yingweiwo

4E2RCat

Alias: 4E2R Cat 4E2RCat4E2R-Cat
Cat No.:V9583 Purity: ≥98%
4E2RCat is an inhibitor (blocker/antagonist) of eIF4E-eIF4G interaction with IC50 of 13.5 μM.
4E2RCat
4E2RCat Chemical Structure CAS No.: 432499-63-3
Product category: New1
This product is for research use only, not for human use. We do not sell to patients.
Size Price Stock Qty
1mg
5mg
10mg
50mg
100mg
250mg
Other Sizes
Official Supplier of:
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text
Alternate Text

 

  • Business Relationship with 5000+ Clients Globally
  • Major Universities, Research Institutions, Biotech & Pharma
  • Citations by Top Journals: Nature, Cell, Science, etc.
Top Publications Citing lnvivochem Products
Product Description
4E2RCat is an inhibitor (blocker/antagonist) of eIF4E-eIF4G interaction with IC50 of 13.5 μM.
Biological Activity I Assay Protocols (From Reference)
Targets
Inhibits the interaction between eIF4E (cap-binding protein) and eIF4G (large scaffolding protein), as well as the interaction between eIF4E and 4E-BP1. In a TR-FRET assay monitoring eIF4E-eIF4GI interaction, IC50 = 13.5 μM [1]
Does not compete with 5′ mRNA cap structures for binding to eIF4E [1]
ln Vitro
4E2RCat suppresses cap-dependent translation by interfering with the interaction between the major scaffolding protein eIF4G and the cap-binding protein eIF4E. It dramatically lowers the amount of infected cells and intracellular and extracellular infectious viral titers caused by the human coronavirus 229E (HCoV-229E). Cap-dependent translation is inhibited by 4E2RCat in a dose-dependent manner. Cap-dependent FF translation is inhibited by 4E2RCat, whereas EMCV IRES-driven Ren translation is unaffected. Coronavirus replication is inhibited by 4E2RCat in a time- and dose-dependent manner [1].
Inhibits cap-dependent translation in a dose-dependent manner in Krebs extract programmed with FF/HCV/Ren bicistronic mRNA; at 25 μM, inhibits FF (cap-dependent) while HCV IRES-driven Ren translation is not affected (even increased due to ribosome availability); at 100 μM, some off-target effects on HCV IRES are observed [1]
- In the same system with FF/EMCV/Ren bicistronic mRNA, 4E2RCat inhibits cap-dependent FF translation but not EMCV IRES-driven Ren translation [1]
- In pulldown assays using recombinant eIF4E and GST-eIF4GI517-606, 100 μM 4E2RCat blocks their interaction [1]
- Also blocks interaction between eIF4E and GST-eIF4GII555-658, and between eIF4E and GST-4E-BP1 at 100 μM [1]
- In m7GTP pull-down experiments using ribosome salt wash (RSW), 25 μM 4E2RCat disrupts preformed eIF4F complex: eIF4GI and eIF4A co-purification with eIF4E is significantly reduced, while eIF4E recovery remains unchanged [1]
- Inhibits protein synthesis in L132 cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner as measured by [35S]methionine metabolic labeling: at 4 h treatment, relative protein synthesis is ~80% at 6.25 μM, ~60% at 12.5 μM, ~50% at 25 μM, ~40% at 50 μM; at 24 h treatment, relative synthesis is ~60% at 6.25 μM, ~40% at 12.5 μM, ~30% at 25 μM, ~15% at 50 μM [1]
- In HCoV-229E-infected L132 cells (MOI 0.1), 4E2RCat at 12.5 μM completely blocks extracellular infectious virus production (below limit of detection) at 24 h and 48 h post-infection; at 6.25 μM, extracellular virus is very low at 48 h (<10 TCID50/ml) [1]
- Intracellular infectious virus titers are also significantly reduced: at 24 h and 48 h post-infection in the presence of 12.5 μM 4E2RCat, titers are <10 TCID50/ml and <20 TCID50/ml respectively, representing a nearly 10^6-fold reduction compared to DMSO control [1]
- Reduces the percentage of HCoV-229E S protein-positive cells in a dose-dependent manner: at 6.25 μM, ~2.4-fold reduction; at 12.5 μM, ~4-fold reduction compared to control [1]
- At 50 μM, 4E2RCat has no effect on poliovirus protein synthesis in HeLa cells infected with type 1 poliovirus (Mahoney strain) at 2 PFU/cell, despite significantly reducing host protein synthesis at this concentration [1]
- Structure-activity relationship (SAR) analysis of 19 analogs identified four compounds with some activity, but none were as potent as 4E2RCat in preventing eIF4E-eIF4G interaction or blocking cellular protein synthesis [1]
ln Vivo
The body's inhibition of protein synthesis by 4E2RCat does not stem from a rise in cell death [1].
Enzyme Assay
