yingweiwo

Phosphorylcholine

Cat No.:V33980 Purity: ≥98%
Phosphorylcholine chloride (Phosphocholine chloride) is a component of lecithin that forms the outer structure of cell membranes and has good blood compatibility.
Phosphorylcholine
Phosphorylcholine Chemical Structure CAS No.: 107-73-3
Product category: New2
This product is for research use only, not for human use. We do not sell to patients.
Size Price Stock Qty
500mg
Official Supplier of:
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text

 

  • Business Relationship with 5000+ Clients Globally
  • Major Universities, Research Institutions, Biotech & Pharma
  • Citations by Top Journals: Nature, Cell, Science, etc.
Top Publications Citing lnvivochem Products
Product Description
Phosphorylcholine chloride (Phosphocholine chloride) is a component of lecithin that forms the outer structure of cell membranes and has good blood compatibility.
Phosphorylcholine (PC) materials are bio-inspired polymers that mimic the extracellular surface of red blood cells, containing an exact chemical copy of the predominant zwitterionic phospholipid headgroup found in the cell lipid membrane. Unlike most biomaterials, the well-hydrated and neutrally-charged PC surface allows for the interaction of proteins without inducing shape changes in the protein's three-dimensional structure and thus reduces irreversible protein adsorption. This decrease in protein adsorption results in decreased blood clotting, cellular adhesion, and a reduction in the inflammatory response and fibrous capsule formation. PC materials have been used for various biomedical applications where a passive interaction between the material and the body is required, including coating blood contact devices, contact lenses, and orthopaedic bearing surfaces. However, for orthopaedic implants requiring bone integration, the inherent anti-adhesiveness of PC is not ideal. Therefore, cationically-modified PC polymers incorporating choline methacrylate (CMA) to introduce positive surface charge have been developed to increase protein adsorption and cell adhesion. [1]
Biological Activity I Assay Protocols (From Reference)
ln Vitro
Phosphorylcholine materials, which have a molecular replica of the main zwitterionic phospholipid headgroup present in the cell lipid membrane, are bioinspired polymers that resemble the extracellular surface of red blood cells. The PC-polymer's phosphorylcholine side chain includes the phosphate moiety found in phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylserine, the latter of which is a membrane lipid component involved in biomineralization and capable of binding calcium[1].
Human osteoblasts (HOb) were cultured on non-coated, PC5 (5% CMA), and PC20 (20% CMA) coated surfaces. Phosphorylcholine with higher cationic charge (PC20) increased HOb cell adhesion compared to lower charge (PC5) and neutral (PC0) surfaces. At 6, 24, and 48 hours, tissue culture plastic controls exhibited the largest number of cells. Significant differences (P<0.001) were observed between control and PC0, and between PC20 and PC0 at all three time points. Significant differences (P<0.001) between PC20 and PC5 were seen at 24 and 48 hours. [1]
Over 28 days, the number of HOb cells increased on PC20 and control, while the number decreased on PC5 with increasing time up to 28 days. After day 1, significant differences (P<0.001) existed between PC5 and PC20 and control surfaces for all time points. Proliferation on control surfaces was significantly greater at all time points (P<0.001). [1]
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity per thousand cells decreased on PC20 over the first 3 days and on control between day 1 and 2; thereafter ALP activity did not change significantly, and no significant difference was found between PC20 and control after day 2. ALP activity on PC5 was too low to give an accurate measure. [1]
Optical microscopy at 48 hours showed that PC20 and control surfaces had the largest number of HOb cells with fully spread morphologies and the presence of mineral deposits. PC0 supported minimal cell adhesion with rounded cells, and PC5 had more cells than PC0 but cells remained rounded. [1]
SEM with EDX at 48 hours and 28 days confirmed mineral deposits on PC20 and control surfaces containing calcium and phosphorus. The Ca:P ratio of these deposits was approximately 0.6, considerably lower than hydroxyapatite (1.5-1.67), indicating calcium-deficient mineral. The amount of mineral deposits increased with time up to 28 days. [1]
ln Vivo
Stainless steel pins coated with PC0, PC6 (6% CMA), PC20, uncoated (negative control), or hydroxyapatite (HA, positive control) were implanted into the right tibia of rats. At 14 weeks post-implantation, histological analysis of the bone-implant interface and interfacial area was performed. HA showed significantly more bone and marrow apposition (P<0.05) than fibrous tissue and loosely associated matrix (LAM). The cationically-charged PC materials (PC6 and PC20) produced a similar response with no significant differences between tissue types. For PC0 and stainless steel (SS), there was significantly more fibrous tissue than bone/marrow and LAM (P<0.05). HA had the highest bone/marrow apposition and least fibrous tissue compared to the other four surfaces (P<0.05). PC0 had significantly more fibrous tissue than PC6 (P<0.05), but no significant differences between PC0 and PC20 or between PC0 and SS. There was a trend for a linear increase in LAM with increasing CMA content in the implant interfacial area (R²=0.9) and at the interface (R²=0.7). No significant bone bonding was observed for any PC-coated implants; instead, fibrous tissue and LAM were present. [1]
