yingweiwo

Lupeol

Alias: NSC 90487Monogynol BLupeol β-ViscolClerodol Fagarasterol Lupenol
Cat No.:V9752 Purity: ≥98%
Lupeol (Clerodol; Monogynol B; Fagarasterol) is an active pentacyclic triterpene with antioxidant, antitumor and anti~inflammatory activities.
Lupeol
Lupeol Chemical Structure CAS No.: 545-47-1
Product category: New1
This product is for research use only, not for human use. We do not sell to patients.
Size Price Stock Qty
10mg
50mg
100mg
250mg
Other Sizes
Official Supplier of:
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text

 

  • Business Relationship with 5000+ Clients Globally
  • Major Universities, Research Institutions, Biotech & Pharma
  • Citations by Top Journals: Nature, Cell, Science, etc.
Top Publications Citing lnvivochem Products
Product Description
Lupeol (Clerodol; Monogynol B; Fagarasterol) is an active pentacyclic triterpene with antioxidant, antitumor and anti~inflammatory activities. Lupeol is a potent androgen receptor blocker/inhibitor for cancer research, specifically androgen-dependent phenotype (ADPC) and castration-resistant phenotype (CRPC) prostate cancer.
Biological Activity I Assay Protocols (From Reference)
Targets
Androgen receptor (AR) [1]
ln Vitro
Lupeol is a useful AR mold for developing new therapeutics to cure human elk cancer (CaP). After 48 hours of treatment, lupeol (10-50 μM) inhibited the proliferation of androtrophic phenotype (ADPC) cells, namely LAPC4 and LNCaP cells, with IC50 values of 15.9 and 17.3 μM. Lupeol reduced the development of 22Rv_1 with an IC50 of 19.1 μM. Lupeol inhibits C4-2b cell growth at an IC50 of 25 μM. Lupeol has the ability to inhibit ADPC and CRPC. Phenotypic CaP cell growth capacity. Androgens, through AR activation, are known to promote CaP cell proliferation [1].
Lupeol inhibited the growth of androgen-dependent prostate cancer (ADPC) cells LAPC4 (IC50=15.9 μM), LNCaP (IC50=17.3 μM), and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) cells C4-2b (IC50=25 μM) after 48 h treatment. It also inhibited 22Rv1 cells (IC50=19.1 μM). [1]
Lupeol (31-50 μM) significantly reduced R1881 (androgen analogue)-stimulated cell growth and proliferation (as measured by ³[H]thymidine uptake) in LAPC4 and LNCaP cells. [1]
Lupeol (added every 3rd day for 14 days) significantly reduced R1881-induced clonogenic potential of LNCaP and LAPC4 cells in soft agar. [1]
In AR-negative PC-3 cells, the growth suppression by Lupeol was not reversed by increasing R1881 concentration, while in AR-positive LNCaP cells, the suppression was partially reversed by increasing R1881 from 1.0 to 1.5 nM at 25 μM Lupeol but not at 50 μM. [1]
Lupeol (5-50 μM) significantly inhibited R1881-induced AR transcriptional activity (3.5-5 fold induction by R1881) in LAPC4 and LNCaP cells as assessed by luciferase-based ARE reporter assay. [1]
Lupeol decreased mRNA expression of PSA in a dose-dependent manner in LNCaP, LAPC4, 22Rv1 and C4-2b cells, and decreased protein levels of PSA in LNCaP, 22Rv1 and C4-2b cells. [1]
Lupeol decreased R1881-induced mRNA and protein levels of PSA in LAPC4 and LNCaP cells. [1]
Lupeol decreased secreted PSA levels in culture media from LNCaP and LAPC4 cells in a concentration-dependent manner. [1]
Lupeol (25-50 μM) competed with labeled R1881 for ligand binding domain of AR in LAPC4 and LNCaP cells. [1]
Lupeol treatment significantly reduced AR-DNA binding efficiency in LNCaP cells as assessed by EMSA. [1]
Lupeol decreased AR occupancy on ARE (androgen response elements) and ARB (AR binding sites) on AR-responsive genes (PSA, SGK-1, TIPARP, IL-6) in LNCaP cells and on PSA gene in C4-2b cells as assessed by ChIP assay. [1]
Lupeol reduced RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II) occupancy at the PSA promoter in LNCaP cells (in presence of R1881) and in C4-2b cells (both in presence and absence of androgen). [1]
Lupeol sensitized C4-2b cells to bicalutamide: cells pre-treated with Lupeol (30-50 μM for 24 h) followed by bicalutamide (10 μM for 24 h) showed significant decrease in cell viability and PSA expression. [1]
ln Vivo
One powerful medication that may reduce the tumorigenicity of CaP cells in the stroma is lupeol. Total circulatory PSA levels (via stromal tumor cell apoptosis) were assessed on day 56 of the research. At poststromal day 5 56, PSA levels in control rats with LNCaP and C4-2b tumors varied from 11.95 to 12.79 ng/mL, respectively. Conversely, rats treated with lopezol showed lower serum PSA levels, ranging from 4.25-7.09 ng/mL. Serum PSA levels were lower in tumor tissue from animals given lopeol than in control subjects [1].
