yingweiwo

FAPI-4

Alias: FAPI-04; FAPI 04; FAPI04; FAPI-4; FAPI-4; 2374782-02-0; DOTA-fapi-04; (S)-2,2',2''-(10-(2-(4-(3-((4-((2-(2-cyano-4,4-difluoropyrrolidin-1-yl)-2-oxoethyl)carbamoyl)quinolin-6-yl)oxy)propyl)piperazin-1-yl)-2-oxoethyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7-triyl)triacetic acid; D7X5DKW7N9; FAPI-04; UNII-D7X5DKW7N9; SCHEMBL21257058; FAPI 4; FAPI4;
Cat No.:V56654 Purity: ≥98%
FAPI-4 is a quinoline-based theranostic ligand targeting fibroblast activating protein.
FAPI-4
FAPI-4 Chemical Structure CAS No.: 2374782-02-0
Product category: Others 11
This product is for research use only, not for human use. We do not sell to patients.
Size Price Stock Qty
1mg
5mg
10mg
50mg
Other Sizes
Official Supplier of:
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text

 

  • Business Relationship with 5000+ Clients Globally
  • Major Universities, Research Institutions, Biotech & Pharma
  • Citations by Top Journals: Nature, Cell, Science, etc.
Top Publications Citing lnvivochem Products
Product Description
FAPI-4 is a quinoline-based theranostic ligand targeting fibroblast activating protein. FAPI-4 is considered the most promising tracer for clinical application. Compared with previously published ligands, FAPI-4 displays excellent stability in human serum, higher affinity for FAP compared with CD26, and slower in vitro excretion. FAPI-4 represents a promising tracer for diagnostic imaging and possibly targeted therapy in malignancies with high content of activated fibroblasts, such as breast cancer.
Biological Activity I Assay Protocols (From Reference)
Targets
FAP (fibroblast activation protein)
ln Vitro
Chemical Modification of the FAPI Framework Resulting in Increased FAP Binding In Vitro.[2]
To determine the FAP-binding affinities of the radiotracers (Supplemental Table 1), radioligand binding assays were performed using human FAP-expressing HT-1080 cells. To compensate for varying rates of FAP expression and allow a direct comparison with the lead structure, all experiments were conducted in parallel with FAPI-04. All compounds demonstrated robust binding to human FAP, with binding values equal to or higher than those of FAPI-04 after 1 and 4 h of incubation (Fig. 1). Internalization rates were comparable to those of FAPI-04 for all compounds except for FAPI-38 (63.1% internalized after 24 h; FAPI-04, 97.1%; Supplemental Table 2). Although most derivatives revealed higher binding values after 24 h than for FAPI-04, the compounds FAPI-38, -39, -40, and -41 were eliminated significantly faster from FAP-expressing cells and were, therefore, not considered for a more detailed characterization. Similar to FAPI-04, all compounds demonstrated negligibly low binding to the structurally related membrane protein CD26 (data not shown).
ln Vivo
FAPI-4 (intravenous injection; 30 nmol per mouse; once) exhibits excellent tumor food effects in BALB/c nu/nu mice [2].
Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is overexpressed in cancer-associated fibroblasts of several tumor entities. The recent development of quinoline-based PET tracers that act as FAP inhibitors (FAPIs) demonstrated promising results preclinically and already in a few clinical cases. Consequently, these tracers are now applied in our hospital to amend the diagnostics of cancer patients facing the limitations of standard examinations. Here, we analyze the tissue biodistribution and preliminary dosimetry of 2 members of this new class of PET radiopharmaceutical. Methods: A preliminary dosimetry estimate for 68Ga-FAPI-2 and 68Ga-FAPI-4 was based on 2 patients examined at 0.2, 1, and 3 h after tracer injection using the QDOSE dosimetry software suit. Further PET/CT scans of tumor patients were acquired 1 h after injection of either 68Ga-FAPI-2 (n = 25) or 68Ga-FAPI-4 (n = 25); for 6 patients an intraindividual related 18F-FDG scan (also acquired 1 h after injection) was available. For the normal tissue of 16 organs, a 2-cm spheric volume of interest was placed in the parenchyma; for tumor lesions, a threshold-segmented volume of interest was used to quantify SUVmean and SUVmax. Results: Similar to literature values for 18F-FDG, 68Ga-DOTATATE, and 68Ga-PSMA-11, an examination with 200 MBq of 68Ga-FAPI-2 or 68Ga-FAPI-4 corresponds