Enzyme Assay
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, an early marker of osteoblast differentiation associated with skeletal mineralization, was measured. A substrate buffer of 0.5 M 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) was prepared in distilled water (pH 10) and supplemented with 2 mM magnesium chloride and 9 mM p-nitrophenol phosphate (p-NPP). In an alkaline solution, ALP catalyzes p-NPP to p-nitrophenol, which appears yellow. Cells were lysed at various time points (1, 2, 4, 7, 14, and 28 days) using freeze-thaw cycles. 50 µL of each lysate (in duplicate) and 50 µL of a range of p-nitrophenol concentrations (for standard curve) were transferred to a 96-well plate. Then 50 µL of AMP buffer was added to each well, and the plate was incubated at 37°C for 15 minutes. Absorbance was read at 405 nm. A standard curve of absorbance as a function of p-nitrophenol concentration was generated to determine total ALP content. [1]
Cell Assay
Human osteoblasts (HOb) isolated from hip bone were grown in T75 flasks in McCoy's 5a growth medium containing 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% glutamine, and 30 µg/mL vitamin C, at 37°C in 5% CO2 humidity. At 60-80% confluence, cells were washed with Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS), incubated with trypsin/EDTA to detach cells, neutralized with growth medium, centrifuged at 220×g for 4 min, and re-suspended for counting using a haemocytometer. [1]
For cell number determination, cells were cultured on non-coated, PC5, and PC20 coated T25 flasks for up to 28 days. At time points (6 h, 1,2,4,7,14,28 days), culture media was aspirated, cells washed with PBS, and 1 mL of 0.5% v/v Triton X-100 in PBS added. Two freeze-thaw cycles (15 min at -70°C and 37°C) were used to lyse cells. 180 µL of lysate was transferred in duplicate to a white-walled 96-well plate, 20 µL of ATP monitoring reagent added, and ATP concentration read immediately using a luminometer. A standard curve using predetermined HOb cell numbers (0, 2500, 5000, 10000, 20000, 40000) on uncoated plates was used to determine cell numbers. [1]
For optical imaging and SEM/EDX, HOb cells were seeded at 12×10³/cm² in T25 flasks coated with PC0, PC5, PC20, or non-coated control for 48 hours and 28 days. Phase-contrast microscopy was performed. For SEM, cells were washed with PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, washed with distilled water, and a ~20×20 mm piece of each flask was mounted on an SEM stub, sputter-coated with carbon, and imaged at 5 kV. EDX was used to characterize elemental constituents of mineral exudates. [1]
Animal Protocol
Thirty mature Sprague Dawley rats (300-350 g) were used. Surgical grade stainless steel (316 L) pins were cleaned, sonicated in acetone and ethanol, and assigned to five groups (n=6 per group): uncoated (negative control), plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite (60-100 µm thick, positive control), or dip-coated with PC0, PC6, or PC20 polymer solutions (5 mg/mL in ethanol) resulting in coatings ~30-50 nm thick, then cured at 70°C for 4 hours. Pins were sterilized by gamma irradiation (25 kGy). [1]
Anaesthesia was induced with a gaseous mixture of oxygen and halothane (4%) at 6 L/min in an anaesthetic chamber. Midazolam (3 mg/kg) was given intraperitoneally, and rats maintained with halothane 4% via mask. The right hind limb was shaved, peri-operative analgesia (carprofen, 5 mg/mL) given subcutaneously. A 1.5 cm incision was made lateral to the patella, a lateral capsulotomy performed allowing medial dislocation of the patella to expose the tibial plateau. A 1.5 mm diameter hand drill was used to drill through the centre of the tibial plateau to a depth of 10 mm and counter-sunk (4 mm counter-bore). The pin was press-fitted into the tibia, patella reduced, and incision closed. Immediately after surgery, rats received antibiotic (co-amoxyclavulanic acid, 150 mg/kg) intramuscularly and analgesia (buprenorphine, 0.15 mg/kg) subcutaneously. A second analgesia injection (buprenorphine, 0.1 mg/kg) was given after 5 hours. Rats were sacrificed at 14 weeks. Tibiae were removed, fixed in paraformaldehyde, washed, dehydrated in methylated spirits (50-100%), defatted under vacuum with acetone for 7 days, and embedded in poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). Longitudinal sections (300-500 µm thick) were cut using a diamond saw, ground and polished to 100 µm thickness, stained with toluidine blue (pH 9, 56°C, 30 min), and five fields per slide were digitally photographed for histological analysis. [1]
Toxicity/Toxicokinetics
The Phosphorylcholine polymers (PC0, PC6, PC20) were described as biotolerant in bone, stimulating the production of fibrous tissue and areas of loosely associated matrix (LAM) around the implant. No quantitative toxicity parameters (e.g., LD50, organ toxicity, protein binding) are reported. For PC0 and stainless steel, there was significantly more fibrous tissue than bone/marrow and LAM (P<0.05). Increasing cationic charge (CMA content) showed a linear increase in LAM formation (R²=0.7-0.9), suggesting a potential adverse tissue response. No other toxicity information is provided. [1]
References