In athymic nude mice bearing LNCaP (ADPC) or C4-2b (CRPC) cell-derived tumors, intraperitoneal administration of Lupeol (40 mg/kg, 3 times per week) significantly inhibited tumor growth. At day 56 post-inoculation, average tumor volume in control mice was 1138 mm³ (LNCaP) and 1198 mm³ (C4-2b), while in Lupeol-treated mice it was 309 mm³ and 510 mm³, respectively. Approximately 60% (LNCaP) and 50% (C4-2b) of Lupeol-treated mice did not reach the endpoint (1000 mm³ tumor volume) by the end of week 12. [1]
Lupeol treatment reduced serum PSA levels in tumor-bearing mice: control animals had 11.95-12.79 ng/mL, while Lupeol-treated animals had 4.25-7.09 ng/mL. Immunoblot analysis of tumor tissues confirmed reduced PSA protein levels. [1]
Enzyme Assay
In silico molecular docking: Lupeol was docked into the active region of AR (2PNU.pdb) using AutoDock4 and Sybyl programs. The binding energy was -10.66 Kcal/mol (~56 nM). Lupeol interacted with AR through 17 putative amino acid residues and 2 hydrogen bonds, surrounded by a hydrophobic pocket consisting of several hydrophobic side chains and 6 methionines (742,745,749,780,787,895) on 5 different helices, with hydrophilic interactions with Trp752 and Asn705. [1]
AR competitive ligand-binding assay: Cells were incubated with 1 nM ³[H]R1881 in the absence or presence of 0.1-100-fold molar excess of unlabeled competitor ligands (including Lupeol) for 90 min at 37°C. Bound ligands were extracted in ethanol for 30 min at room temperature and detected using a scintillation counter. Unlabeled R1881 and bicalutamide effectively competed ³[H]R1881 binding; Lupeol at 25-50 μM also competed for the ligand binding domain of AR. [1]
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA): Nuclear lysates from cells treated with Lupeol were incubated with biotin-labeled AR oligonucleotide (sense: 5'-TGC AGA ACA GCA AGT GCT AGC-3'; anti-sense: 5'-GCT AGC ACT TGC TGT TCT GCA-3'), and DNA binding was assessed. Controls included biotin-EBNA control DNA, EBNA extract, and competition with excess unlabeled EBNA DNA. [1]
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay: Cells were treated with Lupeol, then cross-linked, lysed, and chromatin was immunoprecipitated with anti-AR antibody or anti-RNA Pol II antibody. AR occupancy on ARE/ARB sites of PSA, SGK-1, TIPARP, IL-6 genes, and RNA Pol II occupancy at PSA promoter were measured by PCR. [1]
Cell Assay
Cell viability assay (MTT): Cells (60-70% confluent) were treated with Lupeol (10-50 μM) for 48 h in complete growth medium. MTT solution was added, incubated, and formazan crystals dissolved in DMSO, measured at 570 nm. For combination studies, cells were treated with R1881 (1 nM), bicalutamide (10 μM), or R1881+Lupeol for 48 h. For sensitization, C4-2b cells were treated with Lupeol for 24 h then bicalutamide (10 μM) for another 24 h before MTT. [1]
³[H]thymidine incorporation assay: Cells were treated as indicated, then pulsed with ³[H]thymidine, and incorporated radioactivity was measured. [1]
Colony formation assay: Cells were seeded in soft agar, treated with R1881 (1 nM daily) and/or Lupeol (added every 3rd day for 14 days), then colonies were counted. [1]
AR transcriptional activity reporter assay: LAPC4 and LNCaP cells were transfected with ARE-Luc plasmid (200 ng/well) for 24 h, then treated with R1881 (1 nM), bicalutamide (10 μM), Lupeol (10-50 μM), or combinations for 48 h. Luciferase activity was measured using dual luciferase assay kit. [1]
Real-time PCR for PSA expression: Cells were treated with Lupeol, total RNA extracted, and real-time PCR performed using PSA primers (sense: 5'-GTGCTTGTCGCTCTCGCT-3'; anti-sense: 5'-CAGCAAGATCACGTCTTTG-3'). [1]
Immunoblot analysis: Cell lysates or tumor tissue lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE, transferred to membranes, and probed with anti-PSA and anti-AR antibodies. β-actin was used as loading control. [1]
PSA secretion assay: Culture media from treated LNCaP and LAPC4 cells were collected and secreted PSA levels were measured. [1]
Animal Protocol
Athymic nude mice bearing C4-2b and LNCaP cell-originated tumors were treated intraperitoneally with Lupeol (40 mg/kg; 3 times per week) for up to 12 weeks. Tumor growth was measured as volume over time. Mice were monitored for body weight, food intake, and signs of toxicity. At day 56 post-inoculation (when 100% of control animals reached tumor volume >1000 mm³), tumors and serum were collected for analysis. Corn oil was used as vehicle control. [1]