to an equivalent dose of approximately 3–4 mSv. After a fast clearance via the kidneys, the normal organs showed a low tracer uptake with only minimal changes between 10 min and 3 h after injection. In 68Ga-FAPI-2, the tumor uptake from 1 to 3 h after injection decreased by 75%, whereas the tumor retention was prolonged with 68Ga-FAPI-4 (25% washout). Regarding tumor-to-background ratios, at 1 h after injection both 68Ga-FAPI tracers performed equally. In comparison to 18F-FDG, the tumor uptake was almost equal (average SUVmax, 7.41 for 18F-FDG and 7.37 for 68Ga-FAPI-2; not statistically significant); the background uptake in brain (11.01 vs. 0.32), liver (2.77 vs. 1.69), and oral/pharyngeal mucosa (4.88 vs. 2.57) was significantly lower with 68Ga-FAPI. Other organs did not relevantly differ between 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI. Conclusion: FAPI PET/CT is a new diagnostic method in imaging cancer patients. In contrast to 18F-FDG, no diet or fasting in preparation for the examination is necessary, and image acquisition can potentially be started a few minutes after tracer application. Tumor-to-background contrast ratios were equal to or even better than those of 18F-FDG.[1]
Cell Assay
Cell Culture[2]
HT-1080 cells transfected with the human FAP gene, as well as murine FAP- and CD26-transfected human embryonic kidney cells, were cultivated in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium containing 10% fetal calf serum at 37°C/5% carbon dioxide. For radioligand binding studies, cells were seeded in 6-well plates and cultivated for 48 h to a final confluence of about 80%–90% (1.2–2 million cells per well). The medium was replaced by 1 mL of fresh medium without fetal calf serum. The radiolabeled compound was added to the cell culture and incubated for different intervals ranging from 10 min to 24 h. Competition experiments were performed by simultaneous exposure to unlabeled (10−5 to 10−10 M) and radiolabeled compound for 60 min. Cell efflux was determined after incubation of the cells with the tracer for 60 min. Thereafter, the radioactive medium was removed, and the cells were washed and incubated with nonradioactive medium for 1, 2, 4, and 24 h. In all experiments, the cells were washed twice with 1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, and subsequently lysed with 1.4 mL of lysis buffer (0.3 m NaOH, 0.2% sodium dodecyl sulfate). Radioactivity was determined in a γ-counter, normalized to 1 million cells, and calculated as percentage applied dose. Each experiment was performed 3 times, and 3 repetitions per independent experiment were acquired.
Animal Protocol
Animal/Disease Models: 8weeks old BALB/c nu/nu (nude) mice were inoculated with HT-1080-FAP cells [2].
Doses: 30 nmol per mouse.
Route of Administration: intravenous (iv) (iv)injection; 30 nmol per mouse; one time.
Experimental Results: Display demonstrated higher overall tumor uptake (9.44% ID/g 4 hrs (hrs (hours)) after injection).
ADME/Pharmacokinetics
Improving Pharmacokinetics and Image Contrast in PET [2]
To assess the potential for increased tumor retention and its pharmacokinetic behavior, we performed in vivo analyses of the most promising candidates. For this purpose, we performed small animal PET imaging on HT-1080-FAP xenograft mice. All compounds showed rapid tumor accumulation with low overall background activity and were primarily excreted via the kidneys (Supplementary Fig. 4). FAPI-55 showed the highest tumor uptake (SUVmax 1.8 at 60 min and 1.7 at 120 min), followed by FAPI-36 (1.5 at 60 min and 1.3 at 120 min) and FAPI-21 (1.3 at both 60 min and 120 min) (Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 5). Since the absolute uptake values are limited for comparison with radiotracers, AUC values were calculated based on the time-activity curve, representing the accumulated radioactivity within 2 hours after injection. As shown in Table 1, 7 out of the 10 compounds showed higher tumor uptake than FAPI-04, with FAPI-21, -36, -46, and -55 exhibiting the highest uptake. However, FAPI-36 had a longer systemic circulation time, resulting in an unfavorable tumor/blood ratio and lower image contrast than FAPI-04 (Supplementary Figure 4). Although FAPI-35's tumor/blood and tumor/liver ratios were