an Alzheimer's disease model. Nat Commun. 2019 Aug 21;10(1):3758.

[2]. Targeting macrophage and microglia activation with colony stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibitor is an effective strategy to treat injury-triggered neuropathic pain. Mol Pain. 2018 Jan-Dec;14:1744806918764979.

[3]. Concentration-dependent effects of CSF1R inhibitors on oligodendrocyte progenitor cells ex vivo and in vivo. Exp Neurol. 2019;318:32-41.

[4]. Negative feedback control of neuronal activity by microglia. Nature. 2020;586(7829):417-423.

[5]. Astrocytic response to neural injury is larger during development than in adulthood and is not predicated upon the presence of microglia, Brain, Behavior, & Immunity-Health, Volume 1, 2020, 100010, ISSN 2666-3546.

[6]. Eliminating microglia in Alzheimer's mice prevents neuronal loss without modulating amyloid-β pathology. Brain. 2016;139(Pt 4):1265-1281.

Additional Infomation
PLX5622 is a highly selective, blood-brain barrier-penetrating, and orally effective CSF1R inhibitor. PLX5622 sustainably and specifically depletes microglia, acting before and during pathological progression. PLX5622 exhibits favorable pharmacokinetic properties in a variety of animal models. PLX5622 is primarily administered via a feed-free route. In summary, we designed and developed a specific CSF1R inhibitor, PLX5622, that sustainably and specifically depletes microglia. This novel microglia depletion approach enables us to sustainably deplete microglia during the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Ultimately, these data demonstrate that microglia depletion is associated with prevention of plaque formation and downregulation of hippocampal neuronal genes in preclinical models of AD progression. These results suggest that microglia appear to be involved in multiple aspects of the etiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD)—microglia are crucial for the initial appearance and structure of plaques and, after plaque formation, they promote a chronic inflammatory state, thereby modulating neuronal gene expression in response to Aβ/AD pathology. [1] Synergistic blocking of the activation of spinal microglia and neuromacrophages can significantly alleviate neuropathic pain behavior, as demonstrated in this study by the effects of CSF1R inhibitors. The activation of peripheral macrophages, more specifically inflammatory macrophages expressing CD86, TNF-α, or IL-1β in damaged peripheral nerves, was significantly affected by CSF1R inhibition, while macrophages expressing CD206 were not significantly altered. Furthermore, PLX5622 treatment effectively reduced microglia activation in the spinal cord after nerve injury. Although our results confirm the key role of microglia/macrophages in neuropathic pain and suggest that CSF1R may be a promising target for neuropathic pain relief, it is important to note that blocking the M-CSF/CSF1R signaling pathway, especially with systemic administration, can affect not only microglia/macrophages in the nervous system but also myeloid cells in other tissues. Therefore, to promote the translational application of our findings, more evidence from other animal models of chronic pain is needed, as well as a comprehensive analysis of the properties and safety of this compound in other organs. [2] In summary, by comparing the effects of PLX5622 and PLX3397, we have demonstrated that CSF1R inhibitors can effectively clear microglia in vitro and in vivo without affecting the expression of mature oligodendrocytes or myelin proteins. Furthermore, we speculate that CSF1R inhibitors may directly affect the survival of OPCs by non-targeting binding to PDGFRα (a member of the type III tyrosine kinase receptor family). Therefore, the concentration of the inhibitor and the duration of treatment must be carefully adjusted according to the relevant experimental system. These data also raise questions about whether microglia are necessary for ex vivo brain slice culture and OPC survival in the adult brain. [3] In summary, we demonstrated that glial cell responses to CTX vary at different developmental stages. Adult CTX induces a large number of microglia and a small number of astrocytes, but P10 CTX results in a small number of microglia and a large number of astrocytes, which is related to the differences in CTX recovery (Kopka et al., 2000; Martin et al., 2019; Reddaway et al., 2012; Sollars, 2005; St. John et al., 1995). We demonstrated for the first time that intraperitoneal injection of PLX5622 significantly reduced microglia in neonatal and adult rats without affecting animal health (assessed by body weight) or astrocyte count. While this reduction eliminated the astrocyte response in adult rats, the response in neonatal rats appeared to be unaffected, suggesting that microglia may not be necessary for CTX-induced astrocyte proliferation in neonatal rats. Our findings suggest that there are pathway-specific developmental differences that may lead to differences