yingweiwo

FAPI-4

Alias: FAPI-04; FAPI 04; FAPI04; FAPI-4; FAPI-4; 2374782-02-0; DOTA-fapi-04; (S)-2,2',2''-(10-(2-(4-(3-((4-((2-(2-cyano-4,4-difluoropyrrolidin-1-yl)-2-oxoethyl)carbamoyl)quinolin-6-yl)oxy)propyl)piperazin-1-yl)-2-oxoethyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7-triyl)triacetic acid; D7X5DKW7N9; FAPI-04; UNII-D7X5DKW7N9; SCHEMBL21257058; FAPI 4; FAPI4;
Cat No.:V56654 Purity: ≥98%
FAPI-4 is a quinoline-based theranostic ligand targeting fibroblast activating protein.
FAPI-4
FAPI-4 Chemical Structure CAS No.: 2374782-02-0
Product category: Others 11
This product is for research use only, not for human use. We do not sell to patients.
Size Price Stock Qty
1mg
5mg
10mg
50mg
Other Sizes
Official Supplier of:
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text

 

  • Business Relationship with 5000+ Clients Globally
  • Major Universities, Research Institutions, Biotech & Pharma
  • Citations by Top Journals: Nature, Cell, Science, etc.
Top Publications Citing lnvivochem Products
Product Description
FAPI-4 is a quinoline-based theranostic ligand targeting fibroblast activating protein. FAPI-4 is considered the most promising tracer for clinical application. Compared with previously published ligands, FAPI-4 displays excellent stability in human serum, higher affinity for FAP compared with CD26, and slower in vitro excretion. FAPI-4 represents a promising tracer for diagnostic imaging and possibly targeted therapy in malignancies with high content of activated fibroblasts, such as breast cancer.
Biological Activity I Assay Protocols (From Reference)
Targets
FAP (fibroblast activation protein)
ln Vitro
Chemical Modification of the FAPI Framework Resulting in Increased FAP Binding In Vitro.[2]
To determine the FAP-binding affinities of the radiotracers (Supplemental Table 1), radioligand binding assays were performed using human FAP-expressing HT-1080 cells. To compensate for varying rates of FAP expression and allow a direct comparison with the lead structure, all experiments were conducted in parallel with FAPI-04. All compounds demonstrated robust binding to human FAP, with binding values equal to or higher than those of FAPI-04 after 1 and 4 h of incubation (Fig. 1). Internalization rates were comparable to those of FAPI-04 for all compounds except for FAPI-38 (63.1% internalized after 24 h; FAPI-04, 97.1%; Supplemental Table 2). Although most derivatives revealed higher binding values after 24 h than for FAPI-04, the compounds FAPI-38, -39, -40, and -41 were eliminated significantly faster from FAP-expressing cells and were, therefore, not considered for a more detailed characterization. Similar to FAPI-04, all compounds demonstrated negligibly low binding to the structurally related membrane protein CD26 (data not shown).
ln Vivo
FAPI-4 (intravenous injection; 30 nmol per mouse; once) exhibits excellent tumor food effects in BALB/c nu/nu mice [2].
Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is overexpressed in cancer-associated fibroblasts of several tumor entities. The recent development of quinoline-based PET tracers that act as FAP inhibitors (FAPIs) demonstrated promising results preclinically and already in a few clinical cases. Consequently, these tracers are now applied in our hospital to amend the diagnostics of cancer patients facing the limitations of standard examinations. Here, we analyze the tissue biodistribution and preliminary dosimetry of 2 members of this new class of PET radiopharmaceutical. Methods: A preliminary dosimetry estimate for 68Ga-FAPI-2 and 68Ga-FAPI-4 was based on 2 patients examined at 0.2, 1, and 3 h after tracer injection using the QDOSE dosimetry software suit. Further PET/CT scans of tumor patients were acquired 1 h after injection of either 68Ga-FAPI-2 (n = 25) or 68Ga-FAPI-4 (n = 25); for 6 patients an intraindividual related 18F-FDG scan (also acquired 1 h after injection) was available. For the normal tissue of 16 organs, a 2-cm spheric volume of interest was placed in the parenchyma; for tumor lesions, a threshold-segmented volume of interest was used to quantify SUVmean and SUVmax. Results: Similar to literature values for 18F-FDG, 68Ga-DOTATATE, and 68Ga-PSMA-11, an examination with 200 MBq of 68Ga-FAPI-2 or 68Ga-FAPI-4 