comparable to FAPI-04, its tumor/muscle ratio was slightly improved (Figure 3). FAPI-21 and -55 accumulated more in liver and muscle tissues than FAPI-04. Among all tested compounds, FAPI-46 had the highest tumor/blood, tumor/muscle, and tumor/liver ratios. Based on observations from imaging studies, we selected FAPI-21, -35, -46, and -55 for more detailed biodistribution studies using 177Lu-labeled radiotracers. As shown in Figure 4, all compounds exhibited significant tumor accumulation, while overall uptake in healthy tissues was lower. Because the radiotracers are primarily cleared by the kidneys, and their activity is concentrated mainly in the renal calyces, only moderate radioactivity was detected in the kidneys (1.8–3.5 %ID/g at 1 hour post-injection). Compared to FAPI-04, FAPI-21 and -46 showed higher tumor accumulation at 1 and 4 hours post-injection. Although all other compounds showed the highest intratumoral radioactivity at 1 hour post-injection, tumor uptake of FAPI-21 continued to increase from 1 to 4 hours post-injection. Furthermore, FAPI-21 had the highest tumor retention rate at 24 hours post-injection (6.03 ± 0.68 %ID/g), followed by FAPI-35 (2.47 ± 0.23 %ID/g) and FAPI-46 (2.29 ± 0.16 %ID/g), whose uptake rates were similar to those of FAPI-04 (2.86 ± 0.31 %ID/g). Correspondingly, FAPI-21 retained 64% of its maximum tumor activity 24 hours post-injection, followed by FAPI-35 (37%), FAPI-46, and FAPI-55 (all close to 20%). Compared to FAPI-04, all compounds except FAPI-55 showed equal or slightly higher blood radioactivity levels at all specified time points. FAPI-55 exhibited the highest blood radioactivity within 6 hours post-injection, but subsequently declined gradually, reaching a level similar to FAPI-04 after 24 hours. Except for FAPI-46, all derivatives showed higher hepatic uptake than FAPI-04. FAPI-46 showed comparable activity to FAPI-04 within 6 hours post-injection, but its activity gradually decreased over 24 hours. Renal activity was comparable for FAPI-04, -21, and -35, while renal activity was significantly reduced for FAPI-46 and -55 at all specified time points. Comparison of AUC calculated from time-activity curves from 1 to 24 hours post-injection showed that FAPI-21 had the highest overall tumor uptake, followed by FAPI-46 (Table 2). The tumor/organ ratios calculated based on the overall AUC indicated that the pharmacokinetics of FAPI-21 and FAPI-46 were generally improved, with no significant changes in other radiotracers except for FAPI-35 (Figure 5, Supplementary Table 3). Notably, FAPI-46 showed significantly increased tumor/liver, kidney, and brain uptake ratios. [2]
Biodistribution[1]
Two patients were examined 10 minutes to 3 hours post-injection, and the results showed that both FAPI tracers rapidly reached stable physiological biodistribution. In normal tissues, changes were minimal from 10 minutes to 3 hours post-injection. When using 68Ga-FAPI-2, tumor uptake decreased by an average of 75% over 1 to 3 hours post-injection; clearance of 68Ga-FAPI-4 was lower, averaging only 25% (i.e., longer tumor retention time) compared to 1 to 3 hours post-injection (Figure 2, bottom). However, at 1 hour post-injection (which was also used for comparison with 18F-FDG), the two 68Ga-FAPI tracers were comparable in terms of tumor/background ratio. [1] The quantitative tumor uptake of FAPI PET was similar to that of 18F-FDG, the current reference standard for tumor PET (mean SUVmax was 7.41 for 18F-FDG and 7.37 for 68Ga-FAPI-2; the difference was not statistically significant). In pancreatic cancer, esophageal cancer, lung cancer, head and neck cancer, and colorectal cancer, quantitative tumor uptake was non-inferior to 18F-FDG. Conversely, dedifferentiated thyroid carcinomas exhibiting a reversal in 18F-FDG uptake did not accumulate 68Ga-FAPI (Figure 3). Regarding background activity, 68Ga-FAPI-2 showed significantly reduced mean SUVmax in the brain (0.32 vs. 11.01), liver (1.69 vs. 2.77), and oral/pharyngeal mucosa (2.57 vs. 4.88), thereby improving the contrast of pancreatic and colorectal cancer liver metastases and the imaging clarity of esophageal cancer (Figure 3). For all other organs, there was no significant difference between 68Ga-FAPI-2 and 18F-FDG (Figure 4A).
References