in recovery capacity at different developmental stages. Our findings enrich existing knowledge about differences in glial cell function during development and factors that may make it difficult for the developing taste system to recover from damage. Our findings highlight the potential importance of central glial cells for the developing and damaged taste system and suggest that there are differences in the interaction between microglia and astrocytes at different maturation stages. [5] We have previously demonstrated that microglia can be eliminated in the brains of healthy adult mice using small molecule CSF1R inhibitors (Elmore et al., 2014; Dagher et al., 2015), and our findings have been confirmed by many research groups (Valdearcos et al., 2014; Asai et al., 2015; Klein et al., 2015; Schreiner et al., 2015). Here, we extend these findings to Rosa26 locus mice, which constitutively express YFP in all CSF1R-expressing cells, thus clearly demonstrating that microglia are eliminated, not merely due to downregulation of myeloid/microglia markers. We also found that the same approach can clear chronically activated microglia following extensive neuronal injury. Our study further demonstrates that microglia clearance after neuronal injury improves functional outcomes, while clearance during injury exacerbates neuronal loss, revealing different roles of microglia in the injury response (Rice et al., 2015). Notably, only CSF1R inhibitors capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier can clear microglia. These inhibitors include the compounds PLX3397 and PLX5622 used in this study, as well as BLZ945 (Pyonteck et al., 2013). Furthermore, effective microglia clearance requires sustained intracerebral exposure to CSF1R inhibitors. Microglia death in the central nervous system requires at least 3 days (Elmore et al., 2014). It is important to note that CSF1R inhibitors are highly versatile; high-dose PLX5622 can deplete microglia, thus aiding in the study of their roles in disease and normal brain function; while low-dose PLX5622 can modulate their signaling pathways without depleting microglia. Therefore, we previously used low-dose PLX5622 (300 mg/kg diet, instead of the 1200 mg/kg diet used in this study) to investigate the role of CSF1R in the pathological response of microglia to Alzheimer's disease, and found that PLX5622 modulates the chemotactic response of these cells to plaques (Dagher et al., 2015), thereby improving cognitive function without affecting plaque burden or inflammatory response. Furthermore, previous studies have shown that CSF1R also plays a crucial role in microglia proliferation during disease (Gomez-Nicola et al., 2013), and these studies also used CSF1R inhibitor models that do not lead to microglia depletion. In contrast, this study aimed to clarify the role of microglia in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease by administering CSF1R inhibitors at doses sufficient to eliminate microglia (rather than merely modulating microglia function without eliminating them). We first set out to determine whether microglia in the brains of aged 5xfAD mice still depend on the CSF1R signaling pathway for survival. Importantly, we found that in adult 5xfAD mice, continuous administration of PLX3397 or PLX5622 for 28 days reduced microglia throughout the central nervous system by approximately 80-90%, respectively. [6]
These protocols are for reference only. InvivoChem does not independently validate these methods.
Physicochemical Properties
Molecular Formula
C21H19F2N5O
Molecular Weight
395.4053
Exact Mass
395.16
Elemental Analysis
C, 63.79; H, 4.84; F, 9.61; N, 17.71; O, 4.05
CAS #
1303420-67-8
Related CAS #
2749102-07-4
PubChem CID
52936034
Appearance
White to light yellow solid powder
LogP
4.1
Hydrogen Bond Donor Count
2
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count
7
Rotatable Bond Count
6
Heavy Atom Count
29
Complexity
529
Defined Atom Stereocenter Count
0
SMILES
FC1=C(C=CC(=N1)NCC1C=C(C=NC=1OC)F)CC1=CNC2=C1C=C(C)C=N2
InChi Key
WPOXAFXHRJYEIC-UHFFFAOYSA-N
InChi Code
InChI=1S/C23H27ClN4O3/c1-28-8-6-15(7-9-28)13-31-22-12-19-17(11-21(22)30-3)23(26-14-25-19)27-20-10-16(29-2)4-5-18(20)24/h4-5,10-12,14-15H,6-9,13H2,1-3H3,(H,25,26,27)
Chemical Name
N-(2-chloro-5-methoxyphenyl)-6-methoxy-7-[(1-methylpiperidin-4-yl)methoxy]quinazolin-4-amine
Synonyms
PLX5622 free base; PLX-5622 free base; PLX5622; 1303420-67-8; 6-Fluoro-N-((5-fluoro-2-methoxypyridin-3-yl)methyl)-5-((5-methyl-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridin-3-yl)methyl)pyridin-2-amine; PLX-5622; 6-fluoro-N-[(5-fluoro-2-methoxypyridin-3-yl)methyl]-5-[(5-methyl-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridin-3-yl)methyl]pyridin-2-amine; 16A8IGR8L7; 5-fluoro-N-[6-fluoro-5-[(5-methyl-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridin-3-yl)methyl]-2-pyridinyl]-2-methoxy-3-pyridinemethanamine; UNII-16A8IGR8L7; PLX 5622 free base;PLX5622; PLX-5622; PLX 5622
HS Tariff Code
2934.99.9001
Storage