corresponds to an equivalent dose of approximately 3–4 mSv. After a fast clearance via the kidneys, the normal organs showed a low tracer uptake with only minimal changes between 10 min and 3 h after injection. In 68Ga-FAPI-2, the tumor uptake from 1 to 3 h after injection decreased by 75%, whereas the tumor retention was prolonged with 68Ga-FAPI-4 (25% washout). Regarding tumor-to-background ratios, at 1 h after injection both 68Ga-FAPI tracers performed equally. In comparison to 18F-FDG, the tumor uptake was almost equal (average SUVmax, 7.41 for 18F-FDG and 7.37 for 68Ga-FAPI-2; not statistically significant); the background uptake in brain (11.01 vs. 0.32), liver (2.77 vs. 1.69), and oral/pharyngeal mucosa (4.88 vs. 2.57) was significantly lower with 68Ga-FAPI. Other organs did not relevantly differ between 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI. Conclusion: FAPI PET/CT is a new diagnostic method in imaging cancer patients. In contrast to 18F-FDG, no diet or fasting in preparation for the examination is necessary, and image acquisition can potentially be started a few minutes after tracer application. Tumor-to-background contrast ratios were equal to or even better than those of 18F-FDG.[1]
Cell Assay
Cell Culture[2]
HT-1080 cells transfected with the human FAP gene, as well as murine FAP- and CD26-transfected human embryonic kidney cells, were cultivated in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium containing 10% fetal calf serum at 37°C/5% carbon dioxide. For radioligand binding studies, cells were seeded in 6-well plates and cultivated for 48 h to a final confluence of about 80%–90% (1.2–2 million cells per well). The medium was replaced by 1 mL of fresh medium without fetal calf serum. The radiolabeled compound was added to the cell culture and incubated for different intervals ranging from 10 min to 24 h. Competition experiments were performed by simultaneous exposure to unlabeled (10−5 to 10−10 M) and radiolabeled compound for 60 min. Cell efflux was determined after incubation of the cells with the tracer for 60 min. Thereafter, the radioactive medium was removed, and the cells were washed and incubated with nonradioactive medium for 1, 2, 4, and 24 h. In all experiments, the cells were washed twice with 1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, and subsequently lysed with 1.4 mL of lysis buffer (0.3 m NaOH, 0.2% sodium dodecyl sulfate). Radioactivity was determined in a γ-counter, normalized to 1 million cells, and calculated as percentage applied dose. Each experiment was performed 3 times, and 3 repetitions per independent experiment were acquired.
Animal Protocol
Animal/Disease Models: 8weeks old BALB/c nu/nu (nude) mice were inoculated with HT-1080-FAP cells [2].
Doses: 30 nmol per mouse.
Route of Administration: intravenous (iv) (iv)injection; 30 nmol per mouse; one time.
Experimental Results: Display demonstrated higher overall tumor uptake (9.44% ID/g 4 hrs (hrs (hours)) after injection).
ADME/Pharmacokinetics
Improvement of Pharmacokinetics and Image Contrast for PET[2]
To assess a potential increase in tumor retention and to evaluate their pharmacokinetic behavior, the most promising candidates were analyzed in vivo. To this end, small-animal PET imaging was performed on HT-1080-FAP xenografted mice. All compounds demonstrated rapid tumor accumulation with overall low background activity and predominantly renal elimination (Supplemental Fig. 4). Tumor uptake was highest for FAPI-55 (SUVmax of 1.8 after 60 min and 1.7 after 120 min), followed by FAPI-36 (1.5 after 60 min and 1.3 after 120 min) and FAPI-21 (1.3 after both 60 and 120 min) (Fig. 2, Supplemental Fig. 5). Because the absolute uptake values allow only a limited comparison of the radiotracers, AUCs were calculated from the time–activity curves, representing the accumulated radioactivity within the interval up to 2 h after injection. As shown in Table 1, 7 of 10 compounds demonstrated higher tumor uptake than that for FAPI-04, headed by FAPI-21, -36, -46, and -55. Yet, FAPI-36 showed a prolonged systemic circulation, resulting in unfavorable tumor-to-blood ratios and a poorer image contrast than that for FAPI-04 (Supplemental Fig. 4). Although the tumor-to-blood and tumor-to-liver ratios for FAPI-35 were comparable to those for FAPI-04, the tumor-to-muscle ratio was slightly improved (Fig. 3). FAPI-21 and -55 demonstrated higher accumulation in liver and muscle tissue than did FAPI-04. From all tested compounds, FAPI-46 displayed the highest tumor-to-blood, tumor-to-muscle, and tumor-to-liver ratios.