[1]. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: Biodistribution and Preliminary Dosimetry Estimate of 2 DOTA-Containing FAP-Targeting Agents in Patients with Various Cancers. J Nucl Med. 2019 Mar;60(3):386-392.

[2]. Development of Fibroblast Activation Protein-Targeted Radiotracers with Improved Tumor Retention. J Nucl Med. 2019 Oct;60(10):1421-1429.

Additional Infomation
Cancer-associated fibroblasts are an important component of the tumor stroma, present in over 90% of epithelial carcinomas. Overexpression of the serine protease fibroblast activating protein (FAP) enables inhibitor-based radiopharmaceuticals (FAPIs) to selectively target a variety of tumors. Among these compounds, FAPI-04 has recently been introduced as a therapeutic radiotracer and has demonstrated high uptake rates in various FAP-positive tumors in cancer patients. To achieve higher dose delivery and thus improve therapeutic efficacy, researchers designed several FAPI variants to further enhance the uptake and retention of these tracers in tumors. Methods: Novel quinoline-based radiotracers were synthesized using organic chemical methods, and radioligand binding assays were performed using HT-1080 cells expressing FAP. Based on their in vitro performance, small animal PET imaging and biodistribution studies were conducted on mice bearing HT-1080-FAP tumors. The most promising compounds were used for clinical PET imaging in 8 cancer patients. Results: Compared with FAPI-04, 11 of the 15 FAPI derivatives showed higher FAP binding capacity in vitro. Of these, seven compounds showed higher tumor uptake in tumor-bearing mice. In addition, most compounds showed increased tumor/normal organ uptake ratios, resulting in higher contrast images. Notably, the tumor/blood, liver, muscle, and intestinal uptake ratios of the two radiotracers, FAPI-21 and FAPI-46, were significantly increased. In first-time diagnostic applications in cancer patients, both radiotracers showed high intratumoral uptake within 10 minutes of administration, but FAPI-21 showed higher uptake in the oral mucosa, salivary glands, and thyroid gland. Conclusion: Chemical modification of the FAPI backbone enhances the FAP binding capacity and pharmacokinetic properties of most derivatives, resulting in high-contrast images. Furthermore, higher doses of radioactive material can be delivered with minimal damage to healthy tissues, which may improve therapeutic efficacy. [2]
These protocols are for reference only. InvivoChem does not independently validate these methods.
Physicochemical Properties
Molecular Formula
C40H54F2N10O10
Molecular Weight
872.93
Exact Mass
872.4
Elemental Analysis
C, 55.04; H, 6.24; F, 4.35; N, 16.05; O, 18.33
CAS #
2374782-02-0
PubChem CID
138454803
Appearance
White to off-white solid powder
Density
1.46±0.1 g/cm3(Predicted)
Boiling Point
1144.1±65.0 °C(Predicted)
LogP
-6.8
Hydrogen Bond Donor Count
4
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count
19
Rotatable Bond Count
16
Heavy Atom Count
62
Complexity
1580
Defined Atom Stereocenter Count
1
SMILES