For bioavailability studies, mice received a single intraperitoneal administration of Lupeol (200 mg/kg), and serum was collected at 4 h and 8 h post-administration. Alternatively, mice bearing tumors were treated with Lupeol (40 mg/kg) for up to 8 weeks, and serum was collected. [1]
ADME/Pharmacokinetics
Lupeol was detected in serum by HPLC with a retention time of 13.4 min, matching the standard, indicating stability and bioavailability. [1]
After a single intraperitoneal administration of Lupeol (200 mg/kg), serum levels were 3.08 μM at 4 h and 5.22 μM at 8 h post-administration. [1]
In mice bearing tumors and receiving repeated Lupeol treatment (40 mg/kg, 3 times/week for 4-8 weeks), serum Lupeol levels reached 10-20 μM. [1]
Toxicity/Toxicokinetics
Interactions
In in vivo studies using an orthotopic metastatic nude mouse oral and tongue squamous cell carcinoma model, 2 mg/mouse lupeol significantly reduced tumor volume and inhibited local metastasis, showing superior efficacy compared to cisplatin alone. Lupeol, when used in combination with low-dose cisplatin, exhibited significant synergistic cytotoxicity without side effects…
…This study…used an alkaline melting method to investigate the effect of lupeol on 7,12-dimethylbenzo[a]anthracene (DMBA)-induced DNA strand breaks in mouse skin. Samples were taken at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours before or after a single topical application of DMBA (100 μg/mouse), and incremental doses of lupeol (50-200 μg/mouse) were administered topically. Both pretreatment and posttreatment with lupeol showed significant preventative effects against DMBA-induced DNA strand breaks (p<0.001), in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Pretreatment with 200 μg/mouse prevented 56.05% of DNA strand breaks after 96 hours; posttreatment prevented 43.26% of DNA strand breaks… This study evaluated the antigenotoxic effects of the triterpenoid compounds lupeol and mango pulp extract (MPE) in Swiss albino mice. The known mutagen benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) was administered intraperitoneally at a single dose of 100 mg/kg body weight. Seven days prior to B[a]P administration, mice were pretreated with lupeol (1 mg/mouse) and MPE (1 mL, 20%) via gavage. All animals were sacrificed at 24-hour sampling time, and chromosomal damage and micronucleus induction in their bone marrow tissue were analyzed. In the benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) treatment group, a significant increase in chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei, along with a decreased mitotic index, was observed. In the groups supplemented with lupeol or MPE, B[a]P-induced chromosome breakage was significantly reduced. Compared with the B[a]P-treated group, both lupeol and MPE reduced the incidence of abnormal cells and micronuclei. Furthermore, the anti-cytotoxic effects of lupeol or MPE were also significant, manifested by a significant increase in the mitotic index. Therefore, the results of this study indicate that lupeol and mango pulp extract (MPE) have a protective effect against benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P)-induced chromosome breakage in Swiss albino mice. This study aimed to investigate the antioxidant effect of lupeol/mango pulp extract (MPE) on testosterone-induced oxidative stress in the prostate of male Swiss albino mice. …For 15 consecutive days, mice were orally administered lupeol (1 mg/mouse) and MPE (1 mL [20% w/v]/mouse), respectively, while simultaneously receiving a subcutaneous injection of testosterone (5 mg/kg body weight). At the end of the study, the prostate was dissected, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, lipid peroxidation, and the activities of antioxidant enzymes (catalase, superoxide dismutase, glutathione reductase, and glutathione S-transferase) were measured. Results: In testosterone-treated animals, increased ROS led to depletion of antioxidant enzymes and increased lipid peroxidation in the mouse prostate. However, lupeol/MPE treatment resulted in decreased ROS levels, and lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzyme levels returned to normal. …These results indicate that lupeol/MPE effectively combats oxidative stress-induced prostate cell damage in mice…
For more complete interaction data (14 items in total) on lupeol, please visit the HSDB record page.
Non-human toxicity values
Rats oral LD50 >2 g/kg /see table/
Mice oral LD50 >2 g/kg /see table/
Lupeol treatment (40 mg/kg, 3 times/week intraperitoneally) did not cause any loss in body weight, change in food intake, or exhibit apparent signs of toxicity in athymic nude mice. [1]
References