Ultrahigh-throughput screening for eIF4E-eIF4G inhibitors used a time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET)-based assay miniaturized to a 1,536-well format. The assay monitors the interaction between eIF4E and eIF4GI. A library of 217,341 compounds was screened, and 4E2RCat was identified. The 8-point dose-response curve of 4E2RCat in this TR-FRET assay gave an IC50 of 13.5 μM [1]
- For pulldown experiments to assess inhibition of eIF4E binding partners: GST-eIF4GI517-606 or bovine serum albumin (BSA) was coupled to Affi-Gel-10 beads. Recombinant eIF4E was preincubated with 100 μM 4E2RCat or DMSO for 1 hour at room temperature, then mixed with Affi-Gel-bound proteins and incubated for another hour. Beads were washed, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and eIF4E detected by Western blotting. Similarly, pulldowns with GST-eIF4GII555-658 and GST-4E-BP1 were performed using 2.5 μg GST fusion proteins and 0.25 μg eIF4E, incubated with 25 μM 4E2RCat in binding buffer, then glutathione beads, eluted, and analyzed by Western blot [1]
- For assessing effect on preformed eIF4F complex: ribosome salt wash (RSW) was incubated with 25 μM 4E2RCat or DMSO for 1 hour at 30°C, then 50 μl of 50% m7GTP Sepharose beads were added and rotated for 2 hours at 4°C. Beads were washed, proteins eluted with m7GTP, and eluents analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blot using anti-eIF4E, anti-eIF4GI, and anti-eIF4A antibodies [1]
- In silico computational solvent mapping of eIF4E three-dimensional structures identified five shallow pockets as potential binding hot spots. Docking of 4E2RCat using AutoDock Vina 1.1.0 showed that 4E2RCat binds into four of the five pockets, which is predicted to clash with eIF4E-eIF4G and eIF4E-4E-BP1 interaction [1]
Cell Assay
In vivo metabolic labeling: L132 cells were seeded at 60,000 cells/well in 24-well plates 24 hours prior to treatment. Cells were treated with increasing concentrations of 4E2RCat for 4 or 24 hours. For the last hour, medium was replaced with methionine-free DMEM supplemented with 10% dialyzed serum, and for the last 15 minutes cells were labeled with [35S]methionine (150-225 μCi/ml). Cells were washed, lysed in RIPA buffer, samples precipitated with trichloroacetic acid, and radioactivity determined by scintillation counting. Protein concentrations were measured and used to standardize counts [1]
- Cell viability/apoptosis assay: L132 cells (200,000 cells/well in 6-well plates) were treated with 12.5 μM 4E2RCat for indicated times (4, 8, 24, 48, 72 hours). Cells were collected (including supernatant), washed, and resuspended in annexin V binding buffer, then stained with annexin V/propidium iodide and analyzed by flow cytometry. The fraction of apoptotic cells relative to DMSO vehicle control (set to 1) showed no increase compared to control at any time point [1]
- Coronavirus infection and titer determination: L132 cells were infected with HCoV-229E at MOI 0.1 for 2 hours at 33°C, washed, then incubated in medium containing DMSO or 4E2RCat at indicated concentrations for up to 48 hours. Infectious virus titers (intra- and extracellular) were quantified by immunoperoxidase assay using monoclonal antibody 5-11H.6 against the S protein of HCoV-229E, with secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody, and detection with diaminobenzidine and hydrogen peroxide. Titers calculated by Karber method [1]
- Immunofluorescence for viral S protein: Infected cells were fixed and stained with mouse IgG1 MAb 5-11H.6 followed by AlexaFluor-488 anti-mouse goat antibody (green), and nuclei stained with DAPI (blue). Percentage of S protein-positive cells was determined [1]
- Poliovirus infection: HeLa cells (3×10^5 per well in 6-well plates) were infected with Mahoney strain of poliovirus type 1 at 2 PFU/cell for 30 minutes at room temperature, washed, then incubated with vehicle (1% DMSO) or 50 μM 4E2RCat for 4 hours at 37°C. For the last 30 minutes, [35S]methionine (150 μCi/ml) was added. Cells were lysed and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography [1]
Toxicity/Toxicokinetics
At 12.5 μM 4E2RCat, no induction of cell death/apoptosis was observed in L132 cells up to 72 hours of treatment, as determined by annexin V/propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry (apoptotic fraction relative to DMSO control was set to 1 with no increase) [1]
- At concentrations that significantly reduced host protein synthesis (e.g., 50 μM), 4E2RCat had no effect on poliovirus replication, suggesting no nonspecific antiviral state induction at the cellular level [1]
References