FC1(C([H])([H])N(C(C([H])([H])N([H])C(C2C([H])=C([H])N=C3C([H])=C([H])C(=C([H])C=23)OC([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])N2C([H])([H])C([H])([H])N(C(C([H])([H])N3C([H])([H])C([H])([H])N(C([H])([H])C(=O)O[H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])N(C([H])([H])C(=O)O[H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])N(C([H])([H])C(=O)O[H])C([H])([H])C3([H])[H])=O)C([H])([H])C2([H])[H])=O)=O)[C@]([H])(C#N)C1([H])[H])F
InChi Key
ICWDAESAANBIGG-LJAQVGFWSA-N
InChi Code
InChI=1S/C40H54F2N10O10/c41-40(42)21-29(22-43)52(28-40)34(53)23-45-39(61)31-4-5-44-33-3-2-30(20-32(31)33)62-19-1-6-46-15-17-51(18-16-46)35(54)24-47-7-9-48(25-36(55)56)11-13-50(27-38(59)60)14-12-49(10-8-47)26-37(57)58/h2-5,20,29H,1,6-19,21,23-28H2,(H,45,61)(H,55,56)(H,57,58)(H,59,60)/t29-/m0/s1
Chemical Name
(S)-2,2',2''-(10-(2-(4-(3-((4-((2-(2-cyano-4,4-difluoropyrrolidin-1-yl)-2-oxoethyl)carbamoyl)quinolin-6-yl)oxy)propyl)piperazin-1-yl)-2-oxoethyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7-triyl)triacetic acid
Synonyms
FAPI-04; FAPI 04; FAPI04; FAPI-4; FAPI-4; 2374782-02-0; DOTA-fapi-04; (S)-2,2',2''-(10-(2-(4-(3-((4-((2-(2-cyano-4,4-difluoropyrrolidin-1-yl)-2-oxoethyl)carbamoyl)quinolin-6-yl)oxy)propyl)piperazin-1-yl)-2-oxoethyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7-triyl)triacetic acid; D7X5DKW7N9; FAPI-04; UNII-D7X5DKW7N9; SCHEMBL21257058; FAPI 4; FAPI4;
HS Tariff Code
2934.99.9001
Storage

Powder      -20°C    3 years

                     4°C     2 years

In solvent   -80°C    6 months

                  -20°C    1 month

Note: Please store this product in a sealed and protected environment (e.g. under nitrogen), avoid exposure to moisture.
Shipping Condition
Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)
Solubility Data
Solubility (In Vitro)
DMSO : ~100 mg/mL (~114.56 mM)
Solubility (In Vivo)
Solubility in Formulation 1: ≥ 2.5 mg/mL (2.86 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO + 40% PEG300 + 5% Tween80 + 45% Saline (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 25.0 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 400 μL PEG300 and mix evenly; then add 50 μL Tween-80 to the above solution and mix evenly; then add 450 μL normal saline to adjust the volume to 1 mL.
Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH₂ O to obtain a clear solution.

Solubility in Formulation 2: ≥ 2.5 mg/mL (2.86 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO + 90% (20% SBE-β-CD in Saline) (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 25.0 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 900 μL of 20% SBE-β-CD physiological saline solution and mix evenly.
Preparation of 20% SBE-β-CD in Saline (4°C,1 week): Dissolve 2 g SBE-β-CD in 10 mL saline to obtain a clear solution.

View More

Solubility in Formulation 3: ≥ 2.5 mg/mL (2.86 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO + 90% Corn Oil (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 25.0 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 900 μL of corn oil and mix evenly.


Solubility in Formulation 4: 4 mg/mL (4.58 mM) in Saline (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution; with ultrasonication.
Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH₂ O to obtain a clear solution.