[1]. Lupeol, a novel androgen receptor inhibitor: implications in prostate cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Aug 15;17(16):5379-91.

Additional Infomation
Lupeol is a pentacyclic triterpenoid compound, a derivative of lupene, in which the hydrogen atom at the 3β position is replaced by a hydroxyl group. It is found in the seed coat of lupin seeds, as well as in the latex of fig and rubber trees. Additionally, it is present in many edible fruits and vegetables. It has anti-inflammatory properties and is a plant metabolite. Lupeol is a secondary alcohol belonging to the pentacyclic triterpenoid class. It is derived from the hydride of lupene. Lupeol has been studied for its use in treating acne. It has been reported to be found in tea (Camellia sinensis), holly leaf erythrorhiz (Acanthus ilicifolius), and other organisms with relevant data. See also: Calendula officinalis flower (part).
Mechanism of Action
Lupinol is a triterpenoid compound found in fruits and vegetables. It selectively induces the death of large numbers of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cells, but has little effect on normal tongue fibroblast cell lines cultured in vitro. Downregulation of NF-κB is considered the main mechanism by which lupinol combats HNSCC. Lupinol not only inhibits tumor growth but also suppresses HNSCC cell invasion by reversing NF-κB-dependent epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Lupinol has a synergistic effect with cisplatin, enabling HNSCC cell lines with high NF-κB activity in vitro to become chemosensitized by cisplatin.