[1]. Blocking eIF4E-eIF4G interaction as a strategy to impair coronavirus replication. J Virol. 2011 Jul;85(13):6381-9.

Additional Infomation
4E2RCat is an organic molecular entity.
Coronaviruses (HCoV-229E) replication requires cap-dependent translation of subgenomic mRNAs. Overexpression of 4E-BP1 (which sequesters eIF4E) impairs coronavirus replication, supporting that eIF4F is a vulnerability. 4E2RCat blocks eIF4E-eIF4G interaction and thereby inhibits coronavirus replication [1]
- 4E2RCat is more potent than 4E1RCat (another eIF4E-eIF4G interaction inhibitor) in reducing coronavirus infectious virus production, although both have similar IC50s in the TR-FRET assay. 4E2RCat also appears more potent than the eIF4A inhibitors hippuristanol and silvestrol in this system [1]
- In silico modeling predicts that 4E2RCat binds to four of five hot spots in the eIF4G/4E-BP binding region of eIF4E. Extending the compound into the fifth unoccupied hot spot (magenta in Fig. 3) could improve affinity [1]
- The compound was identified from an ultrahigh-throughput screen of 217,341 compounds from the Molecule Library Screening Centers Network [1]
These protocols are for reference only. InvivoChem does not independently validate these methods.
Physicochemical Properties
Molecular Formula
C22H14CLNO4S2
Molecular Weight
455.93
Exact Mass
455.005
CAS #
432499-63-3
PubChem CID
2287238
Appearance
Light yellow to yellow solid powder
Density
1.6±0.1 g/cm3
Boiling Point
659.0±65.0 °C at 760 mmHg
Flash Point
352.3±34.3 °C
Vapour Pressure
0.0±2.1 mmHg at 25°C
Index of Refraction
1.760
LogP
5.09
Hydrogen Bond Donor Count
1
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count
6
Rotatable Bond Count
5
Heavy Atom Count
30
Complexity
724
Defined Atom Stereocenter Count
0
SMILES
C1=CC=C(C=C1)CN2C(=O)/C(=C\C3=CC=C(O3)C4=CC(=C(C=C4)Cl)C(=O)O)/SC2=S
InChi Key
WOBPZFKXPCYOLU-YBFXNURJSA-N
InChi Code
InChI=1S/C22H14ClNO4S2/c23-17-8-6-14(10-16(17)21(26)27)18-9-7-15(28-18)11-19-20(25)24(22(29)30-19)12-13-4-2-1-3-5-13/h1-11H,12H2,(H,26,27)/b19-11+
Chemical Name
5-[5-[(E)-(3-Benzyl-4-oxo-2-sulfanylidene-1,3-thiazolidin-5-ylidene)methyl]furan-2-yl]-2-chlorobenzoic acid
Synonyms
4E2R Cat 4E2RCat4E2R-Cat
HS Tariff Code
2934.99.9001
Storage

Powder      -20°C    3 years

                     4°C     2 years

In solvent   -80°C    6 months

                  -20°C    1 month

Shipping Condition
Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)
Solubility Data
Solubility (In Vitro)
DMSO : ~23.33 mg/mL (~51.17 mM)
Solubility (In Vivo)
Solubility in Formulation 1: 2.33 mg/mL (5.11 mM) in 10% DMSO + 40% PEG300 +5% Tween-80 + 45% Saline (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), suspension solution; with sonication.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 23.3 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 400 μL PEG300 and mix evenly; then add 50 μL Tween-80 + to the above solution and mix evenly; then add 450 μL normal saline to adjust the volume to 1 mL.
Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH₂ O to obtain a clear solution.