Powder      -20°C    3 years

                     4°C     2 years

In solvent   -80°C    6 months

                  -20°C    1 month

Shipping Condition
Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)
Solubility Data
Solubility (In Vitro)
DMSO: 79~100 mg/mL (199.8~252.9 mM)
Ethanol: ~3.3 mg/mL (~8.4 mM)
H2O: < 0.1 mg/mL
Solubility (In Vivo)
Solubility in Formulation 1: 6.5 mg/mL (16.44 mM) in 5% DMSO + 95% (0.5% Hypromellose 1% Tween-80) (Note: To make 100 mL diluent (0.5% Hypromellose 1% Tween-80), add 25 mL of 2% Hypromellose stock and 4 mL of 25% Tween80 + stock to 71 mL ddH2O) (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), suspension solution; with heating and sonication.

Solubility in Formulation 2: 5 mg/mL (12.65 mM) in 5% DMSO + 95% (20% Ethoxylated hydrogenated castor oil in Saline) (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution; with ultrasonication.
Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH₂ O to obtain a clear solution.

View More

Solubility in Formulation 3: ≥ 3.12 mg/mL (7.89 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO + 40% PEG300 + 5% Tween80 + 45% Saline (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 31.2 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 400 μL PEG300 and mix evenly; then add 50 μL Tween-80 to the above solution and mix evenly; then add 450 μL normal saline to adjust the volume to 1 mL.
Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH₂ O to obtain a clear solution.


Solubility in Formulation 4: ≥ 2.5 mg/mL (6.32 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO + 90% (20% SBE-β-CD in Saline) (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 25.0 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 900 μL of 20% SBE-β-CD physiological saline solution and mix evenly.
Preparation of 20% SBE-β-CD in Saline (4°C,1 week): Dissolve 2 g SBE-β-CD in 10 mL saline to obtain a clear solution.



Solubility in Formulation 5: ≥ 2.5 mg/mL (6.32 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO + 90% Corn Oil (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 25.0 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 900 μL of corn oil and mix evenly.

 (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.)
Preparing Stock Solutions 1 mg 5 mg 10 mg
1 mM 2.5290 mL 12.6451 mL 25.2902 mL
5 mM 0.5058 mL 2.5290 mL 5.0580 mL
10 mM 0.2529 mL 1.2645 mL 2.5290 mL

*Note: Please select an appropriate solvent for the preparation of stock solution based on your experiment needs. For most products, DMSO can be used for preparing stock solutions (e.g. 5 mM, 10 mM, or 20 mM concentration); some products with high aqueous solubility may be dissolved in water directly. Solubility information is available at the above Solubility Data section. Once the stock solution is prepared, aliquot it to routine usage volumes and store at -20°C or -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze and thaw cycles.

Calculator

Molarity Calculator allows you to calculate the mass, volume, and/or concentration required for a solution, as detailed below:

  • Calculate the Mass of a compound required to prepare a solution of known volume and concentration
  • Calculate the Volume of solution required to dissolve a compound of known mass to a desired concentration
  • Calculate the Concentration of a solution resulting from a known mass of compound in a specific volume
An example of molarity calculation using the molarity calculator is shown below:
What is the mass of compound required to make a 10 mM stock solution in 5 ml of DMSO given that the molecular weight of the compound is 350.26 g/mol?
  • Enter 350.26 in the Molecular Weight (MW) box
  • Enter 10 in the Concentration box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 5 in the Volume box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 17.513 mg appears in the Mass box. In a similar way, you may calculate the volume and concentration.