Lupeol (Lup-20(29)-en-3b-ol) is a triterpene found in fruits, vegetables, and medicinal plants, possessing strong antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-arthritic, anti-mutagenic and anti-malarial activities. [1]
Mechanism: Lupeol acts as a competitive antagonist for AR, blocking AR binding to androgen, inhibiting AR-DNA binding, reducing AR occupancy on ARE/ARB sites of AR-responsive genes (PSA, TIPARP, SGK, IL-6), and inhibiting RNA Pol II recruitment to target genes. It also sensitizes CRPC cells to anti-hormone therapy (bicalutamide). [1]
Lupeol is a diet-derived agent, non-toxic, and bioavailable in vivo, suggesting translational potential for treating both androgen-dependent and castration-resistant prostate cancer. [1]
These protocols are for reference only. InvivoChem does not independently validate these methods.
Physicochemical Properties
Molecular Formula
C30H50O
Molecular Weight
426.729
Exact Mass
426.386
CAS #
545-47-1
PubChem CID
259846
Appearance
White to off-white solid powder
Density
1.0±0.1 g/cm3
Boiling Point
488.1±14.0 °C at 760 mmHg
Melting Point
215-216ºC
Flash Point
216.9±12.4 °C
Vapour Pressure
0.0±2.8 mmHg at 25°C
Index of Refraction
1.516
LogP
10.98
Hydrogen Bond Donor Count
1
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count
1
Rotatable Bond Count
1
Heavy Atom Count
31
Complexity
766
Defined Atom Stereocenter Count
10
SMILES
CC(=C)[C@@H]1CC[C@]2([C@H]1[C@H]3CC[C@@H]4[C@]5(CC[C@@H](C([C@@H]5CC[C@]4([C@@]3(CC2)C)C)(C)C)O)C)C
InChi Key
MQYXUWHLBZFQQO-QGTGJCAVSA-N
InChi Code
InChI=1S/C30H50O/c1-19(2)20-11-14-27(5)17-18-29(7)21(25(20)27)9-10-23-28(6)15-13-24(31)26(3,4)22(28)12-16-30(23,29)8/h20-25,31H,1,9-18H2,2-8H3/t20-,21+,22-,23+,24-,25+,27+,28-,29+,30+/m0/s1
Chemical Name
Lup-20(29)-en-3-ol, (3-beta)-
Synonyms
NSC 90487Monogynol BLupeol β-ViscolClerodol Fagarasterol Lupenol
HS Tariff Code
2934.99.9001
Storage

Powder      -20°C    3 years

                     4°C     2 years

In solvent   -80°C    6 months

                  -20°C    1 month

Shipping Condition
Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)
Solubility Data
Solubility (In Vitro)
Ethanol : ~14.29 mg/mL (~33.49 mM)
DMSO : ~2 mg/mL (~4.69 mM)
Solubility (In Vivo)
Solubility in Formulation 1: ≥ 1.43 mg/mL (3.35 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% EtOH + 90% Corn Oil (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 14.3 mg/mL clear EtOH + stock solution to 900 μL of corn oil and mix well.

Solubility in Formulation 2: 20 mg/mL (46.87 mM) in Corn Oil (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution; with ultrasonication.

 (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.)
Preparing Stock Solutions 1 mg 5 mg 10 mg
1 mM 2.3434 mL 11.7170 mL 23.4340 mL
5 mM 0.4687 mL 2.3434 mL 4.6868 mL
10 mM 0.2343 mL 1.1717 mL 2.3434 mL

*Note: Please select an appropriate solvent for the preparation of stock solution based on your experiment needs. For most products, DMSO can be used for preparing stock solutions (e.g. 5 mM, 10 mM, or 20 mM concentration); some products with high aqueous solubility may be dissolved in water directly. Solubility information is available at the above Solubility Data section. Once the stock solution is prepared, aliquot it to routine usage volumes and store at -20°C or -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze and thaw cycles.