 (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.)
Preparing Stock Solutions 1 mg 5 mg 10 mg
1 mM 2.1933 mL 10.9666 mL 21.9332 mL
5 mM 0.4387 mL 2.1933 mL 4.3866 mL
10 mM 0.2193 mL 1.0967 mL 2.1933 mL

*Note: Please select an appropriate solvent for the preparation of stock solution based on your experiment needs. For most products, DMSO can be used for preparing stock solutions (e.g. 5 mM, 10 mM, or 20 mM concentration); some products with high aqueous solubility may be dissolved in water directly. Solubility information is available at the above Solubility Data section. Once the stock solution is prepared, aliquot it to routine usage volumes and store at -20°C or -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze and thaw cycles.

Calculator

Molarity Calculator allows you to calculate the mass, volume, and/or concentration required for a solution, as detailed below:

  • Calculate the Mass of a compound required to prepare a solution of known volume and concentration
  • Calculate the Volume of solution required to dissolve a compound of known mass to a desired concentration
  • Calculate the Concentration of a solution resulting from a known mass of compound in a specific volume
An example of molarity calculation using the molarity calculator is shown below:
What is the mass of compound required to make a 10 mM stock solution in 5 ml of DMSO given that the molecular weight of the compound is 350.26 g/mol?
  • Enter 350.26 in the Molecular Weight (MW) box
  • Enter 10 in the Concentration box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 5 in the Volume box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 17.513 mg appears in the Mass box. In a similar way, you may calculate the volume and concentration.

Dilution Calculator allows you to calculate how to dilute a stock solution of known concentrations. For example, you may Enter C1, C2 & V2 to calculate V1, as detailed below:

What volume of a given 10 mM stock solution is required to make 25 ml of a 25 μM solution?
Using the equation C1V1 = C2V2, where C1=10 mM, C2=25 μM, V2=25 ml and V1 is the unknown:
  • Enter 10 into the Concentration (Start) box and choose the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Concentration (End) box and select the correct unit (mM)
  • Enter 25 into the Volume (End) box and choose the correct unit (mL)
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer of 62.5 μL (0.1 ml) appears in the Volume (Start) box
g/mol

Molecular Weight Calculator allows you to calculate the molar mass and elemental composition of a compound, as detailed below:

Note: Chemical formula is case sensitive: C12H18N3O4  c12h18n3o4
Instructions to calculate molar mass (molecular weight) of a chemical compound:
  • To calculate molar mass of a chemical compound, please enter the chemical/molecular formula and click the “Calculate’ button.
Definitions of molecular mass, molecular weight, molar mass and molar weight:
  • Molecular mass (or molecular weight) is the mass of one molecule of a substance and is expressed in the unified atomic mass units (u). (1 u is equal to 1/12 the mass of one atom of carbon-12)
  • Molar mass (molar weight) is the mass of one mole of a substance and is expressed in g/mol.
/

Reconstitution Calculator allows you to calculate the volume of solvent required to reconstitute your vial.

  • Enter the mass of the reagent and the desired reconstitution concentration as well as the correct units
  • Click the “Calculate” button
  • The answer appears in the Volume (to add to vial) box
In vivo Formulation Calculator (Clear solution)
Step 1: Enter information below (Recommended: An additional animal to make allowance for loss during the experiment)
Step 2: Enter in vivo formulation (This is only a calculator, not the exact formulation for a specific product. Please contact us first if there is no in vivo formulation in the solubility section.)
+
+
+

Calculation results

Working concentration mg/mL;

Method for preparing DMSO stock solution mg drug pre-dissolved in μL DMSO (stock solution concentration mg/mL). Please contact us first if the concentration exceeds the DMSO solubility of the batch of drug.

Method for preparing in vivo formulation:Take μL DMSO stock solution, next add μL PEG300, mix and clarify, next addμL Tween 80, mix and clarify, next add μL ddH2O,mix and clarify.

(1) Please be sure that the solution is clear before the addition of next solvent. Dissolution methods like vortex, ultrasound or warming and heat may be used to aid dissolving.
             (2) Be sure to add the solvent(s) in order.