On the basis of the observations in the imaging studies, FAPI-21, -35, -46, and -55 were selected for a more detailed characterization in biodistribution studies using 177Lu-labeled radiotracers. As shown in Figure 4, all compounds demonstrated robust tumor accumulation with overall low uptake into healthy tissue. Moderate radioactivity (1.8–3.5 %ID/g 1 h after injection) was measured only in the kidneys, because of the predominantly renal elimination of the radiotracers, with activity mostly in the renal calyx system. In comparison to FAPI-04, FAPI-21 and -46 demonstrated higher tumor accumulation 1 and 4 h after injection. Although all other compounds displayed their highest intratumoral radioactivity 1 h after injection, tumor uptake was increasing even from 1 to 4 h for FAPI-21. In addition, FAPI-21 revealed the highest tumor retention 24 h after injection (6.03 ± 0.68 %ID/g), followed by FAPI-35 (2.47 ± 0.23 %ID/g) and -46 (2.29 ± 0.16 %ID/g), featuring uptake rates similar to FAPI-04 (2.86 ± 0.31 %ID/g). Accordingly, 64% of the maximum tumor activity was still present 24 h after injection for FAPI-21, followed by FAPI-35 (37%), FAPI-46, and FAPI-55 (almost 20% each). In comparison to FAPI-04, radioactivity levels in the blood were equal or marginally higher at all specified times, except for FAPI-55, which demonstrated the highest blood activities of all compounds up to 6 h after injection. However, blood activity was decreasing steadily, reaching values similar to FAPI-04 after 24 h. All derivatives demonstrated an increased liver uptake as compared with FAPI-04, except for FAPI-46, which displayed comparable activities up to 6 h after injection but narrowed to lower levels in the course of 24 h. The renal activity of the compounds was comparable for FAPI-04, -21, and -35 but significantly reduced for FAPI-46 and -55 at all specified times. A comparison of AUCs, determined from the time–activity curves from 1 to 24 h after injection, revealed the highest overall tumor uptake to be for FAPI-21, followed by FAPI-46 (Table 2). A calculation of tumor-to-organ ratios, based on the overall AUCs, evinced a general improvement in pharmacokinetics for FAPI-21 and -46 and no considerable change for any of the other radiotracers, except for FAPI-35 (Fig. 5, Supplemental Table 3). Notably, FAPI-46 displayed substantially improved ratios of tumor to liver, kidney, and brain uptake.[2]
Biodistribution[1]
The 2 patients examined 10 min to 3 h after injection demonstrated that both FAPI tracers rapidly reached their stable physiologic biodistribution. In normal tissue, changes between 10 min and 3 h after injection were minimal. Tumor uptake declined by a mean of 75% from 1 h to 3 h after injection using 68Ga-FAPI-2; less washout, only 25% (mean), between 1 h and 3 h after injection (i.e., longer tumor retention) was observed with 68Ga-FAPI-4 (Fig. 2, bottom). However, at 1 h after injection (the time point also chosen for comparison to 18F-FDG), both 68Ga-FAPI tracers performed equally with regard to tumor-to-background ratios.[1]
The quantitative tumor uptake of FAPI PET was similar to that of the current oncologic PET standard of reference, 18F-FDG (average SUVmax, 7.41 for 18F-FDG and 7.37 for 68Ga-FAPI-2; not statistically significant). In pancreatic, esophageal, lung, head and neck, and colorectal cancer, the quantitative tumor uptake was noninferior to that of 18F-FDG. In contrast, dedifferentiated thyroid cancer with flip-flop uptake of 18F-FDG was not accumulating 68Ga-FAPI (Fig. 3). Regarding background activity, the average SUVmax of 68Ga-FAPI-2 was significantly lower in brain (0.32 vs. 11.01), liver (1.69 vs. 2.77), and oral/pharyngeal mucosa (2.57 vs. 4.88), thus improving the contrast ratios for liver metastases of pancreatic and colorectal cancer and delineation of the esophageal cancer (Fig. 3). For all other organs, 68Ga-FAPI-2 presented no significant difference from 18F-FDG (Fig. 4A).
References