[1]. The effect of cationically-modified phosphorylcholine polymers on human osteoblasts in vitro and their effect on bone formation in vivo. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2017 Aug 17;28(9):144.

Additional Infomation
Phosphorylcholine chloride is an organochloride composed of phosphoric acid cations and chloride ions. It contains phosphoric acid choline and chloride ions. Calcium and magnesium salts can be used to treat hepatobiliary dysfunction.
Phosphorylcholine polymers have been used in a variety of medical devices to improve biocompatibility due to low protein adsorption, reduced complement activation, inflammatory response, and cell adhesion. However, for orthopaedic applications requiring bone-implant integration, unmodified PC is not suitable. Cationic modification (incorporation of choline methacrylate, CMA) was attempted to increase bioactivity. Despite in vitro evidence of increased osteoblast adhesion, differentiation, and calcium phosphate deposition on PC20, in vivo these materials did not promote bone bonding but rather induced fibrous tissue and LAM. The authors concluded that development of these cationically-modified PC polymers as bone-interfacing implant coatings is not warranted. Non-charged PC polymers were tolerated in the osseous environment and could potentially be used to coat orthopaedic devices for antibiotic delivery to reduce surgical site infection, where bone bonding is not required. [1]
These protocols are for reference only. InvivoChem does not independently validate these methods.
Physicochemical Properties
Molecular Formula
C5H15CLNO4P
Molecular Weight
219.60400
Exact Mass
219.042
CAS #
107-73-3
PubChem CID
7886
Appearance
Colorless to light yellow solid-liquid Mixture
Hydrogen Bond Donor Count
2
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count
5
Rotatable Bond Count
4
Heavy Atom Count
12
Complexity
158
Defined Atom Stereocenter Count
0
SMILES
O=P(OCC[N+](C)(C)C)(O)O.[Cl-]
InChi Key
PYJNAPOPMIJKJZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N
InChi Code
InChI=1S/C5H14NO4P.ClH/c1-6(2,3)4-5-10-11(7,8)9;/h4-5H2,1-3H3,(H-,7,8,9);1H
Chemical Name
trimethyl(2-phosphonooxyethyl)azanium;chloride
HS Tariff Code
2934.99.9001
Storage

Powder      -20°C    3 years

                     4°C     2 years

In solvent   -80°C    6 months

                  -20°C    1 month

Note: Please store this product in a sealed and protected environment, avoid exposure to moisture.
Shipping Condition
Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)
Solubility Data
Solubility (In Vitro)
H2O : ~250 mg/mL (~1138.43 mM)
Solubility (In Vivo)
Solubility in Formulation 1: 100 mg/mL (455.37 mM) in PBS (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution; with sonication.