Biological Data
  • Inhibition of cap-dependent translation by 4E2RCat. (A) Schematic diagram illustrating the structure of 4E2RCat. An 8-point dose-response curve of 4E2RCat in a TR-FRET assay is provided to the right. (B) Inhibition of translation by 4E2RCat. Schematic representation of FF/HCV/Ren bicistronic construct used for in vitro translation studies (top). In vitro translations were performed in Krebs extracts programmed with FF/HCV/Ren in the presence of [35S]methionine, and a representative autoradiograph of the products after fractionation on 10% SDS-PAGE is provided (bottom left). Translations contained vehicle (1% DMSO) (lane 1), 500 μM m7GDP (lane 2), 500 μM GDP (lane 3), 50 μM anisomycin (lane 4), the indicated concentrations of 4E2RCat (lanes 5 to 10), or no RNA (lane 11). FF and Ren RLU values (relative to DMSO controls) from two independent experiments are provided with the standard errors of the means (SEM) indicated (bottom right). (C) Schematic representation of FF/EMCV/Ren bicistronic construct used for in vitro translation studies (top). RLU values (relative to those of the DMSO control) from two independent in vitro translations performed in Krebs extract programmed with FF/EMCV/Ren mRNA are provided with the SEM indicated (bottom).[1].Cencic R, et al. Blocking eIF4E-eIF4G interaction as a strategy to impair coronavirus replication. J Virol. 2011 Jul;85(13):6381-9
  • Inhibition of eIF4E-eIF4G and eIF4E-4E-BP1 interaction by 4E2RCat. (A) Assessing the effect of 4E2RCat on the interaction between eIF4E and its binding partners. On the left, eIF4E (lanes 1 and 2) or BSA (lane 3) and Affi-Gel-coupled GST-eIF4GI517-606 were incubated in the presence of vehicle (1% DMSO) or 100 μM 4E2RCat, and the effects on interaction were assessed in pull-down assays as described in Materials and Methods. The gels in the middle and on the right show the consequences of 4E2RCat on eIF4E-GST-eIF4GII555-568 and eIF4E-GST-4E-BP1 interaction. The asterisk denotes the position of the migration of the GST fusion protein. (B) Effect of 4E2RCat on eIF4F assembly. RSW was incubated with vehicle or 25 μM 4E2RCat for 1 h at 30°C, followed by pulldowns using 50 μl of 50% m7GTP-Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare) for 2 h end over end at 4°C. GTP and m7GTP eluents are presented. (C) Inhibition of translation in vivo by 4E2RCat. L132 cells were exposed to the indicated concentrations of 4E2RCat for 4 or 24 h, after which metabolic labeling was performed. Results are the averages from triplicates with the errors of the means shown, and values are standardized against total protein content. (D) 4E2RCat does not induce cell death. Fraction of apoptotic cells following exposure of L132 cells to 12.5 μM 4E2RCat for the indicated time periods. Samples were prepared as described in Materials and Methods, and flow cytometry was performed to determine the fraction of apoptotic cells relative to the value for the DMSO vehicle control, which was set to 1.[1].Cencic R, et al. Blocking eIF4E-eIF4G interaction as a strategy to impair coronavirus replication. J Virol. 2011 Jul;85(13):6381-9
  • SAR and in silico analysis of 4E2RCat. (A) Chemical structures of 4 of the 19 most potent congeners tested that inhibited cap-dependent translation in vitro. (B) Affi-Gel pulldown experiments with GST-eIF4GI517-606 and eIF4E in the presence of either DMSO (1%) or the indicated compounds at a final concentration of 100 μM. (C) Inhibition of in vivo protein synthesis of analogs of 4E2RCat. MDA-MB-231 cells were treated for 4 h with the indicated compounds at a concentration of 25 μM, after which metabolic labeling was performed. Results are the averages from duplicates with the errors of the mean shown, and values are standardized against total protein content. (D) Location of the largest hot spots of eIF4E. The site (shown in yellow) binds 24 probe clusters and defines the main hot spot. The other large consensus sites are shown in magenta (22 probe clusters), cyan (19 probe clusters), and salmon (10 probe clusters). A small consensus site is shown in ochre (5 probe clusters) and indicates a shallow channel connecting two other consensus sites. (E) The most likely binding pose of 4E2RCat. The predicted hot spots are superimposed for reference.[1].Cencic R, et al. Blocking eIF4E-eIF4G interaction as a strategy to impair coronavirus replication. J Virol. 2011 Jul;85(13):6381-9
Contact Us