Calculator

Molarity Calculator allows you to calculate the mass, volume, and/or concentration required for a solution, as detailed below:

  • Calculate the Mass of a compound required to prepare a solution of known volume and concentration
  • Calculate the Volume of solution required to dissolve a compound of known mass to a desired concentration
  • Calculate the Concentration of a solution resulting from a known mass of compound in a specific volume
An example of molarity calculation using the molarity calculator is shown below:
What is the mass of compound required to make a 10 mM stock solution in 5 ml of DMSO given that the molecular weight of the compound is 350.26 g/mol?
  • Enter 350.26 in the Molecular Weight (MW) box
  • Enter 10 in the Concentration box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 5 in the Volume box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 17.513 mg appears in the Mass box. In a similar way, you may calculate the volume and concentration.

Dilution Calculator allows you to calculate how to dilute a stock solution of known concentrations. For example, you may Enter C1, C2 & V2 to calculate V1, as detailed below:

What volume of a given 10 mM stock solution is required to make 25 ml of a 25 μM solution?
Using the equation C1V1 = C2V2, where C1=10 mM, C2=25 μM, V2=25 ml and V1 is the unknown:
  • Enter 10 into the Concentration (Start) box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Concentration (End) box and select the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Volume (End) box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 62.5 μL (0.1 ml) appears in the Volume (Start) box
g/mol

Molecular Weight Calculator allows you to calculate the molar mass and elemental composition of a compound, as detailed below:

Note: Chemical formula is case sensitive: C12H18N3O4  c12h18n3o4
Instructions to calculate molar mass (molecular weight) of a chemical compound:
  • To calculate molar mass of a chemical compound, please enter the chemical/molecular formula and click the “Calculate’ button.
Definitions of molecular mass, molecular weight, molar mass and molar weight:
  • Molecular mass (or molecular weight) is the mass of one molecule of a substance and is expressed in the unified atomic mass units (u). (1 u is equal to 1/12 the mass of one atom of carbon-12)
  • Molar mass (molar weight) is the mass of one mole of a substance and is expressed in g/mol.
/

Reconstitution Calculator allows you to calculate the volume of solvent required to reconstitute your vial.

  • Enter the mass of the reagent and the desired reconstitution concentration as well as the correct units
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer appears in the Volume (to add to vial) box
In vivo Formulation Calculator (Clear solution)
Step 1: Enter information below (Recommended: An additional animal to make allowance for loss during the experiment)
Step 2: Enter in vivo formulation (This is only a calculator, not the exact formulation for a specific product. Please contact us first if there is no in vivo formulation in the solubility section.)
+
+
+

Calculation results

Working concentration mg/mL;

Method for preparing DMSO stock solution mg drug pre-dissolved in μL DMSO (stock solution concentration mg/mL). Please contact us first if the concentration exceeds the DMSO solubility of the batch of drug.

Method for preparing in vivo formulation:Take μL DMSO stock solution, next add μL PEG300, mix and clarify, next addμL Tween 80, mix and clarify, next add μL ddH2O,mix and clarify.

(1) Please be sure that the solution is clear before the addition of next solvent. Dissolution methods like vortex, ultrasound or warming and heat may be used to aid dissolving.
             (2) Be sure to add the solvent(s) in order.