[1]. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: Biodistribution and Preliminary Dosimetry Estimate of 2 DOTA-Containing FAP-Targeting Agents in Patients with Various Cancers. J Nucl Med. 2019 Mar;60(3):386-392.

[2]. Development of Fibroblast Activation Protein-Targeted Radiotracers with Improved Tumor Retention. J Nucl Med. 2019 Oct;60(10):1421-1429.

Additional Infomation
Cancer-associated fibroblasts constitute a vital subpopulation of the tumor stroma and are present in more than 90% of epithelial carcinomas. The overexpression of the serine protease fibroblast activation protein (FAP) allows a selective targeting of a variety of tumors by inhibitor-based radiopharmaceuticals (FAPIs). Of these compounds, FAPI-04 has been recently introduced as a theranostic radiotracer and demonstrated high uptake into different FAP-positive tumors in cancer patients. To enable the delivery of higher doses, thereby improving the outcome of a therapeutic application, several FAPI variants were designed to further increase tumor uptake and retention of these tracers. Methods: Novel quinoline-based radiotracers were synthesized by organic chemistry and evaluated in radioligand binding assays using FAP-expressing HT-1080 cells. Depending on their in vitro performance, small-animal PET imaging and biodistribution studies were performed on HT-1080-FAP tumor-bearing mice. The most promising compounds were used for clinical PET imaging in 8 cancer patients. Results: Compared with FAPI-04, 11 of 15 FAPI derivatives showed improved FAP binding in vitro. Of these, 7 compounds demonstrated increased tumor uptake in tumor-bearing mice. Moreover, tumor-to-normal-organ ratios were improved for most of the compounds, resulting in images with higher contrast. Notably two of the radiotracers, FAPI-21 and -46, displayed substantially improved ratios of tumor to blood, liver, muscle, and intestinal uptake. A first diagnostic application in cancer patients revealed high intratumoral uptake of both radiotracers already 10 min after administration but a higher uptake in oral mucosa, salivary glands, and thyroid for FAPI-21. Conclusion: Chemical modification of the FAPI framework enabled enhanced FAP binding and improved pharmacokinetics in most of the derivatives, resulting in high-contrast images. Moreover, higher doses of radioactivity can be delivered while minimizing damage to healthy tissue, which may improve therapeutic outcome.[2]
These protocols are for reference only. InvivoChem does not independently validate these methods.
Physicochemical Properties
Molecular Formula
C40H54F2N10O10
Molecular Weight
872.93
Exact Mass
872.4
Elemental Analysis
C, 55.04; H, 6.24; F, 4.35; N, 16.05; O, 18.33
CAS #
2374782-02-0
PubChem CID
138454803
Appearance
White to off-white solid powder
Density
1.46±0.1 g/cm3(Predicted)
Boiling Point
1144.1±65.0 °C(Predicted)
LogP
-6.8
Hydrogen Bond Donor Count
4
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count
19
Rotatable Bond Count
16
Heavy Atom Count
62
Complexity
1580
Defined Atom Stereocenter Count
1
SMILES