 (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.)
Preparing Stock Solutions 1 mg 5 mg 10 mg
1 mM 4.5537 mL 22.7687 mL 45.5373 mL
5 mM 0.9107 mL 4.5537 mL 9.1075 mL
10 mM 0.4554 mL 2.2769 mL 4.5537 mL

*Note: Please select an appropriate solvent for the preparation of stock solution based on your experiment needs. For most products, DMSO can be used for preparing stock solutions (e.g. 5 mM, 10 mM, or 20 mM concentration); some products with high aqueous solubility may be dissolved in water directly. Solubility information is available at the above Solubility Data section. Once the stock solution is prepared, aliquot it to routine usage volumes and store at -20°C or -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze and thaw cycles.

Calculator

Molarity Calculator allows you to calculate the mass, volume, and/or concentration required for a solution, as detailed below:

  • Calculate the Mass of a compound required to prepare a solution of known volume and concentration
  • Calculate the Volume of solution required to dissolve a compound of known mass to a desired concentration
  • Calculate the Concentration of a solution resulting from a known mass of compound in a specific volume
An example of molarity calculation using the molarity calculator is shown below:
What is the mass of compound required to make a 10 mM stock solution in 5 ml of DMSO given that the molecular weight of the compound is 350.26 g/mol?
  • Enter 350.26 in the Molecular Weight (MW) box
  • Enter 10 in the Concentration box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 5 in the Volume box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 17.513 mg appears in the Mass box. In a similar way, you may calculate the volume and concentration.

Dilution Calculator allows you to calculate how to dilute a stock solution of known concentrations. For example, you may Enter C1, C2 & V2 to calculate V1, as detailed below:

What volume of a given 10 mM stock solution is required to make 25 ml of a 25 μM solution?
Using the equation C1V1 = C2V2, where C1=10 mM, C2=25 μM, V2=25 ml and V1 is the unknown:
  • Enter 10 into the Concentration (Start) box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Concentration (End) box and select the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Volume (End) box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 62.5 μL (0.1 ml) appears in the Volume (Start) box
g/mol

Molecular Weight Calculator allows you to calculate the molar mass and elemental composition of a compound, as detailed below:

Note: Chemical formula is case sensitive: C12H18N3O4  c12h18n3o4
Instructions to calculate molar mass (molecular weight) of a chemical compound:
  • To calculate molar mass of a chemical compound, please enter the chemical/molecular formula and click the “Calculate’ button.
Definitions of molecular mass, molecular weight, molar mass and molar weight:
  • Molecular mass (or molecular weight) is the mass of one molecule of a substance and is expressed in the unified atomic mass units (u). (1 u is equal to 1/12 the mass of one atom of carbon-12)
  • Molar mass (molar weight) is the mass of one mole of a substance and is expressed in g/mol.
/

Reconstitution Calculator allows you to calculate the volume of solvent required to reconstitute your vial.

  • Enter the mass of the reagent and the desired reconstitution concentration as well as the correct units
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer appears in the Volume (to add to vial) box
In vivo Formulation Calculator (Clear solution)
Step 1: Enter information below (Recommended: An additional animal to make allowance for loss during the experiment)
Step 2: Enter in vivo formulation (This is only a calculator, not the exact formulation for a specific product. Please contact us first if there is no in vivo formulation in the solubility section.)
+
+
+

Calculation results

Working concentration mg/mL;

Method for preparing DMSO stock solution mg drug pre-dissolved in μL DMSO (stock solution concentration mg/mL). Please contact us first if the concentration exceeds the DMSO solubility of the batch of drug.

Method for preparing in vivo formulation:Take μL DMSO stock solution, next add μL PEG300, mix and clarify, next addμL Tween 80, mix and clarify, next add μL ddH2O,mix and clarify.

(1) Please be sure that the solution is clear before the addition of next solvent. Dissolution methods like vortex, ultrasound or warming and heat may be used to aid dissolving.
             (2) Be sure to add the solvent(s) in order.

Contact Us