Clinical Trial Information
NCT Number Recruitment interventions Conditions Sponsor/Collaborators Start Date Phases
NCT02205892 COMPLETED Drug: Lupeol
Drug: Placebo vehicle
Acne Seoul National University Hospital 2014-08 Not Applicable
NCT02152865 COMPLETED Drug: Lupeol
Drug: Control vehicle
Acne Seoul National University Hospital 2009-12 Not Applicable
NCT06080841 RECRUITING Dietary Supplement: Curcumin
Dietary Supplement: Curcumin + Piperine
Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer National Institute of Cancerología 2023-04-19 Not Applicable
Biological Data
  • Effect of Lupeol on mRNA and protein expression of PSA in HD- and CRPC cells. (A–C), Histograms and immunoblots represent the effect of Lupeol on the mRNA and protein expression of PSA as determined by real time PCR and immunoblot analysis in HD- and CRPC cells as described under materials and methods. Equal loading of protein was confirmed by stripping the immunoblot and reprobing it for β-actin. The immunoblots shown are representative of three independent experiments. (D–E) Effect of Lupeol on R1881-induced mRNA and protein expression of PSA in ADPC cells as described in materials and methods. Each bar in the histogram represents mean ± SE of three independent experiments, * represents P < 0.05, compared with R1881 treated cells (1 nM); ** represents P < 0.05, compared with control. (F) Effect of Lupeol on secreted levels of PSA in LNCaP and LAPC4 cells. Each bar in the histogram represents mean ± SE of three independent experiments, * represents P < 0.05, compared with control.[1].Siddique HR, et al. Lupeol, a novel androgen receptor inhibitor: implications in prostate cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Aug 15;17(16):5379-91
  • Evaluation of Lupeol-AR binding in silico and in CaP cells. (A) Representative figure shows molecular docking of Lupeol with AR in silico. Lupeol was tested in silico for its ability to bind with the AR using the AutoDock4 modeling program Sybyl (Tripos. Corp, St. Louis, MO). Different domains of the AR are presented in various colors. (Inset) Lupeol bound to the ligand binding domain (LBD) of AR-receptor. (B) Figure represents the putative binding sites in AR-protein. (C) Histogram represents the comparative analysis of binding efficiency of Lupeol with the previously reported chemopreventive agents (EGCG and Fisetin) that inhibit AR activity. (D–E) Histogram shows the binding of Lupeol with AR in LAPC4 (wild-type AR) and LNCaP (mutant-type AR) cells as assessed by radio-labeled cell-based competitive binding assay as described in materials and methods. (F) Representative image shows the AR-DNA binding activity in LNCaP cells. After 48 h of treatment with Lupeol, the cells were harvested, nuclear lysates were prepared and DNA binding was determined by EMSA as described under materials and methods. I, II, and III refer to internal experimental controls, where I represents biotin-EBNA (Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen) control DNA, II represents biotin-EBNA control DNA and EBNA extract, and III represents biotin-EBNA control DNA and EBNA extract plus 200-fold molar excess of EBNA DNA. In control number I, no protein extract for DNA to bind resulted in an unshifted band. In control number II, sufficient target protein leads to DNA-protein binding resulting in shift detected by comparison to band at position I. Control number III demonstrated that the signal shift observed could be prevented by competition from excess unlabelled DNA. Lane number IV represents biotin-AR control DNA without protein extract. The data shown here are representative of three independent experiments with similar results. ns represents non-specific binding.[1].Siddique HR, et al. Lupeol, a novel androgen receptor inhibitor: implications in prostate cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Aug 15;17(16):5379-91
  • Effect of Lupeol (A–B), on AR-occupancy on AR-binding sites in AR responsive genes and (C–D), occupancy of RNA Pol II enzyme on promoter site of PSA. (A) Histogram shows the effect of Lupeol on AR-occupancy in AR-responsive genes PSA, SGK-1, TIPARP and IL6 in LNCaP cells. Cells were treated with the R1881, bicalutamide and Lupeol for 48 h, and were assayed for AR occupancy by employing ChIP assay as described in materials and methods. (B) Histogram shows the effect of Lupeol on AR- occupancy in AR responsive gene PSA in C4-2b cells as assessed by ChIP assay. Cells were treated with Lupeol for 48 h, followed by ChIP assay. (C–D) Histogram shows the effect of Lupeol on the RNA Pol II occupancy on promoter site of PSA in LNCaP and C4-2b cells. Each bar in the histogram represents mean ± SE of three independent experiments, * represents P < 0.05 of three independent experiments, compared with R1881 treated cells (1 nM); ** represents P < 0.05, compared with control.[1].Siddique HR, et al. Lupeol, a novel androgen receptor inhibitor: implications in prostate cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Aug 15;17(16):5379-91
Contact Us