FC1(C([H])([H])N(C(C([H])([H])N([H])C(C2C([H])=C([H])N=C3C([H])=C([H])C(=C([H])C=23)OC([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])N2C([H])([H])C([H])([H])N(C(C([H])([H])N3C([H])([H])C([H])([H])N(C([H])([H])C(=O)O[H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])N(C([H])([H])C(=O)O[H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])N(C([H])([H])C(=O)O[H])C([H])([H])C3([H])[H])=O)C([H])([H])C2([H])[H])=O)=O)[C@]([H])(C#N)C1([H])[H])F
InChi Key
ICWDAESAANBIGG-LJAQVGFWSA-N
InChi Code
InChI=1S/C40H54F2N10O10/c41-40(42)21-29(22-43)52(28-40)34(53)23-45-39(61)31-4-5-44-33-3-2-30(20-32(31)33)62-19-1-6-46-15-17-51(18-16-46)35(54)24-47-7-9-48(25-36(55)56)11-13-50(27-38(59)60)14-12-49(10-8-47)26-37(57)58/h2-5,20,29H,1,6-19,21,23-28H2,(H,45,61)(H,55,56)(H,57,58)(H,59,60)/t29-/m0/s1
Chemical Name
(S)-2,2',2''-(10-(2-(4-(3-((4-((2-(2-cyano-4,4-difluoropyrrolidin-1-yl)-2-oxoethyl)carbamoyl)quinolin-6-yl)oxy)propyl)piperazin-1-yl)-2-oxoethyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7-triyl)triacetic acid
Synonyms
FAPI-04; FAPI 04; FAPI04; FAPI-4; FAPI-4; 2374782-02-0; DOTA-fapi-04; (S)-2,2',2''-(10-(2-(4-(3-((4-((2-(2-cyano-4,4-difluoropyrrolidin-1-yl)-2-oxoethyl)carbamoyl)quinolin-6-yl)oxy)propyl)piperazin-1-yl)-2-oxoethyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7-triyl)triacetic acid; D7X5DKW7N9; FAPI-04; UNII-D7X5DKW7N9; SCHEMBL21257058; FAPI 4; FAPI4;
HS Tariff Code
2934.99.9001
Storage

Powder      -20°C    3 years

                     4°C     2 years

In solvent   -80°C    6 months

                  -20°C    1 month

Note: Please store this product in a sealed and protected environment (e.g. under nitrogen), avoid exposure to moisture.
Shipping Condition
Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)
Solubility Data
Solubility (In Vitro)
DMSO : ~100 mg/mL (~114.56 mM)
Solubility (In Vivo)
Solubility in Formulation 1: ≥ 2.5 mg/mL (2.86 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO + 40% PEG300 + 5% Tween80 + 45% Saline (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 25.0 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 400 μL PEG300 and mix evenly; then add 50 μL Tween-80 to the above solution and mix evenly; then add 450 μL normal saline to adjust the volume to 1 mL.
Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH₂ O to obtain a clear solution.

Solubility in Formulation 2: ≥ 2.5 mg/mL (2.86 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO + 90% (20% SBE-β-CD in Saline) (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 25.0 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 900 μL of 20% SBE-β-CD physiological saline solution and mix evenly.
Preparation of 20% SBE-β-CD in Saline (4°C,1 week): Dissolve 2 g SBE-β-CD in 10 mL saline to obtain a clear solution.

View More

Solubility in Formulation 3: ≥ 2.5 mg/mL (2.86 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO + 90% Corn Oil (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 25.0 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 900 μL of corn oil and mix evenly.


Solubility in Formulation 4: 4 mg/mL (4.58 mM) in Saline (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution; with ultrasonication.
Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH₂ O to obtain a clear solution.