 (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.)
Preparing Stock Solutions 1 mg 5 mg 10 mg
1 mM 1.1456 mL 5.7278 mL 11.4557 mL
5 mM 0.2291 mL 1.1456 mL 2.2911 mL
10 mM 0.1146 mL 0.5728 mL 1.1456 mL

*Note: Please select an appropriate solvent for the preparation of stock solution based on your experiment needs. For most products, DMSO can be used for preparing stock solutions (e.g. 5 mM, 10 mM, or 20 mM concentration); some products with high aqueous solubility may be dissolved in water directly. Solubility information is available at the above Solubility Data section. Once the stock solution is prepared, aliquot it to routine usage volumes and store at -20°C or -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze and thaw cycles.

Calculator

Molarity Calculator allows you to calculate the mass, volume, and/or concentration required for a solution, as detailed below:

  • Calculate the Mass of a compound required to prepare a solution of known volume and concentration
  • Calculate the Volume of solution required to dissolve a compound of known mass to a desired concentration
  • Calculate the Concentration of a solution resulting from a known mass of compound in a specific volume
An example of molarity calculation using the molarity calculator is shown below:
What is the mass of compound required to make a 10 mM stock solution in 5 ml of DMSO given that the molecular weight of the compound is 350.26 g/mol?
  • Enter 350.26 in the Molecular Weight (MW) box
  • Enter 10 in the Concentration box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 5 in the Volume box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 17.513 mg appears in the Mass box. In a similar way, you may calculate the volume and concentration.

Dilution Calculator allows you to calculate how to dilute a stock solution of known concentrations. For example, you may Enter C1, C2 & V2 to calculate V1, as detailed below:

What volume of a given 10 mM stock solution is required to make 25 ml of a 25 μM solution?
Using the equation C1V1 = C2V2, where C1=10 mM, C2=25 μM, V2=25 ml and V1 is the unknown:
  • Enter 10 into the Concentration (Start) box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Concentration (End) box and select the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Volume (End) box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 62.5 μL (0.1 ml) appears in the Volume (Start) box
g/mol

Molecular Weight Calculator allows you to calculate the molar mass and elemental composition of a compound, as detailed below:

Note: Chemical formula is case sensitive: C12H18N3O4  c12h18n3o4
Instructions to calculate molar mass (molecular weight) of a chemical compound:
  • To calculate molar mass of a chemical compound, please enter the chemical/molecular formula and click the “Calculate’ button.
Definitions of molecular mass, molecular weight, molar mass and molar weight:
  • Molecular mass (or molecular weight) is the mass of one molecule of a substance and is expressed in the unified atomic mass units (u). (1 u is equal to 1/12 the mass of one atom of carbon-12)
  • Molar mass (molar weight) is the mass of one mole of a substance and is expressed in g/mol.
/

Reconstitution Calculator allows you to calculate the volume of solvent required to reconstitute your vial.

  • Enter the mass of the reagent and the desired reconstitution concentration as well as the correct units
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer appears in the Volume (to add to vial) box
In vivo Formulation Calculator (Clear solution)
Step 1: Enter information below (Recommended: An additional animal to make allowance for loss during the experiment)
Step 2: Enter in vivo formulation (This is only a calculator, not the exact formulation for a specific product. Please contact us first if there is no in vivo formulation in the solubility section.)
+
+
+

Calculation results

Working concentration mg/mL;

Method for preparing DMSO stock solution mg drug pre-dissolved in μL DMSO (stock solution concentration mg/mL). Please contact us first if the concentration exceeds the DMSO solubility of the batch of drug.

Method for preparing in vivo formulation:Take μL DMSO stock solution, next add μL PEG300, mix and clarify, next addμL Tween 80, mix and clarify, next add μL ddH2O,mix and clarify.

(1) Please be sure that the solution is clear before the addition of next solvent. Dissolution methods like vortex, ultrasound or warming and heat may be used to aid dissolving.
             (2) Be sure to add the solvent(s) in order.

Contact Us