Dilution Calculator allows you to calculate how to dilute a stock solution of known concentrations. For example, you may Enter C1, C2 & V2 to calculate V1, as detailed below:

What volume of a given 10 mM stock solution is required to make 25 ml of a 25 μM solution?
Using the equation C1V1 = C2V2, where C1=10 mM, C2=25 μM, V2=25 ml and V1 is the unknown:
  • Enter 10 into the Concentration (Start) box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Concentration (End) box and select the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Volume (End) box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 62.5 μL (0.1 ml) appears in the Volume (Start) box
g/mol

Molecular Weight Calculator allows you to calculate the molar mass and elemental composition of a compound, as detailed below:

Note: Chemical formula is case sensitive: C12H18N3O4  c12h18n3o4
Instructions to calculate molar mass (molecular weight) of a chemical compound:
  • To calculate molar mass of a chemical compound, please enter the chemical/molecular formula and click the “Calculate’ button.
Definitions of molecular mass, molecular weight, molar mass and molar weight:
  • Molecular mass (or molecular weight) is the mass of one molecule of a substance and is expressed in the unified atomic mass units (u). (1 u is equal to 1/12 the mass of one atom of carbon-12)
  • Molar mass (molar weight) is the mass of one mole of a substance and is expressed in g/mol.
/

Reconstitution Calculator allows you to calculate the volume of solvent required to reconstitute your vial.

  • Enter the mass of the reagent and the desired reconstitution concentration as well as the correct units
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer appears in the Volume (to add to vial) box
In vivo Formulation Calculator (Clear solution)
Step 1: Enter information below (Recommended: An additional animal to make allowance for loss during the experiment)
Step 2: Enter in vivo formulation (This is only a calculator, not the exact formulation for a specific product. Please contact us first if there is no in vivo formulation in the solubility section.)
+
+
+

Calculation results

Working concentration mg/mL;

Method for preparing DMSO stock solution mg drug pre-dissolved in μL DMSO (stock solution concentration mg/mL). Please contact us first if the concentration exceeds the DMSO solubility of the batch of drug.

Method for preparing in vivo formulation:Take μL DMSO stock solution, next add μL PEG300, mix and clarify, next addμL Tween 80, mix and clarify, next add μL ddH2O,mix and clarify.

(1) Please be sure that the solution is clear before the addition of next solvent. Dissolution methods like vortex, ultrasound or warming and heat may be used to aid dissolving.
             (2) Be sure to add the solvent(s) in order.

Clinical Trial Information
NCT Number Recruitment interventions Conditions Sponsor/Collaborators Start Date Phases
NCT01282684 Completed Drug: PLX5622
Drug: Placebo
Healthy Plexxikon January 2011 Phase 1
NCT01329991 Completed Drug: PLX5622
Drug: Placebo
Rheumatoid Arthritis Plexxikon May 2011 Phase 1
Biological Data
  • PLX-5622


    Design and synthesis schematic of the CSF1R inhibitor PLX5622 for extended microglial elimination.

    PLX-5622

    No detectable alterations in Aβ levels or APP processing with microglia elimination in 5xFAD mice.

    PLX-5622

    Remaining plaque-forming microglia in the microdissected hippocampus exhibit a DAM expression profile.Nat Commun. 2019 Aug 21;10(1):3758.

  • PLX-5622


    Extended elimination of microglia does not induce peripheral leukocyte or behavioral abnormalities.

    PLX-5622

    Microglia facilitate plaque formation and compaction.

    PLX-5622

    Microglia mediate downregulation of neuronal/plasticity genes in the hippocampus in response to AD pathology.Nat Commun. 2019 Aug 21;10(1):3758.

  • PLX-5622


    Long-term elimination of microglia in 5xFAD mice reduces plaque number and volume and is accompanied by cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) onset.

    PLX-5622

    Administration of an analogous CSF1R inhibitor, PLX3397 (75 ppm and 600 ppm), to 5xFAD mice.

    PLX-5622

    Microglia seed plaques. All analyses listed in respective order for retrosplenial (RS) cortex, somatosensory (SS) cortex, and thalamus.Nat Commun. 2019 Aug

Contact Us