 (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.)
Preparing Stock Solutions 1 mg 5 mg 10 mg
1 mM 1.1456 mL 5.7278 mL 11.4557 mL
5 mM 0.2291 mL 1.1456 mL 2.2911 mL
10 mM 0.1146 mL 0.5728 mL 1.1456 mL

*Note: Please select an appropriate solvent for the preparation of stock solution based on your experiment needs. For most products, DMSO can be used for preparing stock solutions (e.g. 5 mM, 10 mM, or 20 mM concentration); some products with high aqueous solubility may be dissolved in water directly. Solubility information is available at the above Solubility Data section. Once the stock solution is prepared, aliquot it to routine usage volumes and store at -20°C or -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze and thaw cycles.

Calculator

Molarity Calculator allows you to calculate the mass, volume, and/or concentration required for a solution, as detailed below:

  • Calculate the Mass of a compound required to prepare a solution of known volume and concentration
  • Calculate the Volume of solution required to dissolve a compound of known mass to a desired concentration
  • Calculate the Concentration of a solution resulting from a known mass of compound in a specific volume
An example of molarity calculation using the molarity calculator is shown below:
What is the mass of compound required to make a 10 mM stock solution in 5 ml of DMSO given that the molecular weight of the compound is 350.26 g/mol?
  • Enter 350.26 in the Molecular Weight (MW) box
  • Enter 10 in the Concentration box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 5 in the Volume box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 17.513 mg appears in the Mass box. In a similar way, you may calculate the volume and concentration.

Dilution Calculator allows you to calculate how to dilute a stock solution of known concentrations. For example, you may Enter C1, C2 & V2 to calculate V1, as detailed below:

What volume of a given 10 mM stock solution is required to make 25 ml of a 25 μM solution?
Using the equation C1V1 = C2V2, where C1=10 mM, C2=25 μM, V2=25 ml and V1 is the unknown:
  • Enter 10 into the Concentration (Start) box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Concentration (End) box and select the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Volume (End) box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 62.5 μL (0.1 ml) appears in the Volume (Start) box
g/mol

Molecular Weight Calculator allows you to calculate the molar mass and elemental composition of a compound, as detailed below:

Note: Chemical formula is case sensitive: C12H18N3O4  c12h18n3o4
Instructions to calculate molar mass (molecular weight) of a chemical compound:
  • To calculate molar mass of a chemical compound, please enter the chemical/molecular formula and click the “Calculate’ button.
Definitions of molecular mass, molecular weight, molar mass and molar weight:
  • Molecular mass (or molecular weight) is the mass of one molecule of a substance and is expressed in the unified atomic mass units (u). (1 u is equal to 1/12 the mass of one atom of carbon-12)
  • Molar mass (molar weight) is the mass of one mole of a substance and is expressed in g/mol.
/

Reconstitution Calculator allows you to calculate the volume of solvent required to reconstitute your vial.

  • Enter the mass of the reagent and the desired reconstitution concentration as well as the correct units
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer appears in the Volume (to add to vial) box
In vivo Formulation Calculator (Clear solution)
Step 1: Enter information below (Recommended: An additional animal to make allowance for loss during the experiment)
Step 2: Enter in vivo formulation (This is only a calculator, not the exact formulation for a specific product. Please contact us first if there is no in vivo formulation in the solubility section.)
+
+
+

Calculation results

Working concentration mg/mL;

Method for preparing DMSO stock solution mg drug pre-dissolved in μL DMSO (stock solution concentration mg/mL). Please contact us first if the concentration exceeds the DMSO solubility of the batch of drug.

Method for preparing in vivo formulation:Take μL DMSO stock solution, next add μL PEG300, mix and clarify, next addμL Tween 80, mix and clarify, next add μL ddH2O,mix and clarify.

(1) Please be sure that the solution is clear before the addition of next solvent. Dissolution methods like vortex, ultrasound or warming and heat may be used to aid dissolving.
             (2) Be sure to add the solvent(s) in order.

Contact Us